assassins-creed-logo

The next Assassin’s Creed game may return to the Third Crusade in 2022

A new leak surfaced last month about the next Assassin’s Creed game that we found really interesting. This leak/rumor originates from French YouTuber, Jonathan. Now in case you didn’t know, Jonathan had info before on Valhalla and was correct. These past few weeks, Jonathan has been teasing the next Assassin’s Creed game, so let’s see what could be in store for us.

In his latest video, Jonathan appears to debunk a lot of rumors surrounding the next Assassin’s Creed game. Now during the video, Jonathan shared a number of hints regarding the next Assassin’s Creed game. Those hints come in the form of codes and messages that you can find throughout the video.

Without going into a lot of details, Jonathan hints at the franchise returning to the Third Crusade. In other words, we’re looking at a game set after the events of the first Assassin’s Creed game.

The game may be set between 1191-1199 and follow Richard LionhearΒ΄s life after the Third Crusade. It might explore events from before/after that too. Possible cities would be Acre, Corfu, Dubrovnik, Vienna, Cologne and Paris. Players may also assume the role of someone called Edmund.

A binary code also hints at a 2022 release date, so don’t expect a new Assassin’s Creed game in 2021.

You can find more details here, as well as in the following video.

As always, take everything you just read with a grain of salt. Still, and given Jonathan’s record, this could be legit information.

Stay tuned for more!

LA VÉRITÉ SUR LE PROCHAIN ASSASSIN'S CREED

131 thoughts on “The next Assassin’s Creed game may return to the Third Crusade in 2022”

  1. Enjoyed Origins, Liked Odyssey, LOVED Valhalla. I guess I’m in the minority, but their games have been getting slowly but surely better IMO.

    That being said they’re still far from the witcher 3 or rdr2 quality

    1. That’s the issue, the series never was a copypaste of more succesful RPGs-Open world games.
      It used to have its own identity…now is just another generic action RPG.

        1. Yes, is up there among Activision and EA games when it comes to blatant corporate greed shove into a game

  2. If this is an obvious way of telling that they are going to the roots and the basics (a social “stealth” game and attempt of some historical accuracy), is fine…the series cant do anything but improve after Wokehalla.

    1. Just to say there is an insane huge difference between Muslims/Islam in real life and Muslims/Islam on the media… And everyone knows that the people who own the media is Satanic. Just think about it. And i’m 90% sure the next Assassin’s Creed game is going to have it’s 1st female protagonist cause the story give hint to that.

      1. who owns the media? jews
        who is doing the terrorist attacks? Muslims
        who is attacking asians? Blacks.

          1. in my mind, he’s a+30 years old guy who’s going insane because of loneliness. he’s trying to make some friends on the internet.

        1. Leftists own (most of) the media. (And tech, academia, and government.) Anti-Semitism is evil.

          The recent spate of anti-Asian assaults appears to be carried out exclusively by people of African descent, but there’s nothing about melanin that leads someone to commit violence.

          On the other hand, while not all Muslims are terrorists, jihad is exclusively Islamic.

      2. “And everyone knows that the people who own the media is Satanic.”

        Dude, you just did a antisemitism.

        “Muslims/Islam in real life and Muslims/Islam on the media…”

        They need a good cop/bad cop with Muslims because a lot of muslim sects are just US assets, while the muslims minding their own business get the blame.

        “And i’m 90% sure the next Assassin’s Creed game is going to have it’s 1st female protagonist cause the story give hint to that.”

        Didn’t that happened ages ago, with Odyssey and some AC set in China?

        1. “Didn’t that happened ages ago, with Odyssey and some AC set in China?”
          I didn’t play any of this games, In Odyssey and Valhalla the female are just a skins and an excuse to push the lgbtqxyz nonsense.

          1. Incorrect, since they used female voice actors and commited resources, but coudn’t entirely commit to female only due to concerns over sales, but they try really hard to claim the female version is canon to keep the freaks at bay, lmao. I also forgot Syndicate, which have also female protagonist.

          2. Ubisoft didn’t give a f**k about sales, the only thing they care about is the agenda, ffs man just look at their games.

          3. “ffs man just look at their games.”

            You mean the ones that are best sellers? Regardless of their agenda, they could have gone exclusive female, which was what journo activists demanded, but they are still hesitant for now and ended with the Mass Effect approach with two gender protagonist.

      3. What “difference”? Islam is Islam.

        Just as in any religion, while there are various sects and personal knowledge, belief, and zeal vary from person to person, the core teachings are still there.

        What’s the best that you can hope for from a “god” demanding that the faithful, “kill the pagans wherever you find them” (Qur’an 9:5)?

    2. The “good” guys are the assassins in this games, the assassins were muslims. Read more history, moron, this games just pick some shia muslims and deleted every islam related sh*t from them.

        1. he’s talking about the hashashins, read the wikipedia link. there are even documentaries about this order.

          1. i thought he meant Altair was a muslim , he’s obviously the best character in the Franchise.

    3. i bet the muslims are gonna be good guys

      Well, when the Crusaders took Jerusalem in 1099, thousands of Muslims and Jews were slaughtered, men, women and children. When Saladin retook the city in 1187, not a single Christian was killed.

      1. ahahhahahahahha come on…. come on. The crusades was a response to hundreds of years of islamic invasions rapes pillages and slavery.

        1. ahahahaha…

          I just posted a historical truth as the answer to your comment.
          In fact, neither side was good or bad.
          The concept of human rights and war crimes is pretty recent. If you tried to tell Medieval people or ancient Romans or Greeks about human rights, they wouldn’t understand you.

          1. No, that’s a historical half-truth, as I noted above.

            (Some Crusaders committed heinous crimes against Jews and fellow Christians; that doesn’t make the effort to defend eastern Christendom against Islam immoral.

            Jihad is from hell.)

          2. Jihad? You should be reminded, or maybe for the first time told, that Christians, with their superior science and technology, conquered, brutally subjugated, converted to Christianity and colonized much of the world.
            You should try to see beyond your tribalism, it will give you a much broader perspective on history.

            Some Crusaders committed heinous crimes against Jews and fellow Christians

            You forgot to add “and against Muslims”, your tribalism is on display. As for morality, morals are far from being objective, they can vary greatly from one society to another.

          3. You should be told — maybe for the first time — that you’ve been lied to, lack the intellectual integrity to do your own homework, can’t stay on-topic, and have to resort to absurd ad hominem in order to try to save face.

            Where does Christ command His people to steal, subjugate, and murder? But when Muslims enslave and slaughter those who refuse the “invitation” to convert, they fulfill Allah’s mandates.

            And along with that inane tu quoque you claim that “morals are far from being objective,” which is itself an absolute (and an absolute lie).

            Stop trying to obfuscate for Muhammad’s depravity:

            “Narrated ‘Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six yearsold and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death)” (Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64 and 65).

        2. pillages and rapes happened on both sides you monkey. crusades were never about religion and gods, it was about power and politics.
          aren’t you tired of choking on white c*ck 24/7 here? we don’t need you. southeast asia was never involved in the crusades, I don’t know why the fck are you even here talking about crusades.

          1. Christ distinguished between the “Two Kingdoms.” In Islam, “religion and gods” are “power and politics.”

            Rather than rage in ignorance, you should actually study Islam’s texts, tenets, and timelines. Here’s Muslim Book 19, Number 4294:

            “the Messenger of Allah […] would say: ‘Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war. […] When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. […] Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. […] If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them […].'”

          2. “facts”
            lmao, I don’t like polluting my brain with fanaticism of losers like you.

          3. You’ve shown the slightest hint of a suggestion of a shadow of a patina of decency once or twice, so I’m going to try:

            You were upset that someone referred to jihad and so responded with an extremely inapt tu quoque and a historical and theological falsehood. I offered textual evidence exposing those errors.

            Simply put, Christ commands His people to love even their enemies. Muhammad preached and practiced the rape, enslavement, and slaughter of all who refuse the “invitation” to convert.

            There’s no comparison.

      2. That’s like saying that the United States bombed German cities but the Nazis never bombed an American one.

        The First Crusade was called in 1095 by Pope Urban II as a centuries-late response to jihad.

    4. Both things already happened in the franchise, tough i would argue they treated muslims with “nuance”, and you still killed a bunch of their leaders aniways.

    5. Not only you’re a f ucking Islamophobe piece of shiit, but also a faqqot who enjoys low IQ faqqotry like Terminator Resistance. Kill yourself.

      1. Sadly. The average brain-dead consumer would buy anything as long as it is marked as a “AAA” title. Even to the point they buy the same product, but with a prettier skin.

  3. Valhalla was so damn bad. I don’t even care. I thought there was a leak years ago that kind of showed where future games were headed. It was right about Valhalla being Vikings. The next one is supposed to be Japanese/Ninja Setting from what I remember

  4. I still get amazed how people enjoy these mind numbing grindfest of games . Now this franchise is irredeemable with nothing original !!!!

    1. I feel the same way about 90% of games nowadays. Look at how popular Valhiem is yet it’s grindy and a huge time sink yet people stil lovei it. Most games nowadays are boring ,grindy and time sinks. Good story driven single player games are sadly a rareity nowadays.

    2. Now? It’s been that way since 2, the sole reason people liked 4 was the Sea Combat and Ubisoft wouldn’t even capitalize on that.

      1. I used to think syndicate and unity were terrible but compared to these three games syndicate was the last good assassin’s creed game.

          1. I don’t know, I hated it back then as well but I’d take that over the new ones any day.

          2. Unity was broken on launch and had really ridiculous things to encourage the use of apps and other microtransaction sh*t, but i don’t know how many months later it was fixed, they killed app bs and let you loot everything and it became awesome.

      2. Assassins creed was good 10 years ago . now its a easy cash grab for simple minded ppl who are easy to amuse .

  5. The series could use a back to the basics mentality, right now it has nothing to do with what AC started of.

          1. If you’re talking about someone like Dorsey or Zuckerberg, all they want is power, and they’re working with their fellow totalitarians in technology, media, and government to subjugate (and erase) those who believe in individual Liberty.

            Leaders of businesses of all sizes are either on someone’s payroll or terrified of having the Woke Mob come to their homes. No one wants their businesses destroyed, access to financial institutions shut down, etc.

            Do you really believe that Major League Baseball cares about voting laws, the NBA cares about human rights, or Tim Cook cares about oppression?

            MLB is pandering (at least). The NBA kowtows to the Communist slaver Xi Jinping but kneels in protest against the nation of “all men are created equal.” And Apple reaps ungodly profits from slave labor while silencing their fellow citizens.

          2. “If you’re talking about someone like Dorsey or Zuckerberg, all they want is power, and they’re working with their fellow totalitarians in technology, media, and government to subjugate and erase those who believe in individual Liberty.”

            If you want to be weak by subscribing to a weak ideology, why complain when someone with power crushes you?

            “Leaders of businesses of all sizes are either on someone’s payroll or terrified of having the Woke Mob come to their homes. No one wants their businesses destroyed, access to financial institutions shut down, etc.”

            Leaders are trained to rule acording to the ruling class ideology. The right is devoid of ideology, they can’t rule for their voting base, lucky them their voting base are so forgiving.

            “Do you really believe that Major League Baseball cares about voting laws, the NBA cares about human rights, or Tim Cook cares about oppression?”

            Does it make a difference if their fellings are genuine? The ruling class is allowed to hypocrisy, baked in the cake as they say.

            “The NBA kowtows to the Communist slaver Xi Jinping but kneels in protest against the nation of “all men are created equal.” And Apple reaps ungodly profits from slave labor while silencing their fellow citizens.”

            Pathetic, weak! The corporations crush conservatives and their retort is just “can’t you do the same to China/Iran/Venezuela/anti semites?”. No policy proposals, no punishment for these corporations, just empty posturing and weak boycotts. Liberals feel so sorry for conservatives being such losers that they’re nice enough to patiently explain to them that they actually need to organize and do things rather than Tweet about companies being mean to them: https://t(dot)co/CDVDbgAhmF?amp=1

          3. Lmao is this the best reply you got? Man it’s always such a waste of time engaging with you…

          4. Yeah that’s a billion dollar difference between a company being cancelled and some form of content that goes canceled.

  6. The franchise is 14 years old now, Ubi should realize that it would be totally okay to fully reboot it, bring back Desmond and don’t kill him, lot’s of stuff to be done differently and better.

    1. How about using their brains to come up with a new game instead, or a game set in the past without the r-tarded baggage of the AC franchise.

  7. While I couldn’t care less about Assassins Creed anymore, a return to this setting would make a lot more sense than the gimmick locations on the past 4-5 games. The only game I enjoyed was the first.

  8. Ubisoft should really give more development time for their next Assassin’s Creed and create a new engine for it as I fear they will keep using the same one they used for Valhalla.

  9. The only way they could at least redeem the franchise if they do in an Asian settings like Japan, Korea or China.

    1. If it takes place in parts of the Middle East, they might not do that. They never want to make the muslims mad.

  10. No thanks,i’m tired playing as stronk independent bulky muscle manjaw wahmen. Just give us proper female character like Ciri or Yeneffer and i will reconsider to play your game and no Lgbtqrstuvwxyz BS,ok?

  11. Really? Would devs return to basically the same setting as AC1? I dont thins so. There were already some cryptic messages in Ubi games and it didnt mean much.

    And how many wannabe leaks are there? Afaik there was some info about AC from The Hundreds Years War being released in 2022 and Japanese AC. Both are mentioned in the video. So is this future of AC series?

    BTW I wonder if devs really want to go back in design and make forced protagonist (now female) after games that allow to choose sex…

  12. Notes from the last game mentioned a headquarters in Cologne several times. It was for a sisterhood., though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *