Ubisoft has released a new set of screenshots for Far Cry 5. These new screenshots showcase some of the game’s characters, environments, and animals.
Far Cry 5 releases on March 27th and promises to feature the largest customizable weapon and vehicle roster ever in a Far Cry game. Players will also be able to freely explore Hope County’s rivers, lands, and skies.
The game will also take advantage of Rapid Packed Math which will allow a graphics card to execute two math instructions for the price of one, and it will support online co-op right after the first in-game tutorial.
Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Looks gorgeous…….buuut these are bullshots so I’m not surprised
Looks good, Hoping next gen gpu’s will be out around then as well to play it on max.
I found far cry3-4 ran pretty decent.
6870-270xcrosfire-rx480.
Wild lands ran ok , and origins apparently also runs ok . But this is farcry.
Your “optimization issue” did not happen when I played Wildlands. Seeimg as fc3-4 both run pretty decent I think you are just blowing smoke. Wild lands did not run well on my second comp but it is a 1055t with 4gb ram.
You’re also comparing completely different game engines that were created at different times using different bases.. The Dunia Engine, used to make far cry is a very, very heavily modified version of CryEngine1. Ghost Recon and Origins run on AnvilNext 2.0, based on in-house tech.
I believe that the cause of their typically sub-par optimization is harsh deadlines. The development can get really horribly rushed toward the end at Ubisoft. I’m sure the developers mean well, the publishing managers though..
From what I have seen ac:o runs ok.
Not only a next-gen CPU but also a high-end GPU. I guess it’s a good thing they’ve been sh*tting out the same unfinished, boring, copy-pasted SJW infested bullsh*t for the past few years so most people won’t be missing much.
Picture oversharpening is ugly as hell, and the level of detail looks comparable to other ubisoft games. Sorry but I’m not impressed.
Nice, looks good.
“Players will also be able to freely explore Hope County’s rivers, lands, and skies.”
OUR MAP IS HUGE, WE HAVE THE LARGEST MAP IN A FAR CRY YET.
Oh yeah? Whats in it?
OH YOU KNOW TREES AND VALLEYS AND RIVERS AND STUFF.
So its empty?
NAH AH, WE GOT A TON OF INDENTICAL SIDEQUESTS BRAH, NO TOWERS THOUGH.
you will not be able to play this anyway it will be pirate proof via denuvo + vmprotect + always online + steam + uplay
Guaranteed to be using the same engine that uses 1 core at 80%+ usage as well as having worse performance on CPU’s with more cores all while using outdated Directx 11
Looks like Ubi have toned down the “bullshotting” – apart from the edge motion blur, these screen shots look “normal” and not overly touched up. I’m quite looking forward to the game.
Ahhh the good ol’ Far Cry screenshots , totally representative of the final product !
>posting a video of the in-game benchmark
Thanks for proving my point. Yeah I can pretty much get 60 fps on 1080p and high settings with an i5 and a GTX 1060 in the useless in-game benchmark. However in the actual gameplay the fps can drop as low as 40 during combat. Not to mention the annoying micro-stutter.
Sounds like a ” you issue.”
You do realize your point was disproven.
Oh, no doubt. You think people will be on the forms saying they have no issues… nice evidence.
From what I have seen and shown a mid range pc with it running on high gets between 45-60+. Does not scream unoptimized to me.
I know its fun to hate on UBi and EA etc.
I also tried running it on low 2560×1080 and got a solid 75fps (cap).
And you are wrong ” properly play the game at 1080p with constant 60 fps” it’s clearly possible and was demonstrated.
Oh yes, Ubi is taking a cut for each new GPU sold..
Those are bullshots.