Ubisoft has just announced that Far Cry 5 will be officially and fully revealed on May 26th. Far Cry 5 will be set in America (most probably in Montana) and in order to celebrate this announcement, the French company released four teaser trailers for it that can be viewed below. Enjoy the teasers and stay tuned for more!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Ubisoft cliché is here again,again,again and again.(You pay and don´t play) Nah.. thanks. Fo** for Ubisoft and same sheit of games.
What is this shyte.
Ubishyte
U-BE-SOFT-&-RUNNY!
Give us a nice villain like Vaas and i’m sold.
sure here have one… OOPS we killed him at the second chapter, arent we just the worst? Its ok we can fix it, here have another villain that is not as good as the first one, but hey more bad guys, thats cool right?
Knowing modern gaming and Ubijunk policies, the most likely scenario for this one is a female villain that needs no man.
didn’t they already “clone” him with Far Cry 4, though? If they did that yet again, the b*tching & moaning would be endless.
So the western theme is true then, But ubi want to trick us with modern like tease! 😀
damn… i was hoping that we go to africa.. seems like it’s wild west.
They had t-shirts, automatic rifles and propane tanks in the wild west?
Semantics! ;D
consider my interest piqued. Could be a good idea but then I remember its Ubisoft, only time will tell.
so probably it’s cowboy with horror?
No its redneck county.
Montana Late 1890’s
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/aaca29421698ff461ab92bb68a74d336bfd3cc3db954c4b8763df51d58e078ce.jpg
context?
Redneck Rampage without aliens and turd monsters.
Also you bet no rocketlaunchers and machineguns but there propably will be some form of bow with a dynamite stick arrow.
If it has a crafting system too then it might be interesting, a survivalist perspective. Finally a far cry game that hunting and skinning makes sense.
I am just gonna go back at wildlands to capture some bases with high quality firearms…..you went too far ubisoft. I am spoiled i cant have fun with primal and rednecks now, i want something at the caliber of blood dragon 2 in order to care.
And made with Cryengine…worth a mention at least.
Interresting, why ubi not using Dunia engine this time?
Where did you get that info from?
I corrected myself…I misread and came to conclusions way too soon. After reading all your comments had to check that out again and did a massive facepalm. xD
They will use dunia engine of course, fc3, fc4, fcp use it so they can reuse a lot of assets and code and save money
Dunia was CryEngine 2 – open world version, written by a Crytek employee. FC3 was listed as a CryEngine game on Crytek’s own site at one point. A friend of mine also got Ubisoft employees to reluctantly admit to it at Gamescom in Germany once. FC4 is the same engine, barely any changes. I don’t know about Primal but it looked outdated and not much different from FC3/4 yet again. And this new game’s teasers say “powered by CryEngine”.
They’re saying it’s “powered by CryEngine” because it is. They don’t like talking about it but it’s just CryEngine. It never was anything else. Dunia was CryEngine 2 with a different name. Far Cry 3 used CryEngine 3 features (proof was wiped from Crytek’s site). There is clearly an on-going business relationship between Ubisoft and Crytek with the latter helping with engine work for every Far Cry game. Semi-hidden deals like this are why Crytek is still afloat imo. The stuff they talk about openly (whenever there’s a new trend and they jump on it three years too late, see free-to-play, see mobile, see MOBA) never pans out and the money has to come from somewhere.
Sounds actually pretty interesting.
Outpost Liberating/Climbing Tower simulator.
Outposts are fun and should stay, towers suck and should be remove
outposts are small should become bigger and more challenging like the military bases in wildlands. Towers could work if they are like a castle with traps….thinking too much prince of persia here.
A teaser trailer from Ubisoft? Oh boy, it is time to see how the game will definitely not look like…. Oh boy!
Yes, I’m a cynic….. Can you blame me, it’s Ubisoft, remember.
by far the original far cry was the best far cry for me, I know it has its flaws, dumb AI, weird monsters, buggy level designs, etc. but it was far more better game than repetitive radio tower climbing and liberating camps hoses***s
I’m torn between Far Cry, Far Cry 2 and Blood Dragon.
Far Cry and Blood Dragon were just all out fun while I found Far Cry 2 to be the most intense playing on Infamous with no healing during a mission.
Far Cry 2 was definitely the best
in 2008 the physics were quite incredible (both how fire spreads and how the environment was semi-destructible)
the story was very gray and bleak, Africa was a hellhole and you had no choice but to work with the bad guys
the buddy system, the jamming system
it was all so realistic, but all so GRINDY
and the worst part was that enemies constantly respawn and you had to drive in $hitty vehicles but that’s the price we pay for an open world sandbox
the problem was Ubisoft never patched that game, they just left as it was…
Agree Far Cry 2 was really good. I remember playing it back when I was a kid. I came back to it a few years ago, and I was surprised how I was able to tolerate the constantly respawning enemies back in the day.
Agreed on fire propagation, no other game had done it or did it since, really. But destructibility? I wish. Practically nothing was destructible in FC2 or any Far Cry. Shame, too.
Let me guess, the terrifying Rednecks are the villains and are all part of a Christian Extremist Cult. How original, brave and bold of Ubisoft making those idiots the main villain, not one day goes by where i don’t hear “EXTREMIST CHRISTIAN KILLED DOZEN USING A TRUCK/BOMB” and they are well know for threatening to kill those who make fun of them and their religion.
The funny thing is the easterb orthodoxs are laughint at all of this nonsense. Their relegion never had to be reformed so they cannot feel guilt for something they did not do.
Also, Communism choking the life out of them for the better part of a century.
But, the CEO of Ubisoft said that 99% of PC gamers don’t pay for anything and are pirates… so I guess I won’t be able to play this.
……..
Well how did watchdogs 2 and wildlands work out for them? Not so hot eh? Console gamers must be pirates too.
While personally i haven’t bought a Ubi game in a LONG time, FC3 I believe. I got Wildlands, R6 Siege, AC4, FC4 all in the nVidia bundles, so….
Could be 30 years ago, could be today, could be 50 years ago. The sh*t tank fits into any of those decades, really, as do the phone lines.
Don’t know why but I’m getting some sort of “exclusives” content vibes after seeing these teasers.It’s written Sony all over the trailers.No mention of any other platforms.I guess another timed exclusive deal is going on here.
Far Cry cowboys?
ok so we had Africa, we had Techno 80’s jungle, we had Jungles islands, we had Tibet/Hymalaya, and we had pre-historic
and they were all the SAMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
so what will we do in Far Cry “west”? we kill cougars N buffalos, skin them
liberate areas from outlaws, and go to vantage points to reveal the map
there, that is your far cry 5
Are they really going to try to pass this off as in-game footage for months until they downgrade it again? Ubisoft at it again. They probably figured out that downgrade controversy helps their games get exposure and are now trying to find out how blatant they can make it before people realize it’s intended.
Some people are saying there’s no attempt to dress it up as “in-game” or even just “in-engine” but for full on CGI, anything goes, it’s not good enough. The field in particular showed weird artifacts that you wouldn’t leave in an offline rendered trailer. I really think there is an attempt here to push the consumer to assume it’s real-time.
Sad because it would be nice if a game got *close* to detailed 3D water or physically interactive foliage (fields and forests) like these clips show. But not this close, not during this console gen, the hardware is just not there.
Source? Could be any point in the 20th century, really.
2 words ” official downgrade”