Wolfenstein: The Old Blood – PC Performance Analysis

Wolfenstein: The Old Blood, the standalone expansion and prequel to Wolfenstein: The New Order, has been released and it’s time now to see how this game performs on the PC platform. Like its predecessor, Wolfenstein: The Old Blood is powered by id Tech 5, and is plagued by a variety of technical issues due to this really outdated engine.

As always, we used an Intel i7 4930K (turbo boosted at 4.2Ghz) with 8GB RAM, NVIDIA’s GTX690, Windows 8.1 64-bit and the latest WHQL version of the GeForce drivers. Given the fact that the game is powered by id Tech 5, there is no SLI profile and MachineGames has no plans to support either SLI or Crossfire.

Bethesda and MachineGames have listed an i5 as the minimum CPU requirement for this game. And while this may seem awkward, we have to admit that this requirement is valid to a degree. While highly overclocked older quad-core CPUs (like our Q9650 we used to test Wolfenstein: The New Order) will be able to run Wolfenstein: The Old Blood without issues, those with – even modern-day – dual-core CPUs will encounter performance issues. Dual-core CPU owners, do note that you’ll have to enable HT, otherwise the game may detect only two threads and may not start at all.

Wolfenstein The Old Blood CPU Graph

In order to find out whether the game scales well on a variety of CPUs, we simulated a dual-core, a tri-core and a quad-core system. Unfortunately, our simulated dual-core system was unable to deliver a constant 60fps experience. With that particular system, we noticed major frame-rate drops, especially when fighting a large amount of enemies. Once we enabled an additional CPU core, we managed to hit the sweet 60fps spot. The game is currently locked at 60fps, meaning that our simulated tri-core and quad-core systems offered a similar gaming experience to our normal hexa-core system. Still, we have to congratulate MachineGames and id Software since the engine scales well even on twelve treads (Hyper Threading was enabled).

Graphics wise, Wolfenstein: The Old Blood looks average. id Tech 5 is a really old engine, and is plagued by a number of issues. Texture streaming is awful, there are a lot of low-resolution textures used, the megatextures tech has not helped this game at all as there are a lot of repetitive textures, multi-GPUs are not supported, there is no support for a post-AA solution like FXAA or SMAA (thus the game suffers from a lot of aliasing, even when the in-game AA has been used), there are a lot of invisible walls, and environmental destructibility – as well as environmental interactivity – is quite limited.

WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-07 21-00-15-82WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-07 21-00-22-84WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-07 21-00-29-41

Despite its, somehow, disappointing visuals, Wolfenstein: The Old Blood requires a powerful GPU for max settings (especially if you want to increase the AA setting). With the above graphics settings, we were able to run – for the most part – the game with constant 60fps at 1080p. However, we believe that NVIDIA should further optimize its drivers as we’ve noticed a really awkward behaviour with the latest WHQL drivers.

As you can see below, the game appears to be suffering from various Z buffer/cull issues. For example, in the first image there is nothing that could justify such a performance hit, especially when the second image has more stuff rendered on-screen. This makes us believe that NVIDIA’s cards are rendering stuff that are hidden or not visible to the player, something that basically results in a somehow underwhelming performance.

adsdsadasadsdsads

MachineGames offers a nice amount of graphics settings to tweak. As said, a single-GTX680 is able to – more or less – run this game with 60fps at 1080p with – almost – all its bells and whistles. Those with weaker GPUs will be able to adjust the game’s performance and visuals to their likings. And contrary to other games, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is really, really, really small.

All in all, Wolfenstein: The Old Blood performs and looks almost the same as Wolfenstein: The New Order. While this is an undoubtedly great and fun game, it is plagued by technical and performance issues similar to those of pretty much all other games that are powered by the id Tech 5. Developers should simply stop using this engine, plain and simple. A single GTX680 can run this game with 60fps at 1080p, though PC gamers will need at least a quad-core CPU.

Before closing, here is a guide via which you can minimize the game’s awful texture streaming issues.

 

1) Head over to “Users/YOURUSER/AppData/Local”
2) Make a new folder called “MachineGames” (without quotation)
3) Inside that make another folder called “Wolfenstein The Old Blood”
4) Run the game and you’ll notice the game now creates some texture cache files in the folder you just created.

Enjoy!
It will be interesting to see the benefits of id Tech 6 in the new Doom
WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-09 07-21-33-80WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-09 08-22-09-83WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-09 08-37-34-62WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-09 08-49-53-63WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-09 09-20-07-44WolfOldBlood_x64 2015-05-09 09-22-23-47

23 thoughts on “Wolfenstein: The Old Blood – PC Performance Analysis”

  1. It’s crashed a few times on me so far grrr, and the textures not loading quick enough when I turn around, much like Rage did.

  2. The lack of SLI/CF support saddens me with ID Tech 5 engine. What is really sad is the fact that you need a strong GPU since it’s visuals from low/ultra are pretty slim.

    I hope for our sake’s as PC gamer’s this does not continue. Seem’s like ID’s classic franchises are just turning into Console games with very little difference on the PC versions.

    1. Got a bit of an insider scoop about iDTech 6 from one of my friends who works very closely with Nvidia, it will fully support multi-gpus and from what was described to me, it’s very impressive tech, it will also be used in Fallout 4.
      Oh and those rumours about Fallout 4 being at E3 hold some truth :>

      1. Oh yeah and my dad works for Nintendo. Lmao.

        It would make no sense to change engines for fallout 4

        1. You can take my comment however you want. He does a lot of testing and QA for Nvidia, gets very early access to several games and even Nvidia hardware.

    1. When the engine shines it’s amazing – the problem is that there are very few development teams that know how to use it.

  3. yet to buy it. will do in the future

    PS: ppl please be aware that Witcher 3 is leaked on consoles. so spoilers and all that watch out

    1. Geralt dies at the end.

      Just kidding, I haven’t played it. But seriously, I’m pretty sure this is his last game.

      1. Yeah… you’re right… Just checked the old game too… don’t know why I remember that game being more graphically intense…

        But still Love this game too, as long as they let me mow down old school fps style, I am good.

    1. Definitely worse!!!

      And to top that…in first game I had no video&texture issues, and now I can’t play how many there are.

  4. Graphics in this game is junk on max settings,next gen peasant box territory.Gameplay is dumb corridor shooter,just sensless running and shooting.Who even play this kinda games anymore?

  5. No story about leaked Witcher 3? Also, Conan did a ‘Clueless Gamer’ episode on the game xD

    1. It was not the console version. it was a older build of the PC version. And notice they used a wired xbox controller.

  6. I finished this game twice and i would love to go again for a Nazy fest 😀
    Wolfenstein games even though they use that old dusty engine they still make their games to be very interesting and captivating and most important at all FUN //
    I wish their new Wolfenstein games to be on DX 12 and the new Idtech and we have a perfect game 10/10 for PCgamers.

  7. I couldn’t play New Order can use of the weird texture streaming where when I turn too fast I can see it poping in and that annoyed the hell out of me, since this is same engine I take it same story.

  8. yeah I seen the case.. google it. many sites are reporting it was a early build of the PC version.

  9. Was very pleasantly surprised by TNO, and now this.

    Aged engine aside, just really good writing, presentation, and story boarding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *