YouTube’s ‘Candyland’ has released a new video that compares the original PC version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare with its upcoming remastered one. This video will show you some of the graphical improvements that Infinity Ward has implemented in this Remaster. Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
call me crazy, but i much prefer the visuals of the original. The visibility isn’t terrible, which in a competitive FPS means a lot more then graphics.
Crazy.
Except the trailer was 100% exclusively singleplayer footage, making your point entirely irrelevant.
“Competitive FPS”? What do you think it means? Every multiplayer game has competition involved.
And by the way, if the visibility is terrible, it’s still equal for all players, so everybody has it harder to find enemies.
Cpt Price still ugly. :))
Yo! Too much post processing boys! Sometimes less is more.
You can never have enough motion blur and dof effects!
Life’s good when you’re a vaseline on your lcd fan on a ninja block anime prom night!
They didn’t half go crazy with the post processing effects eh wow
This remastered game makes no sense on PC as the PC version is already 1080/60, it had made more sense if they had remastered Call of duty 3, a game which was never released on PC in the first place.
the nuclear blast aftermath looks better in the original artistically speaking,the rain is less intense in the remaster i prefer the original rain,the depth of field in the remaster is overused blurring the background is not making it better than the original…apart those nitpick the remaster of course looks better but call of duty 4 still looks good and didn’t need a remaster
Exactly!
The art style of the original seems better in many places. This makes the remaster even less sensible.
It’s time for true comparison
COD4MW Original (21.06.16):
– 20 maps
– mod
– user created map
– user created modes
– dedicated servers
– lan game
– user can created his OWN server dedi/lan no need to pay bribe to 3rd company
– pb
– custom anti-cheat
– server browser
– huge player base
CODMW Reamaster:
– 10 maps (rest 10 on dlc, cuz it’s actishit)
– no mods
– no user maps
– no user modes
– no lan play
– want your OWN serwver? Pay bribe to 3rd company, or toy with matchmaking crap
– No server browser
– no dedi serverse, just hybrid crap that shows your ip
– lame anti-cheat
Console players never had most of those in the first place, that’s why this game is being remade. Not as a update to the much loved PC version.
Such a shame activision makes you pay silly money for this and infinite warfare together, I would much rather pay £30 for this alone and not bother with infinite warfare at all, in fact, I wouldn’t of even bought Battlefield 1, because I would just be on CoD4 all the dam time just like I used be back xbox360 all those years ago. Ahh memerories!