It appears that the first details for Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War have been leaked online prior to its official reveal. According to this latest leak, Black Ops Cold War will be a direct sequel to Call of Duty: Black Ops. Moreover, the game will come out on November 13th.
Now as with all leaks, we suggest taking everything you will read with a grain of salt.
“The iconic Black Ops series is back with Call of Duty®: Black Ops Cold War – the direct sequel to the original and fan-favorite Call of Duty®: Black Ops.
Black Ops Cold War will drop fans into the depths of the Cold War’s volatile geopolitical battle of the early 1980s. Nothing is ever as it seems in a gripping single-player Campaign. In this campaign, players will come face-to-face with historical figures and hard truths. They will also battle around the globe through iconic locales like East Berlin, Vietnam, Turkey, Soviet KGB headquarters and more.
As elite operatives, you will follow the trail of a shadowy figure named Perseus. Perseus is on a mission to destabilize the global balance of power and change the course of history. Descend into the dark center of this global conspiracy alongside iconic characters Woods, Mason and Hudson. The game will also have a new cast of operatives attempting to stop a plot decades in the making.
Beyond the Campaign, players will bring a Cold War arsenal of weapons and equipment into the next generation of Multiplayer and Zombies experiences.”
Activision will officially reveal Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War tomorrow, so stay tuned for more!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
As a sidenote: Did the trailer even show any of the war crimes committed by the USA during the Vietnam war?
in men of valor you have a black character. Vietnam war was the first war that was covered without censorship. So journalists lied at the coverage of americans burning down a vietcong base and said it was a village of innocent women and children and the american troops burned it down as revenge because one of them died by a trap set in the jungle. Basically the point i am trying to make is that the media always lied, they always were anti american. Or a least since the 60s. The only reason the media were against the vietnam war was because they were pro communism. Meanwhile with afghanistan that the soviets invaded if before the americans which lead to the cia giving guns to the mujaheddin to fight the soviets and them taking the guns and becoming taliban and then isis that we still fight today. All of this because of communism.The media had no problem invading afghanistan, in fact they promoted because the soviets invaded it first.
So most of what you are taught about historical war and history is taught by the media is from a biased perspective.
American war crimes matter because the establishment is anti america, non american war crimes dont matter because the establishment is anti america.
“Meanwhile with afghanistan that the soviets invaded if before the americans which lead to the cia giving guns to the mujaheddin to fight the soviets and them taking the guns and becoming taliban and then isis that we still fight today. All of this because of communism.The media had no problem invading afghanistan, in fact they promoted because the soviets invaded it first.”
Imagine the brain diahrea required to write this bunch of incoherent mess…
Imagine […]
That’s ironic.
We were at war with the Soviets, so we helped their enemies. (Which only shows the danger of being ignorant of Islam.)
You talking about muslim terrorist groups or the people that fund them (US, Israel, Saudi Arabia and now Turkey)?
The United States helped bin Laden because he happened to be fighting the Soviets at the time.
And the USA never learned from that part of its history. It’s like … the USA wants to be in a constant state of war.
Hm. Wonder why that is.
President Eisenhower warned about the military-industrial complex. That doesn’t mean that all or even most of our efforts have been unnecessary or immoral.
We are in conflict for too long and often wage war unwisely. If our elected officials who send us into battle had to send their own children first — or go themselves — then we’d be a lot smarter and a lot less wasteful when we do.
I know what Eisenhower did. The military-industrial complex is highly successful and Eisenhowers message has been nearly forgotten.
We’re constantly being lied to and manipulated into conflict so others can fill their pockets further. Don’t get me wrong. I don’t have a problem with soldiers going to those conflict zones. Even the smallest of things can make the biggest difference in some of those regions.
I’m simply no friend of blind believe in government and “righteousness of the cause”. Do not lie to yourself. Be aware what and who you actually serve when you participate.
I’m glad the US finally has a president that gives a sh*t about american lives and stops engaging in further, useless conflicts that serve no purpose.
One of those wars was in Libya and it’s still one of the biggest disasters the USA has accomplished and its results are being completely ignored by the media.
I’m simply no friend of blind believe in government and “righteousness of the cause”
Neither am I. I agree with Thomas Jefferson who warned his countrymen, “In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”
I agree with the rest of your points. Libya, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Assad were all terrible mistakes at best — and treason at worst.
And in Yugoslavia, Bill Clinton bombed Christians to help jihadists.
And that turned out great didn’t it? at least according to the official narrative, i don’t believe Bin Laden was involved with the twin towers, he wasn’t the one to gain billions on insurance like the zionist owner of the towers.
turned out great […] zionist owner
Your thinking is deformed hideously by your hatred. Instead, inform your thinking with facts.
I was not defending aiding UBL; I was stating why we did.
(It’s just like the Soviets in World War II: We (not FDR) hated tyranny and the Communists hated us, but we both had a more immediate threat to deal with, Hitler and his fellow genocidal anti-Semites.
Did you know that Stalin was also an anti-Semite? Do you love Hitler and Stalin?)
As for bin Laden, he took credit for 9/11, was on video positively gloating about the surprising success of it, and in all the years following never once claimed that, “Bush was in on it.”
So, no. It was jihad.
“So, no. It was jihad.”
Do you know Saudi Arabia, which allegedly was higlhy involved in the attack, is one of the biggest allies of USA ? Turns out they don’t care about your “jihad”, only business.
only business
It’s not “my” jihad. The statement is witless.
Saudi Arabia is no ally; they’ve been funding pro-jihad mosques and madrassas in the United States for decades; Saudis were involved in the attack; and Bush 43 let family members escape when no one else could.
The House of Saud is corrupt, but that doesn’t mean that they don’t support jihad.
“The House of Saud is corrupt, but that doesn’t mean that they don’t support jihad.”
Huh? I claimed the exact opposite, not that american politicians care if they support jihad or not, terrorism is just an excuse for them, or else they would treat Saudi the same or worse than Iran instead of selling them weapons and guns for hire.
You wrote:
“Turns out they don’t care about your “jihad”, only business.”
If you were unclear with the pronoun antecedent, it’s okay. Either way, it’s not a big deal.
