NVIDIA GeForce GTX980Ti Teased With New Images From EVGA & ASUS

NVIDIA will reveal its new graphics card, the GeForce 980Ti, at this year’s Computex event, and both EVGA and ASUS have teased this new GPU with the following images.

EVGA will offer six models based on this new GPU. These are: Normal, Superclocked, Superclocked with ACX2.0+, Superclocked+ with ACX2.0+ and Backplate, Classified Edition and HydroCopper Edition.

According to the latest reports, the GeForce GTX 980Ti will be slightly slower than the Titan-X, will come with 6GB of DDR5, will pack 176 Texture units, 96 ROPs and a 384-bit interface.

Its price is rumoured to be around $799, though we hope that NVIDIA will surprise everyone by announcing a lower price for this new high-end GPU.

Enjoy the images and stay tuned for more!

41 thoughts on “NVIDIA GeForce GTX980Ti Teased With New Images From EVGA & ASUS”

  1. With a market share of only 24% no they aren’t. They are furiously trying to get the 300 series out and hope people are happy with rebranded cards

      1. Yes but AMD’s only releasing one new GPU right now. The AMD Fury GPU. All the other GPUs are rebrands. They need to make something new. The R9 300 series are R9 200 rebrands which in turn are HD 7000 series and the 7000 series are 2012 GPUs. That’s really bad on AMDs part honestly.

        1. We still don’t know for sure. This has all been deducted not from AMD but from a driver update if I recall correctly.

  2. Wish I could say I’m surprised but I’m not. Wish I could say I’m not bored but I am. Let’s just hurry up and get this show over with.

  3. Too bad majority of games are dumbed down downgraded thanks to the lying and politically correctness of game developers who lie to pc gamers and don’t even fully utilize those graphics cards in the way it was meant to be utilized..so in short I don’t see a reason to get new gpu if games downgraded and run fine in a 770 or somethig…Only few of games completely utilize those graphic cards

    1. This post is pure non sense.

      Get back to me when you’re running 60fps at 2560X1440 or 3440×1440 resolution on a single GTX 770. Yeah, good luck.

      People are running 4K now. At these resolutions, it takes multiple GPUs in order to push that many pixels.

      These top end cards aren’t for people running a single 1080P monitor.

        1. Hence the reason why I said…. “These top end cards aren’t for people running a single 1080P monitor.”

      1. So that’s it the only reason for a higher-end GPU now a days is for AA or higher resolutions screw that. I would prefer better looking games not just more pixels. Running on a 1440P 144hz monitor to.

      2. re-evaluate your none sense post and your thinking again, once you realize those games ( except for some) about don’t FULLY utilize a graphic card and simply games are downgraded and tailored for console you will be kindly delete your none sense comment, if you don’t realize this then you clearly have no idea about how superior PC is to console and how much developers don’t utilize full potential of a PC and those graphic cards. Ya sure I can run console tailored game on PC also on 1440p on my 980, I can run GTA5 on 1440.. but these game are not built ground op for PC tech unless you believed those BS political correct developers then don’t even bother responding.

        1. Totally agree. New gamers don’t understand that playing higher res Console ports PC =/= PC Gaming.

          PC Gaming was best in every area back in the day. First game to use full voice acting, first games to force people to upgrade to CD Roms, First games to bring Storyline in First person Shooters, First Games to push Artificial Intelligence by taking advantage of powerful CPUs and so on were all born on PCs. Now we have to wait for next baby step after every 7 years.

          1. Do you guys remember when every time a new games come out and we couldn’t even run it on our voodoo or gforce graphic card on 720p resolution or below, then we quickly needed a better graphic card to maximize the settings we waited anxiously for new card from ATI or Nvidia or Voodoo to be able to maximize it during those periods games were developed for PC only.. man those were the awesome days of buying new graphic card just to maximize its tech and capabilities.. the awesome 90s!

    2. Don’t worry man, there will be unoptimized Ubisoft ports that will force you to upgrade… JK

      No, seriously man, I agree. However upcoming games like Total War: Warhammer, Unreal Tournament and Star Citizen are taking advantage of newer hardwares. Don’t forget, Star Citizen’s campaign is coming out late this year or early next year.

      Fanboys who think Uncharted 4’s graphics will be best thing since slice bread are going to be disappointed after Squadron 42. If Star Citizen is successful then other devs will take notice.

    1. u are lying

      7776754862585836885PB DDR88*

      99999999999999999999 TMUS*

      3589385332589753785478467878367867834867347854ROPS*

    1. We’ll see if there are any delays due to the fact that HBM 2.0 has yet to be finalized. Might suffer from the same issues AMD has had with ram supply.

    2. I’ll get a 970 to tide me over for VR until Pascal drops. Get a few of those and give my kids my 970. They get two upgrades within six months. lol

      1. A 970 is the bare minimum for the Vive/Rift and since it’s relatively cheap and I’m getting dual Pascals six months later, I’m just sticking with that.

        It’s just a card I’ll need for VR before the Pascal cards drop.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *