Battlefield 6 fan image

New Battlefield 6 leak; reveal trailer info, 128-player map & more

Tom Henderson, a well-known Battlefield and Call of Duty leaker, has shared some new details about Battlefield 6. According to the leaker, the Battlefield 2021 (which we’ll be calling BF6) reveal trailer will show off a desert island map.

Furthermore, the game will have natural weather disasters. The trailer will have a tornado/storm event, as well as a rocket launching event.

In addition, it will most likely have 6-8 pilotable Ospreys. Not only that, but this will be a 128-player map, meaning that the game will support 64v64 battles.

Now as always, take everything you just read with a grain of salt. Still, and given the leaker’s record, we can assume that this is legit information.

Below you can find the image that Tom Henderson shared, as well as an illustration of it.

Stay tuned for more!

BF6 teaser image map trailer

Battlefield 6 fan image

51 thoughts on “New Battlefield 6 leak; reveal trailer info, 128-player map & more”

  1. I see from those pics that EA DICE isn’t being inclusive of the Attack Helicopter gender community. This is clearly a hate crime. Cancel these hateful bigots already.

    1. And that Mitch Dyer is writing Gotham Knights, but the f3ggots here refuse to see it and simply chug it like a bunch of soyboys. Pathetic. They all should be castrated.

        1. Why the hell did you comment then? You could have gotten the same satisfaction from typing out your comment and then NOT clicking post.

          1. are you telling me the only reason to comment on an article is to see who agrees with you and who doesn’t?

          2. Interesting rebuttal. I get what you’re going for, but my question still stands.

            If you truly had no interest in the response of others to your opinion in the form of a comment then you would have sent that comment directly to EA instead of an open forum where others can, and will, respond to it.

          3. I comment only to pass time and entertain myself by pissing off nerds like you.
            a serial killer indeed.

          4. You really had to take it all the way, didn’t you. Might want to go back to the drawing board on your offending tactics.

      1. Why wouldn’t it work? Real battles were fought with 100s of thousands of men. It’s just a matter of making the map big enough.

        1. You sound like a child. Go play planetside 2 and tell me how fun is it to battle a 96v96v96 battle. Where you get killed in a sec when you try to push alone or do someting….. Is it fun. No.

          1. Jeez why so aggressive? We can have a civil conversation about this topic without calling eachother children. I actually have had a lot of fun with Planetside and it didn’t involve dying in a second. I would often go on much larger killstreaks in PS than I do in BF.

            Think about if they expanded the maps to be much, much larger to accommodate all of those players? I think it would be really interesting to see a game approach the numbers of a real, historical battle. It doesn’t have to mean constantly dying if the maps are large enough and the objectives are smartly placed to facilitate a balanced battle.

  2. “Ospreys”, huh? I think we can rule out 80’s era shooter since that was the theme for CoD’s latest fail.

    Maybe its my memories of playing it as a kid, but Osprey’s really make me think of the VTOLs in BF 2142…

  3. Im just silently whishing for BF 2142 remake or a sequal…the PAC and the EU… The massive Mechs, Vtols hover tanks the boardings of the Titans… Running for yer laives through the corridors to jump out and earn a pin for geting there out alive….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *