GeForce RTX 2080Ti feature

First third-party benchmarks for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080Ti and RTX 2080 are live

And the moment a lot of PC gamers have been waiting for has arrived. The first third-party benchmarks for NVIDIA’s latest graphics cards, the GeForce RTX 2080Ti and the GeForce RTX 2080 are now live.

The first benchmarks are coming from OverclockersClub. We’ll try to focus on the games that NVIDIA has not covered in its official graphs. As such, we can see from OverclockersClub’s tests that the GeForce RTX 2080Ti is unable to run Ghost Recon Wildlands with 60fps in 4K on Ultra details. On the other hand, NVIDIA’s latest graphics card was able to run with more than 60fps in 4K both Far Cry 5 and The Witcher 3. Here are the games in the following screenshots (since there aren’t included in them). From left to right: Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Highest settings with SMAA 4X), Far Cry 5, Ghost Recon Wildlands, Battlefield 1 and The Witcher 3).

On the other hand, TechpowerUp has tested some other games like Grand Theft Auto V, Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice, Assassin’s Creed Origins, Prey and Dragon Quest XI. Apart from Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice, NVIDIA’s latest graphics card was able to run these games in 4K with an average of 60fps.

Overclock3D has also published its review, in which it tested Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, Monster Hunter World, Rise of the Tomb Raider and Middle-earth: Shadow of War.

Last but not least, Guru3D has tested some other games like Resident Evil 7, Kingdom Come: Deliverance, Star Wars: Battlefront 2 and Final Fantasy XV. What’s really cool here is that Guru3D has recorded the FFXV benchmark, showing in action the new anti-aliasing technique, DLSS.

Guru3D - DLSS AA Example Final Fantasy XV on GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark mit DLSS auf der GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

12 thoughts on “First third-party benchmarks for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080Ti and RTX 2080 are live”

  1. This is what Hilbert of Guru3D concluded:

    “”The 2080 Ti seen from a 1080 Ti purely based on shading performance is impressive, but the big question remaining is that extra 25 to 40% extra performance worth the
    price tag?

    Purely based on rasterized/shaded game performance I would say no. The extra money needs to be found in the RT and Tensor cores, thus raytracing, DLSS and everything new that will follow from the new cores.

    DLSS I am savvy about, at least from what I have seen at the NVIDIA event and here with FFXV and the EPIC demos, but that is a limited scope of software to form an objective opinion on.””

    1. problem is.. the card may be amazing
      but the price is absolutely F**ked after taxes and import fees
      not to mention i don’t want to encourage Nvidia to make 1200$ a standard…

      maybe after the first or second price drop i’ll then consider buying it
      after all, aside from Metro and KCD, what is there to even play?

  2. I’ll probably get a 2080Ti in the beginning of 2019 for VR. Looks like my oldest son is inheriting my 1080Ti. He’ll be happy to hear that.

  3. I guess it’s time to grit my teeth and just buy a 1080ti after all. Benchmarks are nice but it doesn’t seem to justify the price(s).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *