Intel has officially announced its 10th generation CPUs, the Comet Lake-S series. The price and final specifications for all of Intel’s new CPUs are similar to what we shared yesterday. Moreover, Intel has shared, in a bizarre way, the first gaming performance results of its high-end model.
The top high-end model will be the Intel Core i9-10900K model. This CPU will have 10 CPU cores, will support 20 threads, will cost $488 and will can turbo boosted to 5.1Ghz. However, and thanks to the new Intel Thermal Velocity Boost, it can go up to 5.3Ghz.
According to the blue team, the Intel Core i9 10900K is faster than the i9 9900KS and the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X in the majority of its internal benchmarks. However, Intel has not shared any benchmark graphs, which is a bit fishy.
Here is what Intel claimed in its press release.
“PC Gaming Processors Compared: 10th Gen Intel® Core™ i9-10900K, Intel® Core™ i9-9900KS, AMD Ryzen™ 9 3950X. Prices of compared products may differ. Configurations: Graphics: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, Memory: 4x8GB DDR4 (2666, 2933 or 3200 per highest speed of the corresponding processor), Storage: Intel Optane SSD 905P, OS Windows 10 Pro 1909 v720 19H2(RS6). Results: 10th Gen Intel® Core™ i9-10900K scored better on the majority of the 25+ game titles tested.”
Now while Intel did not provide any benchmark graphs, it did share the games that it tested.
Intel has also shared the following slide which is – once again – not what most PC gamers would expect. This slide compares previous generations with the Comet Lake-S series.
Again, no framerate numbers which is kind of alarming. Therefore, it will be interesting to see when the third-party gaming benchmarks will come out.
Stay tuned for more!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
“VS 3 year old PC”
E.g. vs how much improvement you’ve seen since the market became competitive again, despite us being dragged kicking and screaming along the way.
> performance results
Where?
This is the result from INTEL..LOL
“”10th Gen Intel® Core™ i9-10900K scored better on the majority of the 25+ game titles tested.”
That’s all for now says the company.
I have about as much faith in these numbers, as I do in EGS’ viability in the long term. That is to say…. none.
Well I’m still waiting for a reason to upgrade my 6700K as it’s still doing a stellar job at 4k 60hz.
At 4k your CPU have literally zero impact on fps..at that resolution its about GPU power.
Yes I know hence my comment.
This is so cringy wtf? “Average FPS for GTA V on 1080p = High” Intel you’re a joke.
Just Wait for 3’rd party benchmark results from various tech websites. Period. Can’t trust any vendor’s internal benchmark, and claims.
Ya, that 33% improvement in Mount & Blade 2 vs a 9900K seems extremely sketchy, even considering they’re using a 2080 Ti at 1080p High.
EDIT: Yup, typical Intel mistruths at play. Hardware Unboxed discovered they ran the 10900K with its 125W TDP limit, and the 9900K with its 95W TDP limit. For the latter, this is NOT the default configuration most MOBO’s ship with, and if you enforce that TDP limit, boost clocks go down severely.
I’ll link HUB’s 10th gen coverage video, and their 9900K re-review with the 95W limit in place in other comments.
https://youtu.be/Kfq-hWajeH4?t=696
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmAWqyHdebI