NVIDIA has shared a new video for Titanfall 2, showcasing its single-player campaign on the PC. For this video, NVIDIA used an NVIDIA Titan X and was able to run the game in 4K at 60fps.
As we’ve already said, the PC version of Titanfall 2 promises to be a solid product, and will feature – among other things like a FOV slider and mouse acceleration options – high-quality textures, NVIDIA HBAO+ tech, Ambient Occlusion effects, and higher-quality anti-aliasing, effects and shadows.
From the looks of it, almost all upcoming triple-A games will run incredibly well on the PC. Battlefield 1, Watch_Dogs 2 and Titanfall 2 seem to be optimized for the PC. We are certain that Dishonored 2 will also run great on the PC platform. On the other hand, it will be interesting to see whether the PC version of Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare will be bug-free or not.
Titanfall 2 releases on October 28th.
Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Looking really good! I couldn’t jump on the bandwagon in time for Titanfall 1, but I’ll give 2 a try depending on what the reviews say about the SP campaign.
Yeah, I’m looking forward to this too. I’ve heard some good/interesting things about the campaigns, like there will be environmental puzzles and parkour challenges built in, kind of surprising but if they pull it off it will add another thing to differentiate vs other fps games this fall. Oah and the Titans too…
Yes, the concept is great and I heard good things about the gameplay — I just wasn’t sold on the Multiplayer only aspect, so having a SP component now in the sequel makes it more reasonable to me personally.
they really should have done a pc multiplayer test.battlefield 1 is just a snipe fest and all i see are the few same boring maps.cod if sucks this mite be the best fps out of the 3.i had a lot more fun on console playing titanfall 2 over bf1.
Torn between titanfall2, BF1 or COD4 remaster…I loved titanfall
BF1 and Titanfall 2. CoD4 is swirling toilet water.
say what you want but the infinite warfare setting is freaking amazing, for singleplayer the mp will be the same, it has space dogfights damn it.
ill help you battlefield 1 is a snipe fest,cod if sucks and titanfall 2 has titans.
For MP? BF1 is a joke, CoD 4 Remastered only has a handful of maps (with more to be patched in at a later date), & TF2 looks like more of the same, so if you enjoyed TF you’ll like TF2.
For SP? BF1 is a joke, CoD 4 Remastered is definitely worth playing through, & TF2 looks interesting.
Footnote: Keep in mind you’ll have to pay extra for Call of Duty, since the CoD 4 remaster is attached to Infinite Warfare (unless you eBay one of the keys), & arguably for BF1 as well, since they’re doing the Battlefield Premium Ripoff Pass thing again, whereas TF2 has promised that all post-launch maps & game modes are going to be free, in order to not split the community the way paid Map Pack DLCs always do.
“For SP? BF1 is a joke, CoD 4 Remastered is absolutely worth playing through,”
What logic is that? Cod4 campaign is overrated, it is one of the most scripted, bf1 from what i have saw it is a cod campaign with semi linear stealth elements ripped from far cry, why is cod4 worth playing but bf1 does not?
Because CoD 4’s Campaign remains a classic, even all these years later, making the visually upgraded version likewise worth playing through at least once in a person’s lifetime, seeing as they haven’t f*cked with the actual gameplay.
The levels, while indeed linear & scripted, sure, are worth experiencing at least once. Infinity Ward “OG” did a great job with the Chernobyl level, for example, & the other environments, while linear & scripted, are equally impressive. We are after all, talking about the game that was so influential, it caused Call of Duty to shake the entire FPS campaign genre into “linear scripted sh*tfests” from then on.
Which Far Cry? Far Cry OG? Far Cry 2? Far Cry 3? Far Cry 4? If it’s either of the latter, I’d still recommend Call of Duty 4 over BF1. If it’s the former, then, I suppose, maybe BF1 would be worth it, depending on exactly how similar they actually are.
It remains a classic because you thought it was good back then?
You will replay it for the better visuals?
I fully admit i liked mw2 campaign more than cod4, but if you gonna make an argument about the story of mw2, then black ops had a better story, is that a classic? Ofcourse not, because for “some reason” cod4 was the “classic” just like crysis is the “classic” despite the fact the far cry games are better in every way at this point.
” seeing as they haven’t f*cked with the actual gameplay.”
What exactly is there to fck up? It is a cod game, enemies spawn you shoot them towards the next checkpoint and it is scripted just like all cods, bf1 offers some freedom on that trend and thats that. How is that not “good” people praise cod4 and hate the rest with a nostalgia factor that if someone who had not played it at the time plays it, they will find it horribly underwhelming.
Have you seen any mission of bf1 campaign? its not bad.
Actually it’s generally considered to be a classic, by a lot of people, not just me specifically.
Probably, sure, why not?
I skipped Modern Warfare 2 once I found out the Multiplayer was sh*t, & basically dropped CoD after they didn’t fix that, so I never did Black Ops either unfortunately, so, no comment.
“despite the fact the far cry games are better in every way at this point.” Really? How so? Besides, that’s a really weird comparison. Why are we comparing Crysis to Far Cry in the first place, & on what basis, anyway? What, shooting mechanics? On that alone, I’d say Crysis wins the arcade medal, whereas Far Cry 2 wins the realism medal.
Visuals? Still Crysis. How badly it’s aged? Far Cry OG. Long-term replay value? Crysis &/or Far Cry 2, depending on the mood, really. Though I suppose there’s an argument to be made for Warhead, considering how it’s more action-oriented than Crysis itself.
“What exactly is there to fck up? It is a cod game, enemies spawn you shoot them towards the next checkpoint and it is scripted just like all” Yeah, I used to make that same argument, right until I learned about how the Gears Ultimate “remaster” messed with the environments, inadvertently affecting the gameplay flow as a result. Remasters very often tend to stray into “remake” territory when they attempt to “improve” &/or “fix” something, only to generally just end up making things worse as a result of the meddling.
“bf1 offers some freedom on that trend and thats that.” Good to see DICE finally pulled its head out of its a$$ long enough to do something moderately correct in regards to single-player.
“The rest” as in, what? The more recent entries? Yeah, those suck, period. The campaigns may have something to them, sure, especially Infinite Warfare, I admit, the space portions do look enticing, but since the Multiplayer sucks, & Activision insists on selling even the older entries at ludicrous prices, I can’t honestly recommend them to anyone outside of a 75% off Steam Sale.
The moment Call of Duty’s Multiplayer became about nothing but overpowered killstreaks, the IP stopped being anything of value, & started being a f*cking joke. In other words, the moment MW2 came out the way it did, & defiled everything, forever. CoD 4 precedes the overpowered killstreak problems, which allows it to retain a glorious, time-proof multiplayer, alongside a solid campaign experience, so, yeah, I can honestly still recommend it over the later entries, remastered or not.
“The rest” as in the older entries? CoD 1-3? Those remain solid games, even today, although, yeah, they haven’t exactly aged as well as many other titles.
I have, yes, & even so, I stand by my recommendations.
“I skipped Modern Warfare 2 once I found out the Multiplayer was sh*t, & basically dropped CoD after they didn’t fix that, so I never did Black Ops either unfortunately, so, no comment.”
Then how you can have an opinion on the series or any of the “cod clones”
“Why are we comparing Crysis to Far Cry”
What should i compare far cry with? doom? rainbow six? The basic idea is the same open map, vehicles, play the way you want.
“I’d say Crysis wins the arcade medal, whereas Far Cry 2 wins the realism medal.”
Weird, far cry 2 has alot of bulletspongying and many weapons dont even have recoil as opposed to crysis that has alot of recoil i dont see how crysis is “arcade” with such inaccurate weapons with scope sway and your armor and stealth running out extremely fast.
“Visuals? Still Crysis. How badly it’s aged? ”
It does not look as good as you remember, far cry 3 minus some ambient occlusion lighting issues looks better in every way.
“Good to see DICE finally pulled its head out of its a$$ long enough to do something moderately correct in regards to single-player.”
bad company 1 was awesome, i dont know why they shoved their head in their butt after that.
“The more recent entries? Yeah, those suck, period. ”
But you have not played them.
So long as the Multiplayer focuses on rewarding idiots with gimmicks, then the Multiplayer sucks, & as a result, the game is simply not worth paying for, as far as I’m concerned, period.
The same model applies to Battlefield, really; as long as they continue encouraging the absurd post-BF2 “Lone Wolf” mentality that they picked up from BC2 & never learned how to drop, the gameplay, as a result, will continue to suffer, & will continue to not be worth it. Not to mention how BF3’s & BF4’s maps were utterly terrible in layout & design, so I’m not really expecting much of BF1’s either.
Yes, that model obviously doesn’t apply to the single-player aspect, but as I told people for years; if you really want to continue to the Modern Warfare SP Trilogy, just download the damn thing. There’s no point in buying MW2 &/or MW3 just to play through the campaign once or twice.
As for the “CoD Clones” – I’ve played a lot of non-CoD IP’s trying to replicate CoD, some of them good, most of them bad. I can’t have an opinion on them because I haven’t played a new CoD game in 10 years? I’m confused.
“open map, vehicles, play the way you want.” Sounds like Just Cause, Death to Spies, Metal Gear Solid, Batman: Arkham, The Division etc. etc. etc. Sure, they have similarities, but their approach to the gameplay itself varies significantly.
Crysis has recoil, Far Cry 2 has weapon jamming. Crysis has bullets everywhere, & a manual save mechanic which basically lets you play as arcade-y as you like, so long as you remember to save. Far Cry 2 provides you with limited ammunition, & an auto-save feature (yes I know there’s ways around that).
I preferred Bad Company 2, but BC1 was definitely solid. I really wonder if we’ll ever get BC3 at this point, & even more so, if it’ll actually be good, or if they’ll try to shove in some BF4-BF1 mix Multiplayer into it, instead >.>
See above.
I played through CoD4 again at weekend, still great! No vanilla servers online sadly all rediculous 64 player servers
What, you expect Activision to keep supporting a game this old?
;D
But yeah, those 64-player servers >.>
you and i are once in agreement.bf1 is a snipe fest cod if sucks and titanfall 2 is the best one out of the 3.bf1 is still living off that cod of hate nothing more.all i see when i watch bf1 on twitch is thoe same few maps over and over .plus the short really short sp is good but way to short.
bf1 isnt worth $60 imo.
Is this even a question?
Does it look like a question???
Although I’m going for a 1080 next year, I hardly care for 4k let alone a Titan X, a card which costs a ton of money and to play a console multiplat game at 4k on source isn’t really anything to write home about.
This level of last moment marketing reminds me of ubisoft trying to hype and ham up the Division PC version and the trailer telling us that it’s playing at a whole 60fps lol.
Anyone know this will support SLI ? looking really good btw.
I hope it has jiggle physics.
For what? :)))
Tiddies.
Buy mid range, tweak graphical settings? They are there
Buy md
FINALLY A GAME THAT YOU PLAY AS A HUGE MECH DESTROYING EVERYTHING AND NOT ANOTHER COVER BASED SCRIPTED MODERN WAR SHOOTER
“Get to cover pilot we taking down that wall, gunship that DROPPED YOU, destroys wall…and you fight other mechs that are the same as you and also carry assault rifles……..DAMN IT!!!
Nice visuals for source engine. Nothing special though. Bf3 did this 5 years earlier.
LOL. At least if you’d gone with BF4, you’d have had half a case, but BF3? Come on.
Okay Advance Warfare but that is my final offer lol.
Advanced Warfare with 4K? I could see that.
this games looks like its the best of the 3.bf1 is a snipe fest with a really short sp.cod if suck even cod plays say its bad..lol and titanfall 2 has titans enough said.
Wow, imagine playing it in VR?!