INTEL was recently sued for unexpectedly delaying the 7nm process node, and now we have been informed that Intel has also allegedly infringed FinFET patents of the Microelectronics Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The patent review committee recently got an application that accuses Intel of violating patent number 201110240931.5, commonly referred to as FinFET patent, on July 28th.
This report comes from Small Tech News, via @chiakokhua (Twitter). The patent in question dates back to 2011 and it comes from the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The Chinese patent holders are asking for 200 million Yuan, which roughly translates to 28,664,380 USD. Although the lawsuit has not yet come to an end, but if Intel loses this lawsuit, it may face not only the compensation for patent infringement, but also the possibility that their CORE series of processors will be banned in China, or maybe other costs that must be paid if Intel is forced to settle this matter.
Aside from the fact that this patent infringement is a major one for Intel, it is sure that the company will be pursued extensively in court. All of the Intel’s semiconductors use FinFET technology so the violation comes at a very high price, and is big. The FinFET patent involved in this particular case is an ‘invention patent’ related to the FinFET process, and the patent strength of the Institute of microelectronics is very strong in the field of FinFET.
Since 2011, the third generation of core processors based on 22nm process node began to use FinFET process, due to the fact that FinFET is almost the best choice for the global mainstream wafer plants. In the patent infringement lawsuit of the Microelectronics Institute, the core series processor is also highlighted. Like mentioned before, the Institute of microelectronics has claimed injunction and compensation of almost 200 million Yuan. The amount claimed is not high as compared with the $400 million damages awarded in 2018 in another FinFET technology infringement case, the ‘Korean Academy of science and technology’ vs. ‘Samsung infringement’, but the ban in China could be more severe for Intel.
Of course, the possibility of a settlement between Intel and microelectronics cannot be ruled out, but it can be imagined that the settlement also needs a price. In addition to the pending FinFET patent litigation, in October 2019, the Microelectronics Institute also filed two lawsuits with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, accusing the products manufactured and sold based on Intel Core I3 microprocessor infringed its patent right with application No. 201010269260.0 (referred to as MOSFET patent). Among them, the first defendants are Lenovo (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Lenovo) and Beijing Jiayun Huitong Technology Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jiayun Huitong). The other defendants are Intel Corporation, Intel (China) Co., Ltd., Intel China Beijing Branch, Beijing Digital China Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Digital China) and Jingdong. In both these cases, injunctions and costs are required, and the right to claim damages of an unknown amount is reserved.
Dong Lin, patent director of Shenzhen Jiade Intellectual Property Services Co., Ltd., told The Micronet: “From a method point of view, as long as the side wall is formed on the outside of the gate line, and then cut off (electrical isolation) gate line finFET design, will fall into the microelectronics FET patent protection range. “
In July 2020, Intel submitted two requests for invalidation of MOSFET patents to the China Patent Reexamination Board, but so far no progress has been made. According to Dong Lin, the MOSFET patents involved mainly consist of semiconductor planar field-effect transistors, namely MOSFETs. Different from the three-dimensional design of FinFET channel, MOSFET is a two-dimensional design with larger size, which is mostly used in technical process nodes before 32nm.
In recent years, the Institute of microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, has been committed in promoting patent transformation, and has set up a patent transformation agency, ‘Zhongke Intellectual Property Management Service Co., Ltd’. This time, the lawsuit with Intel may not only protect its own intellectual property rights, but also promote the transformation of patents.
Hello, my name is NICK Richardson. I’m an avid PC and tech fan since the good old days of RIVA TNT2, and 3DFX interactive “Voodoo” gaming cards. I love playing mostly First-person shooters, and I’m a die-hard fan of this FPS genre, since the good ‘old Doom and Wolfenstein days.
MUSIC has always been my passion/roots, but I started gaming “casually” when I was young on Nvidia’s GeForce3 series of cards. I’m by no means an avid or a hardcore gamer though, but I just love stuff related to the PC, Games, and technology in general. I’ve been involved with many indie Metal bands worldwide, and have helped them promote their albums in record labels. I’m a very broad-minded down to earth guy. MUSIC is my inner expression, and soul.
Contact: Email
29 million is a fortune for me but it’s really not that much for Intel. Last year alone Intel generated 33.1 billion dollars profit (before paying dividends to investors) on around 72 billion dollars revenue. So 29 million dollars translates to about 1/1,140th of their profit for last year.
I don’t know what it will cost Intel going into the future though.
I imagine Intel is going to be more worried about the continuing market share loss to AMD. It must be embarrassing for Intel.
Also looking at the past year in the stock market Intel’s stock has fallen from a high point of $67 a share to $48 today. While in that same year AMD’s stock has risen from a low point of $28 to $77 today.
Intel is a business which benefits from a LOT from 2-4 year oem deals i bet that profit will drop fast as they have nothing new for 3 years lol WTF is that basically 10 years on 14nm
10 effing years that’s longer then bulldozer on 32nm!!! How long did the NES stay on the market with new games?
Intel trying to make the record as staying on one fabrication process the longest?
When they do actually come around to making something new that will work it better be a good 30-50% better in terms of EVERYTHING compared to their current design as WOW.
Maybe Intel wants Amd to get big so they can do some kind of back room deal with them? Once Amd gets greedy, Intel can make Amd want to keep that money and just do what ram manufactures did in China.
Few years later,AMD buy Intel and monopolize pc processor market
Or nvidia buys intel and things get fiesty.
So Asia is where all these fancy techs get designed. I guess the future flourishes for AMD. With their open source ethos, I always thought they were the good guys.
https://www.icit-digital.org/admin/docs/content/featured/5cc7dc41ac611_164.jpg
Well, you are already red, you are a SOYcialist.
You are a known neonazi(I see your crap on OAG), neonazis are all SOYcialists. It is the basic requirement to be one. Hence you being red already.
There you go, proving my point. Someone who is RED, and has no self-awareness of it. You are, absolutely, the same as the SJWs and the CTRL-Left. How does it feel like being an NPC?
Ahh yes, but whenever China infringes upon US or EU copyright and patents, it somehow manages to get away with it most of the time…
I think the world should stop cutting China the slack.
I think it’s because of China’s government mostly blocking litigation against Chinese businesses. They have Law and Order in China but only if it benefits China.
China’s government
Let’s not forget that part
Oh how ironic. It’s fair game for them to steal patents for decades but scream bloody murder when it happens to them. Not saying Intel (if the accusations hold true) are on the right here, but I just can’t help but laugh at this irony.
“Dong Lin”
That name probably shouldn’t have made me laugh but…
When I read that name it reminded me of something we said as teens “long dong” meaning big d*ck.
Bit of a hypocrisy move from China if you ask me…
Chinese Patents. Rofl that’s a good one