EA and DICE have launched a new beta weekend for the new Battlefield game, which we’ll be calling Battlefield 6. Or at least for now. And, as you may have guessed, some new gameplay clips have been leaked online. So, let’s take a look at them, shall we?
In these new gameplay clips, we get to see a helicopter and some jets in action. I believe this is the first time we see air combat. Not that the previous beta builds did not feature it. We are simply now getting more clips, focused on it.
Moreover, we get to see some more of the game’s destruction. There was a really cool gameplay clip in which a tank could completely destroy a house. Sadly, though, EA took that video down. Since I watched it, though, I can tell you that it looked really cool.
Since we are in the middle of June, I think we can safely say that EA will not reveal Battlefield 6 this month. So, we’re most likely looking at a Gamescom 2025 reveal. If this does happen, we might also get an Open Beta in August. Or at least that’s my assumption. As for when the game will come out? From what we know, this new BF game targets a late 2025 or an early 2026 release. So, chances are we may not be able to play it this year. Which is fine by me. A lot of the previous BF games launched with major issues. So, let this time DICE cook.
Battlefield 6 seems to be closer to the atmosphere and art style of BF3. In other words, we are looking at a modern-day BF game. It won’t be a WWI, WWII, or futuristic shooter. Again, this is something that will please a lot of BF fans, as everyone has a soft spot for Battlefield 3. And, after what happened with BF2042, I’m certain a lot of people want to go back to the glorious days of BF.
Since these are leaked gameplay clips, I recommend watching it right away. EA has taken down the previous video. Thus, it will only be a matter of time until they take down this one, too. So, be sure to watch it while you still can.
If you are a Bad Company 2 or old-school BF fan, you will definitely like this video. Finally, we get a BF game with an amazing destruction system. So, I can’t wait to get my hands on it. And yes, this new BF game already looks better than BF 2042. DICE is on the right path.
Enjoy and stay tuned for more!
A view of Destruction (Source – DetcikTTV2)
byu/Old_Doubt5886 inBattlefield
BF6 Environment and Battle Ambience
byu/ThatsJustDom inBattlefield
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
The flying and shooting looks just boring man!
And the styrofoam buildings destruction is just insufferable. It's been 15 years since BC2 and it still looks that bad!
And the rest looks just random…
Yeah, no.
The only interesting thing this game has going for it is map inspired in BF2 (2005) "Strike at Karkand".
yeah there's no weight feel to destruction. No evolution since BF3. DICE should watch clips from Gaza with buildings getting destroyed.
pices of sh*t you are unhuman
pices of s****
WTF dude ?
The game is highly enjoyable; I test it and find it similar to Bad Company 2, which has many resemblances. You will absolutely love it! I mean, compared to the previous Battlefield 2042, you will enjoy it!
The performance was decent for a very early alpha; I can say that Battlefield runs it better than most games in early access or pre-alpha stages.
I reached 120-140 FPS on high settings using a 7800X3D and 4080 at a 3440×1440 resolution.
Alright, let's dive in a little deeper now. Yeah, I get it; I can’t really share anything. It’s fine—they’ll never figure out my identity, and honestly, I’m indifferent. They’ve tricked me too many times; I don’t want people to hand EA money they don’t deserve or to preorder their games.
Let's begin.
– The physics seem fine, but it’s clear they haven't enhanced this destruction; it looks identical to the previous game, with the only change being that you can destroy everything now.
– The gunfight is engaging and rewarding upon a kill.
-The vehicles are fine, the physics seem solid as if they're on the "ground", and you can feel the wheel; I'm not sure how to articulate it, tanks I never got the chance to try it because people constantly spammed it.
-The map was enjoyable; there weren't many spots for sniping (which I dislike), but those who enjoy it will find it unfavorable. The buildings were very close together, making it enjoyable to confront the enemy. I consistently take on the medic role to rescue your backs.
-The classes are precisely in battlefield 4, there's not much else to mention you have the internet to look up
The graphics are average, not particularly good or bad; unfortunately, the engine in use is outdated. Some vegetation appears decent, while certain buildings lack detail. The game doesn't have the same sharpness as 2042, which I dislike in games. Battlefield has always been known for its graphics, and this one is just acceptable.
I prefer smooth gameplay over stunning graphics; I've never encountered this aspect in any Battlefield releases.
There was consistently stuttering or poor optimizations at the start of their releases, but I later realized that the stuttering stemmed from their poor servers.
It took me years to understand that the issues were never with my PC or my friends' PCs, as we always had good ones.
I hope you recognize that my writing might not highlight the best aspects of the game, but I want you to understand how much I enjoy their game; I believe I will take two more tests.
If you lack solid arguments and aren't polite, I will block you; I don't have time for disrespectful individuals.
You mentioned nothing about the guns or movement.
It's what you want, not everyone is keen to hear, can't you notice the movement? Nonetheless, as I stated, there is no beneficial argument.