NACON and KT Racing have released three new screenshots for WRC 9. These in-game screenshots will give you an idea of the visuals that you can expect from this upcoming rally racing game.
WRC 9 will have multiple improvements and new features for rally gaming fans. Its Career Mode will have enhanced gameplay mechanics and new opportunities to upgrade your team. Furthermore, it will come with a wider variety of events and a stronger link to what the real-world championship teams are doing throughout the year.
WRC 9 will also include extensive content with three new events added to the calendar. These events are: Kenya’s iconic Safari Rally, Rally Japan, Rally New Zealand and two other rallies with completely redesigned environments. Fans will also be able to take the wheel of new classic WRC cars.
The game releases in September 2020, exclusively via the Epic Games Store.
Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
PSA: If you click the ad on here for a game called Crossout, they sure did link it to a lady’s butt coming out of her ripped up jean shorts. Very nice. Thanks John!
I highly recommend never clicking on an ad for this kind of thing (plus you never know if the linked site is safe).
Well, it looks like your bullsh*t theory was just debunked. (Tip: It depends on the validity of the site my friend ?)
What theory? There was no theory. Even if there was, how was it debunked? By who? What?
It doesn’t matter about the validity of the site. The site rarely chooses what ads appear. I’m a web developer, I know.
I had vetted the ad. A specific ad. Then you postulated some theory that it was unsafe. It doesn’t make any sense.
There’s two Fresh Step Clean Paws Febreeze ads on the page right now. You’re suggesting they’re dangerous? What about the St. Jude’s one that just appeared? Virus?
How about this: Try to treat people like they might have a modicum of intelligence to make risk assessments on what they click on before lecturing. That’s all. Can we agree that since not every ad is a link to malware, that some people might have the intelligence to not click on ones that might wreck their browsing experience? Also, they pay the bills for the site, which I think you would have to know.
First, I didn’t postulate anything and you’re using the term theory wrong. You’re looking for hypothesis. Either way, you’re still wrong.
I simply suggested that one cannot trust links in general. I can prove to you they can’t be trusted. I’m happy to provide some ads that will wreck your day if you really need it.
The thing about an ad is, it doesn’t matter what it says it is selling. It can lead anywhere to anything. The text doesn’t matter, the image doesn’t matter. It can go anywhere. It can be on any page, even on a page you own.
I cannot fathom why you’re so insulted, as I never insulted you, but you need to settle down a bit.
Or don’t, it doesn’t really matter to me. You’re just looking a little unstable.
You seem very extra defensive and unable to work out some very basic thinking. One, you’re obsessed with semantics instead of what the sum of the message is. Then you’re getting into labeling me. I don’t have any idea why. But yeah, extra defensive. It’s like all the things you’re applying to me are exactly how I would describe you.
No, I don’t want cherry picked ads from you. I did however just click on the St Judes ad I previously mentioned and it took me to a nice page which was exactly how it was described.
Basically you’re generalizing things, and that’s fine, that’s a good way to tell senior citizens to think about safety on the internet, but you’re perhaps putting your own ignorance and inability to distinguish safety guidelines on the internet on everybody else.
And on a side note, if you are one of the many scam artist web developers out there that take half the money and never complete the job, and you likely are, I hope to god you get locked up. The most dishonest and repulsive males become web developers. Scamming people left and right. *Spits*
Rolling into full strawman are we?
What did I label you exactly?
How am I seeming defensive? Making points isn’t being defensive.
Sir, I literally work IT for a living. I know what I’m talking about here. I run webpages on the side. I even write my own blog. My expertise counts for something.
I’m not sure how you logic jumped to scam artists and assuming I am one…but O.K. It is clear you’re just going full strawman and doubling right down into ad hominen tactics instead of having an actual discussion.
If you were interested in having a conversation, your last reply would have gone way differently.
You said you’re a web developer. Now you’re saying that’s a side business. Seems to me like you’ll pick whatever sort of work you dabble in and call it a full time job. Obviously you’ve been caught in a lie.
I own my own IT consultation business for 11 years now in a major metroplex and I have the most successful reviews and best customers and etc etc. Once again.. your advice works for the simpletons which can be most people, and especially senior citizens or boomers. There’s a Verizon ad on the screen and I can say with all assurance that it’s safe. That’s it man. You must be able to perform critical thinking and if you can’t do that, don’t even comment to those of use that can. Stay in your lane with your HTML for Beginners education, lol.
Since you can’t put it together, I work for the government in IT. I run websites for myself on the side. It’s not that difficult to understand. Lack of comprehension by to doesn’t mean it’s a lie by me.
You’re not here to have a conversation. You’re just making up stuff, accusing and insulting.
It’s small.
Looks like the screen was smeared with greasy fingers. Meh.
Looks like a PS3 game.
horrid