NVIDIA’s latest high-end Titan X GPU – based on the Pascal architecture – is now available for purchase. This graphics card costs $1,200 and features 3584 CUDA cores, its core is clocked at 1.42GHz (with a boost clock at 1.53GHz), comes with 12GB of GDDR5X VRAM, and offers 480GB/s memory bandwidth.
Those interested can purchase the Titan X Pascal directly from NVIDIA’s store.
As we’ve already said, the NVIDIA Titan X will feature 12 billion transistors and will sport 11 TFLOPS. The GPU will require one eight-pin and one six-pin PCI-E power connectors, and will come with 3x DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0b and a dual-link DVI port.
In addition, the first benchmarks for this GPU have emerged. According to the graphs, this new Titan X is pretty close at running games in 4K with 60fps.
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
GTX 1080 SLI is giving me around 85 fps in all these games at 4k. So if you feel like spending $1200 spend it on two GTX 1080 rather than the Titan X (Pascal).
Nice, should be interesting to see what the 1080ti can do in the near-future too.
thats what im waiting on so i can ditch my 980tis
Lol, two 980ti’s? I’m waiting on the 1080ti to replace my 950 XD!
i feel your pain, brother, hang in there man
Except SLI support isn’t good in all games.
Only garbage console focused developers don’t support multi-gpu, whose games you should not be buying anyway. Good PC/multi-platform developers games all have great multi-gpu support.
Unreal Engine 4 doesn’t support SLI! That is one of the biggest engines Devs use! As soon as I heard that I started to worry about SLI going forward… Plus I have an Oculus Rift and SLI is a no-go in VR (at least so far…). Like I stated in a post above, I have run SLI since 2004 and I am happy to finally leave it behind.
in case of UE4 it is more like the engine are not really working well with AFR in general. so it is affecting both SLI and CF. but UE4 is not outright cannot use SLI/CF. just that UE4 dev reminding that you can’t use all UE4 feature if you want your game to support multi gpu. Daylight for example is UE4 games and yet the game did have SLI support.
But look at a single GTX 1080 vs Titan X. You’re not losing all that much when you can’t use SLI, but you’re gaining a huge amount when you can.
Please. Logic isn’t recommended in the comment section. Warn us next time.
Multi GPU solutions work in roughly 90% of PC games. Only the hackjob consoles ports don’t and almost always they are worth avoiding.
Gotta wait to see overclocked benchmarks. yes, it’s overpriced but I would rather a single solution than SLI
oh dear god the OC benchmarks are amazing.
After all the hype. Quite underwhelming. And that price ? Let me skip.
Do the guys at Nvidia lack that much imagination when naming their top end GPU’s. I mean Titan X Pascal? Like, really?
Let the butthurt flow through you…. it gives us strumph
Why is he butthurt? It is a ridiculous name
I’m not saying anything bad about the GPU itself. I’m just saying it has a stupid, redundant and (for some people) confusing name. That’s all.
First they made Titan (Single Kepler Titan) then Titan Z (Dual Kepler Titan) then Titan X (Single Maxwell Titan) so this should be Titan Y (Single Pascal Titan), some might not like it but it’s still better than repeating a name.
actual name is Titan X. the previous card is called GTX Titan X. so this time around nvidia ditch that “GTX” moniker. people simple called it Titan X Pascal to differentiate this card to previous titan x (maxwell based) because nvidia still decided to use “Titan X” naming despite the hardware inside is different.
so this card is cheaper then getting 2 gtx 1080’s for 4k which is around $1400.
Nvidia’s new gen: Surpasses by far it’s previous gen.
AMD’s new gen: Barely surpasses it’s previous gen at all.
Just saying.
You’re under the impression that the Rx 480 is barely faster than the r9 380? Hah!
Having in mind that so far the benchmarks I’ve seen have been…dissapointing, then yes.
OK, so since YOU’RE disappointed, the rx 480 is now barely faster than the r9 380. I suppose the 50% increase over the 380 falls under the “barely” category for you.
I understand being a fanboy, that’s fine. But at least make a claim that’s SOMEWHAT coherent so you don’t look like a desperate fanboy right up front.
Just block all of the AMD troll accounts. I don’t know who has time to make accounts like this.
And where do you see exactly that 50% increase? Do I have to post benchmarks from trusted sites that tells otherwise?
And even if that was correct, it’s still dissapointing that the 480 manages such results with it’s current top of the line, when NVIDIA’s manages to beat the Maxwell’s Titan X with their 1080, and even the 1070’s.
The only fanboy here is you. Go s– u– c– k– AMD’s c– o– c– k– while it’s not dead yet.
It’s marketing plan, you know.
Besides, both sides released new gpus on different classes and prices. So you can’t compare them.
Yeah, right until AMD fanboys insists that their GPUs can be compared to NVIDIA’s ones, like they always do.
And what makes you think that you’re not Nvidia fanboy who insists that their GPUs can be compared to AMD’s ones?
If you actually read and been following the news, then you’ll know AMD never intended 480 to be their top of the line card.
Before you jump to conclusion and call me a fanboy, I own an intel system. 6700k @ 4.7ghz paired up with the GTX 1080 G1 Gaming.
Right, they intend the 490 to be it. Which is just two 480’s together. And do you think that’s normal?
And we’ll see how Vega performs, but having in mind the 4xx’ example, I wouldn’t bet not even a petrified turd on it.
Nvidia did the same thing in the past with the 7900gx2, 9800gx2, GTX 295, GTX 590, & GTX 690.
Also it’s not completely a like for like of two 480. The differentiating factor is 490 will be utilising second generation HBM.
We’ll see how it performs. Try to look at each company from an objective point of view instead of throwing the word fanboy at anyone who has a different opinion.
As far as we know the 490 isn’t even a thing yet, let alone 2 480’s on a single PCB! Your talking nonsense and have a clear dislike at a company for some rediculous reason, if you don’t want to buy an AMD product, don’t buy one. Pathetic
9800 GTX barely any faster than the GTX 8800. Just saying.
See how annoying that is?
You are wrong.
AMD have only released one card so far and it’s selling very well, and the 470 and 460 will probably sell even better given the pice and market they are aimed at. I think you are looking for a story that isn’t there.
Just saying
RX480 did not even close to Fury X. let alone surpass it.
These are all games that are known to have issues with optimization other than Witcher.
There is still easily 20% OC head room on the card… All of those games will EASILY run at 60fps with a small OC. Remember the Titan X should OC as far as the 1080GTX (2000MHz on air EASY) and the Titan X is clocked at a boosted 1536MHz. So running it at 2000MHz will have these games running in the high 60’s. And on a single card no less! I have run SLI setups since the 7900GTX (7900GTX, 8800GTX, GTX285, GTX480 and now GTX980… all dual card setups). My dual GTX980 Poseidons ran me $1655CDN. The Titan X I just orderd was $1836CDN so $181 dollars more and I don’t have to worry about SLI AND every game should run nicely at 60fps in 4K (I watercool my system so running the Titan X at 2100+MHZ shouldn’t be an issue). Bottom line… I’m STOKED!
Except for that noisy blower fan.
At that price ‘almost’ isn’t good enough.
that price is for unlock INT8 performance that otherwise being crippled on regular geforce.
Double price for just 10 fps improvement ? and in some cases it’s not even 10… Better go for two 1070/1080 or if SLI is not your thing then wait for 1080 Ti. Don’t support this garbage.
this is not for gamer. nvidia create this card specifically for deep learning that make use INT8 which is crippled in regular geforce cards. after seeing how the titan series goes on since 2013 people with sane mind will know this is not the card to buy but instead should be waiting for the “Ti” version that will follow.
Less than 10fps in these select benchmarks over the 1080 amp, this card is aimed for the wealthiest of gamers who want the best of the best, sadly I’m not one of them! As a show piece, this is an incredible piece of hardware, exciting to see how the next few generations pan out from both AMDand NVIDIA
this card is not for gamer at all. but some gamer will still going to buy them for pure gaming purpose.
This is probably the first REAL 4k capable single gpu card to be out. I’m personally going to hold out for volta seeing as how their going to refine this even further.