Screen-News

Watch_Dogs – First PC Screenshots From Final Version Captured At 4K Resolution

229 Comments

NeoGAF’s member ‘twisted89‘ has early access to the PC version of Watch_Dogs and captured some screenshots at 3840×2160 (4K resolution). This will give you an idea of what Watch_Dogs looks on the PC, though do note that gaming at 4K is really demanding for a title such Ubisoft’s open-world. Enjoy!

229 thoughts on “Watch_Dogs – First PC Screenshots From Final Version Captured At 4K Resolution”

    1. Ubisoft REALLY needs to optimize ALL of their Engines.
      I was hoping for something mind-blowing from a Heavy Duty 4k PC, it ain’t that much better.
      It looks nothing like it was previously announced. We waited 6 months more for this? They ruined it!

      Reply

        1. That last shot looks amazing. Glad to see they’re using real-time reflections on most surfaces.

          Reply

    1. Stay chill it will look good don’t worry .
      I am more concerned about performance/visual ratio than great graphics and bad performance!

      Reply

        1. Well what i said performance/graphics!
          If its only just graphics well is not anymore PC Race ………….is bs Race and lazy dev.

          Reply

          2. AC4, best looking game I’ve played in years. Here comes internet the lingo:

            dat water tho bro

      2. I think it is something between average and good but we all expected much more because of the lies they threw at us.fucking liars.

        Reply

          2. he is not a fanboy .believe me i know that.he is just giving his opinion which is a fact to many other pc gamers considering the serious downgrade.maybe you are?

      3. Technically,yep.
        They downgraded this game-the reason:UNKNOWN.
        Battlefield 4 looks better than this…

        Reply

        1. i bet its because consoles were weaker than they expected, or maybe its because they couldnt get the game to run on ps3/x360 which resulted into optimization issues on x86 hardware.

          Reply

          1. It is on the PS3 and Xbox 360.
            I blame Ubisoft bad color choices for the day time. Night looks great.
            But all of their engines should be revised completely.
            I don’t need to remind you guys what Theif was and how bad it is.

          2. Agreed day time looks like saints row 2 and night time looks great.

            The fact they work on fc4 for last gen consoles scares me.

            Thief runs well on pc and runs like crap on next gen.

          3. The PC is an unoptimized mess. All the power for the incredibly low price and it still performs like crap.

          4. i just watched a gtx 660 video with i5 running the game at 40 fps with 1080p aa and very high settings.

          5. BF4 on XB1 is looking way better than Watch_Dogs on XB1.
            Watch_D.O.G.S=Downgrades
            So=Watch_Downgrades?

          6. or most possibly because they are lazy to optimize the game well enough to run on pcs smoothly.

          8. yeah,the fact that the game needs a patch itself is a negative point
            they can make the game run on old pcs and optimize it well enough with graphics worth current-gen-high end pcs too.wanting the game to run on old pcs or consoles does not justify them being lazy or downgrading the visuals.

          9. i just watched a video with a gtx660 running the game on very high not ultra with 40 fps, POS4 runs it at 900p high 30 fps.

          10. Did the visuals satisfy you? I mean were it worth the system or it was not good despite being on very high?

          11. Judging by ultra vs low comparisons i saw the game looks around the same on all apart from some effects, welcome to deminishing returns.

          12. thanks for informing me.i also took a look at techspot and guru3d articles of watchdogs performance.guru3d’s screenshots of the game are not promising.the game graphics is between average and good.nothing special.

          15. No, thas why there are options and you can change things to make it run better.

    3. So you spent $60 before any reviews after the embargo and believed all the bullshots? Well then, more fool you sir!

      Reply

      1. yes i agree i am a fool, i did it with ACIII too, lol, only a fool can do this, i agree. i didn’t fall for bullshots though, i like openworld games no matter what, specially in modern day settings. but yeah buying ubisoft titles aren’t on my list anymore, too late but better late than never.
        on the other hand you really can’t trust reviews unless independent ones

        Reply

    2. Nothing special about GTA 5 if you like sub 720p, sub 30/20fps and Watch Dogs on the last gen consoles looks horrendous.

      Reply

  5. oh no it looks more like a 1080p than 4K….. underwhelming ! s**t I pre-ordered the decsec edition…. kinda feel conned with that ultra demanding specs advertisement…

    Reply

  7. first screenshot

    DAFUQ IS THIS?

    Second shot DAFUQ IS THAT?

    What is this the x360/ps3 version?

    is this 2008 or something?

    The game looks like someone took ac3 and put it on modern era, nothing next gen about it, even the grass looks the same. Where is ambient occlusion? where are the missing shadows? where is the saturation? where is the hdr?

    The game better not run like utter sht.

    Lol ubisoft “the game is next gen, no compromises from last gen”

    Seriously wtf.

    Now i worry about fc4, i bet they gonna show awesome e3 trailer and the game’s visuals “wont be compromised from last gen versions” either!!

    But dont worry guys ubisoft say they will “support x360/ps3 for years to come”

    Thanks ubisoft!!

    Someone should change the “thanks obama” meme to “thanks ubisoft”

    Reply

    1. all of that + you need a monster PC to run this s**t. lol. i wait for more screens and videos for PC version till the game comes and i can play it, if it looks like these screens and runs like s**t then i add ubisoft to my pirate game publishers like EA

      Reply

      1. if fc3 is like fc2, i will add ubisoft to my “dont care” list.

        But hey if watchdogs plays amazing and becomes a hit, then i wont mind, i still play saints row 2 despite the fact it looks like UTTER SHT and runs like UTTER SHT because its a fun game, but somehow i doubt that will be the case with watchdogs. When they first showed the game i was like ZOMG OMG WOW, now i am “arghh, dissapoitment awaits…AGAIN”

        Reply

          1. For brainless item collecting casual’s that want a generic FPS like every other, yeah. Craft a wallet and carry hundreds of $ on a pirate, murdering feasted island.

          2. Already said…I only play Stealth/Indies games…

            Even Crysis 3 played it Stealth way…FC3 is damn good at its Stealth gameplay!

            Good story, Great Graphics.

      1. It’s not too bad at all if you have a good CPU but AC4 is one of the best looking games out there and very dynamic.

        Reply

        1. Seriously i have good CPU and yea is bad and is not the best looking game out there are 90% more who look better and work better than ACIV.

          Reply

          1. I wouldn’t define 40-60fps bad. It has demanding effects for an open world game and I’ve seen a 770 hit 60fps.

          2. If it dosen’t hit 60 stable its pretty bad for a AC game and what old gen graphics it has beside that “water” from Far Cry 3 team(who also runs superb again performance/graphics 10/10) .

          3. There are a lot of effects that are not even in the last gen consoles, even the PS4 doesn’t have godrays, PCSS, HBAO+, TXAA, MSAA, SMAA.

          4. And even with those exclusive effects ACIV with a GTX 760 should be maxing out at 1080p with 60 FPS all the time ofc with a powerfull CPU”i5 4670″ but i want to see Watch Dogs performing good in this ratio that i mentioned before!

          6. Thats what i called a real world for that hardware it should perform that way.
            If is not performing that way it means that is a really a bad optimized game.

          7. Dude, sorry to tell you but AC4 has a lot of CPU bottlenecked areas just due to bad code just like AC3 did. Areas where turning effects on or off does nothing because it’s not a GPU limitation. Areas where my 2600k @4.5 isn’t even half used and my GTX 680 isn’t even 80% used. That’s an artificial bottleneck by poor game code.

            I get what you’re saying about the GPU features being demanding and you are correct but thats a whole different thing. When you have a 780TI in a certain area dropping down to 45 fps the same as my video card with same settings, I’m sorry but that’s unacceptable and lazy coding.

            Either way I’m not here to bash the game, its been ripped on enough for being another Ubisoft kieb lazy project. I love the game, I’m playing through now, I think it looks gorgeous on max settings. I personally cap it at 45 fps so its a smooth experience. Still looks and runs Bette than the ps4 version so I’m happy :).

          8. I think it’s a lot to do with driver and API as well, we know for a fact devs can’t multi-thread proper, Mantle proves it so we can’t blame the devs fully for an API that can’t initialise the hardware fully.

          10. If you have G-SYNC i will call 40 flawlessly but 60 FPS all the time is something that keeps me on PC gaming and think that some developers really tried to give the best for PC gamers. !

          11. You’re full of sh*t sorry, name some open world games that look better than AC4 and run at 1080p/60fps with the same graphics options.

          12. Ohh Sean that’s a new low level of behavior even for you bro …….i am sure that you are a fan of ACIV but i think most of people will tell the difference betwen a good optimized game and a crappy one and to be honest with you ACIV is full of sh*t at graphics/performance ratio.

          13. If AC4 wasn’t so dynamic then you might have case. Games with realtime dynamic effects in them are a lot more demanding. People think Batman Origins was well optimised, forgetting the city has baked low quality shadows everywhere and fake particle lighting.

          1. Indeed!
            But they said this game was designed 100% PC + they also cancel the release date so i’m hoping for good optimization!

          2. It has badly optimised areas but most of the time it runs well. The badly optimised areas seem to be where the birds are in the trees where the mansion is.

  13. If this runs at 60 FPS stable at Ultra 1080p on GTX 670 then it will be EPIC and amazing performance/graphics ratio!
    Better anyway than GTA V and GTA IV with Hard-Core mods in daylight idk why people saying it looks bad probably only on consoles anyway take a closer look.

    Reply

          1. For him it’s always 1080, ULTRA, 60fps or it’s crap POS optimisation. OMFG 59.9fps, POS optimisation.

          2. have you seen infamous ss digital foundry perfomance video?

            its all over the place, 34, then the plays fires a shot goes to 28, then after the explosion it goes to 24 and ithe framerate bounces up and down all the time.

            Badly optimized game on pc> “optimized” game on a console.

          3. Indeed and not only for me for a guy who knows the power the hardware and how much a dev can get from it…and if they are lazy sob then we probably will get low FPS even on medium-high settings with a high-end rig !
            Rest of all are just marketing stuff to make people buy new hardware.

          5. I know stay chill. More than you think but i prefer to stay chill and mind my own stuff!

          6. Also in 2014 with a GTX 770 for the resolution 1080p/Ultra the 60 FPS in all games should be something normal and decent since the dev and GPU comapny’s want to push 4k in every commercial and bechmark .

  14. Sleeping Dogs looks better than this crap. Wasn’t it just a few weeks ago that Jonathan Morin said the pc version would be close to the E3 2012 demo? Watch Dogs is this years Aliens Colonial Marines.

    Reply

  16. it doesn’t look good for sure , i hope it will have at least a descent gameplay .

    Reply

  18. GTA V looks much better than this shit, I DO MEAN IT. And probably when it releases on pc, it will run much better too.

    Reply

  20. What setting is this running on? Looks too bland to be anything close to Ultra. I’m guessing all the other settings had to be turned down to touch 4K.

    Reply

  22. Reading some comments and having a good laugh really.

    Just don’t play the games because of their GOD DAMN GAMEPLAY…

    I was watching some game-plays from JackFrags, ImAnderZEL and they were playing on the PS4 and the game looks solid…maybe not that super “Crysis 3-The Witcher 2-Skyrim modded level of detail” but it looks and PLAYS really good.

    The most noticeable ” bad” thing in the PS4 version was that if you stand in front of the car lights, your character won’t cast a shadow. Then particles are fine (you may like explosions or not), gun sounds are a little bit bland in my opinion, lighting is good (lens flares and the god rays are there), texturing looks kay for an open world game (people seems to forget that this game is a god damn dense open world)…physics are a mix of good and bad, character animations are great, you have a lot of freedom while moving all around…etc.

    I don’t know…maybe I’m wrong and my game´s standards are different than the rest…I always care more for the game-play and fun aspect of the games (if not I probably hate Saints Row which is not the case, the game looks like crap but it makes me laugh for example, so I like that game even if the car physics are horrible)…

    I love good graphics as well, but don’t tell me that the best games are only those who look good…that is not true.

    Check those game-plays and you´ll see that the game looks good enough.

    Anderzel video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl_my62_RNM

    Jackfrags video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33muCkef288

    If you still believe that the PC version will look worse than that…

    Reply

  23. Guys let’s wait a sec this pics are in 1080p and seems to be at medium settings ……let’s wait and see on Ultra or Very High settings !
    Also to make this complete Driver San Francisco looks better than this pics!

    Reply

        1. hmmm not really !
          you can have 4960x and TITAN BLACK and still the fps will go lower than 60 (20-30 fps) in special with that quality

          Reply

          1. Not sure what planet you’re on but I get 25fps on my FX6300/GTX600 with AO off, very high settings, 70, 70 draw distance. That’s just for screenshots though, don’t play the game at 3200×1800 🙂

          2. yea and the game is that bad optimized overall even if you add extreme hardware will still drop to 25 FPS.(don’t care about max fps)
            And really from what planet i am?? i just told you the truth and what it is if you accept it very good for you sir.
            PS: When i say something i say it with years of experience and hardware available on my desk from mid-high to ultra-end.

          4. Sean, is there an easy way to run a game at higher resolution to test performance? I’m considering a 1440p monitor but my GTX760 4GB is borderline at best for that.

          5. Yes, you can use downsampling, which is what those shots are, 3200×1800 downsampled to 1920x1080p on the GPU.

      2. nope. for me it’s 40 to 60, most of the time 60 but in Uturns it drops to 40fps. ultra + ice 2.1 + HD textures etc…

        Reply

    2. So much time spent modding yet they seem to have forgotten to turn on anisotropic filtering o_O

      Reply

          2. Hey punkass.go start enjoying shitty graphics on your shid box instead of throwing crap here.

          3. I don’t find Infamous Second Son “shitty looking.” You PC tards are so full of crap.

          4. No really it isn’t. I thought you PC guys were supposed to be so tech savy. You might like the “look” or art style more, but it is technically inferior to Watch Dogs. Even on console.

          5. You say that but GTA 4 on the PC has many more light sources with shadows, every light casts a shadow, headlights cast shadows, lamps cast shadows, Watch Dogs doesnt do that and GTA4 on the PC is from 2008. They both use a deferred renderer so they can have loads of light sources.

            Being a console user you wouldn’t know that.

  25. I’ll be enjoying this on my 780 Ti while the idiots here (mainly dakan and amir) chew their own legs off cursing “console peasants”.

    Reply

    1. Ugh I thought I was being nitpicky to feel disappointed till you posted that. Such rain. Much sexy.

      Reply

  27. Damn…why did I bought it(Uplay/$40)? its ugly, transistor, among sleep, metro 2033 redux…and I payed that in another shitty AAA.

    Lets hope that at least it will be fun!

    Reply

  29. game lloks fine,, been playing that leaked version for 4 hours already. it uses 3vram for ultra settings, which greatly improves the textures and looks good. its underwhelming during the day, at night it looks very nice and it does have very bad lightning effects, but maybe thats subjective.

    Reply

  30. We need better screenshots ,i want at least 3 night-rain screenshots and some screens while using profiler to see if the dof and post process are still there.

    Reply

    1. so did i but you taking jabs at me again upvoting extreme’s derp bullcrap and pretending you ignore me, my god what a troll.

      Reply

    1. dude! this game is all over the torrents sites from morning….it is the final version 😐

      Reply

    1. He obfuscated with “in many regards.” Nothing specific can be derived from that. Lying by omission, practically.

      Reply

  36. Not only it’s bad looking, but there’s so few people on the streets. It looks… lifeless…
    I didn’t expect things would go this bad…

    To say I’m extremely disappointed would be and understatement…

    Reply

  37. Not what we expected.another hyped game in terms of graphics.now I am going to doubt even more this game being really enjoyable.maybe gameplay is as hyped as the graphics?

    Reply

  39. M$ and $ony are cancer to game industry . To hide weakness of their hardware , they’ve been plaguing game industry for years , by holding it back . Seriously .

    Reply

      1. MAKING LOTS OF MONEY?

        sony finacials are lower than ever, they took double the losses ms had with x360 from ps3. They lost more money with ps3 than they made with ps2. The xbox division hasnt made profit in over a decade.

        Oh look we got exlusives we got this we got that, we got this… bs without people buying console games and getting money out of the royality fees, they would be dead.

        Reply

          1. why are you here console r3tard?

            Ps a old pc can run this game at old settings we just dont want that, we want amazing graphics.

            Now gtfo and go lick some j@p sony dck you pathetic peaseant

            The facts are the facts sony is lossing money like crazy, they close divisions and fire people but you console fangirls wont admit they are in trouble you close your ears and scream “NANANANANA” like butthurt kiddies that you are!!

      3. Sony don’t make much money on the unit itself, in fact last gen Sony and Microsoft sold their consoles at a loss and got back the money over 5 odd years, that’s why the old gen is lasting so long.

        Sony made a $1.3B loss this year because they’ve forgotten how to compete. Nintendo are in the same boat, losses year after year.

        Reply

      4. So hows your 900p high settings barelly 30 fps game workign out? I just watched a video with a gtx 660 running the game at very high with 1080p and AA at 40 fps.

        Damn dat “super computer” ps4 powaaaa of da gddr5

        Reply

    2. Especially $0N¥ as it’s their paupercommunity that’s the real cancer on the internet spreading their lies to trick people into buying products from a dying company.

      Reply

  42. See the thing about Ubisoft is that they dont have the secret sauce that Rockstar Games has when it pertains to Open World Games with graphics fadility simply because rockstar has more experience … in 2 years GTA 6 will look amazing and stunning and another fact is that another RedDead Redemption is coming out.

    Reply

  43. wow this looks so downgraded compared to e3’s 2012 build and on a high end pc! what happened? ubi-lying

    Reply

  44. What’s going on in the 8th and 9th pic? Looks like motion blur artifacts but I’m unsure.

    Reply

  45. even at 8 or 16k, the game will suck, bevause textures are from ps2 games, shaders are the most simple as possible, cars look like a square box with a flat texture and a single color, characters lool like a ps2 game(again), and everything else is just UGLY, OUTDATED, UGLY.

    how dare they calling that next gen ? dear Lord, when i see some screenshots, i feel like i’m watching a gta5 game with low textures and vga resolution.

    please, everybody on PC pirate this crap, don’t give your hard earned money on this crap that ubisoft will try to sell BEFORE E3, because they knew if they were releasing it AFTER E3, nobody would ever look at it, because all the other games look 10 times better.

    how can a next gen game in 2014 only require a low specs pc to run at ultra ? this is the biggest prove the game was downgraded like shit, from E3 trailers, and textures and everything are just so average, with low polygons count everywhere, that even an intel HD4000 will run it at full hd ultra. what a shame.

    they could have delayed the game and polish it, to reach 1080p on ps4 and 900p on x1, and much better visuals on pc. but no. they want get rid of this turd as soon as possible, before E3, grab their little billion dollars, and bye bye idiots, thanks for buying it.

    BOYCOT THIS FKING GAME, EVERYBODY ! don’t buy it, dont give another billion $ to ubisoft, otherwise, in one year, you will get watchdogs 2 with the same graphics, full of microtransactions.

    fking ugly graphics. shame. shame. and shame on you, guys that say the game looks amazing.it looks like shiit, yeah.

    Reply

    2. pc sucks?

      How so, i would love to know how pc sucks when pc has thebest graphics, the most exlusives, customizable controls, mods, backwards compability, free mp and like you said its better than xbone.

      HUR DUR PS4 IS DA KING, lets throw some feces around like sony c3m licking monkeys that we are.

      Reply

    1. +1
      even gameplay looks like s**t ali, specially driving. what happened to cars ? they look weightless

      Reply

      1. They look wonky as hell. Almost as if a kid is playing with them in a sandbox, and moving them from left to right. Really disappointing guys.

        Reply

  49. To me graphics look fresh and sharp (4k duh), but a bit too clean. And this is obviously not comparable with the promotional CGI movie from E3 2012. Also what could have we expected? This is the same engine the AC games were made with, and also an open world game, its just that Ubisoft made us beleive that the game would look great. The next big question is, how will The Division look in ‘real life’? That worries me now after seeing this.

    Reply

    1. Not the same engine uses their “Disrupt engine” Really sad to see what’s happened , still don’t understand how it changed since the Nvidia trailer, Still feel it’s being held back on
      purpose possibly due to the NG version, why make the PC version shine
      with NG base complaining how the different they look compared to where they can claim that it looks just as good as PC , few years time we’ll see the cycle of Ubisoft games looking better on PC but for now consoles are priority.

      But yeah 7 days wait for my copy to finally reach me.

      Reply

  50. It doesn’t look ‘bad’. Also i’ve waited months for this game and i think we PC gamers should be happy that we can at least play new games, not like R* who are keeping their mouth shut. My only question is, how good or bad is the optimization? I have an old I7 860 and pretty old HD6870 and 8GB ram. I have always played games on 1080p and medium to high settings, i hope i can play W_D too with 1080p and at least medium..

    Reply

    2. It will look like that on the 900p PoS4 and yet $0N¥ paupers will say that di*rrhea tastes like the cream of the crop.

      Reply

  52. ‘please, everybody on PC pirate this crap”

    Why so we can be called pirates by you console gamers? You pirate it first.

    🙂 LOL

    Reply

    1. I will download it for PC, so ubisoft can see the seed number reach +1 million.
      I really like some of ubisoft titles, rayman games are little masterpieces.
      But this gta5 wannabe, made knowing PC gamers that couldn’t have gta5 would jump on it, regardless of the quality, this behaviour, I can’t stand.
      I was super excited about it, and would probably buy it once it reaches 20-40$. But when we compare what they showed us last e3, and how it looks now, even at 4k, it became a big joke. They know next E3 there are many great games that will be shown, like open world titles like the witcher 3, maybe another saints row, just cause, and all the open world fps like farcry, because the trend is :
      Open world game @60$ + online pass + season pass + dlcs + micro transactions + maps packs + weapons pack >>>>>>> single player campaign @ 60$ ONCE

      With all the future titles, watchdogs visuals would have looked like a huge pile of crap, that’s why they preferred and choosed to release the game BEFORE E3, if the price to pay was downgrading visuals to a level that it looks like a PS2 game. Those cars with one single color and a few polygons remind me gran turismo 3 cars.

      So yeah, if I can pirate it, I will do it. I will even download the ps3 iso, even if I have no modded ps3. I want them to see all the million sales they lost.
      They deserve it!
      Why don’t they show us some ps3/x360 gameplay, or even X1? Do they have something to hide? Of course they do.
      Muahhahaaaha 🙂

      Reply

      1. Yes i know, you console fanboys are buying the console version, then pirate the pc version because its bettr and then scream and shoot PC GAMERS ARE PIRATES, HAHAH NO GTA V FOR YOU.

        Thats the first message i got from you.

        “But this gta5 wannabe,”

        More like person of interest the game, gta has linear missions and trully stupid characters, this game however takes itself seriously and focus on upgrading your character and approaching objectives diffirent ways, throwing lure grenades, sneaking, hacking traffic lights nad so on, it has nothing to do with gta.

        As for pc sales? Saints row iv sold more on pc than 3 because there was no gta v around, rockstar loses money without the pc version.

        Reply

    1. behold the sony r3tardded jealous and butthurt race.

      LOLOLOL

      Dont you have some bjs to perfom for yoshida and take your ps4 to bed so you can lick its plastic?

      Reply

      1. You seem to be really angry about something, having trouble coming out to the family?

        Reply

        1. Says the butthurt sony c3m licker that posted bullycrap to boast on his patheticstation 4 by claiming 900p high settigns looks better than 4k ultra settings.

          Logic you have none.

          Go lick your ps4 plastic until you fall sleep.

          Reply

        1. The 900p race seems to be a bit jelly, fck that, make it SUPER BUTTHURT AND JEALOUS.

          Well you get what you paid for, you paid for a 400$ trashbox, thats what you got.

          Reply

          2. A 6 year old 955 and a gtx 660 can run the game better than ps4 settings and why not get the 760 gtx which comes with watchdogs for free.

            TA DA console optimization achieved.

            So much for consoles and bad perfomance.

            Glorious pc master race wins again!

    2. at least it’s better than 900p 30fps, it runs and looks better than your s**ty retardstation 4 lol

      Reply

  54. peasants hardware pull gaming back,as always they do,the game that suppose to be the number one in the 2014,crushed and smashed into pieces.ubisoft you become the disgrace of the game generation,get out of my sight!!

    Reply

  55. I have to say this looks pretty damn awful, the PS4 shots Ive seen actually look better which is hilarious, guess the elitist d!ck wad snobs are going to by super butthurt over this one. PC master race, ha ha ha.

    Reply

    2. 1080p+ >900p
      very high/ultra, exlusive AA and ambient occlusion>POS4 high settings.

      Also barelly 30 fps.

      So how exactly does the POS4 version looks better?

      Oh i know its because consoeltards dont understand graphics for SHT.

      I just posted a video with gtx660+ i5 running the game on very high settigns at 40 fps..also 1080p and heavy AA, cry some more sonytard.

      Reply

  56. funny, my comment got deleted but his comment not. visible trolling and personal attack but mine was deleted/removed. lol

    Reply

  58. This looks miles ahead of what the PoS4 can achieve. Poor $0N¥ paupers, still defending their pauprbrick when all they are doing is throwing their money at a dying company.

    Reply

    1. i just watched a video with a gtx660 running the game on very high not ultra with 40 fps, POS4 runs it at 900p high 30 fps.

      Reply

  59. $0N¥ paupers prove over and over again that they are just an epic fail at real life spamming the internet with their pauperpropaganda 24/7.

    Reply

  60. Guys, the game looks really nice but it’s not E3 2012 standard, it’s also nicely optimised especially for NVIDIA cards(no surprise there). All the wind effects are there, trees grass rubbish blow with the wind, lovely day and night cycles, lighting and rain effects.

    The NPCs are very detailed as well, lots going off, it’s not bare on the streets.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *