Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 temp

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 will release on October 28th

Activision has announced that Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 will release on October 28th. In addition, the publisher shared the first artwork for this upcoming COD game, which you can find below.

Activision has also hinted that it will present a gameplay trailer on June 8th.

As the game’s description reads:

“Task Force 141 makes its massive return with a global squad of iconic veterans, these Operators include Captain John Price, Simon “Ghost” Riley, John “Soap” MacTavish, Kyle ‘Gaz’ Garrick and introducing Mexican Special Forces Colonel Alejandro Vargas.”

Stay tuned for more!

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 artwork

Artwork Reveal - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II

47 thoughts on “Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 will release on October 28th”

      1. BF isn’t CoD
        Battlefield doesn’t need a campaign and every campaign it had was f*king terrible.
        What it needs is bots

        1. Personally, I think every game should have a single-player/co-op campaign along with a multiplayer components since many people prefer one over the other. A lot of games have executed that really well in the past.

          Just because you don’t see the appeal in one thing doesn’t mean the same sentiment will apply to others. At least allow everyone to have the option to choose because I can tell you the number of times I felt bummed out when yet another multiplayer-only game gets announced. The Mass Effect series wouldn’t have had the same level of success if it weren’t for its strong campaigns. However, the multiplayer feature was a welcome addition in the third game.

          Also, Bad Company’s campaign was well praised. So there has been at least one decent story-driven Battlefield game before. Perhaps the reason why you failed to mention it is because you’re either too young to remember or you have short-term memory.

          1. Why waste time and money on something as mediocre as a railroaded campaign when Battlefield is good as a sandbox game?
            From 1942 to 2142 the games had bot matches and it was great.
            I’d rather that than some sh**ty CoD wannabe campaign, what I don’t find appealing is every game being the same

          2. Why waste time and money on a lacklustre multiplayer only experience? How does making a single player game = being the same thing as anything else? What a simplistic mindset. It’s like those people who compare any open world game to GTA and complain about how they’re all worthless clones, etc. I’m thankful games like Sleeping Dogs exist because it’s a great alternative.

            How about gaming companies should learn to be less incompetent and make stellar experiences that can appeal to those who are only after a certain types of experiences. If they’re capable of spending millions on making flawless cinematic trailers along with additional marketing materials then there’s no excuse why they can’t do the same when it comes to story driven campaigns. Didn’t the first Destiny game spend more on the marketing than the actual game itself? The problem has nothing to do with the games – it’s the overall production team behind it. Even multiplayer-centric franchises like Battlefield are beginning to suffer gravely. And like others have pointed out, ditching the single-player campaign altogether clearly did nothing to prevent the latest iteration from turning into a disaster. So I really don’t get why you’re still defending it.

            People like myself want more than just shooting at bots. We want a thing called a “narrative”; a sense of purpose. Something that can entice us on why we should be playing it in the first place. If playing a game like COD: Warzone and Apex Legends is enough to satisfy your cravings then more power to you. I’m just tired of seeing the lack of decent SP games in this day and age. And again, a lot of it has to do with the lack of decent visionaries working in these companies due to all these modern hiring protocols and publishers investing in the wrong places.

          3. Clearly you have issues. He’s entitled to that opinion as much as I am. And who knows, perhaps his opinion has changed a lot since he made that claim. If storytelling isn’t all that important to you then just play Pong. Why is it so difficult for you to contemplate the idea that everybody has different tastes? You’re either a kid or an adult who still hasn’t fully developed mentally.

          4. I play Pong, I play Tetris as well. If a mediocre linear character driven singleplayer campaign is that important to you, go play CoD or Halo.

      2. yeah the REASON why BF2024 floped is cuz there was no tacked on terrible single player, your lost!

        All the biggest MP games (CSGO, Fortnite, LOL, DOTA2, Valorant, Apex, Overwatch) don’t have any second thought SP mode tacked on, instead they have focused MP development from the start.

        1. The games you mentioned started as MP, COD Started as SP and added MP after.

          Nobody was playing online on the ps2 dude wtf.

          1. COD1 shipped with a full MP mode that was more polished than the SP. To this day I still havent played the SP mode for COD1, but I played the hell out of the MP. COD2 MP is one of the most nostalgic PC MP games of all time, hell there is a still a healthy community of people still playing it to this day/

            The game wasn’t even released for the PS2 dude, wtf. I dont see what the PS2 has to do with it.

          2. CoD 1 and 2 were just average as f*ck Multiplayer games.
            United Offensive, the expansion for CoD1, had wonderful multiplayer though, it was a scaled down Battlefield 1942 but with much better controls and weapons.

        2. Did you just compare free sh”t with a full priced retail game, with paid seasons too?! ?????

          Damn, you just super failed!

      3. You’re confusing battlefield with call of duty. Also, BF2042 didn’t flop because it didn’t have a campaign, It flopped because it was a rushed game.
        From what I can see, it’s mostly pirates (mostly being the keyword here) who play COD for the campaign. COD is an overwhelmingly MP-focused franchise.

      1. You’re confusing battlefield with call of duty. Also, BF2042 didn’t flop because it didn’t have a campaign, It flopped because it was a rushed game.
        From what I can see, it’s mostly pirates (mostly being the keyword here) who play COD for the campaign. COD is an overwhelmingly MP-focused franchise.

  1. lmao.. they got an fpv guy to record a fly by with a bunch of posters plastered on containers in a random shipyard. And I love that they kept the same MW logo and changed the color of the two legs to resemble 2. The level of imagination and depth here are astronomical! GOTY fellas.

  2. Race Swapping Gaz, goddamn I f*king hate these people.
    They want to push their bullsh*t politics and yet are afraid of creating anything ruin and just ruin the old.

  3. Same sh*t different year. Eventually all they will make is warzone sequels. The mainline CoD games are just repeats of the same formula with (sometimes) slightly better visuals.

  4. “…and introducing Mexican Special Forces Colonel Alejandro Vargas.” ????

    Can smell the politically loaded stink from here.

  5. They couldn’t come up with a better name? To distance itself from the 2009 title?
    Like Modern Warfare Cartel or something?
    They already did it with Black Ops Cold War

    1. MW was a 2019 title … so that makes MWII, 3 years in development by Infinity Ward.
      That’s on the longer side, given CoD development tenures.
      What you’re referring to is … rumors were there’d be no CoD in 2023 and CoD’ll move to a bi-annual release schedule (post MS acquisition completion)
      So that makes IW’s next CoD in 2028. 6 years after this year’s MWII

  6. Hope there will be more anti-russian missions just like CoD MW4.
    Thanks for PS4 version, thought this would be next-gen only.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *