Assassin’s Creed Origins releases in a few days and its full graphics settings have been unveiled. What’s really cool here is that Ubisoft has added a Performance Test. Not only that, but PC gamers will also be able to adjust the FOV.
Going into more details, PC gamers can adjust the quality of Anti-Aliasing, Shadows, Environment Details, Textures and Tessellation. There are also options for Terrain, Clutter, Fog, Water, Screen Space Reflections Volumetric Lights, Character and Ambient Occlusion.
Assassin’s Creed Origins releases on October 27th and from the looks of it, the PC version will at least feature a respectable amount of settings.
The screenshots are coming from YouTube’s member Centerstrain01. Centerstrain01 has also shared a video, showing 23 minutes of gameplay footage from the PC version. Therefore, we strongly suggest watching the video as it will give you an idea of how the PC version performs.
Enjoy and stay tuned for our PC Performance Analysis article!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Not preordering but will pick up to support singleplayer and if it runs well on PC (i.e. not a buggy, stuttering, flickering mess like Unity). I enjoyed Black Flag (the only AC game I liked) and my understanding is that this is the same team. It looks ok in the video, but I thought the same for other games until release day killed the fun. I also read that there is no predatory loot gambling which may have been reverted after all the backlash.
Unity was the last drop for many people. Which is pity because that was quite a good ( and gorgeous ) game. If you exclude how badly the French Revolution was dealt with…
I dunno. I played maybe 6 hours and really couldn’t stand it any more. I wanted to enjoy it, I just really couldn’t.
Unity looked like it had some of the most obnoxious tutorializing ever, that’s why I continue to avoid it even after patches, I’m starting to really lose my patience at games that force you to sit through hours upon hours of ‘cinematic’ garbage tutorials.
ÂŁ50 on Steam, not touching it at that price, I’ll stick with ELEX.
Got it for less… Long passed is the time I was willing to pay full price for games on Steam or elsewhere… The game industry only has itself to blame for that…
Can get it for ÂŁ40 on cdkeys but ELEX will keep me going, no rush to buy this game.
Is it any good? I’ve got to say Piranha Games left me with a bad taste ( not terrible games, just missed oportunities )…
If you liked Risen you’ll probably like this. It’s pretty good so far, hard and combat takes some timing and getting used to, espeically with the energy meter now, you can’t keep spamming attacks.
ELEX is a lot closer to Gothic 1, 2 and Risen 1, than it is to Risen 2 and 3.
Yeah, I don’t know why some people are so obsessed with Steam that they want to use it on top of another client. For example, when GTA V was offered at a lower-than-usual price, they were like: “it’s a Rockstar Games Social Club version, so it’s useless.”
Built-in frametime graph… Impressive.
I’m very, very hesitant to get excited about this game, but I’m also hoping it turns out to be great. I’m also curious to see what an extra year can do for a stale franchise.
denuvo + uplay + always online
LOL!
You are talking to a gentleman of ruse, a baron of bamboozle, an earl of artifice, a duke of deceit, do not be fooled by his clever stratagem of merely pretending to be retarded, for once you believe him, you have been outwitted, and he shall celebrate his own mischief atop his tower of shenanigans.
and what about piracy protection we need a new breakthrough
Read the top comment.
What’s wrong witth the video, character eyes and faces look natural… Shouldn’t they just look badly out of place to reinforce the weight of patriarchy in Ancient Egypt?
Kangz didn’t have patriarchy, oppression was invented by the *ugh* white cis male.
WE WUZ KANGZ AND SHEIT
WE WUZ ASSASSIN’S AND SHEIT
sargons video on the thinkery on this meseum of african history is hillarious.
Wow, I didn’t expect them to include an in game profiler for the settings. Well done!
This reminded me to check for SLI : there is no SLI profile in the latest 388.00 driver.
Good to know before not buying…
Ubisoft explicitly said there wouldn’t be multi-GPU support at launch for this game unfortunately, but that they MAY add it later. I doubt it. The industry in general is giving up on multi-GPU, ever since NVIDIA ditched support for three and four GPU configurations with Pascal.
I’ve always been an SLI person until the past year, when I just got tired of being disappointed when 70% of the games I wanted to play don’t support SLI at all or it takes 2 months from launch to work properly.
I said screw it, when with a 1080 Ti, and I’ve not been disappointed since. Of course, i think 4K is still overshooting for any card right now so I’m staying at 1440p/144Hz. In two or three more GPU generations, when the 1070/1080 equivalents can run 4K at 60/90FPS respectively in most games, then I’ll get a Ti equivalent of the generation to keep over 100 FPS in 4K, but if I can’t keep 90+ FPS, then I’m staying where I’m at resolution wise. I’ve spoiled myself with G-Sync and high framerates.
Unfortunately I can’t be content with only 4k, being accustomed to better for years.
wait… what is that?!
GTX 1080TI–FPS average borders on the 50 FPS??
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3ecb3f4ff0c0e0d15961ea79ef88dd7c8f8179204d02caad33a93c79f20a6472.jpg
In this video AA is set to high. If that means MSAA, then performance will be much better without. Anyway there are already some games that dip below 60fps on 1080ti at 1440p, Quantum Break with upscaling off and ark survival maxed out can dip below 60fps even at 1080p.
can’t u see he has vsync on which means he isn’t going to get more then 60fps,,,,,,
U blind fool!!!!!
He is blind, and dumb too. Heck the guy in the video even says he’s running at around 100 FPS if it wasn’t for Vsync. But it doesn’t matter, the game drops to low 50’s, and that’s in 1440p. Must be because devs focus too much on specific console hardware.
sounds neato
though remember that the 1080TI can output solid 60FPS in witcher 3 4K max setting (including hairworks)
but if it’s 60 FPS solid on ultra wide then it shall suffice.
On my 2GHz 1080ti I cant run witcher 3 maxed out in 4K at rock solid 60fps. I need to turn off HW for that and then it runs 60fps most of the time
hairworks looks beautiful on the animals
though it’s not worth the performance debuffs
Same, pretty much no modern/new game/demanding game can run @ 60 FPS + 4K + Ultra/MAX on one 1080 Ti. We really need a 1180 Ti and then we should be finally be good to go with solid 4K @ 60FPS Ultra.
Hmm well I run 5760×1080 and I can’t play the majority of my games at 60FPS on Ultra. Maybe 4K is different? I have to always disable AA, AF16 and lower shadows and a few other settings and I still get dips. I always have all the latest drivers, OS updates, etc and have a 12 core i7, 1080 Ti, 32 gig ram, SSDs.
For instance Agents of Mayhem, Dishonored 2, The Evil Within 2, Ghost Recon: Wildlands, Watch Dogs 2, Dead Rising 4, Sniper Ghost Warrior 3, Prey 2017, Witcher 3, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and I am sure I could list a bunch of others all can not run at 60 FPS Ultra everything @ 5760×1080 which is less of a pixel count then 4K. Unless mathematically 4K runs better or it is a major culling issue at my rez I can not see how a comp can push more pixels and get better FPS on those games @ 4K.
I have a 4K screen for game dev testing with my own game, on the weekend I will check it out if 4K runs better than 5760×1080 on the games I listed. Now I really want to know! I have never tried 4K rez on my normal games I play. I just assumed more pixels would kill my PC 🙂
Must be something wrong with your system then. What CPU do you have? Might be bottlenecking you a bit. Intels high thread CPU’s generally doesn’t perform as good as their regular 8 thread i7’s.
By the way, turning off anisotropic filtering won’t gain you any performance lol, maybe 15 years ago but not today.
One more note. Wildlands, Watch dogs 2, Witcher 3 (with hairworks), Deus Ex all can’t run at 60 FPS in 4K maxed out on the 1080Ti.
But in Dishonored and Prey you should easily be able to do it.
NOT TRUE, check YT video channels like duderandom84, 4K native is demanding and even on 1080ti. This card can do 4K30fps in every game maxed out, but not 4K60fps. In order to play 4K60fps maxed out you need SLI. There are even games that dips below 60fps even in 1080p and youbwould know that if you would gave 1080ti yourself.
While it’s true that there are a few titles where a single 1080Ti isn’t enough, there are even more titles where I has no problem maxing out games in 4K at or around 60 FPS. But low 50’s at 1440p is quite rare occasion and one will question why is that. It isn’t like the game has groundbraking graphics or anything, to be honest graphics aren’t really impressive for a 2017 triple-A title.
“4K native is demanding and even on 1080ti there are performance problems and some details sacrifices has to be done. In order to play 4K60fps maxed out you need SLI. There are even games that dips below 60fps even in 1080p”
Let me fix that for you:
“4K native is demanding and even on 1080ti there are performance problems in a few games and some details sacrifices has to be done in a few games. In order to play 4K60fps maxed out you need SLI in a few games. There are even games that dips below 60fps even in 1080p in very rare situations”
To be fair, with some graphics settings tweaks (sometimes even little) 1080ti indeed can run most games in 4K60fps. That card is much faster than anything else that’s out there, and even 980GTX is sometimes slower in 1080p max settings, than 1080ti in 4K maxed out 🙂
“Anyway there are already some games that dip below 60fps on 1080ti at 1440p”
Some few badly optimized ones yeah, but not the majority of games.
“I have seen ultra wide 3440×1440 benchmark, max settings on 1080ti with solid 60fps”
Please try and make some research before just assuming things. He was running with Adaptive Quality ON, of course it ran solid. Heck this game runs even worse than Destiny 2’s low 50’s, but that was even in 4K lol. Ironic and sad at the same time since both of those titles are developed prioritizing cheap console hardware first.
Digital foundy have said, that destiny 2 runs good on 1080ti in 4K60, in order to hit solid 60fps they had to lower DOF settings. And BTW. on your 980ti you will see similar performance in AC origins as on XboxX :), but yea, both 980ti and xbox are equally cheap right now.
We’re talking about AC: Origins, not D2 lol. Learn to read?
A cat in a hat gets some blowdryer. Infactomento he went warmer.
See, I can also avoid the topic and respond to people anyway. Like you do 🙂
Interesting self-defense-mechanism of yours, when someone comes along and exposes you 🙂
Max settings is for people who don’t know how to manually optimize.
well i always turn off motion blur and DoF
the rest are essential (except lens flare and other useless effects)
It cant run worse than unity
unity never drops below 60 on my PC on 1440p
I have been saying it for a long time now this is my most anticipated game of the year. I can’t wait to play it this week, I am pre loading it now on my PC.
It’s pretty much Horizon Zero Dawn for the PC but Assassin’s Creed style.
It seems run ok..but its only the prologue. I remember also the FC4 prologue worked fine but once reached the open world things were starting to melt very quicky.
I wouldn’t want to read the same story again…
SO WITH MY 1080 AT 1080P IM GOOD MAXED RIGHT?
It’s UBI, so maybe he’ll be good.
i am also good with my 970 at max settings 1440p at 30+ fps
propably. but framerate will dip at 50 fps and tone down anti aliasing.
Pretty damn impressive actually. Glad they’re keeping up the trend from watch dogs 2. Now to wait for reviews.
Looks good enough. Probly gonna pîck it up
Well Watch Dogs 2 and Wildlands are massively well optimized for the PC as well and also support pretty much everything minus SLI(its not worth it from what I heard).
Ubisoft is a totally different company now I really respect them and actually think they are the best AAA company there is for PC support right now out of the big dogs. I can’t think of any other company, maybe Bethesda but I don’t really think they can compare to Ubisoft. As for CD Projekt RED well they only have three games(GWENT doesn’t count) so you really can’t say they are the number 1 AAA dev shop fort he PC with just three games.
Anyways they deserve massive credit for changing so much over the years and for the good, what other company can say that?
Watch Dogs 2 wasn’t optimized at launch.
Look at this $hit! 100$ for the “full experince” https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/43c36a93ca89446163edd449cc406eec84bec6ab50c211c25c6a7be3c5f7171e.jpg e”
honestly i wouldn’t be interested in this racebait game, but if anyone wants to buy the game
i urge not to support these f**kers.
racebait?
type We Wuz Kings and laugh your a s s off.
When dna studies prove that ancient egyptians were in fact middle eastern.
lol
I laughed. i kinda wish cpy goes back to watchdogs 2 and cracks it with all the dlc, i have never played watch dogs 2 and i propably wont, but, it will be nice to know that the full experiance of that trash game exists without having to intall uplay to get it. I dont even care about money, i can get the game from isthereanydeal where all the deals for games are posted. I just want a message to be sent to ubisoft for selling watchdogs 2 from 2016 at 59.99 and with all the dlc it goes up to 315 bucks.
315 bucks to have the “complete” game.
Really ubisoft?
Ubisoft does not compute logic
they’re basically EA’s little tard brother
oh yeah you f~`ing pirate cu//T die via cancer you f`1king piece of s`1t
Far Cry 2 (2008) looks better…
Not really but it ran okay for its time, unlike this thing.
It ran better than Crysis if I remember correctly, even though its engine was based of off Cryengine 2. The fire system they used was brilliant though. I miss those kind of gameplay elements.
i miss the atmosphere fc2 had.
well…. my old athlon game me bluescreens until i disable one core. Then it run like trash. This was a drm thing, the gog version has no issues.
FOV: 100/115
115 allowed in a console port? Screenshot of gameplay or it’s a lie and they use silly fantasy numbers like id.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2c7fad7a99adfcd84856ac2d43dec9b256313339baa2a3d69b925158a19cd4a0.jpg
Still requires Uplay and as such, I won’t be touching it either.
if it’s optional then why was it cut from the game?
also this game features cancer (lootboxes)
it would be morally corrupt to buy this game with it’s current features
That is the game industry it is not new, this is how it works. In ACO case the core game is so massive there is no need to buy small optional quests / add ons. The DLC is not adding to the world, if you had the game and played it you wouldn’t even think of a DLC or care. The core game is so big it makes the DLC look like a joke and basically = “what ever, who cares”.
As for lootboxes its optional, heck you can even play in offline mode and won’t even have the option to use the store if you want. There is so much loot in the game and loot that you can buy from just completing achievements form Ubisoft games and other means it is pointless for normal gamers. Lootboxes are designed for rich kids and adults that have nothing else to do with their money or have no time.
The day games force you to buy loot boxes as the only means to progress in a game or to equip any gear at all is the day I care. If people are so stupid enough or legitimately value the feature of loot boxes and trust me there are a lot that actually value them then all the power to them. The fact is you can 100% ignore them(and I do) and it is totally separate from the game so who cares.
Do you boycott Zelda Breath of the Wild because it sells DLCs and all the other games as well? No point to single out Ubisoft, better get pitch forks and torches for pretty much every game if that is how you feel. Just saying.
personally i don’t care about zelda because nintendo exclusivity
second while DLC’s are not a huge portion of content and they’re often forgetabble honestly
the fact that Ubisuck cut from the game these missions just to sell them later or make it a “pre-order” bundle makes me sick to the core
this is since 2013 with AC3 the tea dumping mission where if you wanted this important mission you’ed have to cash off 5$ or pre-order
it’s complete bull$hit and companies like Ubisuck don’t deserve a single shekel
to add lootboxes to that, and the overall blackwashing they’ve done to the game
i’ed say it’s not even worth pirating, since even pirating shows that i’m interested in their games
but i’m not, after AC unity i’ve realized the old Ubisoft that once made decent games, is gone
it’s all just repedative crap, DLC, always online, microtransactions and broken promises
hell since 2013 we’ve seen the downgrade and repetition of the Ubisoft formula
personally i wouldn’t shed a single tear if vivandi bought them out
these c u n ts ruined the Might & Magic franchise, call of juarez, Prince of Persia, A$$-creed and many others who’s name are forgotten to time….
and Ubisoft is not alone in this, EA, activision and warner bros (along every other crummy AAA publisher) is doing the exact same thing
but luckliy for us, PC gamers have noticed the sheer lack of value and started pirating again
and now with Denovu gone, maybe publishers realize that we don’t need them, they need us as customers
and that the customer is a king, not a peasant.