Dying Light 2-6

Dying Light 2 has been downgraded, E3 2018/2019 vs PC RTX

Techland has just released Dying Light 2 on PC and even though the game looks great with Ray Tracing, it became obvious that it has been downgraded from its original vision.

YouTube’s Nick930 has shared a video in which he compares the E3 2018 and 2019 versions of the game with its retail PC version. For this video, Nick930 used all the Ray Tracing effects that are present on PC.

Now as you will see, the city of Dying Light 2 took a big hit. In the retail version, the city is less dense and has simpler buildings. Moreover, the lighting was also better in the early E3 builds. Not only that, but the game now has a more “saturated” and less realistic look to it.

What’s interesting here is that the final game features the mission that Techland showcased back in E3 2019. By comparing this mission, we can easily notice the cuts that Techland made during the game’s production. And yes, you will easily notice the downgraded visuals of the final version.

Lastly, be sure to read our PC Performance Analysis.

Enjoy the video and stay tuned for more!

Dying Light 2 Stay Human E3 vs Retail | Direct Comparison

111 thoughts on “Dying Light 2 has been downgraded, E3 2018/2019 vs PC RTX”

      1. Can you spend a single minute of your day without being a shill? “you must spend 60$ to have legitimate criticism”. Yeah, how about no?

        1. Who said that? You’re putting words in my mouth because you have to reach for even the most basic rebuttal.

          Everyone on this site knows there’s ways to try a game before you buy. You don’t have to spend even 1$ to try it out and form an educated opinion.

          Can comment even once without absolutely butchering any evidence of your reading comprehension?

          1. “Everyone on this site knows there’s ways to try a game before you buy. ”

            There are other ways to form an educated opinion that doesn’t involve buying the game or trying to mess with refund policy. I can form an educated opinion just by looking at a game screenshots, or watching a video, depending on the type of game. Some other guy claimed the tutorial is 2 hours long so that you can’t refund the game and piracy is not an option right now, then bozos like you will claim “you need to play at least 30 hours to form a opinion”. Screw that!

          2. I was literally referring to piracy, I know nobody on this site would actually “try before you buy” via the legal route.

            Why is it not an option right now?

            Also no, you can form whatever opinion you want. It’s just not valuable if it’s not based on experience.

            There’s many aspects of videogames that you really can’t understand unless you play the game. Like the gunplay in DOOM. It looks decent in video but you don’t realize how good it actually feels until you play it. Or the movement mechanics of dying light 1, they feel so much smoother than they look.

          3. “Why is it not an option right now?”

            The devs sneaked in Denuvo before the launch. And another reason to criticize your criticism of others while being this clueless about the game DRM, well played.

            “It looks decent in video but you don’t realize how good it actually feels until you play it. Or the movement mechanics of dying light 1, they feel so much smoother than they look.”

            You are literally arguing “feelings”. If you like what you see in the video, you will probably like playing it, it’s not that hard.

          4. How is that a deficiency in a critique? If it has an uncracked DRM that just means defer judgement of the game till it’s cracked. Although including Denuvo alone makes this game a no-buy from me, no matter how good it might be.

            And when I say “feel” I don’t mean emotion. I mean the satisfaction behind the mechanics. Back to DOOM for example, the “feel” is actually a function of several aspects, mainly animation quality, sound, particle effects and lightning. If all of those aspects synchronize well, then firing a gun in the game will “feel” wonderful.

            I wish it was that simple, but I’ve played many games in the past that immediately piqued my interest because they looked good and ended up playing horribly. There were other games that I never thought I would like (e.g. Two Point Hospital) that grew on me once I played.

          5. “If it has an uncracked DRM that just means defer judgement of the game till it’s cracked.”

            lol, another shill argument. It’s not like people are even criticizing mechanics as you seem to imply, they are just criticizing the graphics, cut content and cutscenes, once again your bad faith is showing.

            “I wish it was that simple, but I’ve played many games in the past that immediately piqued my interest because they looked good and ended up playing horribly.”

            I’m not surprised over your lack of good judgement.

          6. People are calling the entire game a joke because it got downgraded. That’s what I was criticizing. I’m not denying that the game looked a lot better pre release.

            I’m not surprised by your lack of nuance. I really hope you get the chance to try to make a videogame some day. It’ll open your eyes to alot of the things that go into how they work.

          7. It’s like you can only be nuanced when shilling for a game. Guess what, you miss the nuance when you take hyperbole seriously.

            “I’m not denying that the game looked a lot better pre release.”

            Really? First time i see you typing this comment, after all the shilling for the game and attacking others for saying the same thing.

            ” I really hope you get the chance to try to make a videogame some day.”

            Lmao, that’s the king of shill arguments “you can only criticize a game if you know how to make one, preferably a way better game”.

          8. Your lack of reading comprehension strikes again. I’m not saying you need to make a game to be allowed to criticize. Read what I wrote. I’m saying making your own game would allow you to understand why a game that *looks* good to you might end up playing bad once you actually try it and vice versa.

            Also is shill the only way you know to respond? You keep spamming the exact same statement when there’s no truth to it. I criticize games all the time, and I just did so above.

          9. “I’m saying making your own game would allow you to understand why a game that *looks* good to you might end up playing bad once you actually try it and vice versa.”

            If i like what i see (doesn’t mean just graphics), then there is a good chance i’ll enjoy it, just because you have bad judgement doesn’t mean others are the same as you.

            “I criticize games all the time, and I just did so above.”

            Not on this site, you spend your day attacking the criticism of others, and only did criticize this once very reluctantly (by agreeing with the people you where attacking lmao).

          10. Ok I’m convinced you can’t read.
            Even you admit there’s a good chance you’ll enjoy it. Which means there’s a chance you won’t. Anyhow, I’ve made my point several times already. It’s not about judgement, it’s the reality of videogames, so many people get burned by buying videogames they later decide they don’t enjoy, or only enjoy for a little bit.

            I’ve criticized games countless number of times on this site. That’s just a fact. You can deny it all you want. And it wasn’t reluctant. You have to be blind to pretend DL2 wasn’t downgraded. I was criticizing people who called the entire game bad because of the downgrade.

            Although many people on this site have such low quality critiques of games that it’s an embarrassment that needs to be called out.

            No need to restate any of this any further though, not like you’re capable of reading it anyway.

          11. “Even you admit there’s a good chance you’ll enjoy it.”

            I was talking about games in general m0r0n, i didn’t criticize this game beyond the downgrade and general pozz.

            “so many people get burned by buying videogames they later decide they don’t enjoy”

            So you want to make psychological profile of internet comments?

            “I’ve criticized games countless number of times on this site. That’s just a fact. You can deny it all you want.”

            I haven’t read every single bit of idiocy that comes from your keyboard, but the ones i saw just points more to shill arguments and personnal attacks against people’s criticism.

            “I was criticizing people who called the entire game bad because of the downgrade.”

            Who cares, it’s just their opinion.

            “Although many people on this site have such low quality critiques of games that it’s an embarrassment that needs to be called out.”

            Yeah, i’m doing it right now with your inane comments.

          12. “I was talking about games in general m0r0n, i didn’t criticize this game beyond the downgrade and general pozz.”

            Bruh…I know…

            Please for the love of god, read.

          13. Maybe you should write clear and properly instead of relying on gotchas and having to repeat yourself. In any case, yes, life doesn’t give you 100% guarantees, that doesn’t mean you should use the exception as the rule and create inane standards such as having to play the game back to back to form (any) worthwhile opinion.

          14. It was perfectly clear if you have a grasp of the English language.

            I’m only repeating myself because you individually struggle with comprehension.

            And I never said you should play the game to completion but at the very least giving it a shot will settle any doubts.

            You don’t really know what you’re missing until you try it. Although the opposite is not true, if you don’t like what you’re seeing yeah you probably won’t like it, unless the satisfaction lies in the feel vs the look.

          15. If i take for example a game like the Last of Us 2: Never played it, but i know that i am missing out on a lesbian teenage romance, shem@le revenge fantasies and tr@nnies and i’m fine with that. The third person shooting can be good, but there is plenty of excellent TPS games out there, classic Gears of War, Binary Domain, Vanquish, etc. so i don’t need to stomach ugly lesbians or tr@nnies in order to have a good time with those games.

          16. I played Doom eternal fitgirl edition just once and i liked the game for the most part, but a game being just decent will make other people overrate the game to oblivion. People that say the game is a old school boomer shooter have no idea what they are talking about.

      2. what is there to get out of playing dude? Its another copy paste open world game with towers and outposts with rpg mechanics and leveled enemies and weapons and crappy dialogues.

        Enough with defending modern trash. What are you a fcking idiot? Do you not see how inferior the game looks compared to e3? Do you not see how inferior the quality of the writing is? Are you braindead or something? Freaking moron.

        Its like saying that the next cod of assasin creed is gonna be much better and not the exact same thing.

        What an absolute idiot.

        1. If by an miracle they managed to get the E3 build the same as retail, the mechanics woudn’t chang much, but then again, i liked the first DL and even Dead Island games.

        2. You call every open world game copy paste when really it’s your opinion of them that’s a copy paste. The moment to moment gameplay of dying light 1 and far cry for example is *vastly* different, yet they share many of the same mechanics.

          I’m not talking about visuals. It’s obvious the game was downgraded.

          You’re calling the entire game a joke, that refers to all aspects. That requires a bit more of an educated opinion than just “I saw a comparison video about the visual so I know the entirety of the game is now a joke”. Witcher 3 got downgraded in a similar fashion, yet it’s one of the best games of it’s genre.

          And even with Assasons Creed, some games in the series are way better than others, even though they are from the same series. E.g. Syndicate was better than Unity, Black Flag was truly unique for the series, AC2 was a gem.

          People like you have no idea of the intricacies of videogames. You just sit back and criticize everything that isn’t a picture perfect match to your tastes.

          1. No it is not an opinion, every open world game today is copy paste. We talking about now not years ago you freaking moron, dying light 2 is not like dying light 1.

            If its obvious the game is downgraded and it has leveled enemies and rpg mechanics and towers and outposts then wtf are we talking about? Story sucks runs bad, t he end.

            “. Syndicate was better than Unity, Black Flag was truly unique for the series,”

            game that works because it was downgraded was better than an unfinished game that broken to pieces.

            Wow, amazing observation there captain obvious also black flag is the worst assasin creed game because its an empty sea with repetitive ship battles. Imagine taking the worst aspect of ac3 and making a boring game out of it.

            “People like you have no idea of the intricacies of videogames. You just sit back and criticize everything that isn’t a picture perfect match to your tastes.”

            On the contrary you fcking clown, i am so tired for trying to point out the differences between games especially now that nearly every game is some always online mmo looter shooter with leveled enemies and leveled weapons with an open world that you capture outposts and climb towers with microstransactions. This entire industry is a godamn joke.

        3. You call every open world game copy paste when really it’s your opinion of them that’s a copy paste. The moment to moment gameplay of dying light 1 and far cry for example is *vastly* different, yet they share many of the same mechanics.

          I’m not talking about visuals. It’s obvious the game was downgraded.

          You’re calling the entire game a joke, that refers to all aspects. How can you tell the writing is bad/worse? From the video linked above?

          And even with Assasons Creed, some games in the series are way better than others, even though they are from the same series. E.g. Syndicate was better than Unity, Black Flag was truly unique for the series, AC2 was a gem.

          People like you have no idea of the intricacies of videogames. You just sit on your a*s and criticize everything that isn’t a picture perfect match to your tastes.

          1. “How can you tell the writing is bad/worse? From the video linked above?”

            The script appears to be the same from comparison videos, it’s the voice acting that got downgraded.

            “The moment to moment gameplay of dying light 1 and far cry for example is *vastly* different, yet they share many of the same mechanics.”

            The weakest aspects of dying light 1 is the stuff they copy from far cry franchise (they even copy the “malary mechanic” ffs), which is a shame because the parkour makes the game better overall.

    1. I saw the side by side comparison but coudn’t get why they changed the voice acting even tough the script was largely the same. And even that was downgraded.

  1. “2013 consoles for games which moved on even past skylake cpu performance”

    In 2022 there will be first ‘next-gen only’ games:
    – Forza Motorsport (Forza Tech 8)
    – Redfall, from Prey creators (Unreal Engine 5)
    – Starfield (Creation Engine 2)
    – State of Decay 3 (Unreal Engine 5)
    – STALKER 2 (Unreal Engine 5)

    Slowest console in this generation is Xbox Series S (299 usd) with Ryzen 3700X with constant sustained clock 3.6 GHz. This should be enough for better physics and AI

    1. Physics and AI will be main usage of 16 threads CPU. First example is new Forza with new physics engine.

      Turn10 developers confirmed that physics in Forza Motorsport 8 will use 48x more CPU power than in Forza Motorsport 7. Ryzen 3700X from Xbox Series S will be used as minimum requirements

  2. Yet another rainbow-ish colored game. What a surprise!
    While the gameplay is surely the same shlt from the previous, the only thing to appreciate would be the environment. Well, would be, but there’s nothing to like in that game now.

    1. Yeah these days games only have these colorish lighting, gameplay , physics are bad

      Past Games had no good graphics, rest gameplay, story was par

  3. By it’s own, it’s a gorgeous environment, but yet again, very stylistic different from the gritty take from before, which is most suitable for this type of a game. The art design has shifted drastically.

    1. Its not an art direction thing at all. Pause the vid at 7:35 for example you can see its like all shadows, fog etc have been entirely stripped from the environment at a distance. Building no longer cast realistic shadows, textures are visually of lower res etc.
      How is any of that a style choice? Its all a matter of hardwarre limitations. Things like volumetric fog are horribly demanding, especially if you decide to cast it across an entire city.

      1. “Building no longer cast realistic shadows, textures are visually of lower res etc.”

        The game employs ray traced shadows and lightning. Its much better now that what it was in 2018. The thing that probably changed is the draw distance, you’re not getting shadows shown far into the distance. Thats probably because it was not feasible in an actual fully formed game. Textures are smoother and less detailed in the 2018 footage, they’re better now

        People are still going on with the downgrade nonsense, where they compare a little piece of game in early development, from many years ago, where the actual full game didnt exist, the systems were not put in place, nothing was there outside of that vertical slice, and they compare it to the full game with everything working.

        Thats the reality of game dev. Things change. What you wanted to do when you were just having ideas may not work in a full game. Especially in this case, where we’re comparing a 4 year old vertical slice

          1. Nope, that’s not what that means 😉

            Again, we’re comparing a full, released game with a stylized vertical slice from 4 years ago. What “downgrade” is there when there was no game in 2018 ? Other than that bit and some other pieces.

            Just like it happened with Witcher 3 and a million other games. You start the journey, you have certain ideas. Then as you make the game, you see some ideas are not feasible, some dont work like you thought and so on.

            Going on about downgrades in 2022 as if we just found out games exist yesterday is very juvenile

          2. Cutting down drastically shadow distance is some sort of downgrading. I know why they did that, but it doesn’t change the fact that shadowing on vista shots looks sooooo much worse. Enabling RT doesn’t help that at all.

          3. If only the money they collected from pre orders was as imaginary as the game they initially sold us on.

          4. Usually half a dozen employees or more doesn’t just walk away from a project either. It’s not the norm in gaming business to make a game look worse after 4 years of work.

            These graphical problems people are pointing out is not a bug. Witcher was ahead of it’s time when it came to graphics, Dying Light 1 was also ahead of it’s time, this one is a blurry mess made for old-gen consoles.

          5. Neither Witcher 3 nor Dying Light 1 were ahead of anything. They weren’t graphical showcases.

            As i’ve said, the game doesnt look “worse”. It changed during production, like any game does. Why are we still judging games based on half decade old vertical slices ? And acting as if we know what we’re talking about.

          6. ARE YOU DYING THERE IS A DOWNGRADE MORON?

            Also new vegas was downgraded as well.

            “Going on about downgrades in 2022 as if we just found out games exist yesterday is very juvenile”

            going out about fake advertisement in 2022 is just juvenile, just accept the lies and how the industry CANT make a game that doesnt look like it came out in 2014.

        1. The problem is when they use that hyper polished vertical slice to market the game to customers and then give them something different.

          I agree though, it’s very easy to make a vertical slice look amazing, since it doesn’t have the overhead of running all the other systems/game logic etc., included in a full game.

          Which is why you shouldn’t mislead customers and tease them with false potential.

    2. “gorgeous environment”
      You either was in a coma, or only played at Atari 2600, mate.
      This cr4p looks cartoonish af, and not even close to a gorgeous thing.
      We’re in 2022 seeing releases that would suit 2008 very well.

  4. The witcher 3 all over again, not a fan of the oversaturated colours and simplified even with ray tracing it doesn’t look as impressive as the 2018-2019 demos…but i get it that sometimes some graphical sacrifices have to be made when they cause issues unrelated to performance but why change the whole art direction? The dark bleak gothic style was much more attractive

    1. That’s without Ray Tracing. Instead, the video we featured has all the Ray Tracing effects enabled.

  5. >show BS footage at E3 to build hype
    >take pre-orders over the 8 months prior to release
    >sneak in Denuvo a few days prior to launch
    >press embargoes on what the media is permitted to show
    >include ~2 hour tutorial so customers can’t refund after having finally played the game

    Scum.

  6. >show BS footage at E3 to build hype
    >take pre-orders over the 8 months prior to release
    >sneak in Denuvo a few days prior to launch
    >press embargoes on what the media is permitted to show
    >include ~2 hour tutorial so customers can’t refund after having finally played the game

    Scum.

