Mavericks: Proving Grounds will feature 400-person battle royale mode, gets first teaser trailer

Automaton Games today unveiled its upcoming multiplayer shooter, called Mavericks: Proving Grounds. Mavericks: Proving Grounds is a next-generation multiplayer shooter which will feature a massive, tactical, and dynamic world. Automaton aims to release a battle-royale version of it in 2018 that will support up to 400 players.

In the battle royale mode, players will duke it out in a 12 km squared world. This map will be filled with reactive wildlife and there will be dynamic water

In 2019, the team will transition into a massive 1000-player online game. As such, the final version of Mavericks: Proving Grounds will feature both the battle-royale and the online MMO modes. Moreover, Automaton’s CEO stated that the game will be powered by the SpatialOS technology.

Enjoy the teaser trailer below!

☆ Mavericks: Proving Grounds - HD Teaser Trailer ☆

Thanks PCGamer

15 thoughts on “Mavericks: Proving Grounds will feature 400-person battle royale mode, gets first teaser trailer”

          1. Yeah but that’s another craze, stupid people caught in that will change their mind eventually, and the reason will probably be another craze.

    1. What’s the point of raining on people’s parades and acting as if it’s an objectively bad type of game? Millions of people play it and enjoy it.

      1. You misunderstood my post. When did I say it’s a bad Game ?

        I was only pointing out the “Battle Royal” trend/genre which is slowly growing these days.

        Sure, there are lot of peeps who really enjoy playing it, and I don’t have anything against them.

        It’s about some of the game developers (not all), who are trying to focus more on this trend, rather than other modes of gameplay (Offline, Single player story and the like).

  1. *yawn* Oh… more “battle royale”. Thank god, cause the world just needs more of these “revolutionary” piles of garbage.

    1. It’s a successful genre and millions of people enjoy playing it. You may not enjoy it but that doesn’t make it an objectively bad type of game.

      1. Never claimed it was objectively bad. I’m claiming that further market saturation by these effortless knockoffs, is not needed.

        1. Oh, okay. I’m not a fan of bandwagoning too, especially when it comes to low-effort projects that are likely cash grabs.

    2. Ahem, you meant pillars of society not piles of garbage. Cause they are so, so very great.

      When will these dense f*ckers wake up and start producing real engaging content?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *