A lot of gamers wondered whether the debut trailer of Rainbow Six: Siege was based on a target render or on an actual game. Well, it seems that Ubisoft has – pleasantly – surprised everyone as Rainbow Six: Siege was playable at this year’s E3. Not only that, but its gameplay was identical to what the French company showed during its E3 conference. Now we all know this is Ubisoft (meaning that the final product may get downgraded), but at least we do know that there is a build of Rainbow Six: Siege that is identical to its debut trailer. Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
SWAT 3 and 4 updated for 2015. Thats what this is. Not necessarily a bad thing, wish this time they insert a story/campaign mode and not just make it missions only.
To be honest, if that is what the final game is, that is more than enough for me!
“wish this time they insert a story/campaign mode and not just make it missions only.”
Can you give us a link where this is stated? I didn’t see or hear anyone comment about the final format of the game anywhere.
Just stated that it looks a lot like Swat 3 and 4 updated for 2015, no idea if it will be mission or campaign based.
Woooo. We have a ubicrap fan here. Maybe? After the mess that is watch dogs, the downgrade, the same shit happened to farcry 3. And no talks about assgreed saga. People like you(sheeps) are killing the pc industry.
Sorry if im wrong. But you cant blame people to show the middle finger to ubisoft.
you know it’s not the final build right ? and this s**t happen most of the time with their titles ?
Here’s a skeptic from previous article. I wasn’t trolling because because the previous video honestly did troubled me in how heavily staged it was. It was too perfectly timed- the chat, the action pieces, the music, and a super villain – that it felt so weird. I mean in this video the squad had just started their breach and already they lost two person to a grenade. It felt more natural than the first one.
And here’s from this very article: “A lot of gamers wondered whether the debut trailer of Rainbow Six: Siege was based on a target render or on an actual game.” So, apparently I wasn’t the only one who’s a bit suspicious with the previous video. I don’t see anything wrong with me being a skeptic.
I showed Ubisoft a big giant middle finger when they launched their always online DRM. I only bought one game from them during that time simply because I forgot that iL-2 Sturmovik Cliff of Dover was published by them but luckily it used Steam instead. Then, Ubisoft stopped using the DRM and I started buying games from them again. I currently have Far Cry 3, Blood Dragon, Ghost Recon Future Soldier, a couple of Splinter Cells and I even tried Ghost Recon Online for a bit.