Call of Duty Black Ops 4 PC Beta will be exclusive to Battle.net, official PC requirements revealed

Activision and Treyarch have announced that the upcoming PC open beta will be exclusive to Battle.net. This multiplayer open beta will begin on August 11th at 10am PT and in order to participate in it you will need a Battle.net account.

The Multiplayer Beta will feature six modes—Team Deathmatch, Domination, Hardpoint, Kill Confirmed, Search & Destroy, and Control. You will battle over six distinct maps—the four already seen at various events, plus two new ones, Gridlock and Hacienda—across playlists that showcase all the content that the Specialists revel in.

In addition, the developers have revealed the official PC system requirements for this open beta. According to the specs, PC gamers will at least need an Intel Core i5 2500k or AMD equivalent with 8GB of RAM and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2 GB / GTX 1050 2GB or AMD Radeon HD 7850.

Below you will find the full PC system requirements for Call of Duty Black Ops 4’s open beta phase.

Minimum:
OS: Windows 7 64-Bit or later
CPU: Intel Core i5 2500k or AMD equivalent
RAM: 8GB RAM
HDD: 25GB HD space
Video: Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2 GB / GTX 1050 2GB or AMD Radeon HD 7850
DirectX: Version 11.0 compatible video card or equivalent
Network: Broadband Internet connection
Sound Card: DirectX Compatible

Recommended:
OS: Windows 10 64 Bit
CPU: Intel Core i7 4770k or AMD equivalent
RAM: 12GB RAM
HDD: 25GB HD space
Video: Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 / GTX 1060 6GB or AMD Radeon R9 390 / AMD RX 580
DirectX: Version 11.0 compatible video card or equivalent
Network: Broadband Internet connection
Sound Card: DirectX Compatible

35 thoughts on “Call of Duty Black Ops 4 PC Beta will be exclusive to Battle.net, official PC requirements revealed”

  1. Does that mean the full game will be on steam ? Was going to get this years COD since i’ve skipped 2-3 years and would be good to know if it’ll be on steam.

    All signs point to no.

      1. I know right, thats kind of what i meant 😛 1 of those has to go, and most people will pass on CoD, if they had to.. altho.. who doesn’t have battle net.. everyone i know has it, its not like the Ubisoft thing.

    1. I dream of a world where provity and world hunger is gone, but I guess Quake Champions is comparably the same.

  2. That’s fine. Multiple launchers aren’t a big deal anymore. If you’re having a problem with them, disable them from starting up with your computer and then when you’re done playing the game, close out the launcher. Problem solved.

    1. It’s just that it’s better to have them all in one spot. Most pf us prefer the steam platform over uplay/origin/whatever.

      1. Of course that’d be preferable.. but as long as I can put the icon on my desktop, I’m okay.

        Shoot, I have GMG and GOG games but when I’m thinking of a game I want to play, I don’t ever think to log in to a website and look at my collection. So I get it, but somehow I still play what I buy. And you can add non-Steam games into your library, so there’s that.

        1. Yea but then it’s going to start the other launcher (R6Siege as an example) and that’s just ugh.

          But i guess you’re right.

      2. The problem is every company wanting their own launcher now. It may actually be worse than a monopoly in some ways and many of them are of poor quality.

        1. Yeah, Ill be waiting for 20 years that Blizzard launcher can recognize my already downloaded version of Starcraft 2!!
          20 years. STOP BEING A DRONE!!!

      3. Worst of all, are those drones who speak about 1 store shell and buy EA games which in fact are just available on ORIGIN.
        BUT THAT IS NOT A MONOPOLY ACCORDING TO YOUR OPINION!

    1. n
      o
      p
      e
      .
      .
      .

      g
      e
      n
      e
      r
      a
      l

      r
      e
      p
      e
      t
      i
      t
      i
      v
      e

      m
      i
      l
      k
      i
      n
      g

      t
      r
      a
      s
      h

      f
      r
      a
      n
      c
      h
      i
      s
      e

      h
      a
      t
      e
      r

      to be more specific….

  3. GD IT. I knwo that it makes complete sense. However why the hell is it I’m still surprised to see activision trash on it?

    1. Implying they care all too much about the PC side of things. Even if they sell less they could make more due to not losing a third of each sale to Valve.

  4. Base PS4 suffers from performance problems, PS4Pro also drops frames.
    I already see how big mess will be PC port 😀
    And like always, we need overkill PC compared to PS4 to play :v

    1. I don’t think any games aside from Valve developed games are required to be exclusive to Steam. I don’t know much about Origin, but I would assume third party games (not made by EA) are also not required to be exclusive to Origin.

  5. It’s fine for publishers to want to stick to their own platforms. Quit being so entitled. A game being on Origin, Uplay, Battlenet has never stopped me from enjoying it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *