Here are four new screenshots for the first-person dark fantasy shooter, Witchfire

The Astronauts has released four new screenshots for its upcoming first-person dark fantasy shooter, Witchfire. These screenshots showcase some of the game’s locations, as well as some of its enemies.

Witchfire will be using Photogrammetry and will be using the latest version of Unreal Engine 4. Thus, the following screenshots showcase the visual state of the game’s latest build. Naturally, and as with all pre-release screenshots, they do not reflect the quality of the final product.

From what we know so far, Witchfire feels like a mix between Dark Souls and Destiny. The Astronauts also claimed that this won’t be a story-driven game. Despite that, though, the game will have a lore, will feature a lot of enemies to slaughter and will have some boss battles.

There is currently no ETA on when Witchfire will come out.

Enjoy the following screenshots and stay tuned for more!

63 thoughts on “Here are four new screenshots for the first-person dark fantasy shooter, Witchfire”

      1. I was sure they were, but I could be wrong, but at the same time, Epic did say they are still going to sign deals, even for games listed or due to release on Steam.

      1. First you call someone a boomer, then you call this same person a kid.
        I know you’re ret4rd, but now I even know you are massively dumb retard3d, since you’re using words you don’t even understand its meanings.

    1. Collecting trash and choosing the best weapon in your trash collection is apparently super complex for big brained intellectuals.

      I too loved all of the mobile game tier busywork with gems and trash in Shadow Warrior 2.

    2. Simpler than a looter shooter?
      Looter Shooters are literally rinse and repeat.
      I am super bummed to learn this is a basic, by the numbers generic game also.
      I was hoping for something more like Metro…
      Thirteen downvotes…new record?

    3. looter shooters are trash, i am still pissed darksiders 2 was a padded out looter slasher with more padding out.

  1. that reflex sight looks worthless, i hate when devs put in sh**ty scopes and reflex sights, just to do something different, here’s looking at you borderlands 2

    1. Borderlands has the most useless sights in history. 95% of the guns suck because the sights take up most of the screen or are worthless.

  2. Dark Souls + Destiny = I’m Out.
    2 of the worse games to ever grace the field of gaming. Too bad cause this was the one game i was awaiting. Been following it for a while. But those 2 combinations are schitt. Not interested in Looter Shooter Dark Souls. Damn, we just can’t have nice things no more.

    1. There’s nothing I hate more than this bullshyt “souls-like” genre created for the braindead in the past few years.
      When I hear that this is what comes to my mind:
      – Boring gameplay
      – No lore
      – Boring bosses
      – Terrible mechanics
      – Made for autists

      FML!!!

    2. ROFL! I guess you people are really fond of the games that came before, right? Yeah! Those were the days… well designed games for smart gamers with no bs hand-holding cause that’s for retards! Let’s highlight some of the impressive, mainstream design principles of that awesome, forever lost, never to come back, golden era of gaming:

      – auto health regen! So that you don’t need to take risks and, more importantly, you don’t have to die, at all! Took a headshot? No worries, hide behind a wall and you’ll be full health in 5 seconds!

      – map markers all over! so that you don’t need to find and keep track of objectives yourself, cause you’re a gamer, not an archaeologist!

      – big arrows pointing the way! So that you don’t get lost, ever! Picture the scenario: you enter a new location, walk in a straight line for 3 minutes and then you have to pause (yes, pause!) to pee, but when you come back, you look at the screen and you realize you’re lost! How are you supposed to keep track of such a complicated level design? No more of this BS, BIG, colorful arrow will point you the way to victory!

      – help button for tips when you get stuck! remember when you entered that dungeon, and then you came into a room with a locked door, and nothing but a giant rocky ball and a circular hole, right in the middle of the room, that seemed to be just the size of the ball, but you didn’t know what to do? Yeah, that was a though one, right? But then you pressed the help button and suddenly, that big ball started shinning like the burning sun, and your character even told you that maybe you should try to push the ball to the hole in the center! You still remember how smart you felt after you had beaten that otherwise impossible puzzle!