    1. Disguise? The first game was so blatantly obvious they where ripping off major parts of Far Cry games. Oh you are talking about downgrade, guess they copied this “feature” as well.

  7. I usually love environments with pretty colors and all, as long as they’re in tropical countries or something…
    But this new cartoonish look is just pathetic.
    And why is the new lighting so damn flat? This looks like a 2000s FPS!
    It completely breaks the immersion. This is worse than a simple downgrade.

  8. Well what do you know. Who would have thought. I mean the difference is night and day. Another vertical slice used to bait the audience into buying a non-existent product. I get that the vision changes and all but entire assets and mechanics are missing, not just the lighting.

  9. The E3 footage was “retouched” with a whole bunch of “cinematic” filters. Everyone does this for E3. A lot of time the devs even have a special separate E3 build which shows a tiny slice of the game, but they go through it with a fine tooth comb to make sure it’s as “shiny” as possible, but that build never actually gets developed further beyond E3. It’s a one off build to generate hype. You’re basically comparing 2 different games.

    1. Sometimes it’s not even a playable game they’re showing. They could be pre-rendered scenes like watching an animation with no one actually having played what they show you.

  10. Of course the graphics are lower, otherwise it would never be available for consoles, this was the case with the “Crysis”, that’s why other Crysis games were made for consoles and ported to PC, I am very disappointed at textures quality and wonder if there really is Ray Tracing at all, but the game is still great, not worth the money but will be when the price will drop to 50%

  11. “Also this POS junk game injected interracial lesb0 trash and gay men posters too along with the f4ggot flag because they fired the actual guy who was behind it – Chris Avellone and took over the company.”

    I see this being brought up a lot, but honestly there’s not much evidence that Chris Avellone doesn’t share the same views as your average pozzed game industry veteran, i remember one of his coworkers from Obsidian, Josh Sawyer was a male feminist, i think he worked on FNV and Pillars of Eternity. Why has he fired again, se#ual harassment? Could happen to any male woke drone…

    1. I get what you are saying in regards to politics and all that bs IRL stuff we have to endure, but i would like to see how was the game affected, for example you said that the ghey pozzed posters in DL2 was after Avellone left, but can you say that for sure? I played DL1 2 times or so and that game is also filled with plenty of pozz, mary sue npc’s, ghey lesbian relationships, multiculturalism praise and general anti-white themes (there’s a quest where you have to rescue a black woman from a White man who made her a slave). So all i’m saying is that this stuff predates Avellone by 5 years or more.

      1. The game overall is fun with the mix of melee/guns combat and parkour, but if you want to play you will have to deal with pozz from time to time. I also forgot to add the stereotypical (in movies but not real life) black scientist.

        The lesb0 stuff is really bad, in the expansion the Following there is a quest where you help a girl escape from her father and at the end of the quest you discover that her boyfriend is actually a she. Very subversive stuff.

        1. Yeah there’s always more hidden subversion in games, example is yakuza which has trance mamasan and other themes. The main story of 5 is the nasty pop singer factory in asian countries but also everywhere else, shallow values, faux virtue, etc Pretty much every game has that it’s just subtle. Even the bright garish colors that would be out of place in a real situation are a subtle reference to the homoflag etc

          1. Japan is an US outpost, a jewish woman was responsible for mandating feminist values post war and they haven’t being the same ever since. A lot of praise japan gets is just because it resembles america 30/40 years ago with aesthetics and demographics, but they are on borrowed time it seems, because as america gets more unhinged, their subjects immediately follow.

    2. I looked up this Serge dude and apparently he was one of the main folks responsible for allowing the toxic behaviours from persisting in the company. He was also the main guy who was behind the reason why most Ubisoft games felt samey for years. If all of that is true then it’s not much of a loss really. The company as we know it is dead, long before things started going woke.

      1. Ah. Fair enough. I only checked out his IMDB page which didn’t list his entire portfolio it seems. I was gonna mention the absurdity of how we’re suddenly hearing all of this stuff. But it doesn’t help when those who are accused just remain silent the entire time. But I guess they’re paid a lot to keep their mouths shut. Chris Avellone was able to defend himself but he was a year too late.

        I don’t doubt for a second that a good portion of the accusations are likely fraudulent, further pushing their agenda, but we can never know what’s true and what isn’t. Of course we can get an idea by checking out the so-called victim’s social media accounts and read into them. All of it needs to be treated in a case by case basis.

        It’s a shame because all of the talented minds behind some of the big games are being ousted with no hope of them returning. And even if they do they have to play by the newly undefined rules. Dan Houser has already established a new company and even if he’s in charge we’re bound to expect him to be placed under so much scrutiny due to everything that is happening.

        1. I thank you. Cause you helped me realize game is trash even on PS4 And I am getting a refund. I had only got it to play with friends. Instead I will use the money to get something on PC.

        2. I thank you. Cause you helped me realize game is trash even on PS4 And I am getting a refund. I had only got it to play with friends. Instead I will use the money to get something on PC.

        3. Yeah that’s way more extensive. He’s pretty much behind almost all the Ubisoft classics I’ve been meaning to try out for a while now. A lot of those games are pretty solid and aren’t generic as people claimed. Games like Child of Eden, Red Steel 2 and XIII are ones I really wanna get my hands on soon.

          I quite enjoyed the AC series despite its flaws but I did get tired of them once I completed Brotherhood. Couldn’t get past the first hour of Revelations. So I can’t say whether the game had some ill-intentions behind the development. Never thought that deeply about the series until some of the things I’ve been hearing about the newer titles. It’ll be interesting to see what kind of materials they’ll be pushing out for the next few years without him and his team onboard. If the reason we’re seeing a lot progressive and lackluster titles from their company lately due to him getting ousted then sure, I’m convinced that he played a major key role within the whole company.

          1. “AC Unity looks the best till date….”. There you are my friend. and the mystery man is also behind Far Cry 2 (the only FC game I genuinely cared after the Crytek FC) & AC Revelations. None other than Alex Amancio. I still remember FC2 was developed to rival Crysis (2007) (after that whole FC licensing sold out to Ubisoft & Crytek joined Battlefield EA) & Alex Amancio is one of those guys who really cared for innovation in games. AC Unity’s lighting system (I specifically mentioned “lighting” because Alex Amancio was so proudly speaking for it in an interview) for example is still miles ahead than most garbage trash AAA buhahahas out there. But Ubisoft fired him. Why? Because his team (ACU) squezzed every bit of PS4/XBS1 in its 1st year!!!

          2. I’ll be trying all those out real soon. ACIII, BF, Unity and Syndicate are the most interesting for me but I do need to give Revelations another shot since I enjoyed Ezio’s storytelling a lot. Didn’t know that about Rogue, so that’s interesting to hear. I remember Unity being a big deal but it had a disastrous launch due to all the bugs and performance issues I think. Still better looking than the newest entries I think.

            Will check his videos out but it seems like he’s not on YouTube. So chances are he was banned or something. People who have extreme takes on whatever subjects tend to be loopy or attract the worse type of viewers. But I’ll go in with an open mind.

            Agreed. I know they’re gonna butcher the Splinter Cell remake based on the things they’ve shared so far. For now when it comes to AAA games I’m just focusing on the ones coming from Asia and certain parts of Europe. We’re already seeing a worrying trend of censorship when it comes to ports of foreign games and Lost Ark (which I have been looking forward to trying out for a long time) has suffered a great deal of damage when it comes to that. Let’s hope all the other upcoming titles that look promising doesn’t end up the same way. I like to think that we’re just going through a really bad phase which may last a very long time.

      2. “Jason Schrier who was fired from Kotaku by Gawker execs on how horrible he was earlier and was employed at Bloomberg.”

        Jew alert. Also notice how these rats manage to go from one outlet to another (jewish) outlet with ease so they can continue with their blood libels and smears.

      1. About three hours. Maybe a little less. When I saw that rainbow flag in that house, I stopped playing and immediately requested a refund.

        1. The funny thing is the 1st game could be more sucessful in spreading subversion, because it doesn’t put their symbols upfront.

          1. Well, I did not know the first game was full of rainbow crap. I just decided to buy the second game because I thought I would support an independent studio. My reaction to creepy Microsoft buying everything was also a factor in me giving the game a chance.

          2. I’m the kind of guy who thinks games like the first Halo is already subversive, so there’s that.

  12. The game released on ps4. Sadly pc players def got jipped and got that version. Installing Reshade and using Geforce Experience Game Filter def helps a bit to customize the appearance.

  13. The city/building layout and architecture, and the visual art style changes are the two aspect that were glaringly obvious to me as soon as I saw the retail version. The boxy simple building structures with more flat rooftaps is such a disappointment…IMHO, a fairly considerable downgrade overall from the E3 demos!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *