Resident Evil 4 Remake feature

Resident Evil 4 Remake has been officially announced

Capcom has officially announced Resident Evil 4 Remake during Sony’s State of Play June 2022 event. In order to celebrate this announcement, the company has also released the game’s debut trailer that you can find below.

This trailer features both in-game cut-scenes and some short gameplay sequences. Resident Evil 4 Remake will be using the RE Engine, so this trailer will give you an idea of what you can expect from it.

Capcom plans to release Resident Evil 4 Remake on March 24th, 2023.

Enjoy!

Resident Evil 4 - State of Play June 2022 Announcement Trailer | PS5 Games

50 thoughts on “Resident Evil 4 Remake has been officially announced”

        1. I’m guessing she will not be annoying in the remake. A shame, it is part of her charm being a spoiled brat.

  1. I’m surprised they didn’t race swap Ashley or Leon

    Also, I’m expecting them to milk the crap out of the remake and remaster it for another decade

      1. Carlos was Uruguayan looking in the original RE3

        They made him Mexican looking in the RE3 Remake under the pretense “well he speaks spanish therefore = brown” capcom has gotten severely U.S Americanized.

        1. Sounds like a distinction without a difference, if the new Carlos looks Mexican, then it is one of the more white mexicans featured in their soap operas. But yeah i just figured out they race swapped a minor character that appeared in a DMC anime.

          1. This model looks yellow actually.

            The new Carlos doesn’t look brown either, and not being inspired on Che sounds like a plus, right? Also, Capcom made his classic hairstyle optional also.

          2. Im Argentinian and i hate the Che but Carlos is a communist guerrilla soldier, that’s literally where his military experience comes from, he was made in the 90’s based on Che, and now he looks brown.

            The new Carlos looks brown, dont know why you say he doesn’t , the original Carlos looked Italian-Portuguese.

          3. The original Carlos looked like a low poly ps1 model. Just kidding, being a purist in these remakes is rough, there will always be changes, but somehow only the female models get the spotlight on the purist rage, at least you brought Carlos to the table.

          4. Well this is specially repulsive to me because im Argentinian and im tired of globalized idiotic npc’s from other countries treating all of Spanish Speaking America as if it was Mexico 2.0 , its such a moronic and obnoxious U.S American thing, which i can get if you’re U.S American, but Capcom is supposedly a Japanese company (not like it matters much all things considered….) they shouldn’t be doing this.

            So now all European looking Argentinians, Uruguayans and Brasilians are supposed to just stfu and accept “yeah okay, we are all brown little short mexicans because we speak spanish, thanks capcom :DDD” this boils my blood, “triple a” game…i wish there was a way to make capcom know when i pirate RE3 Remake.

            Im not okay with them changing Jill’s personality, but Jill looked like a germanic woman in the original game and looks like a germanic woman in the remake, same with Leon.

            Carlos looked Latin European, not Native American.

          5. I don’t get the ending of your rant, first you claim he looks mexican, then claims he looks native american?

            “Im not okay with them changing Jill’s personality”

            That’s my main issue with the remakes from RE2 onwards, they changed the personalities of all characters. In the original games they where just people trying to survive, now they are people trying too hard.

          6. He’s Palestinian and you’re Argentinian. The word “white” only referred to The British (minus the Irish) in America. Even if you are 100 percent pure Spanish, there are still many people who don’t consider Spanish people “white”.
            My grandparents think Spanish people are Arabs.

  2. Capcom has not knocked it out of that park with RE in quite some time.

    2R was….. “good”. 3R was hot garbage. 8 was…… well, I think it was s**t myself, but I think the entire “Winters storyline” is s**t.

    Recall Capcom’s leaked memos on wokeness and political correctness, and you have the recipe for the biggest pile polished trash to carry the Resident Evil name in this thing.

    Trailer looks nice graphically, but, I just couldn’t care less about nice graphics these days. High school kids can make nice graphics.

    Problem is, after the effect of the nice graphics wears off in about 15 minutes, what you’re left with? Well, it’s gonna be s**t.

      1. This is needless complaining considering the remake games allow for way more s3x mods and slutty costumes than the classics ever will.

    1. Im sure the “rural” spanish ganados will ask about Leon’s pronouns before attacking him too.

      1. The voice acting in the original is a national treasure, there’s no way the remake can ever come close.

        1. Nothing about the original will be kept if we take the previous remakes as references that took themselves too seriously (when the series started as an homage of b-tier zombie movies). RE4 was basically Commando with zombies, a true classic.
          At least on PC the OG looks great with the HD project mod.

          1. For better or worse, that’s the nature of remakes, it’s not just a graphics facelift, they will adapt pretty much anything to conform to modern tastes and demands. A remaster is basically games like the Crash bandicoot remaster or the RE4 HD mod.

    2. Ashley hardly had s3x appeal in the first game, and capcom being capcom they will always change the clothes and add a classic option. Honestly i do think this is needless complaining considering the remake games allow for way more s3x mods than the classics ever will (and there’s also the option to get classic clothes).

      1. Bullshxt. The official Jill Valentine classic outfit DLC for RE3make replaced her miniskirt with a skort. That right there is the exact same censorship as we see right here with RE4make. Excusing censorship because mods exist is weak sauce, your censorship apologist behaviour is shameful.

        If your free speech ends up getting limited you’ll have gotten what you deserve. Censorship advocates deserve no sympathy.

        1. Saying that design changes is censorship is weak sauce and easily debunked. You could argue they censored the original script just the same, or that they censored the original voice actors, the original OST, also the scenario are not 100 % identical, is that censorship too? Also anyone could argue the men in the franchise got “censored” as well.

          “If your free speech ends up getting limited you’ll have gotten what you deserve. Censorship advocates deserve no sympathy.”

          The irony is that you end up rooting for more censorship when you have a broad view of what censorship is. And everyone wants to shut up someone, so you won’t see me advocating for utopianism or hypocrisy.

          1. We have a clear paper trail of design choices made in A. previous recent RE games and B. quotes about said design choices by the developers that confirm that alterations to female outfits are deliberate censorship. I.e. they aren’t making character designs to appeal to one specific demographic anymore (straight men, in other words).

            “There were a lot of discussions internally about that direction. The original design of Jill Valentine was clearly going for sex appeal, but that was not the right direction. This is a very strong character, and it is a character that’s going through a lot of adversity, so we wanted to home in on that and make sure that there’s a certain level of believability in what she’s wearing, a certain level of practicality.”

            archive(dot)ph/XO4ZC

            The Capcom wokeness company wide game design leaks from 2020:-

            The presentation recommends characters that appeal to a wide range of people, with male and female player characters being treated the same within a video game. Custom characters should be able to have any haircut or facial hair, and various body types.

            Sex appeal, such as bikini costumes or lewd poses and costumes, should be equal between men and women, and serve a purpose in the context of the story. However, costumes cannot appeal to only one kind of user base, such as only one gender.

            Capcom used their own games as examples of this. While a shirtless costume for Street Fighter‘s Ryu was fine, R. Mika’s butt-smashing super move was not. Cases where an armor set in Monster Hunter World shows more skin on the female character was also seen as a bad thing.
            archive(dot)ph/tCthn

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/97399271a1ae7def54751a14ed14c711295f529e58aae27faebe65998ee13e7b.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3a2e07b6f8a58eef70c3c3837d08150bb78d1d897c5b47bfc1f0088614c94bf9.png

            The irony is that you end up rooting for more censorship when you have a broad view of what censorship is. And everyone wants to shut up someone, so you won’t see me advocating for utopianism or hypocrisy.

            Your reading comprehension is poor. I’m not calling for censorship of censorship supporters like yourself. If you end up being stabbed with your own sword, I’m not going to help you nor feel sorry for you. I will actively point and laugh at you however when you get eaten by the monster of your own making.

          2. I know about these documents and real life trends. Look, if there is a power struggle over 2 or more opposing views, eventually you will have to censor one view, so the weak side is s3x appeal and the “modesty” side won. This isn’t the first or last debate however, a lot of things eventually get censored (i.e cut) even a WHOLE GAME (Resident Evil 1.5).

            With all that being said, Capcom still went to make RE8 with plenty of s3x appeal, the classic era could never come close to the amount of pr0n, s3x mods and adult content in general, so at the end of the day, Capcom efforts for “desexualization! are for naught.

            “Your reading comprehension is poor.”

            Says the guy misinterpreting censorship. How about a reality check: Political prisoners, arresting journalists like Assange, banning opposing political parties, colluding with big corporations to silence views or the gov. threatening corporations and citizens if they don’t do business or behave a certain way. Is Rockstar pro-censorship because of whole countries banning Manhunt series, leading then to censor some scenes? A lot of you fail the chicken and egg test.

          3. Dude, your post is a mess to read, sometimes you quote me and i have the impression it was you saying it. With all that being said, I’m gonna try to answer it in any case:

            >>”Ah yup, the good ol’ “censorship is only exists when a government does it” semantics card that censorship apologist bootlickers love to trot out.”

            You quoted my words but forgot to read them, here, let me repeat: “colluding with big corporations to silence views or the gov. threatening corporations and citizens if they don’t do business or behave a certain way.”
            Big corporations help the gov in controlling speech.

            >>”The concept of self-censorship exists, buddy.”

            Of course it exists. The reason you don’t run naked on the street is because you self censor yourself, tough in some places you can get arrested for this form of expression… And that’s really the crux of the argument, Capcom higher ups sell games for western audiences, so they decided to tone down lewdness in females in accordance to what western society wants (and by society i mean people with means and power). That’s how it means to run a business, they are, as a corporation, literal sell outs, not activists for the right of ladies to show skin.

            Ironically, in order to combat self-censorship you need lots of censorship, shaming and threats that goes in the opposite direction. What, you think Capcom execs woke up one day and decided they are feminists out of the void? lmao.

            >>”Iterating on design choices to make a better quality is not censorship.”

            Lol no. That’s the precise definition of what censorship is. Curating things out of the game because some designer tough it was crap is just like, his opinion man. RE fans love 1.5 and are still working to complete that version one day.

            >>”The vampire ladies in RE8? Don’t make he laugh, they’re more or less dressed like some Victorian nuns with a bit of cleavage. The levels of flesh displayed are nothing compared to the likes of Cowgirl Jill from RE Revelations 2, Tribal Sheva from RE5, Pop star Ashley from RE4. Once again I’ll point 3rd party unofficial content, i.e. stuff NOT made by Cr4pcom + stuff not in the games, like FANart and FAN-made MODS don’t count as actual game content. Stop bringing up this t4rded point.”

            They still made her attractive, big breasts and buttocks. And why shoudn’t i bring up mods? If i wanted to mess around with my d!ck and those games i would download third party content (nude mods), not some silly immersion breaking cowgirl custome. If Capcom was genuine about modesty they would encrypt the files and make modding impossible. Again, the lewdest RE games are the ones Capcom decided to make more modest, you should at least appreciate the irony, but that would defeat the purpose of your whining.

            >>”If they released a Manhunt 3 with features missing and/or lower levels of violence/gore than the first two games then Rockstar would’ve self-censored themselves.”

            Dude, they already did that with Manhunt 2, learn some history, threats of censorship made them change some executions AFAIK. Also the fact that they didn’t bothered with a new Manhunt game was probably due to some countries like Australia banning Manhunt 2, which is also a form of self censorship if you think about it.

            >>”They were just asked to remove the deciptions by some activist Karens, they weren’t forced to by government bodies.”

            Who knows the behind the scenes on this stuff? It is my belief that the jewish led US gov uses these SJW types as scapegoat to achieve their goals. Their goals are aligned in any case.

            >>”The old Rockstar from the pre-woke era would’ve seen all of the outrage made by SJW Karens in recent years and parodied the shxt out of them. They were lived up to their name, by having a rock star “IDGAF attitude”.”

            Wrong, and i already proved above. Rockstar self censored, and Capcom also self censored RE5 because of racism. Any company unwilling to make the most taboo offensive game in the west is self censoring in my book.

          4. I know about these documents and real life trends. Look, if there is a power struggle over 2 or more opposing views, eventually you will have to censor one view, so the weak side is s3x appeal and the “modesty” side won. This isn’t the first or last debate however, a lot of things eventually get censored (i.e cut) even a WHOLE GAME (Resident Evil 1.5).

            With all that being said, Capcom still went to make RE8 with plenty of s3x appeal, the classic era could never come close to the amount of p*rn, s3x mods and adult content in general, so at the end of the day, Capcom efforts for “desexualization! are for naught.

            “Your reading comprehension is poor.”

            Says the guy misinterpreting censorship. How about a reality check: Political prisoners, arresting journalists like Assange, banning opposing political parties, colluding with big corporations to silence views or the gov. threatening corporations and citizens if they don’t do business or behave a certain way. Is Rockstar pro-censorship because of whole countries banning Manhunt series, leading then to censor some scenes? A lot of you fail the chicken and egg test.

          5. That’s odd, your latest post i replied to was marked as spam, just letting you know (and before you ask, no, i didn’t report you, if it was still in my feed i would have copy pasted it).

        2. I think a proper definition of censorship in a video game context would be to, for example, ship the game with boob physics and later remove it via patch, or to put in a non sexual perspective to add a feature and later remove it for a political decision. Western companies are WAY worse in this regards, since they remove features later via patches like Obsidian or Rockstar (or add PC features in the case of Total War franchise adding unrealistic female units).

          What companies like Square, Capcom, KT does is to already ship the game with more modest female characters, lack of boob physics so they can make their game west friendly AND cut back on work. If they state in interviews that they will cut back on lewdness, that’s their decision, but stating is censorship does not help, it’s a misdiagnosys of a issue.

  3. Interesting, i didn’t know about Morrison even tough i played all 5 games, because i didn’t watch the anime.

    For RE3R i went with her classic RE1 costume, i disliked way more how they changed their personalities (jill, claire and leon) in the remake, lots of swearing and overacting.

  4. This doesn’t even look like the same game to me but I haven’t played the original in years so I could just not remember.

  5. While people complain about clothes that will be added back as a classic option and plenty of nude or slutty mods in the future, the biggest “censorship” (aka change) is in the character personalities. Now Leon make some vulgar swears, because apparently REmakes need lots of swearing for some reason, and he appears way more emo and less cool than the original, this nu Leon is small time. I guess we will probably not hear Ashley calling Leon a hentai or suplexing zombies, such is life.

    On the bright side, the game appears more atmospheric and horror centered compared to the original.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *