During its latest earnings call, Warner Bros stated that it expects to release the next part in the Mortal Kombat series, Mortal Kombat 12, in 2023. This is coming straight from the publisher, even though the game hasn’t been officially announced yet.
Here you go Brusk pic.twitter.com/GYqRd8CZt4
— Al¹³ (@Aluminum54) February 23, 2023
To be honest, I really can’t see how Mortal Kombat 12 will release in 2023. That is unless it comes out in Holiday 2023. If that’s the plan, then we can expect an official reveal at E3 2023. Still, and given what has happened with Tekken 8 and Street Fighter 6, this seems unlikely.
My guess is that Mortal Kombat 12 will slip into 2024. That’s the most logical scenario in my opinion. After all, Warner Bros and NetherRealm will need to heavily market it.
It will be interesting to see whether Mortal Kombat 12 will target current-gen platforms only. I’m also curious about its graphics. After all, Injustice 2 and Mortal Kombat 11 had amazing cut-scenes. And yes, the game will be certainly using Unreal Engine.
Stay tuned for more!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
After Warner Bros great track record and after MKX, Injustice 2 and MK11 I sure am hyped for another capeshit pandering MK game filled with censorship and microtransactions and barely any reference to kung fu movies.
A franchise which appeal was mostly fanservice.
Under the David Zaslav Warner regime will they still have the puritanical double-standards of covering up women in effectively bhurkas, whilst the men are allowed to dress like Chippendale dancers? Probably.
That’s an gay double standards, puritans don’t allow male strippers in their ranks.
it’s the same stupid mindset
No it isn’t, stop assigning far right boogeymen to leftist behaviour.
leftists are in favor of Puritan morality through the covering of women’s body parts, precisely because in this way they think the patriarchy will be defeated.
There are many articles on the internet about this phenomenon such as
https://eu.usatoday(dot)com/story/news/world/2018/01/16/some-french-women-say-puritanism-american-feminism-threatens-sexual-liberty/1035354001/
Except it isn’t puritan morality, puritanism dresscodes is about everyone dressing modest, no exception. If they allow ugly women and gays to dress lewd, then they are not against sexu@lization, just an specific form of it (male preferences). We have gay parades, “sl#t” parades, ugly feminists protesting nude, etc. How is that puritanism? I didn’t even read your article to know it is bs using the same tactic/rethoric of assigning a far-right boogeyman, because criticizing leftism on it’s own terms is verboten…
Wanna know why the right is obsessed with calling leftists “fascists”, “natzees” and similar? It’s quite sad tbh, they just project their own low status as an “own” against the left. It’s fine if you want to hold them to their own standards, but how hard it is to just call them leftist, liberal, commies, etc.?
It is not wrong to point out their hypocrisy in supporting the Ukrainian Nazis. And besides, the left was an ally of Hitler in World War II. They became enemies when Hitler betrayed them, not the other way around. The common denominator of both is socialism.
Pointing out hypocrisy is a different issue, what i’m talking about is when leftist censor or change social values and the right’s first instinct is to call them a variation of a far right from the past, in this case puritans. It’s as if leftists, liberals and commies never censored before, total bs.
“And besides, the left was an ally of Hitler in World War II. They became enemies when Hitler betrayed them, not the other way around.”
Yes, Hitler betrayed communists and the allies supplied communists with weapons and preferred communist dominion over national socialism and fascism, what did i miss? Which of these factions are more pro communist, natsocs or US style liberals of the era?
Why is it wrong to accuse them as Puritans? Since they have the same behavior. And also, just because many of us are on the far right because this Nation has been in steady decline for the past few decades, does not mean that we share puritanical views on marriage and the sexual relations of married heterosexual couples.
As for the Hitler thing, they didn’t prefer communists to Nazis. Hitler almost defeated them. Their lives were in danger. Obviously they would fight together with the communists, who as I said were allies of the Nazis a little while ago.
“Why is it wrong to accuse them as Puritans? Since they have the same behavior.”
Because it’s not the same behaviour, as i already explained a few comments ago. Wanna convince me that drag queers and promiscuous ugly woman in the mainstream, among other modern behaviour, is puritanical?
“And also, just because many of us are on the far right because this Nation has been in steady decline for the past few decades, does not mean that we share puritanical views on marriage and the sexual relations of married heterosexual couples.”
Maybe you should. misery breeds company, a warped society produce warped views.
“As for the Hitler thing, they didn’t prefer communists to Nazis. Hitler almost defeated them. Their lives were in danger. Obviously they would fight together with the communists, who as I said were allies of the Nazis a little while ago.”
Maybe they should, i dunno, sort out a cease fire and let Hitler sort it out with the commies? It was not an existential threat as you claim, not even for jews. And when the war was over they partitioned the planet within the commies instead of fighting them, that’s why we had a hot war with the natsocs and a cold war with the commies… But sure, cling to the broken alliance they had with the commies as if that explains anything…
Why should everything be a black-and-white subject? Obviously, most who share puritanical views are not necessarily puritanic on all issues. If you notice my phraseology I didn’t call them “Puritans”. I said they have the same stupid mindset. As their own, some 50 -year -old “reputable” patriarchs (who want their daughters virgin to be before their wedding) are on their knees getting f@ck3d by tr00nies and then return home to pretend the strict dads.
The same sh*t are these “patriarchs” with those who wear tights on their hairy legs and pumps.
You wanna an 100% Puritan? Good luck.
You are accusing old school puritans on being hypocrites, but that’s not really the issue with the new “puritans”, who are quite open about their sexuality. I’m just saying, don’t just throw words devoid of their meaning, and that goes for the original guy who said the MK devs are puritans.
No, most of them are not open. ?here is a huge percentage of ped0s in these communities. There are very few who are not. Isn’t that hypocrisy about their sexuality? Also, they constantly have many disputes among themselves, others only accept g@ys and reject cross, tr@ns, etc.
Their internal disputes are for the most part irrelevant to the agenda they advance to the public. And sure, leftists are hypocrites in various ways but that just proves it is more important than ever to call them what they are whenever they are up to their antics: Commies, lefties and mainstream liberals and not natze, puritan or facist.
Also, pedos are not open for obvious reasons, but even still they are working towards mainstream politics and making progress.
No, if they agree with what they are complaining about, we should publicly shame them. For example, while I agree with National Socialism on many issues, I will continue to call them out for their alliance with the Ukrainian Nazis. Also their puritanical views on female sexuality are the same as the puritanical views of some hardcore Christians, and because of them, all but one of our States do not allow prostitution.
“No, if they agree with what they are complaining about, we should publicly shame them.”
I don’t understand, could u elaborate?
“For example, while I agree with National Socialism on many issues, I will continue to call them out for their alliance with the Ukrainian Nazis.”
I don’t know if that makes sense, NatSoc is all but dead, just old history. What we have today is something else, and the right is mostly divided in the support for Russian vs Ukraine, i rather sit this one out.
“Also their puritanical views on female sexuality are the same as the puritanical views of some hardcore Christians, and because of them, all but one of our States do not allow prostitution.”
Prostitution is legal in the US, you just have to film it, it is the biggest export in the country, so much for puritanism…
“I don’t understand, could u elaborate?”
When they act like nuns or ally themselves with Nazis, I will publicly shame them.
“Prostitution is legal in the US”
No it is not. In Europe they have brothels, here only in Nevada. There’s no way anyone would cross half the country just to f%ck a b]tch.
Would be great if they acted like nuns, in my whole life i never heard nuns express any opinion at all to the public at large. In the case of Azov, they whitewash Ukraine far right, so yeah, it needs to be exposed for what it is. It’s the same as Israel, where most progressive jews keep it hush hush or tries to reframe it to blame exclusively on white people or christians.
Regarding prostitution, you know it’s legalization is a major left wing cause, right? I’m not gonna offer some cheap retort on how it should be banned or allowed, but we should strive for a society with less wh0res and less males seeking their services, and needless to say we don’t live in this society.
No, we shouldn’t. This is a major feminist/lgbt/left wing topic.
https://www.theguardian(dot)com/commentisfree/2017/oct/11/prostitution-legalised-sex-trade-pimps-women
https://foreignpolicy(dot)com/2021/11/08/spain-prostitution-ban-pedro-sanchez-sex-work-feminism-human-rights-psoe-vox/
Wtf? So you think the right wants to live in a society where our daughters are encouraged to be pr0stitutes, and our sons encouraged to seek f0rnication rather than starting families? You are making an compelling case for leftism here if you think they are against prostitution and degeneracy.
Why do you bring up sons and daughters? To sound melodramatic? Everyone should be free to have s3x if they want without being married. And since you mention daughters: Do you feel ok when your daughter is around h0rny weirdos or do you prefer them to f@ck some prostitut3s?
“Everyone should be free to have s3x if they want without being married.”
Even children?
“Do you feel ok when your daughter is around h0rny weirdos or do you prefer them to f@ck some prostitut3s?”
I prefer to reduce the incentives to be h0rny, weirdo and prostitut3.
Where the f#ck did I mention kids? Wtf are you talking about man?
People should do whatever they want with their bodies as long as it is not abnormal, regardless of what puritanical Christians and l3sbians say.
You said everyone, didn’t exclude kids.
“People should do whatever they want with their bodies as long as it is not abnormal”
Here’s the thing, b#ttsex is abnormal, are you for criminalizing the pratice? I am.
Stop the use of the strawman. But since you like using these arguments, and since you did not understand that I said “if it’s not abnormal”: Do you think s3x with children is normal?
“Here’s the thing, b#ttsex is abnormal, are you for criminalizing the pratice? I am.”
B@tts3x is normal as long as it happens between a man and a woman.
So you think homosexuality should be criminalized, then why are you giving me these “consenting adults” arguments?
Why should I put someone in prison, when did I talk about criminalization? Disorders are not cured by prison. The only thing to be achieved is that they pretend to be straight and then they marry unlucky girls who will have a bad time with them, as happened in previous centuries. I am in favor of them being free, but I also have every right to be disgusted by their actions. The only thing that should be criminalized is their obscene propaganda and especially using children as their target of propaganda. But if a grown man wants 15 inches of meat up his a*s, let him have it. I don’t want to make him pretend to be straight and then marry a girl who will have a bad time with him.
You said “as long as it is not abnormal” and said an*l s3x with women is ok, so you imply things by omission.
“Disorders are not cured by prison.”
Who said anything about curing disorders? It’s about putting the trash in prison so they don’t spread their corruption to society at large. The reason we have children being exposed to these vermin propaganda was thanks to decriminalization and “live and let live” bs. There’s a compound interest in entropy, imagine how much misery we could prevent if we could just put these f4gs in prison?
I have already said they should rot in jail the moment they use the children as their target of propaganda.
Besides, you have to wonder why “there weren’t so many f#gs” back in the day.
Do not think that in the olden days there lived tougher men than today. They were just hiding and pretending to be straight. They were ruining the lives of their wives, many had s3x with their children and all the problems were swept under the rug.
They better f4ck each other now, as long as they don’t spread their propaganda.
You do realize you are making pro gay propaganda by saying it is better to be openly gay, right? And the fact people report being gay by up to 20 % nowadays all thanks to the gay liberation and not the propaganda and glamorization in media like you want to imply, right?
“Besides, you have to wonder why “there weren’t so many f#gs” back in the day.”
There are some theories: Back then, being gay was considered a disgusting aberration, and also a crime. There weren’t so many estrogen and poison in the food supply as well, so from a biomedicine point, people where also more normal and gender conforming.
” They were just hiding and pretending to be straight. They were ruining the lives of their wives, many had s3x with their children and all the problems were swept under the rug.”
Thanks to gay liberation, they now display their problems and discussion in the open, talk about progress s/ with the exception of pedophilia, but that doesn’t stop them from trying, and nowadays openly gay people have way easier access to children.
“They better f4ck each other now, as long as they don’t spread their propaganda.”
Except they do both, now what? They coudn’t do it when their behaviour was criminalized, regardless of them being adults. So it is clear as day that it was a better system back in the day.
Seriously now do you think this anomaly is from estrogens and foods?
Do you have any idea what happened to several priests and little boys in the Catholic Church for many centuries? And then the food was to blame?
In the villages, do you know how many crimes did not see the light of day because these small communities “fed” on such gossip? There were no fewer of them in the past. What you say about foods is wrong and it shows from the fact that there are homos3xuals with masculine characteristics and heteros3xuals with opposite characteristics. And s3xuality is too complicated for everyone, you can’t call it g*y/not a g*y.
“Seriously now do you think this anomaly is from estrogens and foods?”
It is a theory, there are plenty of studies claiming western men are not getting much testosterone. Way more plausible than believe that there is a gene that turns people gay, which have zero evidence.
“Do you have any idea what happened to several priests and little boys in the Catholic Church for many centuries?”
I don’t know much about Catholic Church history, but i do know that pedophiles (often homosexual in orientation) like to work in places where they can gain trust from population and have easy acess to children. Why single out catholic priests, when there is plenty of teachers and jewish rabbis who also engage in the pratice or sexual predation in general?
” And s3xuality is too complicated for everyone, you can’t call it g*y/not a g*y.”
Now you are sounding like a libtard, sorry to say it, don’t know why you upvote my posts when you believe this kind of stuff. Leftists love the line that says s3xuality is complicated so they can ram their agenda to unsuspecting children.
“do you know how many crimes did not see the light of day”
No, and neither do you. This is a common libtard talking point, to say that a specific crime is up but “unreported”, in order to advance an specific agenda. We should focus on what we do know, and not make decisions based on wild speculations.
“there are homos3xuals with masculine characteristics and heteros3xuals with opposite characteristics.”
homosexual is a behaviour set, not an inerent characteristic.
? always put off answering for a few hours and then forget about it for days.
1. No. As you have already said, “We should focus on what we do know, and not make decisions based on wild speculations.”.
2. Okay? Ped0s are everywhere, of course those who encounter children more often are more likely to exploit them. But you’re missing the point: Why did these disgusting behaviors exist in the past, despite the “purer” foods?
Explain.
3. No, you sound like a libtard. You agree with feminist positions against br0thels, you are in favor of women’s semnotyphy (which has as its purpose revenge against the male s3xual nature) and just as they see the white straight man as an enemy, so you see someone as an enemy because he was born abnormal. Guess what: Libtards-leftists are the enemies out there. Regardless of whether they are g@y/straight/z0ophiles/necrophiles. They are libtards. Enemies.
4. What? There is a vast variety of psychiatrists and s3xologists that stated this long before the g@y propaganda.
Check the book “Psychopathia Sexualis” by Richard von Krafft-Ebing (1886) or read Sigmund Freud’s stuff. Their views were not pro g@y at all.
“Why did these disgusting behaviors exist in the past, despite the “purer” foods? Explain.”
It’s about quantity, how much of the behaviour celebrated today existed in the past vs what we have today. Libtards wants to rewrite history to claim society in the past was more accepting of homosexuals, like they do with greek history, probably from jewish historians. This open up an avenue they can exploit nowadays in providing legitimacy for their activism, and it seems you fell for it.
“you are in favor of women’s semnotyphy”
Never heard of this stuff.
“You agree with feminist positions against br0thels”
I could offer a compromise: Make p*rn and online pr-stitution (onlyfans) illegal while br0thels get legalized, so long as they stop glamorizing the “professioN”. The rest of your post i will not adress because i don’t know which quote of my post you did.
ok, my last reply is still censored because I didn’t hide ss3xxx.
So, again:
I didn’t mention anything about the acceptance of homos3xuals in the past. I asked you why, since the foods were pure, there were homos3xuals back then?
Also in the rest of my post, I numbered each of your paragraphs and responded. Especially 4, regarding the complexity of s3xuality.
“I didn’t mention anything about the acceptance of homos3xuals in the past. I asked you why, since the foods were pure, there were homos3xuals back then?”
Can you quote me saying homosexuals didn’t exist in the past? Because I didn’t say that. You, however, claims that queer behaviour was always the same, be it today and back then, which i find it hard to prove.
But where did I mention what you say about the existence of homosexuals? You mentioned estrogens and I asked you why there were homosexuals in the past, despite the fact that the food was pure and there was no propaganda. Also, tell me about Krafft-Ebing’s and Freud’s view on the complexity of s3xuality. Do you agree with them or not?
” Also, tell me about Krafft-Ebing’s and Freud’s view on the complexity of s3xuality. Do you agree with them or not?”
Dont know who Krafft is, and Freud is jewish, so he is suspect. But don’t just namedrop people, say what you believe, and what you mean by complexity in this case.
What does his background have to do with whether you accept his views? He was hostile to g@ys. And I emphasize the word “background”, as the word “Jew” implies religion, whereas Freud was an atheist. S3xuality is an extremely complex thing but you insist on saying it’s just “straight” and “non-straight”. Even if I accept these umbrella terms, explain to me how those who are straight and are turned on by redheads are the same as those who like black-haired obese girls, those who like skinny blondes without tlts, those who have a b0ner watching 90-year-old grannies getting fuk3d (disgusting, but there are huge categories on p*rn sites, meaning there is demand) etc. Do the aforementioned persons have the same s3xual preferences? They are straight though. Explain why some g@ys prefer feminine men while others want masculine men. How come they all have the same s3xuality as those who have s3x with the tailpipes of the cars in Kansas or with necr0philes or with z00philes and copr0philists?
“explain to me how those who are straight and are turned on by redheads are the same as those who like black-haired obese girls, those who like skinny blondes without tlts, those who have a b0ner watching 90-year-old grannies getting fuk3d (disgusting, but there are huge categories on p*rn sites, meaning there is demand) etc. Do the aforementioned persons have the same s3xual preferences?”
Probably have to do with “market acessibility”. Like how male dogs screw each other when female dogs are not acessible, but as soon as a female dog is on heat, they all circle around her trying to reproduce. But it’s not as complex as you would like to think, the taste in women in general terms is pretty much the same, skinny, hourglass shape and nice breast and buttocks, with some mild variation. And it is quite easy to veerify, just look at the pr0stitutes with the biggest fans spending money on her material.
“those who have a b0ner watching 90-year-old grannies getting fuk3d (disgusting, but there are huge categories on p*rn sites, meaning there is demand)”
Do you have the data on the demand of the disgusting stuff? Some trends are artificially inflated, like incest and interracial, as soon as people started asking why they where pushing this category to the front page, some spokeperson of the site spilled the beans saying it was jews pushing this stuff (paraphrasing it).
“S3xuality is an extremely complex thing but you insist on saying it’s just “straight” and “non-straight”.”
Nope, s3xuality is just straight, for reproduction purposes, the rest is just trauma.
“Probably…material”
no its not, otherwise explain to me why some people like t33ns categories (within the limits of legality) and others like grannles. Why do some people like fat or skinny girls, with or without b**bs? Different girls make different people feel too h0rny for them. But not all of them.
Your mind is stuck on “normal” and “trauma” and you only categorize them that way. Again, I agree that it is “trauma”, but you don’t understand that there are many categories.
Let me remind you that our European ancestors, during medieval times, give their daughters for marriage at 12 years old. This is straight behavior, even though it is now illegal. Do you think that all straight people belong to this very same category?
“Do you have the data on the demand of the disgusting stuff?”
You can’t be serious. Are grannies/t3ens categories artificially inflated? Even so, do you think you also feel h0rny with n@ked grannies? It is still a straight behavior, even if only one straight person on the planet likes old women.
TL;DR NOT ALL STRAIGHT PEOPLE HAVE THE SAME TASTE
“Nope, s3xuality is just straight, for reproduction purposes, the rest is just trauma.”
lol
Is it trauma to have s3x with your wife if she is infertile?
“Are grannies/t3ens categories artificially inflated?”
I doubt grannies are popular in these sites. Teens is another story, teen is so popular a lot of guys end up in jail, there is a reason “jailbait”refers to teenage women and not grannybait.
“Even so, do you think you also feel h0rny with n@ked grannies? It is still a straight behavior, even if only one straight person on the planet likes old women.”
No, it is a degenerate kink. For utilitarian purpose there is zero reason to do that, since they are old, ugly and infertile.
“Is it trauma to have s3x with your wife if she is infertile?”
This used to be a big deal, imagine spending the rest of your life with someone who is infertile.
“Let me remind you that our European ancestors, during medieval times, give their daughters for marriage at 12 years old. This is straight behavior, even though it is now illegal. Do you think that all straight people belong to this very same category?”
Back then people became adult more younger and nowadays people can be 30 year old and still have the mind of children. A lot of people get mad at age of consent stuff, but if the purpose is family formation, it’s not terrible by any means and pederasty, grooming kids to be gay or trans basket cases is way worse.
“I doubt grannies are popular in these sites…No, it is a degenerate kink. For utilitarian purpose there is zero reason to do that, since they are old, ugly and infertile.”
Whether it’s popular or not, it’s straight behavior. Do you classify them as belonging to the category of g@ayyyys? Is that what you’re claiming?
“This used to be a big deal, imagine spending the rest of your life with someone who is infertile.”
You’re claiming that if you’re a sterile man, you should never have s3x with your wife again. Alright.
“Back then people became adult more younger and nowadays people can be 30 year old and still have the mind of children. A lot of people get mad at age of consent stuff, but if the purpose is family formation, it’s not terrible by any means and p3d3rasty, grooming kids to be g@yy or tr00ns basket cases is way worse.”
I have no objection to that, but I wonder how you can equate those who prefer old women to those who prefer young women, as they clearly have different tastes.
“but I wonder how you can equate those who prefer old women to those who prefer young women, as they clearly have different tastes.”
As a general rule, men don’t like old women, they can at best put up with them. Any basic statistic will confirm that, men gravitate to whatever is barely legal in dating sites.
“Whether it’s popular or not, it’s straight behavior. Do you classify them as belonging to the category of g@ayyyys? Is that what you’re claiming?”
I just think it is weird, like the people who likes corpses, animals or stuff like that. Not even old couples have the hots for each other…
“You’re claiming that if you’re a sterile man, you should never have s3x with your wife again.”
Not really, but we are talking defected people here.
“As a general rule, men don’t like old women, they can at best put up with them. Any basic statistic will confirm that, men gravitate to whatever is barely legal in dating sites.”
Fu3k the statistics; even if a single man on the entire planet likes old or fat women, can you explain to me if he is straight or g@@yy, since you’ve decided there are only two categories?
“I just think it is weird, like the people who likes corpses, animals or stuff like that. Not even old couples have the hots for each other…”
Okay, so are these two grannies’ b@ngers, g@@yss as well? From what you told me, I concluded that you consider there to be only two categories.
“Not really, but we are talking defected people here.”
AND
“This used to be a big deal, imagine spending the rest of your life with someone who is infertile.”
Yes, but you said the opposite before about your wife. Did you change your mind as soon as I asked the question about whether you happen to be infertile?
“Yes, but you said the opposite before about your wife. Did you change your mind as soon as I asked the question about whether you happen to be infertile?”
I don’t remember telling you anything about my personal life and i would like to keep it that way.
“even if a single man on the entire planet likes old or fat women, can you explain to me if he is straight or g@@yy, since you’ve decided there are only two categories?”
He is on the queer spectrum (gay), since really old women tend to look like man and fat people are androginous.
“AND”
Look, words matter, making s3x is pretty straightforward: you are making new life. If you can’t do that, then you can just engage in f0rnic@tion, AKA mutual m@sturb@tion.
“I don’t remember telling you anything about my personal life and i would like to keep it that way.”
Well, from what I can see, you’re using a strawman tactic in your response, which can be insulting to your interlocutor. However, I never referred to you directly. My hypothetical question was about what someone would do if they were in a situation where their spouse was infertile. I asked you this question, and you gave two different answers depending on the gender of the person. This seems to weaken your argument.
“He is on the qu33r spectrum (g@y), since really old women tend to look like man and fat people are androginous.”
Yes. So, are you suggesting that those who are attracted to fat, ugly, or old women are automatically considered g@@y? I’ve never heard of this claim from anyone, not just from leftists but also from conservatives, and I know many of them. These ideas seem to be your own “inventions” that you probably came up with recently. Based on what you said, you seem to be suggesting that g@@ys include not only hom0s but also copr0phlliacs, z00philes, n3cr0philiacs, and those who are attracted to fat or old women. On the other hand, you imply that straights are the opposite of g@@ys. Your philosophy seems to be solely your own simplified perception of what is going on.
“Look, words matter, making s3x is pretty straightforward: you are making new life. If you can’t do that, then you can just engage in f0rnic@tion, AKA mutual m@sturb@tion.”
In other words, you believe it is more typical or acceptable for someone to have s3x with his hand than to have s3x with a fat woman.
“Based on what you said, you seem to be suggesting that g@@ys include not only hom0s but also copr0phlliacs, z00philes, n3cr0philiacs, and those who are attracted to fat or old women.”
Pretty much, but the real word is not gay, it is degenerate. This is why when you normalize one kind of degenerate behaviour, others will soon follow.
“In other words, you believe it is more typical or acceptable for someone to have s3x with his hand than to have s3x with a fat woman.”
I’m not sure where do you come with those conclusions. If the women is morbidly obese and unfit to even walk, then yes, it is degenerate and probably a challange in itself to even screw her, let alone impregnate her.
“Pretty much, but the real word is not gay, it is degenerate. This is why when you normalize one kind of degenerate behaviour, others will soon follow.”
This is what I was telling you at the beginning about umbrella terms. I explained to you first that these are sick behaviors, and you disagreed, saying they are all the same and that sexuality is the same and not “complicated.” But now you are contradicting yourself by saying that gay is not the same as coprophile, etc.
But that’s what I told you from the beginning! They are different behaviors that are obviously not normal!
You disagreed, and now you changed your mind, and you did well because this is the right thing to do.
“I’m not sure where do you come with those conclusions. If the women is morbidly obese and unfit to even walk, then yes, it is degenerate and probably a challange in itself to even screw her, let alone impregnate her.”
Is it more normal to leave your hand pregnant? That’s what you said before.
I already lost track of this discussion ages ago, but i didn’t lost track about the fact you keep making up quotes about things i have never said, like the one below:
“Is it more normal to leave your hand pregnant? That’s what you said before.”
No, i didn’t said that. Provide the quote or stop lying.
Didn’t you write this?
“If you can’t do that, then you can just engage in f0rnic@tion, AKA mutual m@sturb@tion.”
That was in relation to infertile couples, nothing to do with the nonsense you wrote about “leave your hand pregnant”. I still would advise people to not marry someone who is infertile.
You seem to be presenting arguments that contradict each other. The act of masturbation that you endorse aligns with what I previously mentioned regarding the “pregnant hand”. However, it seems contradictory to label sex with your hand as more normal than engaging in sexual activity with a person who may be considered overweight or unattractive. Additionally, it is unfair to suggest that a man is entitled to have a wife even if he is sterile while denying a woman a similar entitlement. This issue is not about equality but rather about your perspective on sex, which is weird and differs from what I have heard from any of my far-right acquaintances or friends.
“that you endorse”
“to label s3x with your hand as more normal”
” it is unfair to suggest”
“your perspective on s3x”
Honestly, could you drop this stuff already? I’m just about done talking with someone who spend 10 days to reply and when you do, it is full of lies, assumptions and general bad faith.
I apologize for the delayed responses, as I often forget to check my profile on a daily basis.
It is a tragic irony that you claim “bad faith” for the other person while you yourself have been operating this way from the very beginning of the conversation. You initially stated that I was making a compelling case for leftism, but then abruptly shifted the topic to sons and daughters while we were discussing pr0stitution. Furthermore, you mixed in words referring to min0r children, which not only insulted your interlocutor but also implied things he never said.
You stated that m@@sturbation is preferable to s3x with a fat woman, and yet you mock me by denying that you ever made such a statement.
(your words: “If you can’t do that, then you can just engage in f0rnic@tion, AKA mutual m@sturb@tion.”)
Additionally, you mentioned that any woman who is sterile shouldn’t have a partner, suggesting that those who engage in non-reproductive s3x are degenerates.
(your words: “This used to be a big deal, imagine spending the rest of your life with someone who is infertile.”)
However, later, you argued that if a man is sterile, he still has the right to have s3x.
Whenever I deconstruct your arguments, you either choose not to answer or resort to attacking the interlocutor’s morality, which has been your consistent tactic throughout this conversation. You have not provided any response to my arguments, and you deny your own words from just two messages ago. Furthermore, you constantly employ strawman tactics and insult the other person.
“You stated that m@@sturbation is preferable to s3x with a fat woman, and yet you mock me by denying that you ever made such a statement.
(your words: “If you can’t do that, then you can just engage in f0rnic@tion, AKA mutual m@sturb@tion.”)”
Just goes to show you have bad reading comprehension or you are not paying attention. I wasn’t comparing m@sturbation to s3x with fat women, i wasn’t even talking about m@sturbation per se. F0rnication is s3x without reproduction (that’s why i used the word “mutual”).
“Additionally, you mentioned that any woman who is sterile shouldn’t have a partner, suggesting that those who engage in non-reproductive s3x are degenerates.
(your words: “This used to be a big deal, imagine spending the rest of your life with someone who is infertile.”)”
They are degenerate, literally, because they have defective organs. And a infertile person will make his partner have a lifetime of disappointment for not providing children, thats a fact.
“However, later, you argued that if a man is sterile, he still has the right to have s3x.”
Where’s the quote? I don’t remember even going into gender specific in this case.
“Whenever I deconstruct your arguments, you either choose not to answer or resort to attacking the interlocutor’s morality, which has been your consistent tactic throughout this conversation. You have not provided any response to my arguments, and you deny your own words from just two messages ago. Furthermore, you constantly employ strawman tactics and insult the other person.”
I have been really patient with you, but no more. You should apologize for your lies just as you did for your delayed responses.
“Just goes to show you have bad reading comprehension or you are not paying attention. I wasn’t comparing m@sturbation to s3x with fat women, i wasn’t even talking about m@sturbation per se. F0rnication is s3x without reproduction (that’s why i used the word “mutual”).”
You finally explained what you meant. I understood that you were referring to a couple engaging in giving each other a h@ndjob.
“They are degenerate, literally, because they have defective organs. And a infertile person will make his partner have a lifetime of disappointment for not providing children, thats a fact.”
So, are you suggesting that both individuals involved should be in perfect health? What would you do if you have myopia, allergies, a short stature, or experience headaches? Are you implying that individuals with these conditions shouldn’t have children again?
“Where’s the quote? I don’t remember even going into gender specific in this case.”
Me “You’re claiming that if you’re a sterile man, you should never have s3x with your wife again.”
You “Not really, but we are talking defected people here.”
“I understood that you were referring to a couple engaging in giving each other a h@ndjob.”
You didn’t understand and i am too tired to explain again.
“So, are you suggesting that both individuals involved should be in perfect health? What would you do if you have myopia, allergies, a short stature, or experience headaches? Are you implying that individuals with these conditions shouldn’t have children again?”
No, here you are again with your “suggestions”. Infertile people can’t have children, simple as. Someone who is infertile could in theory be holding back a healthy individual of passing their genes.
“Me “You’re claiming that if you’re a sterile man, you should never have s3x with your wife again.”
You “Not really, but we are talking defected people here.””
There’s nothing here that suggest “infertile men can have s3x but infertile women cannot”.
“You didn’t understand and i am too tired to explain again.”
I understood, I said I thought that you were referring to a couple engaging in giving each other a h@ndjob. That’s not the case, though.
“No, here you are again with your “suggestions”. Infertile people can’t have children, simple as. Someone who is infertile could in theory be holding back a healthy individual of passing their genes.”
Bro, relax. You mentioned defective organs, indicating that someone may have additional medical issues along with infertility. One such example is obesity, which is the problem that prompted our discussion.
”
There’s nothing here that suggest “infertile men can have s3x but infertile women cannot”.”
In the beginning, you stated that it is a trauma and that we should not be with sterile women. However, when I mentioned that a sterile man shouldn’t have s3x, you disagreed. Here:
Me::: “Is it trauma to have s3x with your wife if she is infertile?”
You :::This used to be a big deal, imagine spending the rest of your life with someone who is infertile.
Me :::”You’re claiming that if you’re a sterile man, you should never have s3x with your wife again.”
You::: Not really, but we are talking defected people here.
“In the beginning, you stated that it is a trauma and that we should not be with sterile women.”
No, that was a general statement, you should avoid someone who is infertile (or at risk of infertility due to health and age issues) if you want to start a family. What do you do with this information is up to you.
Okay, now that you’ve elaborated on it, I realize you meant something different about these two topics.
However, I’m a bit confused about how we ended up discussing these topics when the original discussion was about attacking the s3xuality of heteros3xual women.
Maybe you weren’t that interested in the original topic so we drifted towards arguing about hidden meaning behind words.
This whole convo reminds me of that movie The Shining, the classic old hag scene. The mere prospect of screwing an old hag is considered an horror scene. And one thing i forgot to talk about is the LUST factor: if someone is lusting for old hags or morbid obese, then something is very wrong with this person, you can’t just mark it as technically straight. It’s not the same as someone settling down with someone who let himself go or just became old or just ugly because it didn’t have the means to get better prospects, and even in most of those cases their s3x life is pretty much dead.
Why do you bring up sons and daughters? To sound melodramatic? Everyone should be free to have s*x if they want without being married. And since you mention daughters: Do you feel ok when your daughter is around h*rny weirdos or do you prefer them to f*ck some prostitutes?
Sweet. More woke, politically loaded, digital bile incoming. Can’t wait to ignore it.
Is MK12 developed by the Taliban again?
Mmm i just hope MK12 is as fun as it was in the 2D era.
idk but the modern cool guy overdesigned aesthetics of the characters and stages don’t quite do it for me…
The 90s games at low res had a simplicity and grittiness that hit me to the bones.
PS: i just found out that ie the “93 below” Sub Zero skin is the kind of stuff i need (though opponent will look overdone anyway).
i thought mk11 finished the story, liu kang becoming an elder god and most of the baddies defeated.
You think they are gonna stop making these cash cows because the lore says otherwise?.. The answer is no my friend
Do you even care about the story???
The story will never end as long as there is money to be made.
UE3 again?
Or are they finally upgrading to UE4?
Prolly since Switch is so bad with Unreal 4 LOL
That means, Half life 3 confirmed ??
SF6 comes out in June… MK12 could come out fall of 2023 like in September. Tekken 8 is coming out in 2024. Best time for MK12 to come out this year is in the fall.