And the time has finally come. Rockstar has just released the PC trailer of Grand Theft Auto V in glorious 60fps. Grand Theft Auto V hits the PC on April 14th, and we’ll be sure to cover it extensively (with both a PC Performance Analysis and a Review). Enjoy and stay tuned for more!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
breathtaking
No in-game gameplay.
That can’t be good, I smell a badly optimized port.
And what is this? Freecam around the world isn’t in-game?
Not per se.
It’s a clever edited, cut, slow motion kind of gameplay, which is usually made to hide flaws, in this case, the fact it might not look good enough, it doesn’t move too well even on their high end pc.
All in all, it’s not good.
“”it might not look good enough””
GTA5 on ps4 looks already amazing, so in my opinion they dont need to hide anything. The only thing that interest me is how performance will look like on my 680GTX OC (I dont want to buy new GPU just for this game, I’m waiting for pascal)
I just see empty claims and assumptions.
Video was perfectly smooth.
they want to hide the z-fighting
the game will be a texture flickering/shimmering mess like GTA4 in motion, only slightly less so because they were smarter how they made the world this time (less thin wires/fences/polygons)
I don’t know if people are on drugs or something, cause this looks like sh**ty ps3 footage, watch it in 1080p guys
This looks better than Sh##ty PS4 and X1.
Looks a lot better than ps3. I think you’re the one on drugs
Didn’t anyone see lag? I thought saw some.
full server
yeah. It actually ran quite smoothly.
You get a upvote over your name
23.976 fps
This is wrong in so many levels.
It really does look great. Only two more weeks hopefully.
Red Dead Redemption on PC at 4k/60fps, we still want it Rockstar.
well they are doing something red dead related and since max payne 3 released with the latest version of the rage engine and they re-released gta v with the latest version there is still a chance.
Would be marvelous. STEAM dayONE
Anyone notice some lag in the trailer?
It could be your computer loading the video, or it could be a problem with the recording. Difficult to say.
This looks so good! I hope my PC will handle it. I see so much fun and hours spent 🙁
I have a lob on.
Look at it peasants! LOOK AT IT!
i will do anything for GTA V PC 1080P/60
Heroin its nothing compared to GTA V !
STEAM DAY1 4K 60FPS !!!
After Steam you need to log on to Rockstar Club so… take care,will be laaag. 😉
Rockstar Club & Gta V can wait 1month,for some patches.
60FPS and looks better than the console versions. The definitive version of GTA V. Worth the wait.
playing it in fps with a mouse is worth the wait alone.
april 14
yehss PCMr
Honestly, many PC gamers like ripping on consoles because of how weak they are and yes they are a bit on the weak side but I see it as positive as well. Sure for console gamers it sucks but for PC gamers, it makes everything more affordable. Imagine if Microsoft and Sony were willing to take a risk again and sell high-end consoles but at a huge loss with power like an i7 or a GTX 780 Ti etc. Now all you need is a cheap system with a 750 Ti and you’re already a match for consoles. Would it honestly have been a good thing if as a PC gamer, you’d have to shell out a small fortune just to match consoles?
Yes i think it would be we would have better games, also when the PS3 came out it was actually a lot more inline with high-end PC’s at the time but this time around when the new consoles came out it was competing with mid-range hardware like a 750Ti.
Think of the games we could have we such great hardware to power them i don’t even mean graphically i mean huge open worlds with lots of detail.
750ti mid range? it doesn’t get much lower range than the lowest cheapest card of the old 700 series.
As far as gaming graphics cards, it’s low end, being sold for less than 100 euros already in several places here. GT series are not only outdated, but also associated with NOTEBOOKS and LAPTOPS, pretty much like the M series.
Interesting “divisions” you created there by yourself.
The GT series aren’t even considered gaming cards. An exemple from IGN: “The GT series of nVidia cards represents nVidia’s lower end graphics cards. They are generally a fraction of the cost, and low performing than the GTX counter-parts. It is recommended that for gaming purposes a GTX card be purchased.” So it shouldn’t even be considered for gaming.
And then you go into gaming cards, the GTX family, and yeah the 750 ti is one of the lowest cards, thats why for me its low end.
Actually it is the limitations, the old consoles caused games to have small maps. Also look at how bloodborne runs.
It’s a nice trailer, but lets actually wait for the gameplay.
Hi guys, how you think it going to run on my pc?
CPU: i5 4690k 3.9ghz
RAM: 8gb
GPU: GTX 560 1gb oced to core 980mhz, shaders 1960mhz, memory 4400mhz
I know that there’s a huge bottleneck with that gpu. But i can’t afford a new one now.
Get a cheap 750Ti.
The cheapest one here cost 275 dls, and the gtx 960 (the one i like, AMP from Zotac) cost 382 dls.
The prices here sucks.
750TI,good joke.
Gtx 960 or R9 280 3GB Vram.
Yep the 280X is great for Gaming (i have One -> XFX Black !)
But you’ll better wait for REAL Monster = R390X HBM WC !!
That will be too expensive for him.
Or a new one with good price/performance or some second-hand card.
It depends on the resolution you play at. Assuming its 1080p i’d guess not very well, with low settings hovering around 30fps at best. That GPU would be holding you back in 2013 let alone 2015.
You really need to buy a new GPU mate as you have a really good CPU that will last a long time but your GPU is really limiting what you can do, it’s not just the performance of the GPU but more the fact that it only has 1gb of GDDR5 which pretty much relegates you to low settings. You can pick up modern GPU’s that run modern games well without having to spend too much on them so I would buy a new GPU and let that CPU stretch it’s legs a little as it’s far too overpowered for your GPU.
Yes you will be able to run the game but you will need to dial settings down as your 1GB of GDDR5 is holding you back.
Yeah you’re god damn right, at the first chance i get, i’m going to upgrade the GPU. Wich one you think i’ll should go for?
Because the 970 and the 980 with those 4 gb problem, i think it’s not a good deal. Maybe i should wait for a 960 ti right?
nothing wrong with 980 at all, the 970 issue was blown out of proportion
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-revisited
The 970 even with 3.5gb of fast GDDR5 and 500mb of slower GDDR5 is still a good deal as it’s a powerful card and plays games well. There has been 4gb 960 released from Gigabyte though/
Everything but the GPU is great m8. It should get a respectable 1080/30 on Medium but I wouldn’t hold your hopes up for the full 60FPS experience unless you ducked the rez to 900/720 and played around with settings.
Mind you, the recommended GPU is a R9 270 which goes for as low as $130 at the minute so you could pick one of those up.
Hope this wont run as sht as GTA4 did.
Why are they teasing us with this? It’s like they don’t know we know they’ll postpone it again.
Yep. that’s RS Ladies&Gents 😀
Lost interest in the game…will get it when it becomes cheaper (and comes with all DLC’s).
I have to wait a month more for the real PC game called The Witcher 3. And a month after that, Batman Arkham Knight.
It’s probably best to wait, anyway. There will be major patches.
arent the dlcs free?
No idea, are they? Don’t have the console version and never heard about them being paid or not.
there are preorder dlc stuff which are on ps4 and pc versions and then there are mp dlc which are free updates. Then ther is the railgun exlusive for those who re-bought it.
only few seconds ? 🙁 and no one talking about how it works or what’s new ?
i see better reflections (guess we also won’t getting any working mirrors) and better AA and better frame rate and more foliage than, let say PS4 version. what else ? what about preload ? or how the new movie maker works ? or how about mods ? any new features ? after 2 years of wait and delays they just released a teaser, 12 days before release.
by working with Nvidia we managed to bring latest visuals ….
remeber Watch Dogs a lot of talk and sh*t console port!
The AA looked blurry. Possibly they were using FXAA? Or maybe DOF and AA don’t play well together.
might be TXAA, both are blurry but with txaa less jaggies but again it was a teaser, it might be worst in-game, but maybe not as bad as ps4 version which was a jaggies fest
Hopefully will have an option for SMAA 1tx at least. If not, can still inject it. Or go with a 2xMSAA and inject FXAA for a clean IQ.
But then even in the trailer it doesn’t have the AF Pop in the console versions have (16x coverage FTW) and a far greater LOD.
Preach ????
This is fake. The human eye can’t see past Gabe’s fat a*s.
A SLOW MOTION trailer to boast about 60 FPS? Are they THAT stupid? Wait, I’ll rephrase: Do they think we’re THAT stupid?
they really think we are stupid. they are selling us 60fps as a feature. duh! any game can run at 60fps it’s not a feature
Thats why if you want the true cinematic feel you have to play on console. PC is for idiots who want to burn out their retinas because of too much graphics.
yet, even for idiots who would believe something as stupid as that, you can still lower the res and even limit the frame rate to 30 fps on any game on PC, while on consoles you control nothing at all.
You get an up-vote for making me laugh out loud.
I laughed so hard.
Will probably never get completely used to 60 fps video. Dat smoothness thou.
You’ll sh*t your pants when you see 120 fps, then.
Well, that was awesome. I like how they didn’t use Youtube, which is crap.
NVIDIA has worked with developers to make lots of great games though. I loved the Batman Arkham and the enhancements with NVIDIA software. Borderlands 2 and Borderlands The Pre Sequel also have great NVIDIA features. There has been lots of good games with NVIDIA support.
You are right in one thing though, NVIDIA shouldn’t get behind Ubisoft as they don’t support PC properly and that is even with NVIDIA behind them pushing them to do better. I am willing to bet Watchdogs would have ended up far worse on PC if it wasn’t for NVIDIA pushing them
There has been lots of games where NVIDIA software has made them loo better or added features that otherwise wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for NVIDIA’s software engineers coding them so I am positive about this game.
I know i have all Batman Collection on Steam same goes with Borderlands all run more than great Ultra 60+ GTX 760
how old are you?
AMD sucks. 29old
STEAM dayONE 4k 60FPS FTW