Man, I can’t believe it’s been a year since our first poll for our Comment Section Policy. Back in 2017, we decided to give you, our readers, the ability to vote for Comment policy. And as promised, and for the next year, you will once again be able to determine our policy.
This poll will run until Sunday (October 7th) and will end at 21:00 GMT. Do note that in order to minimize any possible spam or attempt to alter the results, we accept only accounts that have commented on five other stories in DSOGaming. Accounts that have been created today or last week are not acceptable. Accounts that have commented on five stories from today are also not acceptable. Duplicate comments are not acceptable. We’ll be also deleting all irrelevant/off-topic comments (so that it’s easier to determine which option has won). Do note that if you don’t choose a number, your comment will be deleted.
This new Comment Section Policy will take effect on October 7th and will last for one year. In 2019 we’ll have a new poll for a new Comment Policy.
Here are all the current available choices:
- Unrestrained Policy: Our readers can comment about anything they want. They can leave political or racist comments, and they can insult other members (who can defend themselves via the Comment section. Moderators are not required to protect them and they can leave all users to fight each other).
- Users can talk about anything other than racist stuff. Personal attacks will not be allowed: Our readers can talk about anything as long as it’s not racist or personal attacks. Moderators are free to delete comments THEY feel are racist or personal attacks. In case such a comment passes under the radar, readers can report the comment in order to bring it to our attention. Moderators can also ban users that keep talking about all those topics.
- Users can talk about anything other than racist or political stuff. Personal attacks will not be allowed: Our readers can talk about anything as long as it’s not racist, political or personal attacks. Moderators are free to delete comments THEY feel are under those categories. In case such a comment passes under the radar, readers can report the comment in order to bring it to our attention. Moderators can also ban users that keep talking about all those topics.
- Only PC-gaming related stuff: Our readers can talk only about PC gaming stuff. As such, they can’t share off-topic videos (such as music videos), talk about the weather, earthquakes or other disasters (like tsunamis for example), talk about history, or talk about all the other aforementioned categories. In case such a comment passes under the radar, readers can report the comment in order to bring it to our attention. Moderators can also ban users that keep talking about all those topics.
UPDATE:
The results are in and you, our readers, have voted for number #1. We had 109 legit comments (as we’ve already said, replies to other comments, off-topic comments or comments not containing a number were deleted) and from them:
69 voted for option #1
15 voted for option #2
11 voted for option #3
14 voted for option #4
It’s crystal clear that most of you want the Unrestrained Policy (hell, the first option would win even if we had added the other three options together).
So for the next year, our Comment Policy will be “Unrestrained”, meaning that in October 2019 we’ll have another poll for our Comment Policy. However, and as we’ve already explained, the word filter will remain as harsh language can get the website into trouble with Google. We’ve explained the situation and since we don’t have enough Patreon backers, we cannot remove it (obviously if we are – ever – funded via Patreon, we will remove it).
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
1 Cause i’m chaotic neutral.
Pathfinder: Kingmaker?
That is what I’ve been recently, yes.
Chaotic good. Also whoever drew amiri seems to have read my preferences on my tinder profile.
Option 1 without a doubt.
I would consider option 2 if it was just about insults and didn’t say that moderators will delete whatever THEY consider racist, but since that’s not an option, I say stay unrestrained.
EDIT: Also there are no objective standards defined for any of the other options, what is “racist”? what is “political”? it’s always entirely the moderator’s opinion so every other option is pretty much carte blanche for the moderators to delete and ban whatever and whoever they want, and I don’t even know who the moderators are so it’s crazy to vote so much control for somebody I have no idea what they think.
Upvoted. Comment competition is closed. You won it. (not being sarcastic).
Oh man those results, this was not a vote, it was a massacre.
Even now, there is hope for man.
im for 1
Option 4.
1. i guess
opt 4
Option 1
Option 2
Reason being that some people have no self control and attack anyone for anything and everything. Personally I don’t care when someone attacks me. I just ignore it and go on. I don’t do hardly anything to offend anyone so people who attack me are usually just social misfits or trolling.
The reason that I do say no to personal attacks is that it turns the comment section into garbage sometimes where you have a couple guys going back and forth at each other over and over and over and it’s just a mess to sort through the comments to find comments that are worth reading. Sometimes half of the comments under an article are people attacking each other. It makes the site look bad also imo.
Option 3. Let them go to other boards for political, racists, attacks, etc garbage
If you wanna cry about not wanting to discuss politics, race or other stuff then whine to developers to stop them from putting in their own political and racial biased agenda into games. Lately it’s been more devs attacking their fans for having a different opinion in general about things.
Thanks for proving my point why we need option 3!
Option 1, altough I am not sure if I can vote.
RPS moderation makes my blood boil. The most smug soy filled moderation (after Kotaku) on the internet.
Option 3, I like this site, but sometimes the comment section is pure cancer.
Cancer, the second leading cause of de*th worldwide, is equal (to you) to some comments you happen to disagree or find offensive…therefore a system of censorship must be implemented…to appease your line of thinking…
-__-
Please grow up will you.
Option 2
But i block them anyway, free speech is good but not at the cost of people behaving like a**holes
Option 3, don’t let the comment section becoming as sh*tty as it is on some other sites
2 is good.. Politics and gaming seems linked now
I’m not sure what the comment section would even look like without the trolls.
So 2.
I just don’t want this place to be like WCCF. Too many trolls posting spam.
Option 1…I don’t need to be coddled. Free speech all around even if it is uncomfortable or unpleasant.
option 1, what would be the difference here and a website like PCgamer. racist stuff are funny.
Option 1 for free speech.
Option 3
2 sounds good. Quick question – if most people vote for some form of moderation, but none of the individual categories out number option 1, are we still stuck with option 1?
That’s how it worked last year. The votes for 2,3 and 4 combined were far, far more than just for 1 which got the most votes of the 4 options . That’s why it’s been anything goes for the last year.
In other words the majority wanted some form of moderation when things get ridiculously crazy here. Even some that voted for 1 complained that John wouldn’t ban certain individuals when it was obvious that they needed to leave..
3.
Can we talk about the quality of articles lately, I feel like the there has been too many click baity headlines and news regarding old or irrelevant games lately and not enough news related to current and upcoming games.
Option 1.
Option 1.
4 again. This is not a forum, just a comment section. Each article has its comment section and the comments should be about the article content anything else is cancer
1. Unrestrained Policy.
Couldn’t we get like a 1.5, where it’s like, the obvious things get dealt with, at the very least?
I mean, if we have to spend weeks complaining about the next KKW’s endless trolling personal attacks on everyone, that’s a little too much, honestly.
Excellent idea. I would vote for that. That would be the ideal situation.
Just use the block function.
A ruseman of KKW’s caliber (low caliber) can easily adapt to rules about personal attacks. Rusemen know how to make people upset with minimum force.
I do, but KKW in particular made a lot of accounts, so it was a constant re-block affair.
I can’t find a site these days that doesn’t abuse moderation. Option #1 for me.
Give keyboard jockeys “mod” power, and it goes straight to their heads. Don’t turn into a speech filter. This is one of the very few sites left, that I regularly visit, due to this very reason.
I could go on about how many times I’ve seen, and have been, abusively moderated, but I’d be here for the rest of the year.
Only thing that should be filtered, is bona fide spam.
4. i can’t stand trolls and filthy pirates.
Option 1.
Option 1.
if your insulted by retards on the internet you shouldn’t be on the internet
One pls.
Option 1. The block button is your friend if you are easily offended. Thank you for letting us choose, John. Policies like these should always come down to the community and, imo, each individual user.
Unrestrained Policy option number 1 please.
Option 2 easy
I’m still for the 2nd option
I vote for 1.
Libtards who beg for censorship forget why DSO is popular in the first place
as do always i vote for 1: unfiltered PLUS get rid of the godawful comment censorship system
having to write “$hit” or a$$ is really silly
Option 1.
Option 4.
Option 1 If you don’t like what people say either fight back with a better argument or block them. So many other gaming sites have PC mods or are so left leaning it’s hard to visit them anymore. I like that this place is so hands off and treats the people who come here like adults.
option 2.
3, this website has been shown, time and time again that nobody can keep anything to the topic at hand and all it devolves into is personal attacks. If people want to act like children, treat them as such until they actually learn to stop being infants.
The site went downhill since the last voting, nowadays I don’t even scroll down for the comments, since most of them are trash, same people trolling etc, only a handful of people are civilized. Free speech is one thing, but constantly messing around, trolling, fanboying is a different story. Some people are only here to $hittalk EVERYTHING.
Option 1.
Tons of others gaming sites where censorship shadow-banning are used and abused by moderators to the liking of PC normies and SJW millennials…just go there if you don’t like/don’t understand Free Speech.
1.
Option 1. Unrestrained Policy
1 obviously
Option 1
1 Unrestrained Policy
Option 1
Still 1.
Option 2:
It’s option 1 but with trolling and flame-wars edited out. And while I’ll be sad to not see all the flames, I’ll manage. I only have so much time.
Last year i chose 4 but 1 turned out just fine, turns out if you let people say what they want, they get it out of their system and move on.
SO i pick 1 no restrictions.
One
You know the answer John….. 1 .Unrestrained Policy !
I visit this site because you don’t post PC & SJW BS .This site is heading in right direction the reviews are solid and unbiased and you promote indie games too !
I’ll go for 4. Knowing that the winner is number 1.
The fact that 1 is even an option shows how ethically bankrupt this site is.
Ughh.. Need a chainsaw to cut through this irony.
2 i guess
#1
Option 1
Option 1
Option 1
2 sounds good in theory, But people have differences of opinion in what is considered offensive.
There is a fine line between giving sh! t to someone about a poor graphics card choice and teasing them over it in good fun, Compared to PERSONALLY attacking someone about race/sex/religion etc or making threats to them or a family member, Mods would need to be on the ball and see through what is a joke and what is serious, I can’t see that happening without some mistakes.
Need to keep free speech alive, Let us commentors along with you site owners moderate ourselves.
The fact that option 1 is even a choice just shows how much of a trash, bottom of the barrel website this is lol. I’ve always thought the comment section on this website is a cesspool that any intelligent person should stay away from.
I vote for option 1 Unrestrained Policy.
Now that OAG is dead, the world needs more OPTION ONE.
The attack on OAG showed that free speech is under attack when it comes about telling the truth and having an unbiased debate. I doubt the attack was Random, like with Mombot it was most likely done by SJW with malicious intent.
4.
I choose 3…I’m here for gaming news but I like to talk other thing like “that” certain group, console worshipper,pron..etc but not about politics or racist…I read that enough in Twitter,and I’m sick of it…
I Choose 3.
# 2
Option 1
Option 1.
1. Stop trying to be fckn reddit or restera.
Option 1.
option 1
Option 1. But please do moderate images posted. There was one dude that posted these sick and brutal images because there was no moderation.
PB, I thought you would vote for some other better option ? Why choose the first one ?
Just asking.
Mainly it comes down to convenience. Option 1 doesn’t require the mods to do too much and allows the most freedom. Even with extreme or hateful content, the violating user can always be blocked so I see the first option as the most fair.
Okay, fair enough then. No probs. I fully understand your point of view as well.
Option 1
Came here specifically because I was tired of the SJW crap in both the comments and articles of seemingly every other gaming site. Wish I’d switched sooner — it’s been a breath of fresh air. Let free speech reign… It’s an important principle, it’s better to have honest spaces than so-called ‘safe’ ones, and the worst types are allergic to it.
Option 3
option 2 of course , idk why you needed to ask.
Unrestrained Policy. Please and thank you.
Option 1
option 4
Why not include a poll widget like every other site does???
Option 4, i don’t need trash and spam, i need and appreciate mature constructive comments.
1. Unrestrained policy.
What was the result last year? I go with option 1, and plz disable the word filter
Option 2, as long as only actual racism — and not anything leftists don’t like — is addressed.
Fat chance. Addressed a zer as a zebra = feelings hurt = moderated.
Supposedly it’s 1 now but apparently that doesn’t include being able to criticise the website since my other post was deleted.
Option 1, of course.
1. Unrestrained Policy.
1 of course.
BTW wouldn’t be easier to create poll trough google forms rather than counting all comments manually?
4. Please only gaming stuff.
I can’t believe you guys let me get away with some of the things I say. I’m a terrible person but DSOG is obnoxiously tolerant of my nonsense.
Anyways, I like Option 1. If someone is annoying me I can just put them on block/ignore, like I do with almost everyone. If you say something to me and I don’t respond, probably because I have you on ignore. This is the best policy: tolerance through apathy.
Option 2.
I’ve been reading DSOGaming for years, I use to read it every day. However, for quite awhile now the comments have been getting overly toxic and filled with trolls. I’ve ignored it the best I can, but its gotten so bad. If the community of DSOGaming is so toxic, I’m not sure I’ll be as active of a reader here anymore.
Always 3.
1.
Clearly option 1 would be ideal.
It also means the comments section will remain a cesspool of bottom feeding idiocy.
I just came from the Oddessy article and came away feeling bilious after reading comments there for less than a minute.
Fantastic site with some real journalism here, but the comments section is a disease.
My vote’s still option 1, but it’s unfortunate.
TBH, I already know what’s going to be the end result of this voting policy, and I was a bit reluctant to give my opinion as well, but nonetheless here it is.
“Option number 4. Only PC-gaming related stuff.”
# 1 of course
Option 1
For american readers that is just a must (1st amendment and all) and for the Europeans a heaven to remind them/us that freedom of speech ends only where it tramples on the rights/freedoms of others.
Calling someone an asscracker might hurt their precious feefees but it doesnt trample on their freedom to express themselves or defend said feefees. Doxxing someone on the other hand beyond immoral is also illegal i am quite sure just like making threats against physical violence. So option 1 should basically say “Unrestricted within the limits of the law” or “US Constitution 1st Amendment policy”
Option 4
option 1
Let us fight
1.Unrestrained Policy
1, the internet as it should be.
This isn’t a fair ballot, unless votes can be done anonymously, where peer pressure can’t put people off voting, a quick look at the thread below shows what the vote will be.
The so called options are not balanced either, and are clearly designed to make option 1 the only viable choice, forum users are not choosing here the choice is forced on them,
Personal attacks should never be acceptable, you attack the opinion of the person, not the person.making it, but this options only offered with sweeping topic restrictions.
Beyond that, there should be a gaming aspect to the discussions, but not restricted in the extremely narrow limits option 4 sets out.
Gaming covers a wide variety of topics, and that can include all the subjects option 4 automatically excludes.
1 No personal Attacks will be tolerated,
2 Comments should be about the subject under discussion in the original article.
3 No specific subject is banned, as long as the first two rules are followed.
4 Discussions can veer off the original subject as long as it’s still on a gaming topic.
No spurious vote is required, but if any ballot is made
It must be a secret ballot, and votes must only be counted after the voting has ended.
That’s the only way to ensure an untainted result.
option 1
The fact that there is almost never any “sjw” stuff in the comments OR articles, yet people are still using it as justification for option 1, is… really telling about the kind of people on this site. Wish dsog didn’t get this low.
“”.(hell, the first option would win even if we had added the other three options together)..””
——
I don’t get this. It’s a shame you even had such an option to vote in the first place tho..
Let the cancer now spread on DSOG ! *sigh*
15 voted for option #2
11 voted for option #2
Where did number 3 vanish ???
Lol, 11 were for option #3. Now that the vote is over, we’ll also allow discussion in this article.
I dont get why you are here you constantly whine about everything including what john writes you are clearly a troll.
LOL, triggered much after reading my reply ? ! pretty much proves my point.
(obviously if we are – ever – funded via Patreon, we will remove it)
if you actually wanted me to donate, maybe make some REAL f**king articles for once instead pointless “Remakes in Unreal Engine”
seriously, you’re not supposed to ask for Shekels until you reach a level of quality that cannot be replicated elsewhere
Kinda looks like pity begging for SJW money, if you take into account they suggest if you don’t like the policy pay us and you’ll be able to change it.
Feels more like sellouts. i know bills have to be paid but this is why Gamergate fought the journalist because they put greed in front of journalistic integrity.
They already removed 2 of my comments so I’m not planning on using DSOG and most likely this one will also be deleted cause it Criticizes them.
So John went full Olive N*gger?
wow, that’s depressing
i’m hoping that Billy might regain his balls back and continue OAG or at this rate i’m gonna have to write articles every f**king week
the only plus site of DSO that it’s PC centric but it has a $hitload of Spam articles (all the Unreal remakes, old mods, and other clickbait)
2 comments of mine were deleted.
one for commenting to somebody that politics in gaming is something they should blame devs and their agenda for and not people calling them out for it and that they are now a part of gaming.
2nd was a comments when one user
here calling out that since OAG isn’t around anymore there is barely any free speech and me commenting. ”The attack on OAG showed that free speech is under attack”
I think Billy is mulling it over if you ask me, he showed some twitter activity and commented he would have made a great article with his last twitter post.
The problem is we don’t know the extend of the hack and we all seen how dangerous agenda driven people can be as an collective. Sadly with OAG gone there just isn’t a site where you can debate what actually is going on in the gaming industry and we are just shallow bystanders again which sucks.
It was more fun debating with people who saw the problems in gaming industry instead of where everybody plays nice and is ignorant towards everything.
what boggles my mind is the radio silence
his disqus profile isn’t shoah’ed, neither is his tweeter account
at first i thought he was doxxed into submission and tried to sympathize with the radio silence
but later as i tracked down his Linkin and found he’s a f**king american
and there was activity on the OAG twitter (on the fifth of october)
everything just boils down to him giving up
and that’s blackpilling as f**k
William the cuck destroyer has become William the cucked.
I hope he regains his balls back and continues fighting the good fight
for OAG is actually a site i’m WILLING to donate, considering how much time and enjoyment i find with such a lovely, based community (even though 2 years ago everyone was blue-pilled asf about (((them)))
He has no obligation towards us on how conducts his business if he decides to quit it’s of his own choice. simply cause you like what he writes about doesn’t mean he needs to do anything to accommodate us.
How does it even matter if he’s an American how is that even relevant? Aren’t you being a bit too much entitled cause you could just try making a website your self ya know you don’t get to say what Billy has to do.
What comments have they removed? I’ve been on DSO for almost 3 years now and since Unrestrained Policy was enabled, censorship may not be absent, but I feel it’s among the lowest of gaming centric sites comment sections.
While this thread was going on it was deleted.
One was a counter comment to a person complaining about politics in gaming in the very post but seems it got deleted right away. I only called him out for saying if he doesn’t want politic in gaming complain to the Devs and their political biases and injecting their own ideology into their games.
One was.
After some guys a comment about One angry gamer you should know which you up voted it yourself. and it got deleted. If your make a post about what freedoms you want for this year your not allowed to call things out to point out the benefits of free speech itself?
You might say ”since Unrestrained Policy was enabled”
it still would be ridiculous to censor a section asking about what kinda policy it is suppose to uphold.
You should seriously stop lying because it makes you appear like a complete idiot. Disqus has stats, bring evidence that your comment was deleted (after the end of the voting, when we said that this article is open for discussion). If you have been regular here, you’d know that we don’t delete comments. From the moment we said this article is open for discussion, we haven’t deleted anything. Below are the deleted comments (that most of them were deleted by their own users).
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/59913da9085b088228bf8ec1fc5b23b7c87de24e05f61dd4ea7629eb10a598ee.jpg
And I was right. You ARE lying. Your comments were made 5-6 days ago when the article specifically says that all off-topic comments or replies will be deleted.
https://i.imgur.com/pQpn4od.jpg
Also i said while this thread was going on moron not when the new policy was in place or before that so learn to read moron!! while the thread was going on implied when it started if your to stupid to understand that it shows how short sighted you are!!
That why i commented on the n_ice_drone question if it was after or before as that it was a bullshit concept in the first place whether it was before or after. What’s the point of trying to go with a option of free speech but won’t people to argue which option would best suit them.
The sellout option for the Patreon already shows why i wouldn’t support sites like this cause they have a price and are nothing more than Kotaku.
That was pretty much expected…We’ll continue having all kind of scum here commenting and giving opinions they shouldn’t, because they’re uneducated and in addition they’ll even start with insults and bad manners. Cool year ahead.
mmm liberal tears
my favorite
Liberal? Wut?
don’t fret. your comment was not liberal. quickshooter misused the term. You fall under the authoritarian side of the scale. Left or right who knows but authoritarian nonetheless.
That’s why my message was “Liberal? Wut?”
I know that was authoritarian, because it’s the only thing i think suits a website. The internet is a jungle, but we don’t need every website to be one, especially if they only treat one subject.
Well this is at least my opinion – Option 1 won, again, it’s not like i’ll be stop visiting this, i’ll just answer with the same manner, and also talk about other stuff, if that’s what most people wants.
its unfortunate but the term liberal tends to usually describe “progressives” and “post-modernists” at least for Americans. I get your point and sure even myself and other who believe in freedom of speech can find some comments tedious and unnecessary but they are made by real people and real people can be a-holes sometime present company (myself) included.
Yeah it does even here in Italy, or at least i think it does,
Well don’t think i’m a nice guy and all, if you check my history i’m actually one of the biggest a**holes here, but well if it’s allowed, and others use that approach, i think it’s only natural to react the same way, in my case even abuse bad words sometimes. But i know i’d be able to behave if a more strict rule was used, i’d have no problem using civil tones and everything, but the same thing cannot be said from others here.
I don’t know if oxidized is a “liberal” or not but all that matters is that freedom of speech won the day… by a reassuringly overwhelming majority. ?
Expect further bitterness from the vocal minority (Squiffy and SoyNuts, then) who, regardless of how they try to spin it, oppose freedom of speech. We’ve already witnessed one such person characterise freedom of speech as being like “cancer”. Jesus wept. Their tears and tantrums are rather amusing! ?
Hey! I’m not crying…just ranting, but i’m fine with it like i was fine with it last year.
Censor and shut down? This is a website of videogames, more precisely, pc videogames, and that’s the only thing it has to be treated while using manners too.
I’m not actually sure you realize who you’re talking with…There’s literally no game i don’t criticize.
I’m not referring to that, opinions i’m cool with, i’m not cool with many of the people who come out with those opinions, and mainly due to their bad manners.
Oh i don’t care about any opinion, as long as those remain that, and not some kind of law, or rule, because basically, most of the people who visit this website are ignorant turds, that’s what i’m not cool with.
This is still one of the fastest sites for PC games related news even if it has one of the worst comment section.
Agree 100%. Luckily there’s no shortage of gaming sites out there.
But there’s surely shortage of Good gaming sites.
Indeed.
I f*cking love this site, gives hope for humanity 😀
69.
No votes from KIM or Sp4cTr0.
Now I’m wondering if they are one of the mods sock puppets?
Highly doubt it.
More likely agenda driven/fanboy trolls have little to no interest in what the policy of a comment section is as long as they’re free to advertise their drivel.
In fact if you examine closely, none of the 4 options would impede these trolls to continue posting their usual gibberish. So why bother?
This !
Hey, I thought you would rather go for option number 4, but why did you vote for the first ?
I already told you what’s going to be the end result of this voting policy. But, I don’t have any issues with the result though.
But, I think there are many other members who didn’t Vote, and they are also regularly browse DSOG, if I’m not mistaken. ??
The Voting should have been left open for some more time, imo ?
I believe option 2 to be the best of the 4 offered. I listed my reasons in my vote/comment. One reason I forgot to list is because my comments are sometimes (maybe too much) off topic. If voting for number 4 then off topic comments would be subject to deletion too and possible ban for going off topic too much.
Yeah, I knew when I voted that the first option would win but that’s no reason to just go along with the crowd for me when I thought number 2 was better. Anyway, it’s all good. This is still the best of the PC gaming sites imo.
| “”This is still the best of the PC gaming sites imo.”” |
I respectfully disagree on that opinion of yours, to some extent. But don’t get me wrong though, as I’m not saying DSOG isn’t a good gaming website, but I won’t call it the BEST out there.
This is what I honestly think. **punish me, if I’m wrong though, lol**
As of late, many have been complaining about the “quality” of the articles being published here as well.
There have been some articles on indie games, fan remakes and other stuff as well, which weren’t worth publishing, as evident from the negative feedback given by the DSOG readers.
I’m fine with it though. I know JOHN is really doing a great job promoting indie Games, and other Modders, and I have nothing but RESPECT for him. But, he shouldn’t be dropping full Moderation out here.
I can understand the “Unrestrained Policy”, but what about those members who abuse/disrespect JOHN in the comment section ??
We have seen that happen on several occasions. I know criticism is good, but it should be “constructive”. Even I’ve been complaining to JOHN sometimes, but that was out of good intention though.
Also, some mod needs to clean this place at least from the copy/paste SPAM bots, and those gore/obscene pics.
I’ve said this to you before and I still believe it to be true. You would make a very good mod to at least get rid of the spam bot trash. I’ve noticed that you pick up on it far more than anyone else so why not you? You wouldn’t be able to moderate much besides that but still it would be an improvement to at least have the spam gone.
Are you a liberal? I seriously think that only modern liberal will be voting for 2/3 and all the right-wing ‘freedom of speech or no deal’ guys will vote for 1.
KKW has been MIA since long..
Even though i’m 1 man through and through, next year i’ll vote 4, it’s clearly why the website keeps having these stupid votes and why it’s so annoying, so they can get what they want and then forget about policy changes forever.
There’s not really a point to voting in the future except that it gives people a chance to express what they think.
The votes from last year were close between 1 and 4
1 — 46
2 — 18
3 — 14
4 — 39
but this year they aren’t even close. It’s clear that the majority are happy with the way things are.
Russia strikes again! They have rigged this vote in their favor.
Aren’t you taking it more as a case of PTSD? I’m ok with whatever Billy decides to do or what he doesn’t want to do cause up till now he did great reporting unlike any in the gaming industry ever could match, i think your just a bit bitter that he gave up after such a long run. I’m not happy with the conclusion either. but I’m not gonna feel like i need an anwser to the Why question unlike you.
Prayer won’t get you far in this dimension so that was kinda pointless of you.
I take it you expected him to be from Great Britain? Which was my assumption with that added. And spare me you’re Jewspiracy garbage you anti-semitic nutjob! You were gonna redpill the OAG with what? delusions of Jews being behind everything?
”not to mention keeping the torch lit by opening a subverse on voat and writing an editorial each week”
I saw that it made me cringe and laugh at the same time.
The Community was nice, but I’d rather have a more stable person in charge than you, I keep wonder if you actually mean all the jew garbage you spew out or if it’s just for the lulz
There is thin line between Freedom of speech and buying bulk tin foil and preper meals in 50 galon tubs.
For simpletons like quickshooter, life is very simple, no need to think or gather information, no matter what happens its (((them))) behind everything.
He is a typical 16 century village idiot.
you bet your a$$ i mean it
Jews are behind the mass immigration and destruction of the west for decades now
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8d157b56e634a49f2be7a908e1b2cd845ec4f61037ae143a6327a308c556ebbd.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/654bb33678710210bca8233f256454492f55a4c9cbcb1a8805e5724b7c8dc6f7.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a4a3126e7b367f4238a5bb705f3e62f5e58a4a8b824fa292e3747526f7a7f3f3.jpg
do i hate jews? you bet!
do i hate all jews? no.
there are still a few Honest Jews out there like Frame Game Radio which got me to read Mein Kampf
how we solve the Jewish problem? get them out of power
and HANG all the traitors (that’s like 80% of the jewish population living in “goyim” countries)
i know it’s a lot for to understand, being Jew and all.
but come to OAG discussion and i’ll unload some redpill bombs on you that will forever change your optics
if you desire the truth.
I’m not a Jew moron!!! I just think the reason they are on top isn’t a conspiracy but more a genetic thing kinda like I.Q is with race.
Just because you made nothing out of your life doesn’t mean you get to blame others for your failures which is mostly the reason people hate other people because of their race or gender and that this new age political push is just about grabbing power and not about what’s right.
Are you an Arab by any chance? cause that would explain all the hate considering the book of the Cult of Islam teaches them to hate the Jews and would explain your obsession?
>Responds in answer
>three exclamation marks
>denies all said evidence
>thinks i’m a sand-nigger
yep that’s a jew alright
“What darkness fears the most is light. What jews fear the most is exposure.”
?????? ??????, ???? ???? ????
How long has it been since you escaped the insane Asylum? If you give me the number I’ll call them so they can get you.
So in general anybody who disagrees with you is a Jew? what mind shattering logic you got there, My mentally challenged friend.
that’s a nice Goalpost (((Migi)))
it would be a shame… if someoned expose you…
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8a602402ab08d30800ef23c4209e2432544f151f84728ba51112150be7f1b3cc.gif
Hi,
I voted 1, but these kind of choices are unfair, basically its #1 vs #2,#3,#4 combined but they each separate so they have no chance.
Can you please for next year make it so we have only 2 options, then its will be a much closer fight:
1: Unrestricted
2: Video Games only with Moderation [so a mix of 2,3,4]
Then we will have a closer fight and a chance for 2 to win.