Capcom has announced that the Special Edition of Devil May Cry 4 will be coming to the PC on June 24th. This special edition adds three new playable characters (Vergil, Trish and Lady) and includes the Legendary Dark Knight Mode (that was already available on the PC version of the original Devil May Cry 4 PC).
Devil May Cry 4 Special Edition will also sport upscaled textures, bonus costumes and skins, as well as various tweaks and balance fixes.
In order to celebrate this announcement, Capcom has also released a new trailer dedicated to it that can be viewed below.
Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Next bring Dragon’s Dogma on PC, please Capcom.
Oh god yes…il give everything to Capcom only to bring this game on pc .
Oh god yes.
Capcom’s in a bad situation financially so there’s a chance but it’s been a long time that there’s also a chance it won’t happen
Next-gen consoles can’t handle next-gen games so developers re-releasing old games.
Devil May Cry 4 Special Edition, Borderlands: The Handsome Collection, God of War 3 Remastered, DmC Devil May Cry: Definitive Edition, Tomb Raider Definitive Edition, Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition. Bloodborne, Uncharted 4 will be released on PS5. How many times you will play same games???
Bloodborne & Uncharted 4 are great exclusives for Sony. Give respect where it is due.
uncharted 4 will come out 2016.
Because Naughty Dog don’t make anything less than amazing games.
I remember when they made Way of the Warrior… That was not a amazing game…
Pony…
I am more a PC Gamer than you can even dream to be. But I also appreciate quality console exclusives.
Dude, your comments are not bad, but don’t upvote yourself, it’s really low.
Bloodborne coming to PC.
bloodborne yes, it’s a great game but uncharted 4 (the whole series) is just an overrated cinematic s**t
well bloodborne keeps going under 30 fps all the time and doesnt look “next gen” at all, i dont think there will be another gen.
Define “next-gen games” because your comment makes no sense
Game for PS4/Xbox One. No 1080p, no 60 fps. BF Hardline, Final Fantasy XV..
Another cash grab from Capcom —__— . Well, it’s better than that DmC crap so it’s ok
Better than DmC anyway
I liked dmc more than this overdramatic half finished mess. Nero sucked the story sucked and when you finally get dante, you already went through the whole game.
Also i wonder now that people will replay this, will they finally reallize just how bad the dialogue is in those games?
The only thing i hated about the game is the backtracking, the second half of the game is nothing but backtracking.
There isnt a second half, they run out of time so they reused the same levels.
youre doing it wrong. these games arent about that, theyre about the combat and dmc4 wins at that by a long shot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6oTtBoZaE8
This generation is all about making same game with slightly better textures and call it next gen experience. Sucks…
well, bloodborne is pretty much dark souls 3, gets 9.5s and 10s.
????????
I dont even know and its not like it innovaties or hits new techinical standards the graphics are unimpressive, the framerate is almost always under 30 fps and the animations/physics are the same as dark souls.
At it’s core, the combat doesn’t seem that much different but there are many minor tweaks to the combat which makes it more satisfying and innovative as well. Plus the artstyle looks great and the game’s emphasis on combat as shifted from defense to offence. It’s not a carbon copy of Souls.
EDIT: I agree that the graphics aren’t impressive but it holds 30fps most of the time. It isn’t a sub 30fps game.
The guns long weapons and gothic stuff are nice, but seriosuly this game has the same ai and physics as before. At fight i thought the reason games didnt get high scores was because they werent innovative, new or “next gen” now this gets high scores.
The only thing i can conclude here is that just like hotline miami, critics like hard games and there is a market for it. But the thing is those 2 games get away with issues that if seen in a game with broader appeal, like say dated tech, subpar control/animations, those games will be heavilly criticized for not being on par with other games in the market.
Actually it isn’t that simple. Some of the inherent nature of a “game” is the challenge, overcoming the said challenge gives to the player the sense of accomplishment, thus making the game enjoyable or at the very least compelling.
And these games doesn’t get away with issues, but their quality somehow helps to overcome them. That isn’t to say that it is to everyone (as in, I agree with some of your points).
and that’s the same thing since Demon Souls. how many time it is gonna be praised for the same thing? it’s like GTA. i mean after GTA 3 the sequels were all epic but they were not as important as GTA 3. they can’t possibly be praised more until they do something as important as GTA 3 (adding 3 protagonists is nothing revolutionary). the only GTA after GTA 3 that imo could praised as much is Vice City probably.
i am not actually arguing about 9/10 scores. i am arguing about 10/10 scores. if games like Bloodborne or GTA V get 10/10 then the likes of Demon Souls or GTA 3 that started it and were good enough for their time should be 11/10.
and the fact that most critics are from console friendly websites makes it all less credible when you consider all of these.
Yeah, but arguing about review scores isn’t too much subjectivity? Even arguing with different people/communities or the people/community that also like the game is subjective (we could like the same game for completely different reasons).
Also you already said that they are “console friendly” which would add another layer of discussion on top of it.
I really get what you mean, I see how these games don’t push technology or gameplay forward (a.k.a innovate) and how their sequels feel like little tweaks to the formula, but it’s their quality that stand out on top of it even the said quality being forever a subjective point. Hell, I would love to see a leap foward especially in terms of gameplay (and let’s frank, holy molly we are in the need of one). But even then, it can’t guarantee massive praise, and to be honest, I’m getting around the idea that this could be good. Sometimes, it’s better that a small game create something really good/new and remain small, than it being big and end up spawning a overwhelming amount of copycats/rehashs.
(Also, I disagree with your take on GTA. IMO Vice City improved the GTA 3 formula (better characters, better story, more vehicles, etc) and San Andreas introduced some RPG-like elements. From GTA 4 onwards I would agree in the lack of “things”.)
To each his own. I’ve played all the Souls games and Bloodborne and each game feels different. Not by much but to say they don’t try is too bold a statement. Each game offers a unique experience in it’s own right.
Well far cry 4 is diffirent but still it is called far cry 3.5
It’s different with regards to the missions and other additions for replay value but the mechanics feel exactly the same. Plus the map is more or less the same as well. Not a good comparison with Dark Souls and Bloodborne.
“but the mechanics feel exactly the same.”
So does bloodborne.
“Plus the map is more or less the same as well.”
Lol wut?
Nope you misunderstood what I meant. The point is that FC4 is basically a copy and paste when it comes to combat. Bloodborne has the same mechanics yes but there’s many innovations that fundamentally changes the combat and the way you play. For instance, there’s this risk/reward mechanic whereby if you are attacked, you can regain some health if you attack the enemy in the timeframe. This alone changes many things. Do you play it safe and retreat or do you take that risk in order to overcome the challenge? Then there’s the addition of guns, the changing forms of weapons etc which all change the way you play.
FC4 is basically exactly the same like FC3 but with a grapple hook. Same outposts, same enemies, same tower mechanic. It’s basically a copy paste. To me, Bloodborne is the true sequel to DkS1. DkS2 was great but it wasn’t that much improved over the first game the way Bloodborne is.
And I mentioned the map because it’s not that much different from the map in FC3. Just copy paste basically, in other words, just affirming your FC3.5 statement.
It is a gimmick, infact fc4 and this are proving my poiny exactly you see bloodborne changes as much bigger becuase you are invested into the game. Most of the game is the same, has similar mechanics and similar animations, way of doing things.
“FC4 is basically exactly the same like FC3 but with a grapple hook”
No, it is not as scripted the campaign is more open it has better open world with more quests, plently of new things to do, new mechanics like kicking stuff, riding elephants, it is more balanced, but that is the point, this is the point
“Same outposts, same enemies, same tower mechanic. It’s basically a copy paste.”
Same animations, same sounds, same souls mechanic and upgrading system, same ai. It is basicly copy paste with a gothic settning.
“but it wasn’t that much improved over the first game the way Bloodborne is.”
Not only people say the opposite that is infact worse but far cry 4 is massively improved, not on techinical stuff but gameplay.
“it’s not that much different from the map in FC3. Just copy paste basically,”
Completly diffirent enviroment and setting, vertical design, more hills and climbing than beaches, more caves, no it is not the same.
I see the changes as bigger because it has a big impact on the way you play. I’ve put in hundreds of hours in the souls games and Bloodborne is by far the biggest when it comes to changes. As for FC4, sure it has more content and the scale of the missions are a bit bigger but the combat is a blatant copy and paste. It’s a great game no doubt but it could have just been an expansion. The map honestly didn’t seem that much different to FC3 for me. But there’s no point to this discussion. You see Bloodborne as a rehashed game, I see it as a game that’s much improved over it’s predecessors. Let’s just agree to disagree.
“I’ve put in hundreds of hours in the souls games and Bloodborne is by far the biggest when it comes to changes”
Obviously but that doesnt say much since the games are the same.
” but the combat is a blatant copy and paste.”
Not sure how you change a fps combat, the mission are nonlinear and have more options and you got more toys what else can you do?
“but it could have just been an expansion.”
Considering how it is a much bigger game made by 500 people, no you are wrong.
“The map honestly didn’t seem that much different to FC3 for me”
One is on snowy mountains the other is in a tropical island. Wtf? Saints row iv was copy paste not this one.
“. You see Bloodborne as a rehashed game”
I dont i am simply pointing out that people bash cod, creed, far cry 4 for re used animations, same gameplay mechanics and same assets but bloodborne is doing it and it is most definetly NOT next gen or anything new. The reviews keep complaining that games are the same nowdays, bloodborne is mostly thesame, gets high scores.
???? Makes no sense.
I said that I put in hundreds of hours because having played the games so much, I can definitely spot the differences.
The game just felt like a more beefed up FC3 to me. It will always feel like an expansion to me.
The map might be different in some areas but there are those areas where it looks the same. Or maybe because I haven’t played FC3 in so long, I’ve forgotten how the map looks LoL
Those are only critics’ opinions. Games like Souls and Bloodborne aren’t even liked by most gamers but rather a niche crowd. I’d say that the reason why critics keep on giving high ratings to each souls game is because unlike games such as COD and FC4, the series feels more unique. For instance if people also play a new COD game, to them it would just be another COD game but also just another shooter. And people would call FC4 just an open world shooter. The games themselves, irrespective of the amount of sequels aren’t that unique You can’t really apply that to Souls or Bloodborne because the series has basically established it’s own identity. Nobody would say the game is ripped off something else, they’d rather say games are ripped off them like with Lords Of The Fallen. That’s probably why the series consistently gets high scores.
Actually the point i am making is that we are both biased when in reallity both games are very similar but also have their changes.
Hmmmm I get what you mean yes. You are more inclined towards FC4 and you are able to appreciate the changes more. To me, it’s the same with Bloodborne.
First, Bloodborne falls to 20 to 24 fps several times, has loading screens 40 seconds long, the visuals aren’t that good and are certainly a downgrade from what they showed a few months back, its a copy Souls game with no story crap story telling, horrible faces and voice acting, 0 interesting characters, and it gets 9 or more from teh reviewers. Fanboys all around.
Also I love that BS talk about how action games should be played at 30 fps… when anything faster than a snail gains from 60 fps.
Yup i dont think they even have to try anymore, this series gets a 9.5/10 for merely existing. WTF?
Nah I played a bit and while it looks similar, there are many minute changes to the gameplay that might seem small individually but together, the combat is is quite a different experience. As for the framerate, it doesn’t dip that much. It holds it’s 30fps for about 95% of the time. There’s quite a bit of stuttering though but I’m guessing From Software will fix it in a patch.
who do you think is giving those 9.5 or 10s. gaming websites that are obviously console biased. lots of their articles focus on console updates.
What i want to know is how you go “pftt same thing we played 100 time over” and “not a next gen game, just a HD last gen game” and this game despite falling under those 2 categories gets 9.5s and 10s.
Amazon France has a page for Bloodborne PC, probably a mistake but still crossing my fingers 😡
I don’t see it?
Amazon is terrible for that sort of stuff. They always make mistakes in listings.
Another mistake at best. Sony won’t let this happened. Although how i much i wanted it to be on PC.
yes it is clear as day that you are not a butthurt console fanboy lurking around…NOT.
Why couldn’t they do this as dlc?
Keep begging pc beggars .
pc beggars? Funny because pc gaming has more game releases than all consoles combined, last year steam had 2000 exlusives and pc has MORE dev support than consoles.
Keep crying console tard.
What’s so special about it? No Nero? HA, I crack myself up! 😀
Wish they would remaster DMC3.
damn it no gods must die difficulty?
How about a “Player must die difficulty” then.
Probably a good news for PC Gamers cause BloodBorne is coming : http://i.jeuxactus.com/datas/jeux/b/l/bloodborne/xl/bloodborne-55117023338d9.jpg
http://www.amazon.fr/Bloodborne-Nightmare-Edition-import-europe/dp/B00SGDOGN0/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1427234629&sr=8-2&keywords=bloodborne+nightmare
This one’s great if it’s true but I thought this game was co-published by Sony ? Then there’s very slim to no chance at all that this game will be available on PC
3month in 2015 and:
Super Mario Galaxy 2
Resident Evil HD Remaster
Saints Row IV: Re-Elected
Grim Fandango: Remastered
Fahrenheit: Indigo Prophecy Remastered
Metroid Prime: Trilogy
Heroes of Might and Magic III: HD Edition
Cities XXL
Dead or Alive 5 Last Round
Homeworld Remastered Collection
Oddworld: New ‘n’ Tasty
Zombie Army Trilogy
DmC: Definitive Edition
not to mentioned re-releases. only the good ones were homeworld and oddworld. and still dmc4,gow3 and maybe greas of war for xb1 and many more to come. remaster/delays/re releases/ thats what happened to game industry.
I wish this time they give a happier ending to the story by killing of Nero and his cliché girlfriend.