AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper 1950X will be released later this month and while this CPU does not target PC gamers, Linus Tech Tips has revealed the first gaming benchmark for it. In case you weren’t aware of, the AMD Ryzen Thredripper 1950X features 16 cores and 32 threads, is clocked at 3.4GHz (and can be boosted to 4GHz) and will be priced at $999.
In other words, this is a beast CPU that is meant to be used by workstation users and not gamers. Still, it’s interesting witnessing how this upcoming CPU performs on PC games.
Linus Tech Tips has put the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X against three other CPUs: the Intel Core i9 7900X, Intel Core i7 7700K and AMD Ryzen 1800X. These four CPUs were paired with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX1080Ti and 32GB of RAM. And according to this first benchmark, all four PC systems performed similarly.
Unfortunately, Linus Tech Tips did not reveal whether these systems were GPU-bound or not. As such, we don’t know whether the Intel systems were limited by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX1080Ti, and whether there would be performance differences once – and if – this GPU limitation was eliminated.
We expect Linus Tech Tips, and other publications, to share more gaming benchmarks once the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is available on August 10th. Until then, we have only this gaming benchmark to look at.
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Was it mere coincidence that Linus happened to use one of AMD’s current go-to games of choice with which to benchmark AMD’s new product against the competition?
Lol. Of course not, it was just lying on the shelf….
LinusShillTips is unreliable, i hope DSO will never use him as source again…
Current go to games? It had to be patched to put Ryzen on par with Intel.
Alienware over priced pre-production garbage
you’d be surprised how many dumb shets buy those things
Tru dat
WeakRipper.
Noobsters dont know the ThreadRipper is not for gaming,because still dont have a lot of games who benefit of cpu with 8-16 cores.
Thats why Intel have cpu with 10-16 cores at the right price,because noobsters dont need it and dont have money to buy it.
Only professionals will buy it.
Bang-bang
We urge the game industry to use more cores for games… cores cores cores
I’d like to know why the DX12 numbers are all lower than their DX11 counterparts. I thought that better CPU performance and better performance over all was, like, the point of DX12?
It’s not like RoTTR has horrible DX12 implementation either. Interesting…
Just buy all consoles
Do pc gamers feel proud when they waste all the money building some stupid machine that is worse than a console?
i prefer playing battlefield 1 at 165fps, what about your 35-60fps.
Yeh ofcourse, but at 10x the price, i think ill stick to my console and a mortgage, thanks.
Nah i prefer 30fps and a good community instead of £2000+ on a pc port that gets no love.
Everyone should be happy amd will force intel to innovate, and drop prices if they feel the heat.
Some of us don’t have the time or patience , to google every little thing than can go wrong on a new build.
Be nice to see some ArmA 3 multiplayer, GTA 5, and Attila Total War benchmarks