Star Wars: Battlefront – Comparison Shot Shows How Close To The Real Thing The Game Came

Star Wars: Battlefront is perhaps the game with the most impressive visuals of 2015. And as you can see below, it did come really close to the real thing. The following image compares the game’s visuals with the actual movie. This comparison alone shows the potential of the Frostbite 3 Engine, and the benefits of Physically Based Rendering and Photogrammetry. Enjoy and kudos to our reader ‘Little_Sebastien’ for sending us the image!

CUz-fHfWUAALL8h

49 thoughts on “Star Wars: Battlefront – Comparison Shot Shows How Close To The Real Thing The Game Came”

    1. you would waste 60$ on a 8hr single player campaign?this game was always meant to be a multiplayer game its from ea..lol

      1. Yes i would,because that would be far more epic.
        Story game > random online crap (which is still fun, but i cant really spend 60 on it)

        Which is why 60$ multiplayer only games are a big no no for me. Titanfall was my only mistake and i wont repeat it. Hell, they could make an awesome story mode for Battlefield too, if they were forced to. If Call of Duty can deliver of that, so can Battlefield or Battlefront. They got the money and time.

        1. agree 100% whenever i see a game that doesn’t have a offline single player option it suddenly goes off my list of games

          1. Same here! Its auto nono for me, and i hope more people are like us, so they would actually make some story mode for the next game!

      2. Yeah I know, was just saying 🙂
        Should have said I like story driven singleplayer games, not just run and shoot..LOL!

          1. i was being sarcastic, there is so much more to them than just “running and shooting”

    1. Indeed. Finally we got an engine that makes me sh*t my pants every time i see pics from the games that use it.. and what kind of games we get? We keep getting boring or mediocre games.

      Battlefield 4, while fun and finally working properly took a very long time after the release to get into a working condition, and no thanks to DICE. The American team patched it up, while the Swedish studio went to make the boring game that almost everyone dislikes. Why cant they support their own baby? Have you seen Blizzard sending Starcraft 2 to some other company to fix it and update it? Of course not! Its crazy.

      Dragon Age I was kind of So/So too. Heres hoping Mass effect 4,Battlefield 5 and Mirrors Edge 2 will be different.

      1. i do. i play the single player campaign and skip the tacked on multiplayer and leave it for casuals like you, kiddo.

  1. Not true hell i do all the time if anything the multiplayer is no fun to me at all. I think the only co-op game i ever somewhat liked was resident evil 5, even that i still like single player more.

  2. too bad the game is re*arded and both the publisher and developer are re*arded as well. but well there must be at least one starwars or NFS or EA related news a day.

  3. Black op3 story mode is kinda different this time….story full of twist and turn until u know what really happened…i found the levels are larger and quite innovative this time

  4. wait a minuet all hyou guys say you waste $60 to play a 8hr single player campaign for a known multiplayer game?.thats winging about multiplayer in a single player game.

    fyi battlefirld 4 and battlefront are multiplayer games.

    1. those games you named both have single player and both have more content than this crap, idiot. shill harder.

      fyi, EA is known to abandon it’s online only games, that means you paid 60$ for nothing.

          1. that would be your mom but she don’t play video games, she is playful but in reality not in virtual space

          2. whet ? if you want to make fun of my language, it’s fine but at least type like a human being

  5. if you have read some of the responses to my posts you will see that quite a few just get the game for its story mode..lol.they just need to get a single player game.

  6. your talking about COD single player being great, lol how can anyone take you seriously.

    COD has the WORST single player, and yes I did play COD2 for the multiplayer, it was the 2nd best COD game, next to the original.

    1. Call of duty (now days) is like the Transformer movies, why do you think million of people watch them while they are not very good? CoD is played for the same reason. While Black Ops 2/ That dog game sucked, the rest of them are pretty solid as far as games go.

      Also whats best or best is subjective. What i think is awesome, you might find horrible.. so yea? Opinions ftw!

      Also people like you (CoD2 for online? really?!?! It was good but Medal of Honor was better for that), that play games for the online probably ruin it for people like me that play games for the singleplayer part. Why do you think they tried to cut the story mode from the last CoD, because they thought everyone only cares about online lol. What a mistake haha!

      Most people i know (i can also read it on the net comments) tend to agree that CoD has some pretty good single player games (CoD1,2,4, World at War,Black Ops 1.. 5 games is a lot) I don’t know if you are living under a rock or something. Enough of this now, happy new year! 😛

      1. huh Medal of Honor? that was like 4 years before COD2? and it was basicly the same team that made MOH:AA (the only good MOH game). COD2 had a great esports community and i have many great memories of CAL matches.

        Single player games should stick to single player and Mult player should stick to multi player, enough of this watered down please everyone/no one BS. No one cired when Quake 3 or Unreal Tournament had no single player.

        PS Transformer movies are pure lowest common denominator trash

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *