Activision and Sledgehammer Games have revealed the official Call of Duty: WWII PC requirements for the final build. According to the specs, the game will require 90GB of free hard-disk space. PC gamers will need at least an Intel Core i3 3225 3.3 GHz or an AMD Ryzen 5 1400 and 8GB of RAM.
Regarding the game’s minimum PC requirements, Sledgehammer suggests an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2 GB or a GTX 1050. Similarly, regarding the red team, Sledgehammer suggests ATI Radeon HD 7850 2GB or an AMD RX 550.
Sledgehammer recommends an Intel Core i5-2400 or an AMD Ryzen R5 1600X and 12GB of RAM. Moreover, the team recommends an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 or a GTX1060 6GB. As for the red team, Sledgehammer recommends an AMD Radeon R9 390 or an AMD RX 580.
Sledgehammer has also revealed that it will increase its FOV slider, aim assist will remain disabled, and that its anti-cheat system will be ready at launch.
Call of Duty: WWII releases on November 3rd, and below you can find its final PC requirements.
Minimum PC Spec:
- OS: Windows 7 64-Bit or later
- CPU: CPU: Intel® Core™ i3 3225 3.3 GHz or AMD Ryzen™ 5 1400
- RAM: 8 GB RAM
- HDD: 90 GB HD space
- Video: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 660 @ 2 GB / GTX 1050 or ATI® Radeon™ HD 7850 @ 2GB / AMD RX 550
- DirectX: Version 11.0 compatible video card or equivalent
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Sound Card: DirectX Compatible
Recommended PC Spec:
- CPU: Intel® Core™ i5-2400 or AMD Ryzen R5 1600X
- RAM: 12 GB RAM
- HDD: 90 GB HD space
- Video: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 970 / GTX 1060 @ 6GB or AMD Radeon™ R9 390 / AMD RX 580
- DirectX: Version 11.0 compatible video card or equivalent
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Sound Card: DirectX Compatible
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Looks like all my hopes trainwrecked. Call of Duty still does not know term “file compression”.
:/
Seems like the trend is towards storage hogs like this game. I wonder if the Developers think it gives the impression that there must be a lot to the game because of how large the storage requirements are?
It’s mostly about discouraging torrent, I think.
exactly, too cheap to invest in DRM
so they save money by both uncompressing it and by making it unpirtable (since people rarely seed a 100GB game)
They will, pirates will put those installer which compress files, this affect much more to legit users who doesnt have at least 10MB of internet connection bandwidth. Also pretty sure steam installer will be compressed too. This is just because dev lazyness.
as i was saying, this is probably activision al-cheapo decision to save up money on literally everything
hell the main reason why they censored the swastikas in the game was to save a few bucks on the german version
activision is eugene krabs+Scoorge Mcduck+Corporate Commander
they are literally trying to break records on making as much money while spending as little as possible
yep it is good method but denuvo uwp and always online will make it sure that no one is pirateing
Pirated versions can be played online if one so wishes. It won’t be UWP. But sure, Denuvo will stop piracy. I mean, seriously. Lately, Denuvo has never been cracked…
this fast.
LOL, torrent knows file compression.
which is stupid because repacks exist
How did those work for Titanfall? Is there a cracked version where someone compressed all the audio and made the game work with compressed files? I doubt it.
They stripped the game of all the language paks and unnecessary online multiplayer files.
Lol what a load of BS. You heard it here first guys!
Developers inflate their games with empty data taking up loads of space for no reason!
Get a clue.
Not a new thing, Titanfall did it years ago and may not have been the first either.
Titanfall did it because on the fly file decompression took too much CPU resources for low end PC’s. Although they could have fixed that using the XPRESS16K algorithm instead of the far slower LZX algorithm that they used.
Uncompressed videos and textures.
That’s a price to pay for “4k ultra hd photorealistic graphics”.
All in game videos are compressed, it’s just a matter of compression level. Two hours of uncompressed 1080p video can take over 100GB, not to mention 4K
Well i don’t really care. As long as it’s a good game with enjoyable gameplay and nice graphics. If this call of duty fits these parameters then so be it. At this point the majority of games have 500gb+ hard drives, i believe.
I have two 1TB hard drives and recent game sizes are becoming a pain for me too.
How many games do you have installed ? i got tons of games installed and i haven’t maxed my 500gb :X
It only takes 10 AAA games to reach 500GB these days and I don’t only use my computer for games, I need at least 1.2TB for my smug anime girls folder.
Indeed lol. Keep that on an external HD with a good sized magnet just in-case le gf finds out.
i’d sooner install a virus
You mean an ubisoft or EA game
I think Ubisoft has actually been doing pretty well recently.
Yea i do too.Recent iterations of Ghost Recon and R6, in my book, are 2 must have games.
Remember warch dogs
Remember Watch Dogs 2? Remember Ghost Recon? Remember Rainbow Six Siege? All of them look pretty nice and run rather well.
Wow really? But all the textures look like muddy plastic figures.
Lets be honesty here, the game is really good and optimized.
>multiplayer
>has no servers
As good and optimized as a skyscraper underwater.
Do you know what optimization means?
I do, I’m just horsing around. For the record COD WW2 optimization is a mixed bag. Most maps in the beta ran well but one was unplayable. So yeah, not optimized a month ago. Wanna bet it’s perfect now?
LOL. Compared to what, multiplayer is all about going through all the map, capturing points, killing enemies. Youll be bored in a month.
Me Playing Your Game requirements revealed, will require dedicated servers.
you can use matchmaking on proper servers, that’s no contradiction. you may be confusing dedicated servers with having a server browser and choosing your server to play on freely. not a requirement at all, I could go without. i prefer skill-based matchmaking (without bogus pay 2 win elements obviously) to random servers like old games had, actually. one of the few things modern games sometimes get right.
nope get your eyes checked
LOL, Stop c0cksck1ng Activision. This game obviously has better graphics than COD2 but its not better than many other games which have bigger maps and better textures. And again Activision ruined it again.
What are they smoking?
1050 is faster +22% than 660
RX 550 is faster +5% than 660lel
1060 is faster +10% than 970
RX 580 is faster + 5-10% than 970
R9 390 and 970 are almost the same, one time wins R9 in the other 970
They are still using that file system form old IDtech 3 Engine from COD 2 😉
New generation of Cod gamers doesnt care about historical accuracy, they dont care about history either.
One always expect Activision to learn from its mistakes with every new cod, it never happens.
Guns almost have no recoil, and the game is still about running and kill everything that moves, ah and capturing points.
Well, it is an Activision Published game and who the f*ck knows anything about real gaming hardware over there in their studios anyway.
wccftech is a good home for Sp4ctr0. Sh*t posting is welcomed there.
tbh he’s not stupid. He’s pretty smart actually. Whether he’s trolling for attention, a dedicated Xbox One X fan or a paid shill he keeps the drama rolling and people pay attention to him.
The sites he links to are spurious and the charts he posts are dubious but most people don’t question what they are being told if it has the appearance of legitimacy. It’s human nature to be lazy and go along with the crowd.
I doubt XboxX is as fast as 1080ti, but looking at AC Origins benchmark at gamegpu site you can see that even 1070GTX has problems with 4K30fps in this game while xboX somehow run this game maxed out in 4K native.
Unlike like you I just read all current information when it comes to games. Origins on XboxX was using checkerboard at first, then it was 4K native with dynamic resolution system, and after further optimisations dynamic resolution system is not even needed anymore because game holds native 4K all the time (at least this is what ubisoft told). When it comes to settings, we need to wait for some indeepth DigitalFoundry article. Right now I can only guess it’s close to PC max settings, because gameplays on xboxX looks very similar to what I can see on PC gameplays. I have still not played AC origins myself but if I would have to choose, I would buy PC version simply because on my 2GHz 1080ti I should run this game maxed out even better than xbox X.
i dunno, but the gameplay is 100x better.
I wonder where Zatara went to? We miss ya pal.
Hey, Zatara. I guess this is your newest account then.
ummmm no Mr Internet Person. I’m a Skyrim cat. How the f*cking hell can I be a Zatara anyway? Don’t they teach you people anything in school these days :p
Nope.
Had to wander off for a week 😛
Requiring 90GB does not mean the actual install size is 90GB. Destiny 2 requires 60+ GB, the game fills up around 38GB.
80% of people were stuttering in beta
and here i am talking 1080Ti and i9,i7 with fast DDR 4 memory 3200+
their answer was upgrade ur GTX 1080Ti its weak
Damn I’m lucky 20%. And not even close PC to that.
That’s an improvement over laggy Black Ops 3.
I’m running it on a Q6600, 8GB, and a EVGA GT 1030. No issues. Download took forever.