AMD’s Ryzen CPU was clocked at 3.6/3.9Ghz in CES 2017, F4 revision rumoured to be clocked at 3.6/4.0Ghz

AMD will release its Ryzen CPU in the first quarter of 2017 and according to reports, the red team demo-ed Ryzen with a base clockspeed of 3.6Ghz and a turbo frequency of 3.9Ghz at this year’s CES event.

In addition, French hardware magazine CanardPC claimed that a fourth revision of AMD’s high-end processor is already here. According to CanardPC, this fourth revision features a base clockspeed of 3.6Ghz and a turbo frequency of 4.0Ghz.

It’s worth noting that AMD’s Ryzen will be feature an unlocked multiplier. As such, users will be able to overclock their CPUs without any major issues.

What’s also interesting is that AMD’s Ryzen was able to compete with Intel’s Core i7-6900K. During AMD’s New Horizon event, the red team showcased Ryzen (clocked at 3.4Ghz but with an unspecified turbo frequency) matching – and in some cases surpassing – Intel’s Core i7-6900K.

AMD has not revealed how much Ryzen will cost and its exact release date, so stay tuned for more!

17 thoughts on “AMD’s Ryzen CPU was clocked at 3.6/3.9Ghz in CES 2017, F4 revision rumoured to be clocked at 3.6/4.0Ghz”

  1. Nothing major but still good to see.
    This is way better than it would have been if it was the other way around.

  2. I really hope these turn out as good as they seem. I’m itching to build a new PC and I want some new hotness for my build. That and I really want to support AMD…

  3. We need prices!! I want to build some new rigs for my customers but I told them to wait and see…

  4. Can we see full specs, pricing and eta’s yet? no? ok shut the hell up until you’re ready to discuss that.

  5. Everything I need to know now is:
    1. Single-thread performance benchmarks.
    2. Pricing in EWW region.
    Show me…

    1. What single thread aplication are you using? You probably use many of them, but still.
      To even consider 16 thread capable CPU for single threaded performance is … well…

  6. Just as an FYI, in New Horizon, the turbo was disabled on the Ryzen CPU so it was running at clock speeds.

    1. IMO, it’ll surpass the 6900K with ease, but probably it’ll fall short of the 7700K due to the higher frequency of the latter, and the fact that lazyass devs don’t bother on optimizing their games even if the console themselves have 8-core CPUs.

      I’m still gonna buy Ryzen anyway, cos my main game for the next years will be Star Citizen, and it uses 6+ cores, probably even all of them eventually. And in those situations, more cores > higher frequency (well, most surely).

  7. Forgive my hopefully not too naive question but which Ryzen chip is the one that’ll directly compete with the 6700K/7700K?

    The articles on Ryzen I’ve seen thus far all seem to focus on the chip/s intended to compete with Haswell-E/Broadwell-E rather than Skylake/Kaby Lake.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *