Kingdom Come: Deliverance to be published by Deep Silver, gets new beautiful screenshots

Deep Silver announced today that it will publish Warhorse Studios’ upcoming first-person realistic RPG, Kingdom Come: Deliverance, in 2017.

Deep Silver will be responsible for the PC retail version of Kingdom Come: Deliverance, while Warhorse Studios will handle the digital one.

In order to celebrate this announcement, Deep Silver has also released a new set of screenshots for Kingdom Come: Deliverance that can be viewed below.

Enjoy!

kingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_01_talmbergkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_03_forestkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_04_thiefkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_06_tavernkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_07_duelkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_08_millkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_10_cave_fightkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_11_close_combatkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_12_marshland_fightkingdom_come_-_deliverance_screenshot_13_pine_forrest_fight

52 thoughts on “Kingdom Come: Deliverance to be published by Deep Silver, gets new beautiful screenshots”

    1. Me too, but everything looks great so far. The combat seems complex and elaborate, different ways to solve quests, plenty of stats (including a hunger meter!).

          1. Mind you, this isn’t everyone and the bs came mostly when GG was on fire, atm you can see way more people talking about it.

          2. yup, to be fair they have calmed down since then…I WONDER WHY, could it be someone fought them?

          3. If you believe that even half of those buzzwords mean anything and are ever valid accurations you’re as mentally ill as any other SJW lunatic who fell for the shill press’ deflection campaign during GG. GG itself was a fun ride while it lasted, no complaints here, and the remnants are still out there, still occasionally calling out corruption and collusion in internet journalism. During all of GG’s heyday the only big mistakes the “movement” ever made was when individuals would donate to “feminist” charities of any sort. The weird virtue signalling was a mistake. It didn’t sway anyone, it just let a bunch of people take advantage financially. Other than wasting a bunch of money GG did nothing wrong.

          1. Man that really rubs me the wrong way. If it was me in their position I would have responded much much worse, like go shove your SJW opinions up your a** or something.

            Badass t-shirt.

          2. That would probably cause a lot of controversy to be honest. We’re living in a day and age where people are just way too sensitive about things. I think he handled it reasonably well, being humerous about it. Must of angered the Gamergate community a great deal 😛

          3. “Must of angered the Gamergate community a great deal”

            wat

            I think you got it backwards, GamerGate was on Vavra’s side on this.

          4. “he handled it reasonably well, being humorous about it.”

            I think that’s the point EuphoricShadow made, GG was obnoxious, loud, angry and all serious.

          5. Well, GG likes to think they are objective but the truth is after their victory they sound more and more like Trump than objective people.

          6. Wait a minute, didn’t we argue a long time ago about GG?
            I remember saying that it was bs and you said it wasn’t, what made you see the light? :o)

          7. Yeah that was my mistake. I initially thought Gamergate were a pro-SJW movement with all the things that happened long ago, but never delved too much into it due to how much I like to stay away from most toxic discussions. I wouldn’t be surprised though if some of the people behind the movement are just as bad as those opposed to their thinking (feminists and such).

          8. Gamergate were the good guys, fyi. The SJW/corrupt-press alliance were the ones who would chimp out over historical accuracy being “racist” and other non-issues.

          9. Someone else told me the same earlier, but thanks for the correction. I did respond below to someone else but I guess I’ll edit the post I made intially. Doubt we’ll ever understand those kind of mindsets tbh. Maybe it’s all to do with wanting fame and recognition.

          10. Ironically enough, it was the media that was being outed by gamers for unethical journalism and then the media turned around and made it some issue about… misogyny? What? lol

            For me, Gamergate was always about unethical practices in gaming and gaming journalism. No Man’s Sky is a Gamergate issue. Ubisoft calling 95% of PC gamers pirates is a Gamergate issue. Constant graphical downgrades from a slew of AAA games is a Gamergate issue. There was no misogyny until the media raised the issue, which actually attracted REAL misogynists to get into the fight. lol

            But, like I said, ironically enough, the whole debacle proved the initial arguments made by GG about how unethical gaming journalism has become.

          11. Never really heard of the Moors and this is coming from a African himself lol. But they do sound pretty interesting, so many untapped potential to cover new grounds on other cultures really. Like what Daniel Vavra is saying himself, he’s making a game based on a history largely connected to his culture, I really don’t understand the big fuss about that. The gaming business is massive in the west and some parts of Europe, it’s the only reason why we see historical games mainly based on those lands.

          12. well someone can say that since moors were from africa they had some contacts with sub-saharian Africa for commercial purposes, slaves/servants/mercenaries and such. At that point is possible that a sub-Saharan black guy could go in the south part of Europe and if he was a mercenary/merchant, he could travel to where he wanted. Ofc someone cannot say this could be a widespread phenomenon but is not absurd to say that there were some black people in northern Europe, it is just highly unlikely, so unlikely that it becomes irrelevant.

          13. Agreed. A Sub-Saharan merchant or mercenary, while extremely unlikely, is theoretically possible, if they originated from one of the coastal colonies that had trading ties to Northern Africa, Southern Europe, etc.

            Of course, while it is theoretically plausible to see a Sub-Saharan merchant in Medieval Spain, Italy, Southern France, etc, the odds of seeing one as far inland as Bohemia are phenomenally astronomical, arguably, so it would most likely be a mercenary, if anything – assuming he could have picked up a European language well enough (Medieval Latin, probably?).

            Either way, agreed, the presence of Sub-Saharan Africans in a historically-accurate representation of Medieval Bohemia is absolutely astronomical to the point where (not to be crass, but) including them or not is irrelevant, considering how unlikely the phenomenon in question would be in the first place.

      1. I’d say he didn’t stir sh*t, he stood his ground and punched back.

        The ones stirring sh*t were the journos smearing him as a racist because he didn’t want to add black people to what’s supposed to be a historically accurate portrayal of medieval Bohemia.

          1. Oh I read that as “some sh*te he stirred up”, but looking again the word “he” wasn’t there.

            Derp.

        1. That was back them. this guy is a major loudmouth and he doesnt have anything other to do than be a jerk on twitter to anyone not 100% aligned with his views. Basically what i am saying is there might have been black people back then in that region, but even if you showed to him with historical proof, he would still act like a know it all and be a major dbag to anyone correcting him.

          1. I’m not seeing that at all.

            Also if what you say were true, I’d have expected the historians he consulted with to confirm there might have been black people in Bohemia instead of laughing at the idea. What historical proof did anybody show him? Smugly linking the wikipedia article on moors?

          2. “loudmouth”, “jerk”, “major dbag”

            So salty. And the irony of pretending HE has a problem interacting with people who disagree with him. No, that’s your problem. It’s your views that everyone has to tread around with care or they get hit with a bunch of labels, see above. I can’t remember Vavra firing the first shot against anyone on twitter. He seems to be a peaceful fellow who dares to have opinions whether they allign with YOUR political views or not. And maybe he debates them on twitter sometimes. So what? Where’s the part that justifies your insults?

            Btw there were basically no black people in Europe during the Middle Ages. It would be very, very weird for black people to turn up in a realistic game about that time and that place. It is extremely odd to WANT to find select exceptions so you can pretend it’s a reasonable request to have black characters in the game. It isn’t.

          3. well in northern Europe for sure, but in the south I bet there were many brought by the Moors. It is probable also that some of them fought and were not slave or servants, but I highly doubt they would have a reason to live and fight in Bohemia with all the troubles they had with the occupation of Spain etc.

          4. Moors weren’t “black people”. Moors were North-Africans. “Black” usually refers to sub-Saharan Africans with really dark skin. Moors were about as dark as Arabs. If the devs included a bunch of Moors chances are the SJW journolist clique wouldn’t even notice it.

      2. To be fair the studio head is a massive jerk. If i was him i would spend more time working on the game and promoting it than fighting sjws on twitter from my right wing conservative- i am always right-know it all perspective.

        1. internet, echo chambers, monkeys flinging sh*t yadda yadda

          For example “right wing conservative- i am always right-know it all perspective” is a thing you just associated him to be based on him fighting people that think he is right wing conservative- i am always right-know it all perspective. Everyone is right and wrong, because sitting down, shutting up and reasoning makes too much sense.

          It’s a snowball of blank statements and generalization that I can’t be @rsed to care about anymore.

          1. Liberals are tolerant of you… until they disagree with you. Then they’ll do everything in their power to destroy you. They picked a fight with the guys from Warhorse and they just gave the SJW media the finger. lol I love it.

        2. Better than the lefts….my life’s choices should be yours attitude, and leftest scum rewriting history to fit their narrative…It’s pathetic…

      3. It’s because he would tolerate their nonsense. That and some dindu was trying to teach him about the history of his country and why their should be black people in it, you know, just because.

  1. Now I just hope they optimize it. The frame-rates are absolute trash. I’m getting 27-38 fps on a GTX 780 SC on medium settings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *