Battlefield 4 feature

It’s official, the next Battlefield game will be revealed on May 23rd, will be called Battlefield V

Last week, we informed you about a possible reveal of the new Battlefield, which appears to be called Battlefield V, will be revealed on May 23rd. And today, comedian actor Trevor Noah confirmed that Electronic Arts will host an event on May 23rd in order to reveal its new Battlefield game.

Randy Evans, senior video and media director at EA DICE SE has also hinted that this new Battlefield game may be called Battlefield V.

The official Facebook page for Battlefield has also shared an image, confirming that the new Battlefield game will be called Battlefield V.

Although we don’t know much about this new Battlefield game, we do know that it will feature a single-player campaign. Moreover, DICE has been experimenting with a battle-royale mode, though it has not been confirmed whether it will be added to the game via a future patch or not.

Last but not least, this new Battlefield game will be playable at the EA Play event this June, during which we’ll most likely get our first look at its multiplayer mode.

50 thoughts on “It’s official, the next Battlefield game will be revealed on May 23rd, will be called Battlefield V”

    1. Loot boxes everywhere, in the sink, in the shower, some inside of Ron Howard. Will it stick, we’ll never know, give it a squeeze and see it grow.

      Anazed?

      1. Yea i don’t see how lootboxes can make it P2W. IMO, when it’s cosmetic i just don’t care about it if people spend their money on those. If they add that kind of lootboxes in BF so be it (while i dislike it). As long as it doesn’t give a “gameplay edge”.

    1. I wonder how many of you will buy the game anyways and be weak. Always falling for it and wondering why they keep making games with them. News flash. Buy BUYING THE GAME ITSELF you are supporting the idea of loot boxes. At least in a stock holders eye.

      Don’t want them anymore? Be a big boy and play other games for a year. Problem will kill itself.

      1. gamers aren’t the ones who’s funding this, casuals/normies are
        tbh you can literally buy the game, finish the campaign
        play 10 hours+ of multiplayer (basically the content offer on day-1 version)
        and then refund it (Origin got a refund option up to 24 hours of gameplay)

        EA can get cucked

        1. EA can keep doing what it’s doing. You idiots are buying. Oh boy is the “it’s the casuals” yet ALL the big name YouTube personalities are buying into it. And all of their fans do the same. Casuals? How about VAST MAJORITY of the customers, period. Me? Possibly you, and I doubt it. Are the ones who don’t buy the boxes or the games with them. I haven’t bought a game with loot boxes in at least 2 years. Never bought a loot box. You? Oh I’m sure you make plenty of exceptions. EA is evil but Overwatch is just fine, right? Yawn.

          1. those “youtube personalities” ARE SHILLS! they even admit they’re being sponsered by EA

            the problem lies with the mentality they spread, cancerous the “lets enjoy the game while everyone is still new”
            because once you pick up the game after a few month, you’ll get decimated by anyone with better guns

            that’s why i always despise how EA makes grind/pay2win viable and completely destroy any semblance of fairplay because “shekels speak for themselves”

            and i’m not sure who you’re angry with, go to VG247 where the console peasants and shills lie
            in DSO we’re mostly anti-EA anti-microtransactions (the majority that is)

  1. Wasn’t a fan of Bf1, not a fan of the new stylizing of the menus and what not that’s in line with the Battlefront games, and not a fan of another WW2 shooter. Just want a Bf5 that’s like a Bf4.5.

    1. Yeah exactly what I’m thinking. Loved BF3-4, really did not like BF1, have hardly played it.

      It just didn’t work for me, and it was missing the “magic”.

      I want to go back to modern combat too, but wonder how much can they innovate in it for the third time, maybe something near future-ish? BF hasn’t really done anything future like since that 2042 or what was it.

      I’d just be happy with a modern combat shooter with updated mechanics, graphics and everything just polished and improved upon BF4.

      Gotta say, I’m really looking forward to this announcement.

  2. They surpassed activision in their own game…well ok technically ea tried to do the one medal of honor every year but failed. LOL trevor noah, dude wtf, get out here what you doing there,

  3. I really tried to enjoy BF1 but just couldnt get into it. The new bullet spread and damage model just didnt sit well with me. Honestly unless they change that ill probably stick to CS, Fortnite and Pubg.

    1. Yeah I finally stopped watching. He’s nowhere near as amazing as a Jon Stewart or John Oliver.

      1. Yea i loved stewart and colbert back when they had their own show on comedy central. The woman that hired noah actually got fired because his ratings are so much lower.

        1. They’re sticking with him.. but I don’t see it getting better. The following shows haven’t been good either, and they depend on the lead in quite a bit. But Noah has just the worst jokes. I mean, everything comes back to some metaphor that involves an emoji, or Beyonce, or something so very millennial that it just feels childish and shallow. Also, 4 outta 5 guests black for some reason, lol, like it’s some kind of mandate.

          That said, Jim Jefferies has the best show of that kind on the channel.

          1. Oh wow i didnt even know jefferies had a show on CC. Havent watched the channel in a long time but i really enjoyed his standup in the past

        1. Smart people watch him. You say you don’t watch him? It all makes sense.

          But you do know that all his main stories are essentially non-Trump stories, right? Oh, you were just making assumptions and blindly attacking him but you’ve never watched him?

          This week’s main story was about Venezuela and it’s leader Madura and how his people are starving. It was interesting and informative.

  4. i’m still confused about the name…
    the name implies modern battlefield
    but what we were told they’re going with a WW2 direction
    so… whats up with that?

        1. I think Vietnam was a “cool” war era, with its nostalgic music, but I think we have enough Vietnam war games 😀

  5. No thanks, haven’t bought an EA game this gen and this Frostbite engine, 2 hour campaign garbage isn’t going to change anything.

    1. God I hope not.

      The way they went with “WW1”, I don’t think there’s much room for a WW2 game being that different.

      I’m ready to get back to modern day after that mess of a BF1.

      I was thinking that the V would mean that it’s actually a “next to BF4”, but after reading your comment, I’m a bit scared.

  6. Same here, skipped 3 and BF1. I’m really hoping the new one is actually something interesting or actually appealing to me.

  7. Will they be able to finally make a decent campaign?

    Might as well go 60 dollar multiplayer only bullsh*t

  8. actually i will:
    do i go by dates or by years of released?
    because in 2017 i literally bought less than 8 games
    -Tekken 7
    -A hat in time
    -cuphead
    -sonic mania
    -ELEX (bought it for cheap)
    -Persona 5 (best game in that year, followed by A hat in time)
    -Dishonored Dindu of the outsider (i bought this literally just to review it, paid 20$ just to make sure i’ll never buy another bugthesda title again)
    and that’s that.
    didn’t buy an EA/UBISOFT/ACTIVISION game in ages
    and not planning on buying anytime soon

    it’s all because my standards are high as the Olympus

  9. BF4 has commander mode, battlelog, spectator mode, destructible environments etc. Not to mention far better visuals. BF V will be even better than that. Anyone playing BF2 still is doing it for sentimental reasons and nothing else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *