Cyberpunk 2077 was one of the most anticipated games of 2020, and it’s finally here. Powered by the latest version of the RED Engine, it’s time to benchmark it and see how it performs on the PC platform.
For this PC Performance Analysis, we used an Intel i9 9900K with 16GB of DDR4 at 3600Mhz, AMD’s Radeon RX580 and RX Vega 64, NVIDIA’s RTX 2080Ti and GTX980Ti. We did not test our GTX690 as the game can put to its knees even more powerful GPUs. We also used Windows 10 64-bit, the GeForce driver 460.79 and the Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.1 drivers.
CD Projekt RED has added a lot of graphics settings to tweak. PC gamers can adjust the quality of Textures, Anisotropy, Shadows, Subsurface Scattering, Level of Detail, Ambient Occlusion and more. There are also options for Depth of Field, Chromatic Aberration, Film Grain and Motion Blur. Additionally, you can find a FOV slider, Framerate Limiter, as well as settings for DLSS, Ray Tracing and FidelityFX CAS.
Since the game does not come with any built-in benchmark tool, we used a custom one. For our benchmark purposes, we used the end scene from “The Rescue” mission. During that scene, you can admire the Night City at night and with heavy rain. This is among the heaviest scenes we could find, so it will give you an idea of how the game will run under very demanding scenarios. Also, for our CPU tests, we lowered our resolution to 1280×720 (with DLSS Performance) so we could avoid any GPU bottlenecks.
In order to find out how the game scales on multiple CPU threads, we simulated a dual-core, a quad-core and a hexa-core CPU. Cyberpunk 2077 requires at least a quad-core CPU. Even with Hyper-Threading enabled, our simulated dual-core system could not offer acceptable performance. We’re talking about 4-8fps so yeah, it’s unplayable. Thankfully, the game can run smoothly even on modern-day quad-core systems. Without Hyper-Threading, our quad-core system was able to push a minimum of 57fps and an average of 78fps. We should also note that Cyberpunk 2077 benefits greatly from Hyper-Threading on most CPU configurations. Hell, even our octa-core CPU was able to run the game slightly faster when we enabled HT.
Cyberpunk 2077 can also run with 60fps even on older-generation Intel CPUs. Our Intel i7 4930K was able to push a minimum of 61fps and an average of 78fps at 1080p/Ultra. Yes, this particular CPU basically bottlenecks the RTX2080Ti, but you can get a pretty smooth gaming experience. At 1440p and 4K, the RTX2080Ti was bottlenecking the Intel i7 4930K CPU.
Now while the game can run on a variety of CPUs at Ultra settings, it sure as hell requires very powerful GPUs. At 1080p/Ultra, our GTX980Ti could only provide a “console” experience. In fact, the only GPU that was able to provide a smooth gaming experience (from those we tested) was the RTX2080Ti. We should also note that the game performs great on AMD’s hardware. As you can see, the AMD Radeon RX580 came really close to GTX 980Ti’s performance, and that says a lot.
At 1440p/Ultra, our RTX2080Ti was unable to provide a constant 60fps experience. As for 4K… yeah… good luck running 4K/Ultra without DLSS.
Even though CD Projekt RED has added a lot of graphics options, the game does not scale that well on lower settings. For instance, the performance difference between Ultra and High is only 10%. The performance difference between High and Medium is higher, and is around 30%. Lastly, the performance difference between Medium and Low is 23%.
Graphics-wise, Cyberpunk 2077 is one of the best looking PC games to date. The quality of all object materials is simply unbelievable. Furthermore, the game features a lot of highly detailed characters. Not only that, but CD Projekt RED has also overhauled its lighting system. As a result, Cyberpunk 2077 looks awesome, even without RT. However, and when you also add the amazing Ray Tracing effects, and you get a next-gen visually game. The overall image quality in this game is truly incredible. Still, this does not mean that Cyberpunk 2077 is perfect. We did notice some low-poly objects, and there are noticeable pop-ups for shadows, lights and objects.
In conclusion, Cyberpunk 2077 is a really demanding PC game that justifies its high GPU requirements. The game looks gorgeous (or should I say “breathtaking”) on the PC. PC gamers will at least need a quad-core CPU, and a high-end graphics card. We also did not encounter any crashes, or mouse acceleration/smoothing issues. For NVIDIA users, we also suggest using DLSS 2.0 as its implementation appears to be great.
Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
so many settings, now to find which ones harm performance the most.
Cascaded shadows. Lowering it from High to Med gives a big performance boost. Rest of the settings impact besides SSAO quality and Screen Space Reflection Quality doesn’t impact performance that much.
Possibly some better optimization will roll out in future patches that will help with performance but most of us knew for a while now that the game would be demanding.
This seems to be the best game out there that takes FULL advantage and use of multiple cores and threads.
Impressive!!!
Now they need to just squash out the hundreds of bugs.
I was thinking my game doesn’t have too many bugs in the few hours I’ve played of the prologue, and then I fell through the floor to my death and a car I was supposed to get into went missing, stopping me from continuing the mission. Hopefully more fixes are coming soon.
Im not sure if my computer is good enough to run it. I have a i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 16GB, 970 PRO NVMe M.2, and R9 390x. Anyone know if this will be good enough? (for example I can play Doom 2016 @4k/55 fps)
You need to upgrade your graphics card. Your R9 390X will be too slow even at 1080p.
Darn. Im probably going to have to wait a while. Dont want to spend more than $400 on a video card, otherwise I can just get the PS4 copy of the game. Was just checking userbenchmarks site, card prices are ridiculous.
the ps4 copy of the game runs at 18frames per second lol. I am not even joking. go look on youtube.
You’re GPU is the obvious weak link here. DO NOT upgrade unless you are going to buy a 12-16 GB GPU. I repeat DO NOT buy a 8 GB GPUs for this new generation of gaming you will be wasting your money. Let those 8 GB GPUs stay on the shelves and rot.
You sound crazy saying a 8GB gpu won’t cut it for gaming moving forward. People who are playing at 1080p and 1440p don’t have a use for anything over 8GB.
One of the things that I like about TPU is that W1zzard reports VRAM usage.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/45a2c661eccb28628df8d217e5e69bf9da20008d91527236d7ca25f4132361a5.png
Once you turn on RT you are cutting it pretty close with 8 GB. The thing is that you are not just buying a GPU to meet the needs of today’s games. If you are like a lot of people then you are buying a GPU today to last for 4 years. Games will continue to progressively use more VRAM and require more GPU power so that’s something to consider.
Its ironic saying this on a Cyberpunk post.
Compare 2080Ti vs 3070 on max settings and guess what – 8gb is not enough so the 2080Ti is miles better then 3070.
If you want proof check out HW unboxed videos on cyberpunk.
This game is still a cross-gen titles, in a year you will see even more Vram usage for next-gen only games.
The downvotes from Nvidia fanboys lol
That’s all they do man. I’m not saying anything that is biased here it’s just a simple fact. Those 8GB cards in 2020 are garbage. Unless you plan on playing in 720p ultra, then sure have at it. Other wise, leave them to rot on the shelves where they belong.
Good read.
Btw I will suggest redesigning your charts man, they are super confusing.
And any optimized settings you guys would like to share?
Gotta give this game props for one thing though, it loads fast as hell. This game kids 2-3x as fast as The Witcher 3 ever did. The load times are impressive. It makes me wonder if this game is finally programmed to take advantage of an Nvme. I’m using an Nvme and it’s fast in loading this game. Whatever the case is impressive.
Still takes a few seconds, but just fired up the game after a couple of hours and it loaded the latest save instantly. Certainly a far cry from Witcher 3.
Noticed that too
Loads fast on regular SSD lol
Yeah loads fast.
I’m using and old a$$ HDD and the loads are impressive, indeed.
I did a test installing it on SSD but got no difference whatsoever, so I’ve left it in the HDD, wich has way more space to spare.
I Tested on my Nvme and it took 15 secs load the game. Hearing you say that about an HDD makes me wonder what they did to the engine/game. What I’m about to say will upset the console people but I believe this is what happens when for the first time a game was built for PC & NOT DOWNGRADED to fit on consoles. We finally got what we wanted and I don’t think People even noticed that. I don’t know if any open world game that even loads that fast such detail. So we finally got what the witcher was suppose to be and CDPR for back last for it but I don’t think People even notice, yes I understand it didn’t excuse the bad console performance but I think there is something to think of/consider here.
Indeed!
It’s a game for us, THE MASTER RACE™, but it needs to be finished.
As for the peasants, they can go fvck themselves and stop preordering stuff they don’t know.
Yep, it’s good to see a game that is a mess on consoles instead of PC. Of course, not a good thing that it’s so bad on any platform, but still, after so many bad PC ports, this one is a breath of fresh air.
It feels good when after you got TW3 downgraded for consoles, got multiple crappy ports on PC and console players making fun of the situation then the table turns and we have the peasants complaining because their 200$ 7 years old garbage is unable to run an ambitious game, seriously even with all the negative thoughts i have for this game, i respect CDP for taking the (hard) decision to not downgrade the game
They preordered like the peasants they are, without even questioning these multiple delays and the fact that CDP hinted at issues with the oldgen version, and they never asked for a refunding system for their store so they could fight those practices easily like PC players, so they should just take it as the peasants they are, i will not show any form of solidarity for those morons, especially for the numerous times they laughed at our faces and defended the devs when we had sh*tty ports
It looks great on PC, once again hating on the game doesn’t make it look garbage for that reason, and RDR2 has infinitely less geometric details on the environments and the models than CP, and it lighting is much less dynamic, better stop this peasant RDR2 excuse FFS, all what people can expect on PS4/XB1 is less bugs and more stability
Why are you deforming my words ? I said “ambitious” not “most ambitious” do you even read or you just wait for my replie so you can say what you wanted to say ? I’m not cucking for anyone, i gave it a 5/10 on Metacritic while i gave a 6/10 for RDR2 just to clarifie the situation.
As for the video i don’t even know how people can compare them in such a raw manner, different art styles, different genre, different setting…
A “technical only” comparison will only show that RDR2 has better physics and animations and that’s all, the rest goes for CP, especially with RT lighting, don’t fool yourself
LOL Saying a Rockstar game is inferior graphics or details wise, you just lost that debate instantly. Say all you want about how Rockstar is a sh*t PC publisher but they make what people consider “last gen” games look next gen compared to “next gen” games released years after it. (Remember GTA 5 was a PS3/Xbox 360 game and RDR 2 was a PS4/Xbox1 game while CB2077 is a PS5/Xbox X game)
RDR 2 is the most impressive looking game made to date period.
Instantly lost ? Nah mate maybe the most impressive “Open World” and the debate can still live, but it doesn’t compare graphically to some linear titles like HL Alyx or even TLOU P2 and Star Wars Battlefront II, in fact even Death Stranding surpasses RDR2 in a lot of aspects like textures and models, just look at the rocks on the screens. RDR2 sure is an impressive game though and it has the most impressive physics, art, and overall animations in an Open World to date.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/634aef4d380f77db88f20155805eb5dbfca2f56eb9e45a8b6e4ae06f0c1dd906.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9261c09d4f5a6b0cdd76663b95db9772b066d7f1e2c5e2a37d3d3de9421b8f7a.jpg
Uhh … what is that? comparing textures from 6 feet away to hundreds of meters away??? Is that even on PC? Still, that’s just textures. And if you’re talking about the geometry again. It’s for gameplay reasons that Death Stranding has complex uneven terrains and RDR 2 doesn’t. But in the end, those are just rocks. Nothing special to render. In RDR 2, you have trees in those rocks, snow, plants that interact to whatever you do to it. RDR 2 is more complex than Death Stranding. Compare it to other aspects of RDR 2 and RDR 2 will win overall.
Also, linear games? really? Order number something which was a PS4 game also looked good because it was a rail shooter game 0_0
I just said it surpasses it in “certain” things like textures and models, calm down dude, that’s the problem with you people, you can’t take things specifically you have to go 100% or 0%, that’s not how it works when you’re judging visuals, it’s not like i’m denying that RDR2 has awesome graphics, i’m just pointing at the fact that it doesn’t entirely destroy it competitors when it comes to graphics, and not just graphics to be honest…
And yes linear games have more room to look better due to the fact they have smaller maps and less real time unscripted events, that’s a fact, that’s why Ryse Son of Rome and The Order 1886 look better than any open world game to date
EDIT : Yes it’s on PC and both are my own screens, 1080p Ultra on both games, no MSAA on RDR2
“you can’t take things specifically you have to go 100% or 0%, that’s not how it works when you’re judging visuals” LOL WHUT!? 0_0 . So how do you do it then? look at 1 aspect, in this case texture, and if the other game has better looking texture it is visually superior to the other?
So by your logic, modded Skyrim with 8k/16k texture is more impressive graphics wise than another open world with obviously better graphical fidelity? Dude, your just digging your hole deeper XD. That’s the problem with YOU PEOPLE, your braindead ROFL
One place. Saint Denis
Nope, it’s a matter of pointing and appreciating smaller aspects too instead of just overall visual quality and put credits where credits due (X game has X thing, Y game is not doing well on Y thing etc…)
And sadly once again we can’t just talk like two mature dudes discussing videogames, one must be disrespectful and take it like we were discussing politics or sh*t…
AHAHAHA! I stated that RDR 2 is the most impressive looking game made to date but your counter argument was it’s not because Death Stranding has uneven rocks, just like that dude above, and now you’re retracting it to “appreciating smaller aspects.” Get your arguments straight FFS LOL
Yeah because that’s not the most impressive looking game to date, only the most impressive Open World, just do your homework
Ahahaha! XD
Lol that’s the sound of someone facing the truth, you’re welcome
Pu …. hahahahaha! can’t give a vaild argument so wants to have the last say and declare he won the argument so he can convince himself he won. Eww … plain pathetic *cringe*
Oh yeah, you can reply and have the last say BTW. That way you can sleep at night convincing yourself you won the argument. My gift to you for this coming holidays. You’re welcome 🙂
Because your ret*rded laughter just before was a highly intellectual argument i guess…
“that’s the problem with you people, you can’t take things specifically you have to go 100% or 0%”
Welcome to the Internet with an added dose of ZERO SUM GAMING on DSOG. I know it’s heartbreaking ????? Because they all hate something you can’t have appreciated for certain aspects of that thing.
I used to really love this place, it felt like fresh air when you come from social media comment sections riddled with stupid fanboys and normies kissing the first azz that spawns near them and discuss with real experienced gamers, but it started to go downhill 2 or 3 years ago and now everytime a game has a single SJW element or perhaps something that barely leans left it’s systematically flagged as a bad game, with bad graphics, bad sound design, bad story, bad gameplay, bad art, bad mom, bad cousin, bad everything… And it’s ironic how these people are acting exactly like SJWs, no different opinion allowed, big attention to tiny meaningless details and a narcissistic/nearly psychotic behavior, what a stupid world we live in
yeah i don’t comment here much anymore, ind it to be a waste of my time. You hit the nail on the head by very much. And i quite frankly got tired of seeing the word SJW especially from people that i know for a fact plays ubisoft games. they act like they don’t play but bring up an article about any creed game and they are knee deep in it. Just go to any Assassins creed odyssey article on DSOG showed me just how many of them pre-orders these “SJW” games just to come and then complain. And if there’s one black person in the game or works at the game studio, it’s automatically racial slurs laced everywhere. Just got tired of that Sh*t. This sites comment section has gone to the dogs. I sit and read your comments to these fools back and forth and i just facepalm. I don’t know where you get the patience.
“I see SJW people”… “The Ghost Of SjWs past”… “there are too many god damn SJWs On This Plane”… “The Good The bad and the SJW… “Lock, Stock & SJWs” ?
“waste of my time”
Absolutely, life is short…
I play RDR2, Cyberpunk and Death Stranding on a daily basis, and DS is far more gorgeous looking then any of the other two.
Meh … I also played Death Stranding and even though it does look good, RDR 2 has more complexity in it’s overall graphical fidelity than rendering uneven rocks.
Smoke and lighting are something to considerate as well, but I guess your mind is already set. And I’m quite sure you’ve played only the tutorial of the game (DS), otherwise you would know better.
Ahaha! nice counter argument. If you can even call it that. You’re quite sure, huh? you’re dead wrong LOL. I got to the 2nd map and explored it but got bored of being an LBC delivery guy (Nuke delivery mission but thrown it under water or something). Have you seen RDR 2’s Saint Denis? *smh*
Yep, played RDR2 till the end, and still think DS beat it in terms of graphic (not saying RDR is bad, before you start to scream that into your head).
Anyway, I was just pointing something I see when I play, that’s it and that is, too, the end of this conversation.
“while playing it cannot hold anything near to R* games in sheer depth of the world building & immersion, like gameplay, Art and other aspects it’s no contest”
Of course, everyone knows that mate, do i look like i’m defending the whole game ? I’m strictly defending it graphics, i’m not even defending it art as i hate what they did with clothing and the overall atmosphere.
But let’s be objective for a second please, i played the whole RDR2 (100h+) while i’m just free roaming in CP2077 for less than 3 hours, while i’m pretty sure right now that the game is going to be a huge disappointment especially if you take it as an RPG, i give it kudos for it impressive city, it’s really well done and overall more impressive than the RDR2 world “VISUALLY ONLY” I hope i was clear this time
As usual, i respect your opinion
And that is the hardcore truth. But the hatred is too strong for these A-holes on here. The way I see these guys going off about CP2077, none of them went off like this in a Ubisoft game. We finally got a PC game that’s not downgraded and this is the hate it gets. Next game, will definitely be downdraged to avoid this mess and now we see why companies downgrade. Unlike any garbage Ubisoft puts out this CP2077 graphics justifies the performance hit. I’ve never ever played a game on medium till now and I’m ok with it because in didn’t expect my old a*s Vega 64 to cut it. In 3 years when we get hardware that can actually run this beast we will see. But for now, it’s not an opinion it’s a fact that the game is the most graphically beautiful that’s ever been created. Just too bad about the show Start & the excessive dialogue. THIS IS NOT A SHOOTER! In hard mode you just get one shifted.
Was this without RT and DLSS ? Just palin ol’ simple Ultra without RTX mumbo jumbo ?
Yeap. We had a different article that covered DLSS and Ray Tracing.
first: if you want to disable the damned blurry taa go here: https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Cyberpunk_2077.
second: the game is not demanding if it is giving bad fps compared to the hardware and how it looks.put the game in low preset:looks bad and runs like sh*t. put it on ultra preset: it looks average and runs very bad. the problem is that it is nothing special in terms of visuals. open world my a** for god’s sake even in closed spaces it has low fps. john i don’t know how you think the game looks breathtaking or whatever but i have seen you giving wrong impressions about a game visuals.for example quantum break.
Actually, more and more people start appreciating Quantum Break’s and Assassin’s Creed Unity’s graphics, and we were among the first who said that they were incredible.
I recently saw some video of Unity, and yeah, graphics still hold up well. Also, the lip movement and sync in cutscenes in the game is surprisingly excellent, especially compared to the new AC games, like Valhalla.
Man come on.there are a lot of people on the opposite party.
Quantum Break looks very good mate, it has one of the best (if not the best) rasterized lighting of this generation on PC
Mate i respect your opinion but gotta tell you that i installed this game 4 times after every gpu change and everytime i stopped playing simply because it looks average and runs like crap.
I agree for “runs like crap” though…
I personally never enabled reconstruction, and the game looks obviously miles better without it, i agree for SCC being a better game than QB, but seriously it can compete it with it when it comes to graphics, c’mon…
What specs did you try it on?
1080ti ryzen 1700 32gb ram evo 860 ssd .now please be informed while the setup is not new,it is way more capable than running this at best medium looking crap at 4k. the game engine is older than the setup also. i put it on low to test how it performs and i get 37 fps on closed space. now the low preset looks like sh*t and way worse than the upper presets yet it performed like crap. the max preset is average looking and 11 to 17 fps on closed space. man this is ridiculous. even low presets has serious performance problems.
Did you make that change in the memory_pool_budgets.csv file?
If not, I strongly recommend you to do.
My game was stuttering a little and was never higher than 35fps, after the change, I got 45-50fps and the game is smooth af.
thank god for removing that blurry taa, was driving me insane.
good to be of help. man i don’t understand this recent trend of devs forcing the crappy blurry AA on us.
Good write-up. Nice. For me the game runs very well on my i5 8400 + RTX 2600 GPU: at DLSS’d 1440p with a mix of High and Ultra settings, average framerate somewhere between 50-60fps. I just locked it down to 50Hz (using a custom resolution) and enabled vsync and it is smooth as butter.
game runs great with no RT and ultra, but having severe audio issues , crackling ? with the onboard realtek audio, nothing fixed this so far
Reduce the sound sample to 96Khz from the Windows 10 Sound Settings
https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/107?tab=files&BH=4 this fixed the issue
Beat the game. The graphics and Soundtrack is all the game has going for it. The world lacks any depth. Riddled with bugs. AI is stupid aF. gameplay and driving feels so stiff. Menus are a clusterf##k mess. Played this game on a titan xp, 1440p at ultra and got 45-55fps. Too much of a graphic snob to tone down some settings for higher frames. The game has too much talking/dialog scenes. The hacking parts in the game are annoying and not fun. Game world has nothing to do in it except walk around and look at it. The world is definitely beautiful and has a ton to see. but that is about it. even the police prescense makes no sense. you can be shot through walls. overall… the game feels incomplete and not worth the hype. Can’t see myself playing it ever again. The game is also proof you don’t need Ray Tracing. The game has incredible lighting/shadows all over and it works fine. I think Ray Tracing will be a gimmick until atleast next gen with more powerful cards to actually take advantage of it. But still… it’s not needed.
You BEAT Cyberpunk 2077 already?
OMG… So, it’s that short, huh?
I’m always extremely disappointed when I see people writing “I beat the game” only a few days after the game was released. That says a lot about how shallow it is…
There are some great models, and then there are some mediocre NPCs (that you can easily find in the streets). Generally speaking, they are better than those of Valhalla or Watch Dogs Legion.
Yep some of the models in the main quest are surprisingly good
truth.
It doesn’t work well in screen shots or youtube. Once you max the graphics, RT on phsyco and DLSS quality the graphics are jaw dropping. It adds a lot to immersion.
Get real man. your wrong.
It’s the same with VR. You are not going to appreciate it by simply looking at screen shots or watching videos.
Funny that if someone says it is not looking good,he is supposed to have seen the screenshots only. I played the game at 4k and it is AVERAGE at best. Improve your low standards.
Dont forget to set the res to 4k while you are it.
Seriously, the game DOES have amazing graphics, textures are unbelievable, BUT nothing really works gen-wise to be able to play at acceptable FPS (60ish) while having DLSS off or at the very least on Quality. Having DLSS on balanced and lower, REALLY subtract from the IQuality
How did you manage to run MSI Afterburne’s OSD in the game?I have been trying for 3 days with new and old (clean install) drivers and new and old MSI and nothing.OSD is shown on any other games i run but CB 2077.GTX “2060 GAMING OC 3X 8G”.
Why calling them f4ggots etc. What a lot of frustration you write about a videogame. Videgames are made for entertainment purposses. There are more important things in life. Why such a hate and frustration about …a game? Take a breath meditate or something.
you are describing yourself instead of s_fnx. you have no clue about good graphics and performance at all.
Sure. Enjoy your delusion then. A pity you need others to determine good graphics for you. As i said you have no idea.
“Only people who play cyberpunk at low details can complain about the graphics in this game” you are WRONG man.
Too bad I didn’t read your bullshlt shill wall of text.
Sorry shill, I ain’t clicking in any of these links.
Use this mod to enable psycho settings on your game, it will look awesome! https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/124?tab=description
Obviously, PC MASTER RACE.
Console peasants will not be able to enjoy that 😛
Holy crap … this game is getting more and more disappointing the more I play it. I’ve been discovering more and more details and polish that are not in CP2077 but are in games that are made years ago. This game clearly needs more years of developing time. Floating materials because it was put there without thought, static foliage (shooting or cutting them doesn’t do anything) and many more *sigh*.
This game wins most disappointing game of 2020 0_0
” Besides Control no game has equally good lighting and cyberpunk is OPEN WORLD GAME”
Do you even know about Metro Exodus ? It has the best RT implementation in the games much better than shiny reflection trash in Control, it has Global Illumination and blends in with the game exceptionally well and has high fidelity GFX and a real immersion factor over this game.
Want a true real open world game and fidelity comparison ? RDR2, it crushes this game to oblivion. CDPR tried to become R* just by hype and all b.s and it backfired, people are realizing on Steam and Metacritic.
Cyberpunk’s “open-world” has lots of details and props and stuff, but it’s dead and non-interactive, though.
I didn’t try Metro Exodus, but I’ve seen lots of very old open-world RPGs which offered far better interaction and more interesting quests than Cyberpunk 2077.
lol there are more clothing options than that. Way, way more!
Told you, it’s just the bandwagon effect or whatever they call it.
Even the comments on this page shows that I was right 2 days ago.
The more people play it, the more they’re disappointed.
Some even say “most disappointing game of 2020”.
Wait until the hype dies, and thousands of negative reviews will finally come up. Just give it some time.
It’s too bad, I would have enjoyed such a game, but they messed it in every way possible, and no patches will be able to fix the boring gameplay, unless there’s a miracle like for No Man’s Sky. (although not a game I enjoy, but its fans are very happy satisfied of the recent updates)
If the developers not working on some MASSIVE game-changing updates for Cyberpunk, I hope they’re already working on a new game.
As for me, this one is already forgotten.
What a huge waste…