What a bunch of nonsense.
The USA committed war crimes during Vietnam, like the M? Lai Massacre. My coworker who regularly has to travel to Vietnam and talked to Vietnamese people about it. There are still remains of agent orange in their country. The have to avoid certain parts of their land.
There are museums in Vietnam with actual footage, men, women, children, even little babies slaughtered because no one denied their orders.
From time to time survivors would show up in those museums and tell their stories. Think the american media is paying them to do that? The soldiers themselves even admitted to it.
God damn, it’s so sad that you have to lie to yourself instead of accepting the truth that was is and always will be ugly.
The americans are one of the few people on this earth that still seem to think that war is something positive. And the only reason for that is the sickening denial which you perfectly represent.
Don’t mind him, he is just a deranged zionist.
“The USA committed war crimes during Vietnam”
they commit war crimes every day!
USA who spread Agent Orange on the viet villages full of innocents… what a proudness… rotten pieces of trash
Get it right; America was in Vietnam to save it from Communism. That doesn’t excuse harming innocents, but to demonize the tens of thousands who gave everything in its defense is the height of depravity.
The world will be a better place when america stop trying to “save” countries from themselves.
The world will be a better place when america stop trying to “save” countries from themselves
That is one of most untrue and ungrateful things I’ve ever seen.
The United States helped save the world in World Wars I and II. We saved South Korea. We tried to save Vietnam. Afghanistan and Iraq were originally about self-defense; nation-building was a well-intentioned but fatally misguided strategy for counteracting jihad.
“The United States helped save the world in World Wars I and II. We saved South Korea. We tried to save Vietnam. Afghanistan and Iraq were originally about self-defense; nation-building was a well-intentioned but fatally misguided strategy for counteracting jihad.”
That’s exactly what i’m talking about, stop trying to “save the world” (lol, imagine believing that), and drop your american exceptionalism bs.
drop
Facts are facts.
I notice that you’re refusing to admit the source of your hatred, bitterness, and envy. Neither are you reading what I wrote.
The United States is not trying to save the world, nor am I advocating for that. That fact is that we have, multiple times. And America is exceptional.
This is the only nation in the history of Man founded on the belief that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”
If we wanted to, we could go Roman on you, but we don’t.
Instead of being uninformed, angry, and ungrateful, why not do the work, and think for yourself?
Your fanaticism over US neoconnery borders on idolatry, i can’t wait until this satanic scourge drop dead from the world lmao.
You need a dictionary.
lmao don’t waste my time.
don’t waste my time
Projection.
to test
I disagree with the why, but I don’t disagree that some of those in positions of influence had bad motives.
www[.]dsogaming[.]com/news/first-details-leaked-for-call-of-duty-black-ops-cold-war-releases-on-november-13th/#comment-5050679887
The biggest problem with Afghanistan (and Iraq) was President Bush’s belief that we could “win hearts and minds.”
I don’t doubt that there are many decent people in both countries, but it is impossible to win over hearts, minds, and souls devoted to “kill the pagans wherever you find them” (Qur’an 9:5).
The very first time one of our people were taken out by a suicide bomber is the very last time any of our people should have been forced to be vulnerable.
Weren’t you in the basketball thread?
Welcome.
I could care less
A lot less, judging by the insanity of your posts.
A few items:
Settle down, Don Quixote. You’re tilting at windmills.
everything
So, you’re collapsing into gibberish and prefer foaming at the mouth to actual intellectual integrity.
This all began because you were attacking team sports — not liberalism, not identity politics, not the Democrats’ war against the Republic, not the Marxists’ Useful Idiots like LeBron and Jemele — team sports.
You’re entitled to be illiterate. You’re entitled to forget what you write. You’re entitled to be deranged. You are not entitled to lie about me.
Man up, Jemele.
the entire american intervantion has been done to oppose russia not for oil.
how do you know they were innocent?
His point was that the media were Anti-American, which it is still to this day. I don’t think anyone would argue the US has never been involved in war crimes.
You must be specific when you say anti-american. The media is pro American empire (and it’s wars) with zero space for doubt.
Speaking of lying to yourself, you’re trying to smear the American military on the basis of one incident?
Bigot.
The american military serves the interests of zionists, they are in the open stealing Syrian oil right now, but a zionist like you woudn’t understand.
The american military serves the interests of zionists
Let’s see:
The last time I checked, neither 18th- nor 19th-century Brits, Mexicans, 19th-century Democrats, American Indians, Germans, Nazis, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Chinese, Russians, nor jihadists are “Zionists.”
Your anti-Semitism is unjustified and therefore depraved.
… you have absolutely no idea about any of the details of the current wars the USA is in, do you? Do you know anything about the industrial military complex?
You haven’t been reading.
And that’s not “Zionists.”
Are you illiterate? I said they SERVE the interests of zionists, not FIGHT zionists.
illiterate
(That’s ironic.)
That list was not necessarily naming enemies; it was pointing out who was involved. Why we were fighting.
None of those people listed have anything to do with Israel, yet you claim that that our military serves Zionists.
Please, fnd, try harder.
“None of those people listed have anything to do with Israel, yet you claim that that our military serves Zionists.”
LMAO i never claimed they served Zionists through all of their history BUT the fact that america having strong roots with Masons can lead to such belief , tough i can’t confirm nor deny.
Let’s review the record:
That’s progress, I suppose.
Yes, they serve zionist , as in, right now.
Opposing tyranny — whether Islamic, Communist, or just plain generic — serves everyone.
Are you this naive or just pretending?
Only the perverse and the craven call opposition to tyranny “naive.”
Stop watching Marvel movies.
What kind of illiterate thinks that history begins with comic books?
Jefferson was before Rogers.
The founding fathers where slave owners and white supremacist, but i don’t see you advocating for slavery, so yeah, stop watching Marvel movies.
supremacist […] Marvel
Your illiteracy is showing again. (But what can you expect from someone’s who’s knowledge of history consists of only Disney film franchises and Communist propaganda?)
The Founding Fathers were not racists; they’re the ones who created a nation “conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that ‘all men are created equal.'” And “all” meant all.
Vice-president of the Confederacy Alexander Stephens boasted about the Democrats’ finally proving scientifically that “white” was the superior “race” and enslaved submission the proper place for “blacks.”
He admitted that the general belief among the Founding Fathers and Americans in general up until the last generation before the Civil War was that, “all men are created equal.”
And the depraved, gutless racist laughed at it.
Just like you.
“The founding fathers where not racists, they just owned black slaves” is the most stupid defense i ever heard, no wonder liberals and J-left are removing their statues and memories. Just a heads up, you can’t have your cake and eat it, can’t serve 2 masters.
just owned
You’re literally not reading.
When John Casor, the first African in the American Colonies to be enslaved for life through a civil suit, was made a slave, who did that to him? Anthony Johnson, an African immigrant himself. Was he a “racist”?
When the Barbary States enslaved Americans and Europeans of various flavors, were they “racists”?
When the Aztecs enslaved their Indian neighbors, were they “racists”?
When the Vikings enslaved the English, Irish, and anyone else they could get their hands on along Europe’s coasts, were they “racists”?
When Europeans enslaved Slavs so frequently that their name came to mean “slave,” were they “racists”?
When the Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, Babylonians, Hebrews, Assyrians, et al. enslaved — including people of their own hues and even tribes — were they “racists”?
Slavery does not necessarily equal racial supremacism. To get that in America, look to the Democrats who actually justified race-based slavery on “scientific” and “religious” grounds, contrary to the Founders’ own words.
“When the Barbary States enslaved Americans and Europeans of various flavors, were they “racists”?
When the Aztecs enslaved their Indian neighbors, were they “racists”?
When the Vikings enslaved the English, Irish, and anyone else they could get their hands on along Europe’s coasts, were they “racists”?
When Europeans enslaved Slavs so frequently that their name came to mean “slave,” were they “racists”?
When the Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, Babylonians, Hebrews, Assyrians, et al. enslaved — including people of their own hues and even tribes — were they “racists”?”
Yes to all, the current moral paradigm of the society you love so much is anti-racism AND anti white supremacism and no appeals to history or “Dems are the real racists” will change that.
Yes to all
So, Europeans’ enslaving Europeans, Asians’ enslaving Asians, Africans’ enslaving Africans, and Indians’ enslaving Indians is “racist.”
Brilliant.
The point was that slavery does not necessarily imply racism; that’s an error that the simplistic make and the mendacious exploit.
And you’re still arguing from ignorance; America’s “anti-racism AND anti white supremacism moral paradigm” comes from the Founding Fathers themselves, has always been embraced by Americans, was the reason for creating the Republican Party, and has always been warred against by the Democrats, including today.
You’re not even trying. Thanks for clarifying that you’re not to be taken seriously.
“So, Europeans’ enslaving Europeans, Asians’ enslaving Asians, Africans’ enslaving Africans, and Indians’ enslaving Indians is “racist.””
Not as simple as you make it sound but irrelevant in any case, no one gives a sh*t about correcting the record on racism and slavery, the blames fall squarely on whites, history be damned. Must be the fault of jihadists, lmao s/
And you decrying racism just shows your ignorance, it was a term formulated by communist jew Trotsky, talk about a own goal, but it’s not like capitalists conservatives like you and marxists are not kindred spirits, on the contrary.
“The point was that slavery does not necessarily imply racism; that’s an error that the simplistic make and the mendacious exploit.”
One of these mendacious elements is the republican party you like to defend, you have Republican senate leader on record saying “racism is America original sin”, you have plenty of republican outreach to any race other than whites and a callous indifference to white people plights, their main constituency.
“”anti-racism AND anti white supremacism moral paradigm” comes from the Founding Fathers themselves”
So why are you mad at democrats and leftists again? They are simply doing what the founding fathers wanted, according to you.
democrats and leftists again? They are simply doing what the founding fathers wanted
Only the illiterate and the deranged can claim that.
“Only the illiterate and the deranged can claim that.”
Like you? The ideological struggle within the major parties is in having the moral claim of being more anti-racist and anti white supremacist (whatever that means). That’s all there is to the stupid Dems vs GOP anthics, not that i expect stupid people invested in this theatre to understand…
Like you?
No, like the person who wrote, “democrats and leftists […] are simply doing what the founding fathers [sic] wanted.”
That’s insane. Deranged. At least an illiterate would have an excuse.
What you call the “ideological struggle” is simply the result of America’s race-mongers’ success in projecting their bigotry onto others, making “racist!” a career-ending smear.
Anyone who’s paying attention knows that the struggle is literally between Liberty and tyranny, between Civilization and savagery.
You would do well to quit being one of the savages’ Useful Idiots.
“What you call the “ideological struggle” is simply the result of America’s race-mongers’ success in projecting their bigotry onto others, making “racist!” a career-ending smear.”
Based on this conversation where you smeared me as racist with all the baggage that it implies like genocide, murder, etc. you would probably work to ruin my life if you had my dox, i’d say the system you uphold as sacred is working as intended.
“And speaking of “stupid,” anyone who’s paying attention knows that the struggle is literally between Liberty and tyranny, between Civilization and savagery.”
Now that’s rich, why would a place like China or North Korea be regarded as “savage” when they are much more civilized than your average diversity ridden western democracy? Liberty nowadays means anarchy, “anything goes”, and it is much more accurate to paint a more savage picture, or worse since in nature you have equilibrium.
You said, “you decrying racism just shows your ignorance, it was a term formulated by communist jew.”
I think you call that an “own goal.”
Another craven lie. That’s what your people do.
Among systems devised by Man, the American Founding is the greatest. And despite the dogged persistence and pathological depravity of people like you, it works.
It will work as long as anyone cares to defend it.
Slavery? Slaughter? Religious persecution? Forced abortions? Its leaders growing fat on and satiating itself with its people’s food and daughters?
You were talking about the Democrats’ domestic terrorists. But let’s talk about China and North Korea, two Communist hellholes.
The fact that you would defend them as somehow less “savage” than any Western nation shows just how unserious you are.
There’s two more. That makes it 3-0 now, right?
Liberty doesn’t change, and it isn’t license. (That’s your anti-intellectual, anti-liberty, anti-Christian professors talking.)
The American concept is Liberty and equality under law. Always has been and always will be. (Or we’ll be not us.)
Communism is a Zionist invention. Islam is what the Zionists use to flood countries with migrants and maintain Israel’s victim complex in the Middle East.
Communism is a Zionist invention
Karl Marx was a German anti-Semite and tyrant.
Just like Hitler.
Communism is a Zionist invention. Islam is what the Zionists use to flood countries with migrants and maintain Israel’s victim complex in the Middle East.
“The USA committed war crimes during Vietnam, like the M? Lai Massacre. My coworker who regularly has to travel to Vietnam ”
and communists didnt?
like i said american war crimes matter because the medie and the establishment in america are marxists, commie war crimes dont matter and what happened in the soviet union is not taught because the media covered it up.
But hey lets pretend the violent communist revolution in vietnam did not result into any deaths or rapes or anything and lets pretend the narrative wouldnt be the other way around if the non communist have won the war.
Are you not listening? If Vietnam has a problem with communists, then Vietnam needs to fix that problem itself.
How is invading another country and committing the same atrocities the communists did any better? How does that justify anything?
Even discounting the War Crimes committed by USA soldiers during the Vietnam “Police Action” (which did happen) we have plenty of skeletons in our closet that people here don’t want to hear about or think about. From the Mexican-American War, the Philippine-American War, WWI, WWII, the Korean War.
Media was pro-US in Afghan cause US was pro-radical izlam. Media loves izlam.
There isn’t a single war that the media and all politicians doesn’t approve, stop being ridiculous.
Every word of that is true. Well done.
Lmao he blames russian communists for Taliban, Al Quaeda and Isis, how more dumb can you guys get?
he blames russian communists for Taliban
Either you’re not reading, or you don’t know your history.
And who did arm the Taliban moron?
Here’s an analogy:
-Man pisses off woman
-Woman gets mad and makes something dumb
-Then woman says to man: Look what you made me do!
In the case, the woman is you guys blaming Russia for Taliban or other forms of Islam terrorists.
moron
Says the person blaming jihad on the United States. Do you always blame the victim for the atrocities committed against them?
America is 246 years old. The genocidal pedophile Muhammad unleashed his “struggle” almost one and one-half millennia ago.
You can do that math, can’t you, fnd?
“The genocidal pedophile Muhammad unleashed his “struggle” almost one and one-half millennia ago.”
You must hate free speech if you think a ancient prophet that may or may not have existed is still responsible for people killed in the present. Speaking of victim blaming, let’s not forget that most of the blame goes directly towards the people in charge of the plan, which means american and israeli political class. Don’t like muslims in Europe or America? take it up with them first.
hate free speech […] still responsible
Of course Muhammad is responsible for preaching and practicing the rape, enslavement, and slaughter of all who refuse the “invitation” to convert. That doesn’t deny that every individual adherent of Islam is responsible for his own contribution to waging jihad.
It has nothing to do with either “freedom of speech” or American or Israeli politicians, an illiterate non sequitur if ever there was one.
And don’t try to lie; I focus on the genocidal pedophile Muhammad, his allah, their doctrines, and those who promote and carry them out. I don’t make blanket statements about “all” Muslims anywhere.
Tell the truth, if you can.
I don’t give a crap if you dislike muslims, jihad or whatever, but i always point out the contradiction of you loving countries that promotes muslim immigration or the fact that you hate countries that put muslim terrorists in line, such as China.
muslims […] hate
You’re allowed to be illiterate, angry, and envious, but you’re not allowed to lie about me.
Nowhere — I’ve got an extensive digital record in Disqus, on Twitter, and at my own site — do I make blanket statements about Muslims as a whole. And on the contrary, I love Muslims. I wish for them to join humanity, not only for the benefit of the world but also for their own good, too.
I do despise jihad, Marxism/Communism/Socialism, National Socialism, any tyranny that raises itself against the dignity and equality of Man.
So should you.
I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
“I love Muslims. I wish for them to join humanity”
That’s a funny way of calling muslims subhumans…
“any tyranny that raises itself against the dignity and equality of Man.”
What about the tyranny of vice? You know, homos*xualism, drugs, porn**raphy, pros***tion, tran***nderism, pe**philia that is so rampant in capitalist society?
a funny way of calling muslims […] capitalist
That’s a funny way of deliberately misrepresenting my comment. A literate person would know that I’m referring to ideology, not nature.
Or do you call the rape, enslavement, and slaughter of all who refuse the “invitation” to convert “humane”?
And you’ve been lied to. Capitalism is merely economic liberty. You’re actually defending Marxism/Communism/Socialism and jihad and shari’a as moral.
How insane. Your professors owe you an apology, and you ought to ask for a refund.
“A literate person would know that I’m referring to ideology, not nature.”
That’s why you seem to be so confused.
“And you’ve been lied to. Capitalism is merely economic liberty.”
They use said “liberty” to disrupt society, deracinate people etc, but a person who don’t grasp simple concepts such as cause and consequence would never understand.
“How insane. Your professors owe you an apology, and you ought to ask for a refund.”
How curious that jewish ideologies such as cultural marxism was allowed to thrive in the capitalist west, no? Can’t you see how phony your rethoric sounds?
confused […] deracinate […] don’t grasp […] cause and consequence […] jewish marxism […] rethoric
No one who confuses genetics for belief, sells himself for Hitler, and thinks that Liberty is a problem has the right to criticize anything as “phony.”
You do know that Marx was a virulent anti-Semite — just like you and your buddy Hitler — don’t you?
“thinks that Liberty is a problem”
Meaningless buzzwords.
“confuses genetics for belief”
I’m not talking about jewish genetic defects like propensity to schizophrenia, i’m talking about
their beliefs and culture, like 95% of them being pro Israel and it’s ethnic cleansing policies.
“You do know that Marx was a virulent anti-Semite”
So? Most jews don’ t mind, in fact they used his knowledge to their benefit.
Liberty is a “buzzword” only to slaves and tyrants.
Everyone should be for their own nation, and there’s nothing wrong necessarily about support for a nation to which you have familial or other ties.
(I love the idea of Scotland, and I don’t even own a kilt.)
And defense against jihad is not “ethnic cleansing.”
So, who taught you to invert reality so perversely?
“Liberty is a “buzzword” only to slaves and tyrants.”
I think there is a quote, falsely atributed to war criminal Churchill, that says “facism in the future will come disguised as anti-facism”. So yeah, we have Tyranny disguised as liberty and slaves that don’t even know they are slaves.
“Everyone should be for their own nation, and there’s nothing wrong necessarily about support for a nation to which you have familial or other ties.”
That’s the exact opposite of what America is nowadays, they severed their ties to the original pilgrims and turned into a melting pot. Suffice to say that America doesn’t approve of your ideas of nation.
“And defense against jihad is not “ethnic cleansing.””
Is your definition of defense shoot/bomb first, make excuses later?
“So, who taught you to invert reality so perversely?”
Jews of course. Have you heard the portuguese word for sadism?
don’t even know they are slaves […] melting pot […] your ideas of a nation […] excuses […] sadism
Someone’s completely lacking in self awareness. America was a melting pot (E pluribus unum — out of many, one). Your fellow Marxists have worked for decades to Balkanize the country so that now we’re a tossed salad (and some of the ingredients are lighting the others on fire).
They’re not “my” ideas; “all men are created equal” comes from the Founders. Their foundation was ultimately Christ.
Sadismo? Sadism comes from Count Donatien A.F. de Sade, a Frenchman.
“Your fellow Marxists (…)” Cultural marxists or whatever you wanna call them are allowed to thrive in the west, don’t blame the player, blame the game. We are in a point of history that countries that want to normalize relations with US need to pay tribute to the “marxists”, even with a supposed “conservative” president in power.
“to Balkanize the country so that now we’re a tossed salad (and some of the ingredients are lighting the others on fire).”
A multicultural society is easy to balkanize, no wonder big corporations love diversity so much, Amazon likes diversity because it is more unlikely for workers to unionize, their study shows.
“Sadismo?”
Yes, and also the word “judiar”, which is synonym.
Multiculturalism has gone from tolerance for cultures other than your own to the tyranny of Identity Politics.
America was, should be, and will be again (or there will be no America) defined as “a nation conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that ‘all men are created equal.'”
“Multiculturalism has gone from tolerance for cultures other than your own to the tyranny of Identity Politics.”
The real tiranny is the forced racial integration that you force on people unwilling to do so, Identity politics is a half assed attempt to fix that, and the only real opposition to IdPol is in preventing whites from viewing themselves through a racial lens.
“America was, should be, and will be again (or there will be no America) defined as “a nation conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that ‘all men are created equal.'””
Only the insane and evil thinks more of a bad thing will fix the bad thing.
you force
Whom do I force? You’re still just making things up.
Freedom is “bad” only to slaves and tyrants.
“Whom do I force? You’re still just making things up.”
You=America
Freedom of association in America is prohibited you ignoramus.
Freedom of association in America is prohibited
In churches, perhaps, but not at Democrat bonfires.
You’re equating peaceful protests with theft, arson, and murder.
Talk about complete ignorance. What’s the matter with you?
“You’re equating peaceful protests with theft, arson, and murder.”
More projection, it’s not me who let people riot in the name of a “good cause”, it’s your sacred government, which reminds me, wasn’t Trump going to classify Antifa as domestic terrorists? What happened since he announced that on may 31?
The Democrats are inciting, permitting, and facilitating the destruction of their cities. Where the federal government has been allowed, it has intervened successfully.
We don’t know what the Department of Justice, FBI, et al. are doing behind the scenes.
There are a lot of people to punish (and not just those in the streets).
The Democrats are inciting, permitting, and facilitating the destruction of their cities. Where the federal government has been allowed, it has intervened successfully.
We don’t know what the Department of Justice, FBI, et al. are doing behind the scenes.
There are a lot of people to punish (and not just those in the streets).
“The Democrats are inciting, permitting, and facilitating the destruction of their cities.”
Civil wars where fought for less, both sides are playing a political game without regards for collateral damage and lives. Letting the democrats have their way is Trump’s and republicans in general way of giving them legitimacy and for you to whine about it.
“We don’t know what the Department of Justice, FBI, et al. are doing behind the scenes.”
Ok that’s easy: Giving cover to anarchists, chasing/entraping white nationalist ghosts for their jewish bosses at the Anti Defamation League (you know, that one created to defend the honor of a convicted pedophile), and basically advancing American ideals of anti-racism and anti-white values. Supposedly Trump run both of those institutions, so he is either complicit or just a puppet, but both these options might be true.
You ruin it with “Jewish.” Why? Muslim or Islamized Christian?
Would be nice if jewish organizations and lobbies where not involved with censorship and anarchism so you could get off from accusations of racism or anti-semitism, but wishing it will not make reality go away.
Muslim or Islamized Christian?
Jew or Christian zionist?
Neither. Fact teller.
Why are you deflecting?
Neither. Fact teller.
Why are you deflecting?
Why are you asking irrelevant questions? If you think my anti zionist stance is based on a specific identity, then surely your zionism is based on a specific identity.
Telling the truth is not an “-ism.”
Stop deflecting. Muslim or Islamized Christian?
based
That’s absurd. It is a fact that the kind of deranged anti-Semitism (redundant, I know) that you display is nearly always the result of either Nazism, Leftism, or Islam.
Which is it?
he blames russian communists for Taliban
Either you’re not reading, or you don’t know your history.
Last game they pinned their war crimes on Russia, so unless they use the “rogue american” trope, don’t get your hopes up.
Israel barely exist on videogames and that’s kind of a good thing at least.
That’s insane.
What are your sources, Goebbels?
The ironic thing about Goebbels is that all of his quotes are out of context to make it seem he is this saturday morning cartoon when he was actually describing jewish propaganda tactics (things like accusing others of what you do, lying so much until it becomes true, etc).
The ironic thing about Goebbels
He was the minister of propaganda for a genocidal anti-Semite.
The irony is that you’re trying to extenuate his atrocities.
Surely if he is that bad why the need to quote him out of context? Does truth need slander?
I believe in always telling the truth, even about someone as craven and depraved as Goebbels.
Where did I quote him?
You implied it. Most people who talks about Goebbels as a bad guy do so quoting him out of context. And you continue doing so when you claim he is craven and deprived without evidence.
Goebbels was the minister of propaganda for a genocidal, anti-Semitic, socialist tyrant.
I’m pretty sure that qualifies as “bad.”
Do you agree that murdering millions of Jewish men, women, and children, young and old, enslaving them, and conducting the vilest atrocities against them is “bad”?
If so, I’ll play along: You show me actual factual information about Goebbels that proves he’s just the innocent victim of bad press. And no, National Socialist and Muslim apologia does not count.
“If so, I’ll play along: You show me actual factual information about Goebbels that proves he’s just the innocent victim of bad press.”
Haven’t i already? Here’s a question, when Goebbels say that a lie told 1000 times becomes the truth, was he talking about the way his ministery should run or was that a criticism of jewish propaganda? That’s one of his most famous quotes taken out of context.
Haven’t i already?
No, you have not. And that quote was actually from Hitler who was smearing Jews.
So, I’ll ask again: What evidence do you have that Goebbels was just the innocent victim of bad press and not the minister of propaganda for a demonic fiend, the third worst mass murderer of the 20th century?
I’m actually replying to the evidence, a guy brainwashed by WW2 propaganda rambling about demons and quoting people out of context. One would think the war being over 75 years ago would make people engage with a open mind but instead you get an official narrative that might land you in jail in several countries if you question it a certain way, so you either repeat the dogma or you can be hyperbolic and inflate the numbers even more, just be careful to not steal the jews grift or they might call you out on it.
propaganda rambling
That’s ironic.
Terrible things happen in war, and all are fallible, but to imply that America encouraged or endorsed atrocities is deranged.
Tens of thousands of Americans risked and gave everything to save a people with whom most shared no common culture, language, or history.
To denigrate their sacrifice is vile and disgusting.
“Tens of thousands of Americans risked and gave everything to save a people with whom most shared no common culture, language, or history.”
There is a word for them (and a game): Cannon Fodder. Ironic how America thinks fighting communism is morally just when they actively helped communists in WW2, they even let USSR have poland which it was one of the main reasons to fight Germany, ironic. I could say you reap what you sow, but only the cannon fodder suffer the consequences.
Ironic how America thinks fighting communism is morally just when they actively helped communists in WW2
Hitler.
(And FDR was a Communist.)
Hitler was so evil that the allies forgot one of the main reason(or is it?) to fight him and let the commies take Poland for themselves s/.
Hitler […] Poland
False dichotomy.
It’s no surprise that someone who blames jihad on its victims and thinks that under every rock and behind every tree is a “Zionist terrorist” waiting to “stab him in the back” with a knife paid for by Donald Trump doesn’t know what happened with Poland.
After the War, the West struck a deal with Stalin that meant death and slavery for millions of people for generations, and it wasn’t just Poland (which both the Nazis and the Soviets terrorized).
Instead of hating Jews, you ought to hate Communists. (And Nazis and jihadists.)
“After the War, the West struck a deal with Stalin that meant death and slavery for millions of people for generations, and it wasn’t just Poland (which both the Nazis and the Soviets terrorized).”
Serves them right for not making a deal with Hitler instead, maybe they don’t think communism to be that bad, not the first time they bail out communism.
“Instead of hating Jews, you ought to hate Communists.”
Marx was a jew, but at least he had the decency of calling out his tribe bullsheit, and lots of communist sympathisers and leaders are jews.
Serves them right
So, you’re a Hitler groupie. Great.
Being Jewish has literally zero to do with ideology. How nescient can you be? I’m genuinely embarrassed for you.
“Being Jewish has literally zero to do with ideology.”
Someone who is ignorant of a ritual commonplace as the brit milah have no right to lecture anyone about being ignorant of judaism.
ignorant of judaism
You’re doing it again. Genetics have nothing to do with ideology.
And a practice intended for antiseptic and antibiotic benefits — not prurient interests as you claim — is completely unlike the genocidal pedophile Muhammad’s keeping a prepubescent nine-year-old child as his s[…]x slave.
Your hatred and ignorance are disgraceful.
“And a practice intended for antiseptic and antibiotic benefits”
LMFAO i guess you didn’t hear the news of babies being infected with herpes thanks to the pervy rabbis. Feels good to have a foreskin dude, don’t know if you have this privilege since Americans got brainwashed by phony jewish doctors to cut foreskin. And stop doing whataboutism with muslims, i want a stable middle east so that they can live there in peace, the exact opposite of what your western capitalist heroes want.
phony
Your obsession with putting your mouth on babies is disturbing, and in your deranged Jew hatred, you misrepresent the practice.
I’m not doing any “aboutwhatisms” — that’s called a tu quoque, by the way — I’m merely making the point that in your insanity, you’re turning something non-prurient (if disturbing) into something perverse. If you really want to be outraged, then you should look at the single greatest crime against children in history.
If you really want peace in the Middle East, then do something about jihad. No more rape, enslavement, and slaughter in Allah’s name and — poof! — no more “instability.”
So, why do you hate Jews so much?
“Your obsession with putting your mouth on babies is disturbing, and in your deranged Jew hatred, you misrepresent the practice.”
So you are just going to slander and lie anyone critical of children molestation now? What does that make you, a pedo activist? I don’ t care about rationalizations about why they do it mind you.
“So, why do you hate Jews so much?”
Because they help spread jihad from the Middle East to the rest of the world thanks to their money, political conections and activism, is that good enough for you?
Your obsession with turning a non-prurient ritual into something pedophilic says everything about you and nothing about its practitioners.
Jihad belongs to the genocidal pedophile Muhammad, and he hated Jews even more than you do.
Try again.
Both female genital mutilation and male genital mutilation are barbaric rituals, no excuses for me, but plenty of excuses for the jews in the medical profession, media, etc.
“Jihad belongs to the genocidal pedophile Muhammad, and he hated Jews even more than you do.”
You can’t have your cake and eat it, criticizing jihad and defending jihad’s benefactors, you know who they are.
jihad’s benefactors, you know who they are
How deranged can you be? To insinuate that Jews support the genocidal pedophile Muhammad’s jihad is like saying that Jews supported Hitler’s Holocaust.
Your hatred has made you witless.
Jews are know for playing both sides, while they can be quite vicious towards arabs, ethiopians and palestinians, the moment those people cross europe’s or america’s borders they become their best allies.
“is like saying that Jews supported Hitler’s Holocaust.”
Holocaust is pleasing to their God, so it’s not as outrageous as you claim to be, read the essay a-holocaust-of-biblical-proportions from the Unz site for more info.
Jews
As you prove here repeatedly, mendacity and treachery are not limited to one group of people.
It’s neither “Arabs” nor “Palestinians” but jihad against which Israel wars. As I’ve noted for you before, if you don’t want to get treated “viciously,” then don’t slaughter the innocents of a superior (in every way) foe.
Only someone as sick as you can claim that anyone supports the mass slaughter of their own people.
“It’s neither “Arabs” nor “Palestinians” but jihad against which Israel wars.”
Are you jewish or christian zionist? Only a liar or someone delusional can keep talking this obvious bs that can be disproven with one google search.
liar […] delusional […] bs […] google
(That’s ironic.)
A Marxist tech. tyrant is your source of truth. That explains a lot.
Search this:
“A Marxist tech. tyrant is your source of truth.”
False, Trump even gave them tax cuts and told the press they are one of the companies that “Make America Great”, along with Apple, Amazon and Microsoft, try again.
And every time you whine about jihad, i’ll remind you that it was Israel, jewish NGO’s and American military that displaced more than 37 million people, most of them muslims to the west, so keep your crocodile tears to yourself you useful idiot!
>Israel, jewish NGO’s American military that displaced more than 37 million people, most of them muslims to the west,
False, but cool how you attempt to bring antisemitism and anti-Americanism in this. Eating commie propaganda by the bucketload I assume.
False
Speaking of “Useful Idiots,” you’re claiming that Google isn’t censoring Conservatives, buying politicians like Kamala Harris and Mike Lee, and interfering in our elections in order to help the Democrats!
And even worse, that jihad didn’t begin with Muhammad nearly one and one-half millennia ago!
You’re either so ignorant or so deranged that, either way, there’s no point in continuing this.
Your nescience is unspeakable and … tragic.
“Speaking of “Useful Idiots,” you’re claiming that Google isn’t censoring Conservatives, buying politicians like Kamala Harris and Mike Lee, and interfering in our elections in order to help the Democrats!”
All of that with Trump’s blessing and lower tax cut as a bonus, i’m sorry you are too stupid to be invested in theatrics.
“And even worse, that jihad didn’t begin with Muhammad nearly one and one-half millennia ago!”
>Exposes US crimes since 2001 onwards;
> You: “JIhad from 1500 years ago !!!”
Pick an history book if that is your passion, you are just too clueless for current events.
Speaking of “clueless,” we have a system of laws in the United States. The Section 230 protections provided to our tech oligarchs were enacted and are defended by the politicians they duly bought.
A president is not a dictator. Not much of a surprise that you don’t know this.
The governments the American people endure are the governments they’ve chosen for themselves.
“A president is not a dictator.”
Nice copout, along the lines of “democrats stopped him” or “he can’t do that because judges will block him”, classic pathological narcisism. The real fact is that his policies helped the oligarchs big time and that is the one and only litmus test necessary to see where he stands on.
Are you in the habit of helping your enemies with cash? Supposedly, Trump is, or maybe Occam’s Razor would suggest they are not really his enemies.
Facts are not “copouts.”
If you were to pay attention, then you would see that the entire establishment is after the president.
It’s a strange thing that someone who seemed so unlikely to even know anything about America’s Founding is actually defending it vigorously.
“You see, the entire establishment is against Trump so he can only act as an inept politician just like all the others that came before him”. Why should i care what his REAL intentions are, i care about actions and so far, none are good for him. His constituents will get a based tweet from time to time while all the spoils go to your so called tirants.
Non sequitur.
The narrative that Trump is under siege provides the perfect excuses for his betrayals if you think about it, every time he goes against his campaign promises his supporters will point fingers at democrats or his own ” unloyal” hirings. The only exception to the rule is , you guessed it, zionism.
betrayals
That does not reflect the facts.
Which ones?
All of them.
I bet you believe in Qanon conspiracies, which is based on a fed disinformation campaign.
More nescience? Produce a fact, any fact. Whom among his constituency has Trump betrayed?
Qanon
How odd — (not really) — that you would resort to absurd ad hominem.
I believe in facts. You should try it sometime.
“You see, the entire establishment is against Trump so he can only act as an inept politician just like all the others that came before him”. Why should i care what his REAL intentions are, i care about actions and so far, none are good for him. His constituents will get a based tweet from time to time while all the spoils go to your so called tirants.
Facts are not excuses.
one google search
Go ahead.
You argue like an atheist, except you will defend the juicy parts of the bible and even the Talmud, or claim that those parts are not relevant for the character of current day Christians and Jews.
like an atheist
That’s interesting. So you’re an adherent to something (still won’t say what, though); you have experience with atheist “argumentation,” and it hasn’t been positive.
A religion’s “sacred” texts are authoritative in that religion; anything outside of them is relevant and persuasive only to the degree that it reflects accurately those documents.
I defend the truth. Get it right.
Wasted. They wasted their lives. For nothing. Those poor souls. But even worse: The lives of those poor civilians that had nothing to do with it.
To give one’s life in defense of the innocent is never a “waste,” no matter the outcome.
But a sniveling and ungrateful coward wouldn’t know anything about that, would he?
As for innocent civilians, yes. But blame the Communists who fought to and finally enslaved and slaughtered them.
“To give one’s life in defense of the innocent is never a “waste,” no matter the outcome.”
Ah, yes. The innocent people. That’s why the USA went to Vietnam. Because it cared so much for its people. That’s why the USA is in so many wars, to protect the innocent people.
“But a sniveling and ungrateful coward wouldn’t know anything about that, would he?”
I dunno. You tell me.
It’s not your fault. You never had a foreign power on your soil. You’ll never understand until you do. That is the only reason why you’re viewpoint is one of pure, childlike naivety.
Plot twist. Bet this Perseus figure is you the player.
pay me first if you want me to be informed about this game.
yeah not the cucking i was expecting. It goes to say that money and demographics are everything, bashing communism is fine but if china is upset who has all the money and a huge population is a problem. So when the western population and capital declines…..the west will be irrelevant when it come to international affairs.
“So when the western population and capital declines…..the west will be irrelevant when it come to international affairs.”
Kind of amazes me when people say they gonna miss this, when it happens. USA still have nukes, so brace yourselves for a global shakedown.
so brace yourselves for a global shakedown
We could do that now if we wanted to. How ungrateful and uninformed.
Yes, you already do that, thanks for reminding me,
A nonsensical reply because you have no answer.
No they really do that with economic sanctions to countries that goes against their interests, provoking famine and such.
economic sanctions
Iran? North Korea? China? Whom are you defending?
What you’re really saying is that nations can threaten, cheat, and kill Americans, and we have to take it.
Sorry, but that’s deranged. If you don’t want to lose a fight, then don’t start one in the first place.
“Sorry, but that’s deranged. If you don’t want to lose a fight, then don’t start one in the first place.”
Implying America isn’t an agressor lmao.
“Iran? North Korea? China? Whom are you defending?”
Don’t forget Syria, Lebanon, Venezuela, Bolivia and others.
Assad’s a butcher, but like Saddam, he is not as bad as the more devout Muslims who would replace him. Obama had his vanishing red line; Trump has tried to help (as much as someone who doesn’t know the history of Islam and the region can). We should not be involved in Syria unless we’re going to actually destroy jihad or defend/rescue whatever Jews, Christians, Druze, et al. remain.
Broken Lebanon is Islam’s fault.
Venezuela’s run by a murderous dictator who’s starving his own people. Opposing Marxism/Communism/Socialism is always a good thing.
I like how you complain about dictators starving people but are in favor of sanctions that does the same thing.
You’re not thinking.
There is a difference between enslaving and murdering millions of your own people in service to your tyrannical ideology — in this case, Socialism — and using nonviolent means to weaken a genocidal enemy.
I don’t want anyone to suffer, but if your nation’s leaders are going to threaten our nation with slavery and death, then the onus is on you for whatever comes next.
How is Venezuela, Iran, Syria, etc. a threat to the United States? So much bs in a single comment, i’m rather thunderstruck by the chutzpah on your fingers.
You’re not paying attention.
I’m paying attention to you making up bullsh!t.
No, you’re proving my point.
Which is?
That you’re not paying attention.
To what?
I can smell the hype! LMAO
They should just make COD: North Korea. If any place needs to be invaded..
First Crysis game and Homefront series.
They should make a COD with Mexico invading USA, to be honest the US was a mistake.
Not a chance since COD is CIA/Mossad propaganda, why would they make a game with real anti america propaganda against oligarchs looking for cheap labor?
That Yuri Bezmenov character is just a CIA character and based race mixer, look it up, no wonder conservatards love him. And when it comes to business, you don’t talk sheit about your partners so no wonder any anti China propaganda would be censored, why is that so hard to understand? And lastly, BLM IS AMERICA PROPAGANDA, both political parties(DEM and GOP) support it, stop being dumb.
Wow, you’re an idiot.
Call of Duty mainstreaming Bezmenov is intended to further normalise the idea of Russian based subversion/interference in American politics. Back then at least it was easy to pirate CIA propaganda.
No offline single player campaign,no buy…
would you really buy it though? 😉
I haven’t bought a call of duty game since MW3
it’s time. 😀
Good for you and your wallet.
Same for me!
I won’t even pirate because it is too many gigabytes. Besides, since the argument is that COD is all about multiplayer, then they should treat single player campaign as a demo.
my connection is third-world and I’ve been playing and enjoying it since it came out. it might be rough around the edges in some areas (the size and the updates are infuriating) but the rest was done right. especially the animations and the graphics. SP was decent but the gameplay was top notch
Why not?
if it’s as grounded and gritty as MW2019 was, I am in !
“Grounded” LMFAO, not in reality that’s for sure.
you have clearly not played the single player. what I said was purely about gameplay and nothing else
What’s “gritty” about the gameplay? Did the game stop having health regen?
well our definitions seem to differ
I don’ t know, you didn’t explain what you mean by grounded or gritty.
Great Level design, immersive sfx, fantastic animations, excellent lighting, amazing gunplay
My only niggle would be the story
And maybe Gaz and McTavish
I assume You haven’t played it because I was just as skeptical before I got hands on with it
Tbf that would describe your average COD single player game campaign.
then again I told you we had different definitions
If you think the last COD stand apart from the older ones , you haven’t explained properly. Just saying the game have good sfx, graphics and levels is not enough i’m afraid.
don’t have a random guy explain it to you then
FFS, either play the freaking game, read a review, or watch the game on youtube.
I don’t have to sell you on the game.I couldn’t care less , it’s not my responsibility
P.S. if those are not the criteria for judging the quality of a game I don’t know what is
When i first saw someone playing the first COD4 back in 2007 or so, i got really impressed at the time.
That Yuri Bezmenov character is just a CIA character and based race mixer, look it up, no wonder conservatards love him. And when it comes to business, you don’t talk sh*t about your partners so no wonder any anti China propaganda would be censored, why is that so hard to understand? And lastly, BLM IS AMERICA PROPAGANDA, both political parties(DEM and GOP) support it, stop being dumb.
Death to amerikkka, we will destroy the protestant culture.
You talk about “chinese bots” but you spend most of your time on this web repeating the same bullshit.
Idpol is sh*t, alt-right too.
Neocon propaganda dictates you need an external enemy to point fingers too. It is certainly not the chinese that is destroying america right now, and these are people aware of zionist control ffs.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c06e9db0d810d64d577162eec68b3ad27150bb5d32737496d82dad5dd21d2c31.png
worst than MW 2019, lol