      – “epic ctuscenes” every 5 minutes! because you’re playing, you don’t have time to read… or to think! better if the game shows you the story, right in your face, all the time!

      – intricate, complex mechanics, like: point and shoot!! With aim-assist!

      – infinite ammunition! overpowered weapons! Because you’re the damn gamer, you OWN the game, literally!

      Oh, the nostalgia, the feelings… it’s such a shame Dark Souls HAD to destroy that PERFECT formula… hate that game…

  3. How many times have these been compressed? I can see the blocks without even zooming in.

    Regarding the game: We’ve sadly seen gameplay already and it resembles Borderlands, not real shooters.

  4. I remember a game that glorified this “photogrammetry” feature but end up being shitz…

  5. I had such high hopes for this game when it was first announced! I love horror, and I love FPS games! One of these I will have to make my own f*kin hardcore game…it will be dark, mature, full of violence, and tense cut-throat shooting!

        1. no intention of being racist from my side

          I asked why you were referring to a “black” meme. You said it was nothing. I put your meme into a context perhaps a bit more personal to you. Your reaction says it all.

          Instead of getting mad at me for pointing out your hypocrisy, why not just do something about it?

          1. dumass

            Does anything more need to be said? Context does matter; I asked you to explain the “black” reference. You implied that it was nothing, so I put it into a context that you could relate to a little more personally.

            What context makes the use of one person’s ancestry perfectly fine but the exact, same use of another person’s ancestry an international incident?

            If using an identifier in that way offends you so deeply, then shouldn’t you refrain from doing the same thing?

            And no, I didn’t “joblessly stalk your profile” (whatever that means); I looked at your username.

            Instead of engaging in hysterics, just be honest.

          2. intended personally as an attack, which is what you did, passive aggressively […] stop trying to correct people on the internet even if they are wrong

            Which is it, Aristotle?

            I was going to post only that you’re still whining, but then I saw that last bit. You’re a colossal coward: You made the statement, you excused it, and you’re still trying to justify it even after you realize how offensive it can be to those targeted by it.

            Instead of crying like a certain meme, why not just man up, and admit that referring to “race” may be unhelpful?

          3. dumass

            (That’s funny. The b is silent.)

            Why do you think that I’m Spanish? More importantly, why are you still hyperventilating over something that you did?

            I merely asked a question, one which you’ve been answering ever since.

            The lady doth protest too much methinks.

          4. I’m here for your Mexican / Spanish a*s.

            (You might want to talk to dagoat; he prefers goat, but in your case, he might make an exception.)

            Look at that: I ask you a question, and you descend into madness. You’re the one foaming at the mouth about “racism,” not me. And if the context really were just, then you wouldn’t be so hysterical.

            more imaginative

            Now you’re trying to attack what you think is my “race.” If you had a little more imagination — wit, historical literacy, or just plain literacy — then you would know that you’re referring to a pseudonym. A nom de plume. A nom de guerre.

            It’s a reference to Spain’s patron saint of its 800-year campaign (the Reconquista) to free itself from Islamic tyranny, something every free soul should know about.

          5. you’re racist for thinking I’m racist […] only racists think that way […] you bring up my race out of nowhere […] I don’t speak your stupid language […] stop trying to sound like an intellectual […] the context of my original post in the first place […] being racist against me you Spanish f**k […] your racist a[…]

            How ironic. Projection much?

            I asked you a question. You answered it. Over and over again.

            All you had to do was say that the term was for identification purposes only. You did not. You were so cavalier in your reply that it seemed restating it in more personal terms might help you see what you were doing.

            Apparently, it did. Don’t blame me because you don’t like what you found.

          6. my very first reply […] got mad […] you proceeded to attack MY race

            You can’t retcon this conversation: You used the term. I asked a question. You melted down. You attacked a historical symbol in attacking what you thought was my “race.”

            And now you’re embarrassed at your histrionics.

            You should be.

          7. bs […] offended […] passive aggressive […] numbskull […] poor Spanish […] blocked

            I asked. You ranted and raved. And now you’re running.

            Well done, @Prashanna Shanmuga Sundaram!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *