Last week, Blizzard officially announced Diablo 4. Diablo 4 will have a similar style to Diablo 2, and will be darker and grittier than ever. And while Blizzard has announced only three classes, it appears that two more will be announced in the near future.
This information comes from a leak about Diablo 4 that surfaced on Reddit four whole months ago. That leak got a lot of things right, like the game’s art style, its classes, its combo system and more. As such, it’s really interesting looking back at it (after the game’s official reveal).
Back in July, the leaker claimed that the game will have five classes at launch. These classes are: Paladin, Barbarian, Sorcerer, Amazon and Druid. Therefore, it’s safe to assume that Blizzard will reveal the Paladin and Amazon classes at a later date. Furthermore, the leaker claimed that we’ll be getting the Necromancer after the game’s launch.
What’s also interesting is that Blizzard has more likely cancelled the Diablo 2 Remaster/Remake. Instead of creating a remaster/remake of Diablo 2, Blizzard will focus on making Diablo 4 as close to a Diablo 2 Remaster as possible. This most likely explains the similar art style these two games will be sharing.
As the leaker claimed:
- Blizzard will be treating Diablo IV as a reboot of the franchise. Those who wanted a Diablo II Remake and a brand new Diablo game will be pleased. Basically, it’s a combination of both for the modern era. Best way to think of this is the latest God of War that was released in April for the PlayStation 4 in 2018.
- Diablo II Remake/Remaster was planned, but they later realized that it would be much better to give the franchise a complete reset and put majority of the fans requests into 1 giant package.
Furthermore, the leaker revealed some additional and interesting new information. For instance, a server will be able to host 100 players and players will be able to trade items.
- You can trade items in the game with other players such as gold, basic crafting materials (but not special crafting materials as they are soulbound) and any kind of loot ranging from grey quality and all the way up to rare yellows. Blizzard is not sure yet what to do with Legendary items/weapons yet and if they should be tradeable or not as far as the game’s economy goes due to competitive fairness and end-game systems that have a lot of functionalities with the legendary loot.
Last but not least, Diablo 4 will be a GaaS (game as a service) with regular patches and free content. A beta phase may begin in 2020 and the game may come out in 2021.
As said, take everything you read with a grain of salt. Still, it’s worth reminding you that the leaker was spot on about the initial details of Diablo 4. As such, we are confident about this rumour. Question now is when Blizzard will reveal these new classes.
Stay tuned for more!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
They’re really trying their hardest to make us hate them, I swear.
They’re trying to be as cool as bethesda with the never ending fallout76.
God i swear it’s just mindless.
We would be remiss if we didn’t reward such great efforts by giving them exactly what they’re trying to achieve.
Nah, you just do your best to hate regardless
I dont want d4 to be bad but all this garbage is too much, im so sick of the gaming space being flooded by microtransactions and constant online, when is enough enough? I dont hate just to hate things, i never want a game to be bad
put majority of the fans requests into 1 giant package
Like always online and microtransactions?
I know my favorite thing is playing singleplayer games with a constant internet requirement…
Rehashing the same tired tropes. Poor people never cease to amaze.
tired
That’s ironic.
What kind of person buys for a game and then keeps paying for it?
tired
That’s ironic.
What kind of person buys a game and then keeps paying for it?
i personally dont know anyone that played diablo 2 offline. i mean for a few hours sure but beating the 3 difficulties and the such on it? and that was like what 20 years ago. kinda pointless to focus on offline content today. or do you see a lot of single players game in the top games by revenue?
i personally dont know anyone that played diablo 2 offline
I do.
revenue
Is everything.
yea and for how long did you play it? you beat it on normal after a few hours and never played again just like i said? why didnt either of you bothering answering that part?…
bother
I’ve only ever finished DOOM, Call of Duty (the first one), and WarCraft II (made it all the way to the last map of the expansion). I’m not a valid reference for the point you’re trying to make.
I’d be more concerned about why you’re so upset about innocuous comments about a video game.
because i specifically asked about people finishing the game or at least people that played it a long time 😐
I play ALL Diablo games Offline.
Only the first one because it was something new when it came out and i was teenager we connected with my body using dialup modem to modem and played together.
yea let me guess, you played it on normal, killed diablo maybe and never touched it again (like i said in the original comment)? that not the types of players blizzard is after
There is nothing wrong with microtransactions, as long as it’s not pay to win. Offering skins & visual only content as both microtransactions & ‘grind-your-rear-off’ rewards (giving choices) is not only acceptable, but it offsets the need to sell DLC, or having a monthly fee, while allowing the studio to afford creating free premium content updates regularly.
I would MUCH rather have D2 remastered than D4.
Play Path Of Diablo, much better game than anything Blizzard will make.
PoD is terrible, period.
tell me one thing about d2 that is better than its path of exile counterpart other than pvp (and that is still arguable)
PoE is great but here:
It has P2W elements, Premium Stash Tabs.
It’s unoptimized.
RnG is way worst than any Diablo titles out there combined (map system added tons more).
It’s not playable offline.
Not modable, Item filters and some UI tweaks (like wow) and nothing more.
Comparing it to a 20 years old title is also not fair to D2.
PoE is great but here:
It has P2W elements, Premium Stash Tabs.
It’s unoptimized.
RnG is way worst than any Diablo titles out there combined (map system added tons more).
It’s not playable offline.
Not modable, Item filters and some UI tweaks (like wow) and nothing more.
Comparing it to a 20 years old title is also not fair to D2.
The main reason I never got into PoE.
I guess it’s not as egregious as D3-4 because it’s free to play, but f*ck always-online games.
Oh and it’s owned by Tencent.
whats the name of the otehr game, it was made by some diablo 1 devs, its not F2P
Same. I would also pay full price for it, heck even could go above. Its a game thats really worth it. What other game keeps you playing for 20 years? A few, but NOT that many.
The monkey paw shall grant your wish with an always-online D2 remaster including MTX and censorship.
At this point, i kind of agree..
A true shame about D2. I’d rather replay that with a fresh coat of paint instead of D4.
Diablo 2 is all i need in gaming. Period! Give me that in HD textures and resolution and you can keep DIablo 4 5 6 7 and even 8. Heck, you can keep any video game, cuz Diablo 2 is all me and all of my friends EVER need.
Warcraft 3 is a good addition tho, for the RARE times we get bored of Diablo 2. If this rumor is true, Blizzard are finally dead and gone for us/me.
It was cancelled out of fear. with up to date version of D2. no one will play D3 and D4 anymore. that’s why it was cancelled. by how things are shaping up for D4, it’s better they release it as a F2P game otherwise it’s way too expensive and game will be bare bone until expansions released and new content added.
people that haven’t played D2 lately are saying this. It’s a good game, but it’s an extremely flawed game
Extremely flawed game. As somebody who has close to 15k hours in the game over many many years. Absolutely hilarious to watch people act like it’s not flawed. So flawed that they had to release an expansion to fix the f*cking game. So flawed that mods have strictly been made to fix the game like Path Of Diablo.
No truly good post Baal content beyond Ubers which are OK, runewords that ruined classes beyond repair to the point where it was pointless to use anything else(Enigma I’m looking at you), absolutely pointless stats that people think gave a lot of options(Oh BOY SO MANY OPTIONS, STR till geared, max block for Melee, THAN DUMP EVERYTHING ELSE INTO VIT. Energy? Don’t even think about it, absolutely useless stat), and completely busted farming spots where there is no reason to play any other content if you’re looking for certain items.
I could go on and on about the flaws of the game, because there are many of them. Diablo 2 is an extremely good game, but also very flawed. I’d rather them turn D4 into D2 Remastered by listening to the community and fixing the broken things that existed in D2.
D4 has so much potential to be the best Diablo game should they actually listen to the community, and I don’t care what people say. Diablo 2 remastered will be the same sh*t I’ve played endlessly. They probably will not add a mapping type system into the game like Path Of Exile has if they did it.
Oh great, I can play Diablo 2 in 1440p with QOL changes. How great!
Shut up Meg.
agreed. people that praise d2 as the best arpg is because they either just played the basic campaign on normal (which is like when the game is getting started) or they forgot what the game is since they played it like a decade and a half ago. d2 was great for its time, its just not the case today. the ambience and all that was awesome though and still to this day i think it keeps up but not so much on the gameplay department
I still play the game to this day(playing it right now actually), and with that said the gameplay is good. It’s just not as good as people make it out to be.
Grim Dawn, PoE, and even Diablo 3 have better gameplay that actually feels modern and is far smoother and far more visceral in comparison.
If Blizzard could combine that with the itemization of Diablo 2, the skill system of 2, and make lvl 100 the max level(instead of 99 like in 2). Post 80lvls being difficult to progress so those who actually want the challenge can freely do it we’d have a great game on our hands in Diablo 4.
I’m going to sign up for the Diablo 4 beta when it comes, and I’m giving Blizzard a sh*t ton of feedback on everything. If the game ultimately isn’t that amazing and it seems Blizzard isn’t listening to their hardcore fans and are moving in a terrible direction and not moving in the direction I feel it should be moving towards, I’ll simply push it out from my mind and never play it. I’ll move onto POE 4.0, or maybe Grim Dawn 2 if it ever gets announced.
>people that haven’t played D2 lately are saying this.
Cancelled because of D4, that’s my take and makes sense to me. it’s not a D2 praise.
>It’s a good game
People that haven’t played any games in their entire life are saying this. See ? there are no perfect games.
>extremely flawed game
Of course it was, all video games are flawed, Remember Starcraft ? it beats SC2 in every way but it was flawed, it wasn’t even that good until Broodwar.
Right now we are talking about a game that came out almost 20 years ago, most games even the good ones will be forgotten in a matter of weeks, flawed or whatever, Blizzard didn’t made anything good in past years, do you think D4 is going to beat it ? specially with all these crap transactions live service garbage that they are going to shove in ? at least you can say D2 was good and had a good run, can’t say the same about D3.
Diablo 2 R cancelled sounds to good to be true, it stays pure guys 🙂
I knew this game wasn’t “years away”. Beta 2020. So the release is likely going to be late 2020 or early to mid 2021. Dope.
Nice to hear it’s a reset to the whole franchise. They should have just named it Diablo then though. I’m glad they aren’t remaking Diablo 2 as well. No need for it. The original game is still very much playable. Can’t wait to play it.
I knew this game wasn’t “years away”. Beta 2020. So the release is likely going to be late 2020 or early to mid 2021. Dope.
Nice to hear it’s a reset to the whole franchise. They should have just named it Diablo then though. I’m glad they aren’t remaking Diablo 2 as well. No need for it. The original game is still very much playable. Can’t wait to play it.
yea, really looking forward to it.
i could imagine (hoping) it being a release title for the PS5 and/or Scarlet
Blizzard should just called it as WoD and be done with it.
Really dont care for the always online thing as i am always online when playing ANY game anyways…
It isn’t about now, it’s about when the servers go down. GaaS is a trend that needs to die as fast as possible.
when was the last time you played a game and didn’t have internet connection…
i just dont understand why people are mad about that.
even on the move you can always use celular if you really NEED to game.
yea its a meme at this point. theyre are fine about downloading 80GB games but god forbids its an online game
Imagine defending a system that has 0 benefits for you as a customer. i take a 400GB game playable offline over the best game ever made but always online.
0 benefits? if anything its the opposite, i get no benefits if it were a single player focused game. id probably get more content thanks to all the players that buy cosmetics and keep the games i play alive and with new stuff all the time
Again, Always Online has 0 benefits for you and me, Game can have a strong online components, gets updated frequently and adds tons of content without forcing you to be always online and shove cash shops in you face every minute, Grim Dawn is mostly a single player ARPG better than Diablo 3 and has more content than both D3 and PoE, so it works.
>id probably get more content thanks to all the players that buy cosmetics.
In F2P games sure, it’s free but a 60$ game with paid expansions, that s**t has no place to be there and no, 0% of that revenue will go toward the game having more content and most of the time the content you get in online games is just grind the same stuff over and over.
grim dawn more content that PoE? grim dawn has no end game from what ive read and PoE was always hundreds time more popular. but yea obviously it CAN work theres no reason it shouldnt, but if theres no compelling reason for the devs to include server code on each clients pc and if it makes devs job easier due to coding and security, i see no issue with it.
and of course “where the money is at” its an important thing, i mean as you said i as a customer “shouldnt” care about that, obviously if it were up to me id say hey include both modes and whatever, but thats just being naive and unrealistic. i think theres better things to fight for instead of the always online thing which for most people makes no noticeable difference at all
and as i said earlier, most people that played diablo 2 EXTENSIVELY (heck id say 99% or more) did so online. blizzard and most devs shouldnt waste their time on players that play a dozen of hours and never come back again while the big chunk of players spend hundreds or thousands of hours online on their game. who would you rather cater to? obviously youd say both but this is the real world and compromises need to be made (especially if youre a for profit corporation)
>grim dawn more content that PoE?
Yes, played both more than 1K hour, it has endless dungeons which works better than that awful map system in PoE. thats end game for you. and yes PoE is near twice as popular but again, we don’t have GD’s GOG data and since the game works offline and they are not forced online checks, so the number might be the same.
>if it makes devs job easier due to coding and security, i see no issue with it.
I do, It’s not that, it’s about having control over you and monetization and you have no issue giving that control to them.
>i think theres better things to fight for.
No, it’s game website not ending africa’s hunger problems.
>for most people makes no noticeable difference at all.
You can’t say that, you have no proof, i don’t either. so i can say the same thing, but Most people hated it when MS showed it’s new always online console, the hate was so strong that they backpedaled in just a few days. EA/Ubisoft etc all did this horrible mistake to some of their game and backpedaled.
>(heck id say 99% or more) did so online.
You are wrong, again you have zero proof and playing online isn’t the problem, i play online, i enjoy playing online, but my game should have offline mode.
> who would you rather cater to? obviously youd say both but this is the real world and compromises need to be made.
This is pure nonsense. why the f*ck they should care if i’m online or offline ? they don’t get paid by number of people being online. i bought the game, they made a profit and i enjoyed the product. compare that to be always online and use their servers, me being forced online is not profit, is it ? also why the game can’t have offline mode again ? your game can have offline mode and a good online mode, people mod or play their offline however they want, then they all go to online mode to experience it differently, it’s a choice.
Here is a thing, you are fine by being forced to be always online by the publisher, i am not because it has 0 benefits for me or you. but the game having an offline mode, won’t hurt your experience, does it ? no. so you can do your online thing and i do my offline thing. that is the normal way to do it and by this day there are only a handful of forced online games (why ? because people are hating it), most of them are either died or they are wastelands. and when it becomes a pure wasteland, publisher will pull the plug, you can’t play anymore at all but what will happen to games that have an offline mode ? you still can play or you might even find some fans who are willing to revive it.
Look at Skyrim, it was garbage and buggy, community made it into something nice, they made hundred thousands of mods for it, patches, you name it. you still can enjoy the game however you want, and it’s one of the best selling games out there. look at Fallout 76, it’s already dead, a buggy mess just like Skyrim but the difference is: it never get fixed, there won’t be any mods or unofficial patches, guess what ? it won’t even make 1/1000th of what Skyrim made for them.
> it has endless dungeons
i checked them but they seem rather poor. i mean see the wiki for the boss of one of the endless dungeon https://grimdawn.gamepedia.com/Ragarroth_the_Tormented
barely any text. check the wiki for PoEs bosses and theyre many pages long. now this wont say much i know but it does mention community involvement in the game at least. btw you dont need player numbers just check twitch or reddit or youtube content and youll see how popular the games are.
>it’s about having control over you and monetization and you have no issue giving that control to them.
dude control of what? its a video game. if they can see everything i do and have more info on how players enjoy their game then i can only see that as a good thing. monetizing is how they will hopefully keep the game alive with extra content throughout the years. very few single player games can manage that (only if theyre really popular). obviously its not the right way for most genres but for ARPGs/MMOs type of games it seems quite fitting
>You can’t say that, you have no proof, i don’t either. so i can say the same thing, but Most people hated it when MS showed it’s new always online console
actually i have proof. i see how online-only games are the most popular and profitable games on earth with VERY few exceptions.
and that has NO comparison with an online always DEVICE. that is indeed a horrible idea. i couldnt imagine my pc being always online thatd be the worst thing ever
>your game can have offline mode and a good online mode, people mod or play their offline however they want, then they all go to online mode to experience it differently, it’s a choice.
yea i agree, but again, but how big of a cost will this have on the production of the game? i know its quite a different beast to host a server than to be just another player on it.
not to mention giving more info to potential cheaters / hackers / exploiters. but yea modding. thats one thing i agree with you, it completely takes that away and it sucks. my best experience of diablo 2 was actually a fairly popular mod (median XL) which i loved it and i thought it put the original diablo 2 to shame.
>Look at Skyrim, it was garbage and buggy..
yea i agree. as i said mods are the price to pay for this. but these are MP focused games so its not THAT bad. i mean MMOs never get mods (or hardly ever) because that will just fragment the community more. no idea about fallout (never touched the series) but obviously theres cases which implementing always online doesnt make sense (like starcraft 2)
as with most things, always online is useful on some places and hurtful on others. im just surprised by the amount of hate it gets here so i play devils advocate and try to defend it
btw i play mostly single player games. like in the last 5 years only MP games ive played was a tiny bit of WoW, PoE and league of legends with friends from time to time. ive yet to play any always online game other than PoE so maybe thats why i dont hate it too much
have a good one
>seem rather poor.
Because it is, like most endless maps/dungeons it’s just endless of the same thing, being more talked about also doesn’t mean it’s more successful, PoE is a F2P always online game, of course they are more social stuff attached to it, and it is also a good game for the most part.
>players enjoy their game then i can only see that as a good thing.
It’s not, they usually see how you enjoy the game, what aspect is more enjoyable then this is where monetization will comes into play, this is where selling/stealing data comes into play.
>Monetizing is how they will hopefully keep the game alive.
This is how they keep making unlimited cash and when it’s become normal then this is where all their focus will spent. Selling the game will make them enough money/revenue so they can support the game years to come, cutting the stuff that was supposed to be in the game and selling them in cash shops is greedy and anti consumer. specially in an ARPG when the most thing you see on the screen is your character, and fashion play a big role in that.
>very few single player games can manage that.
And fewer online games. most of them die regardless of their greed. hell some die because of that.
>actually i have proof. i see how online-only games are the most popular and profitable games on earth with VERY few exceptions. i see how online-only games are the most popular and profitable games on earth.
That’s not a solid proof, you get data about online only games, the same data can’t be gathered for single player games because people are not connected to a server all the time. and they are only a handful of profitable online games, most of them are popular in China and Korea. DFO is an example, it’s number one, but it’s a graveyard in the west, only popular in east asia.
>how big of a cost will this have on the production of the game?
Compared to their marketing budget, nothing. it’s just the same thing but offline. look at Diablo 3, did it cost them money to do that on consoles ? no your private season must be yours and accessible offline, the game do that but not on PC. see ? it’s not because they are trying to make the game better or for support or keep things alive, Pure control, what does that mean ? well a simple useful FOV Mod will get you banned in Diablo 3, if it had an offline mode, well F blizzard and their ban hammer, i do my mods hell so much potential annihilated by it’s being always online and under the publisher’s control. this way when the sequel comes they will put D3 on life support, so they can sell the next one and community are either forced to quit or buy the new one. same thing they do with Division and Destiny.
>but these are MP focused games so its not THAT bad.
Yeah i play MMOs, they are not that bad but when my single player game and a game with single player history which is not an MMO, forced to be an always online thing, there is a problem.
>as with most things, always online is useful on some places and hurtful on others.
I agree, they are good online only games and good single player games out there.
Have a nice life.
Ok boomer. Imagine still acting like a petulant entitled child about always online in 2019.
entitled? im saying certain genres of games cater way more towards the multiplayer side of things and thats also where the moneys at
>thats also where the moneys at.
Ah, so as a customer you care about where the money is at instead of where are your benefits. thats why publishers and their practices becomes more predatory each day.
Also that f**cking re*ard was just replaying to me, and called me entitled not you.
OK Coomer, imagine putting every publisher’s d**ks in your mouth while at the same time getting f**ked in a** in 2019 and defend such thing, oh wait you don’t need to imagine that, you just had that experience a moment ago.
Well they are Androids, thats what they do 😀
But Blizzard, Sony, Bethesda have the worst fan base ever existed. go to Fallout 76 subs, that s**t is broken beyond repair, it’s P2W, it has sub fee, yet people defend it and even some of the fans that helping the game to get fixed are now getting banned, Next Elder Scrolls ? shut up and take my money. that’s the state of gaming.
They are right thou, if its cheaper for them to pay for a subscription and they happy its their right.
I pay for MS pass and its awesome value, to the point that i want to get EA pass and and uplay pass, all 3 together cost less then ONE game a month and you get hundreds of games to play.
I seriously hope Sony adds such option for PS5, not some streaming but downloading.
I’m sorry if you’re too dumb to see this, but the issue isn’t about having an online connection. The issue is wanting to play this game when Bliz-Act decides it’s not worth it to keep the servers up anymore. And then the game you have can NEVER BE PLAYED again.
And don’t give me excuse like “Do you really play games that are 10+ years old?” people still play Diablo 2 today and it’s 20 years old! Battle.net still works, but if didn’t then they could still play solo or via direct connect.
Even the argument that OS support won’t be around forever, you can still do virtual machines, or even build an other PC with that OS to play. But if the server that runs the game and delivers mob spawns and content goes dead then good luck playing that game ever again. Your only hope is somebody creating a custom private server and that requires an extremely high amount of work, technical knowledge and often can never be replicated perfectly.
This is why people b*tch and moan about Game as Cancer Service, it’s there for the sake of being a glorified copy protection and provides 0 benefit to the player.
>when was the last time you played a game and didn’t have internet connection.
Like always, all the time ?
>i just dont understand why people are mad about that.
Of course you don’t, mindless drones designed to consume more and more, they don’t ask questions, they don’t think.
>even on the move you can always use celular if you really NEED to game.
Can you play Marvel Heroes ? How about Spore ? Age of Empires Online ? just last year more than 20 games got shut down. let us don’t mention mobile gaming, games gets shut down left and right there.
He has a point thou, when my PC boots i have internet, all the time. After DSL/CABLE became a thing maybe 20 years ago i have always on connection.
Only during dial-up era im the 90s I connected when needed, also it cost a lot per minute, now i have 500MBps cable and pay per month, so why should i disconnect my internet?
>when my PC boots i have internet.
All of us do.
>why should i disconnect my internet?
He didn’t have a point, that’s not even a point. Just because we have internet doesn’t mean all games must be “ALWAYS” online. that has nothing to do with our internet. also sometimes internet might be down, most of the times game servers are all f*cked up, and always they pull the plug after some time, in all cases, you will lose your access to the game you paid for, for no reason at all.
Tell me, what are the benefits ? what will you gain by being forced to be online in order to play a game ? specially single player games or games with single player components ?
You just told him that you play games with Internet disconnected.
Diablo is not a SP game, personally i prefer offline SP games but if its not then whatever, i just disable online like in Diablo 3 or dark souls when i want to play by myself
Diablo is a Singleplayer game, Diablo 3 is also single player but with forced online on PC. You can’t just disable online in D3, you can create a private game, 1 second of disconnect means you will get kicked from the game, in DS sure, you can disable it, you can do it offline or however you pleased.
noone plays that sh*t anymore. how can you even have time to play older games with at least 10 new games coming out every damn month.
at some point it is time to let go.
and if you really want to play older games there are always mods that let you play offline in some way.
That was not my question, you paid 60$ for a game that you can’t play anymore. s*it or gold, they stole your money, if someone steals your car, and it’s a 2013 model of a really good car, will you let it go ?
People aren’t really mad. Blizzard became a target for political reasons, and now trolls are attacking & picking apart every little aspect of Blizzard. If it were offline, everyone would be complaining about the lack of a rich & deep multiplayer system.
Antonio Brown, is that you?
Nobody cares Blizzard is dead.
I really hope they make a D2 remaster in the near future. The always online part of D4 killed the hype for me.
Why 3 was exactly the same?
oh you think a Diablo 2 remake wouldn’t be always online? lol
Excellent, better idea to dedicate all resources for D4.
I don’t mind always online at this point it’s so common, but I don’t want to have to quest/play with random people on the same server that I haven’t chosen to party with. I will always prefer private game worlds for Diablo.
You sound like an old man screaming at the clouds. Everything is online now. Literally everything. You either accept it or get left behind.
Turns out, always online never stopped any real amount of fans. Just because you want something doesn’t mean you speak for everyone
Welp, guess I’m done with Blizzard then. D2 Remaster was the only thing I’d been waiting for.
Zero hype for this, Bli$$ard burned all the goodwill I had for them with D3 and the greed they displayed in all these years.
Sad. Blizzard absolutely nailed cosmetics in Diablo 3, one of the few things they did very well in that game.
To hear they’re doing microtransactions for cosmetics in D4 is like… multiple giant steps backward. I’d rather go back to D1 days when your character only had three looks, instead of having to pay or grind a ton for new looks.
“And while Blizzard has announced only three classes, it appears that two more will be announced in the near future”
You mean SOLD one by one as overpriced DLCs, right?