Mass Effect: Andromeda – E3 2016 versus Final Build comparison screenshots

Back in E3 2016, Electronic Arts showcased a trailer that appeared to be featuring in-game footage from Mass Effect: Andromeda. And since the review codes for Mass Effect: Andromeda have already been sent, you can find below some comparison screenshots between the game’s E3 2016 build and its final version.

As we can see, there are some differences between the E3 2016 and the final builds. The eye and skin shaders have taken a hit, and the lighting in the final build feels simpler/less complex than the one used in the E3 2016 build.

To BioWare’s and Electronic Arts’ credit, the gameplay footage found in the “Official EA Play 2016” video (from which these scenes were taken) was never advertised as representative of the final build.

Still, and given the fact that Star Wars: Battlefront’s reveal trailer was just as good as its final version, we are a bit disappointed that BioWare had to lower the graphical fidelity of its title.

Enjoy the comparisons (E3 2016 build is on the left, whereas the final build is on the right).

Thanks NeoGAF

59 thoughts on “Mass Effect: Andromeda – E3 2016 versus Final Build comparison screenshots”

  1. Still looking good and it has gorgeous vistas but I didn’t expect a downgrade since most of the titles from EA don’t do them. Or it was not obvious enough.

    1. No yeah, this is the first major Frostbite downgrade – I think.

      Unless Dragon Age: Inquisition got downgraded a little, but I don’t seem to recall any such controversy, so I’d say not.

      1. Dragon Age: Inquisition had gameplay downgrade. Check out the video from the PAX reveal. That’s not the same game we got.

    1. That female Ryder looks gorgeous. The same could be told about the Asari, which would make complete sense considering her species…

      At least the Asari seems to have some personality…

      1. “That female Ryder looks gorgeous” yes she does, in the E3 footage not in the current build though.

        1. I was talking about the Photoshop’d one of course 🙂

          The original version really looks like the defiinition of bland. At least there is true equality: the same can be said about the male version.

    2. These are bad, but the 3rd set of images is the worst, in my opinion.

      It’s always the environments that get hit the worst when the downgrades come in 🙁

    3. The reason all Bioware females have ugly faces these days is so that when fat SJW land whales play ME:A they won’t feel inferior to their squadmates and NPCs. This is their fantasy and they are going to be the prettiest one in it. Typical liberal tactics.

      Now however, they still needed the females to be fit and have nice bodies. This is to ensure the male gamers, who make up most of the revenues, will still buy the game.

      No one wants to play a game where you have to see Lena Dunhams everywhere.

      1. Sounds like Trump logic. If the women don’t look like the plastic Ms America contestants then their ugly. I would love to see the partners (if y’all have any) of you alt guys. Lol, lots of sows and heifers in the South and Midwest.

  2. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=232077535

    Another random neofag post that makes it into news on this site. Also the only site that keeps repeating the downgrade cretinism after all these years. So a prerendered cinematic trailer from a year ago that was made for presentation purposes and full of filters isnt 1:1 with the actual playing game? My god, this is so extraordinary and unheard of. Let quickly post it in the news. :facepalm: Then points in the article itself that nobody ever said this is ingame footage nor advertised it as such. This site started good years ago, but my man, its a complete joke at the moment.

    All its missing are the “tech interviews” where the most uninformed person alive asks programers technical questions that he read on forums and has no idea what they mean, so people can laugh about it on reddit

    1. Wow…Bioware are masters at making faces look like plastic dolls. Same as in DA:I.

      I played the Mass Effect trilogy some months ago and I loved it, even the dialogue parts were pretty damn good and were the bests bits of the series in my opinion. (combat was not so good neither that bad…story is what made this game stand out)

      But saw some gameplay from Mass Effect: Andromeda and it seems they went back in the animations department. AI’s movement, animations from the faces and reactions (the eyes mostly) and dialogues are terrible like written by a 12 year old. (the only “good” animations are the ones from your character, but the AI’s look really weird)

  3. now to complete those models, add little bit of hair to chest and legs, maybe thicker eyebrows and wider faces overall and then we’re good to go

  4. Although still ugly the characters from final version do look a tad better IMO than the trailer version. Especially female Ryder.
    Also I saw the character customisation gameplay and TBH the default female Ryder looks much better than the custom character creation ones. And I thought this uglisness could be fixed with custom character creation.

  5. Put on some protective latex gloves and head on over to Rock Paper Shotgun, they just sh*t all over this game, hahahahaha…

    1. And as expected it looks like the story-telling is terrible.

      When your hiring policy only relies on politics instead of talent you just end up with bland characters and dialogues.

  6. it’s official. the ugliest game in the 50 years of gaming history. even Styix goblin is more likeable than these garbage characters

  7. this new mass effect feels like the ugly teen version of mass effect. I hate , hate, hate that asari with her stupid face paint, oh god i will so ignore her ingame, hope i can

  8. Why they michael cera’d PeeBee is beyond me. Then again there’s the story that they purposely made everyone uglier before release.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *