At GTC Japan 2018, Jensen Huang claimed that both the GeForce RTX 2080 and RTX 2080Ti will be able to run the latest games in 4K with 60fps, even without DLSS. Jensen shared two graphics in which we see both the RTX 2080 and the RTX 2080Ti outperforming the current fastest gaming NVIDIA GPU, the GeForce GTX1080Ti, in 4K.
Of course this does not come as a surprise. We’ve already claimed that the RTX 2080 will most likely be a bit faster than the GTX1080Ti, whereas we expect RTX 2080Ti to be around 35% faster than the GTX1080Ti.
According to NVIDIA, the GeForce RTX 2080 will be able to run the latest games in 4K with 60fps, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080Ti will be able to run them with more than 60fps. Of course this looks like an average number, meaning that there might be drops below 60fps on both the RTX 2080 and the RTX 2080Ti.
However, with DLSS enabled, NVIDIA expect to see a tremendous performance difference between its Pascal and the Turing graphics cards.
The first third-party benchmarks for both the GeForce RTX 2080 and the GeForce RTX 2080Ti will be published on September 19th, so stay tuned for more!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Well my 1080 can also play the games on 4k/60fps if i set my graphics to low.
Would be nice if Nvidia can show some prove with game titles and graphics settings.
look at the first graph
notice the leap between the Maxwell and Pascal?
now look at the SHORT distance between the 1080TI (which is a 699$ card)
and the 2080 (which is 800$ card)
about 7-10% gain according to the graph’s measurement
now if we measure the 2080TI (which is a 1200$ card)
to the 2080, we can see about 15-20% gain
so that’s with ray-tracing off
which then i ask myself, is this really worth the money??
Whether it is really WORTH the upgrade, is kind of hard to tell right now.
Because we need to wait for actual Gaming benchmarks from various TECH websites, to get the real performance/fps numbers.
Nvidia can “claim” all they want, by showing all these Graphs/charts, but the actual picture will only become clear when proper gaming benchmarks come out on 19 September.
Not saying it won’t be worth it, but I’m not buying into all this stuff right now.
These new RTX gaming cards are way much overpriced as well, at least in my opinion, but I can understand the reason behind this (due to new GPU arch, and other market factors).
If you view the graphs with ray tracing on, you’ll see a hidden message that says “succers! Haha lol”
That’s weird, I tried it and I just see a looping animation of hand-rubbing.
.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cec56d5e7b76c71721417555961c4d88edc472d604bb119aeefe3958344b9039.jpg
The 2080ti looks to be around the 75-80fps mark; the 1080ti 45-50fps mark – more like 50%
80 FPS ultra on 4K? sounds skeptical to me
i’ll wait for the benchmarks
I think the real problem is this: does AMD have something that can compete head to head with nvidia 1080ti? For nvidia is it worth it to completely replace 1080ti with 2080ti price wise when 1080ti have no competitor at the market? Also when it comes to the fastest flagship there is no such thing such “does it really worth the money spend on it” thingy. Just look 970 vs 980. $330 vs $550. The gap is even closer unlike how it was with 1070 vs 1080. Does the asking price for 980 really worth it over 970 when we look at the performance gap?
AMD got nothing for the top-end gamers
it cant play god of war, spiderman, last of us and entire sony exclusives
????
archaven the ruseman is here to bamboozle us with his mischievous stratagems, will the DSOG community be able to see through his master plan?
He’s just saying that no matter how powerful the Turings are they still can’t be used to play the Sony console exclusives. It’s a consoles are better than PC thing.
but it can play zelda.
Not the point here.
Yeah stuck at stone age without any improvement or innovation with all of your complete a game by pushing a button “exclusive”
Thats why I have a PS4 Pro as well. Havent dusted if off in months though. Waiting for a jailbreak so I can steal all my Sony shekles back for the glorified QTE games they sold me in the past.
for the amazing price of 99999999999999999999$ You two can be disappointing by unoptimized games and empty promises.
come to think of, which graphical games aside from Metro (which already looks like a rape child of Far Cry 5 and Last Light)
do we really need all that GPU power? hell the only game i’m waiting for is Bannerlord and some De la Croix from Warhorse studios
sounds like a waste of shekels tbh
Shekels? Are you from Israel? What’s this Delacroix thing from Warhorse you’re talking about by the way?
De la Croix is a meme about DLC from Witcher 3 Blood and Wine
Shekels is an all round term for money, because all of our money is owned and governed by Jewish bankers
Oh that one I’ve missed. Thanks for explaining. Yeah I guess that makes sense, I had a friend from Israel and he always talked about shekels here and shekels there. Guess it can be applied to all currency lol.
Enough with the anti-Semitism.
cry me a river
cry me a river
Some tears would do you good.
I’ll wait for third party benchmarks…
GTX 1080 Ti is still the greatest card ever considering it only cost $700.
Pretty obvious they should be faster, but still the bloated price is for RTX, which apparently does not work on 4k at 60 fps. Or 1080p at 60 fps with the new Tomb Raider.
The high price is for pc gamers to test their new technology.
And if rumors are true and Microsoft and Sony partner with AMD in the next gen consoles, RTX with be an afterthought for developers and another bad implemented NVIDIA exclusive technology.
It’s the “early adopter tax”. New tech is usually very expensive.
It’s funny how so many people can’t understand basic economics.
>Complain about console ports and lack of innovation in PC tech
>Real time ray-tracing in games becomes reality thanks to new hardware
>Complain that it’s not cheap right away
My trusty Maxwell Titan X Hybrid is still doing fine, 4+ yrs in, so I’ll be happy to wait for the 2nd crop of these cards.
If the RTX are >= the Titan V games should play in 4k. Look at the recently released and demanding Shadow of the Tomb raider. 1080ti (non-sli) suck at 4k, but the V can handle it. (and the V is coming up on a year old)
https://youtu.be/Ycqu4Mv9Lv0
https://youtu.be/8EkRMoRWZpM
What are you talking about? The V is 10% faster than a 1080Ti at best.
The benchmarks are almost here and very eager to see AMD reply to this.
Sticking with my Gtx980 for a bit longer. The premium for just “eye -candy” is just laughable.
This is where I sit. I have a Maxwell Titan X, and really, I’m gonna hang on for another generation. The pricing of this series is absolutely idiotic.
Wont get any better, just wait for the 3080. I bet prices will get even worse. Reminds me of the smartphone market. Expensive phones were 300.. somehow they became 1000. This year, they started having phones for 1200-1400. Imagine next year.
Yeah.
Yeah and they are full of s**t.
This very fat and sad cat represents the current state of Nvidia lying constantly in their “benchmarks” for these cards. I for one don’t believe them at all, and I need to see true benchmarks before I even remotely say these cards are worth any sort of money.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fa666269dd44802ed97ca74c5395e602eed156c4c5ee2f371b4033ec18c2266b.jpg
When have Nvidia ever “lied” about benchmarks and their new generation of GPU’s? I’ll tell you when… NEVER. If these slides are legit from Nvidia (and they are) then you can be assured that these cards will do what is represented in the graph.. It’s AMD who have had a bad history of over-estimating the performance of their GPU’s… not Nvidia… Remember the 2900XTX? Otr the launch of it’s successor the 3xxx series? AMD were right their saying those cards will compete with what Nvidia has to offer and they were out and out lying. Nvidia have no history of the same kind of B.S. The fiasco with the GTX970 is a different story and it’s not like they lied about the cards performance… Was the means to achieve 4GB shady? Yup. But the card still performed like it was suppose to and tbh it was much ado about nothing. The GTX970 was still an amazing card for the price and that is proven by how well it did in regards to sales. Bottom line is that people like you saying Nvidia lies about it’s benchmarks are simply ignorant and misinformed. And yes… the benchmarks that will be released after the NDA is up will prove this point. Where will you be then? Probably under a rock.
This cat does not look fat or sad. The fact you called this cat fat and sad makes me sad for the cat, and for us all.
I confused
Why Nvidia put GTX 1080 Ti under the line of 4K 60 fps ? my card can do 4K 60 and even more except one title (if i don’t forget) : Ghost Recon wildlands
These tests are done in Ultra settings, no single currently released card can do 4K 60 highest settings in most games.
I always game at 4K ultra settings and have 60 fps except few titles, maybe because my card is overclocked
Maybe Jensen has been hanging out with weed smoking Elon again.
Given the 20-30% avg performance increase trend every generation, sure it will without RTX and DLSS. Considering we can already hit that mark in most games. (No AA) I’m not surprised about that at all. I highly recommend everyone to go out and try 4K @ 60FPS gaming playing with the IQ to see for yourself how capable our GPU’s are in its current iteration. (opportunity permits) I also recommend minimizing or disabling AA at that res.
Haha 4k 60fps latest games?
Probably medium details huh?
Ya, I think I will wait for someone “other than” the people profiting from the sales, to verify this claim in benchmarks.
Thanks though, Nvidia.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7e18b36df11da73568ab60568c896345018082189c163318579b169e56ffbc90.jpg
That would require a GPU more than x2 faster than the 1080Ti. That doesn’t happen in one gen.
And by the time that arrives, people will be saying they want 8k 120…or more.
Until next year.
I’m going to buy a few 2080TIs and not even open them.
I’m gonna get a 2080Ti for the office and for home will help me open excel documents can’t wait
lower price cards to damn expensive 500 bucks max
Yea but with RTX OFF witch is stupid.
They should just make a version of these cards without the RTX. And yea i know you can turn it off, but i just don’t want to pay for RTX bullshit you baboons.