Funcom and Bearded Ladies, a Sweden-based game development studio that includes former ‘Hitman’ designers and Ulf Andersson the designer of ‘PAYDAY’, today announced a brand-new game called Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden. Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden is a tactical adventure game combining the turn-based combat of XCOM with story, exploration, stealth, and strategy.
The game is currently planned for release later this year. Players must take control of a team of unlikely heroes, such as Dux (a crossbow-wielding, walking, talking duck) and Bormin (a boar with serious anger issues), and help them navigate a post-human Earth with its abandoned cities, crumbling highways, and mutated monsters on every corner.
Executive Producer Ulf Andersson at Bearded Ladies said:
“It’s an unusual label for a game, but tactical adventure really fits the bill, no duck pun intended. Our goal is to blend the deep and tactical combat of ‘XCOM’ with a branching storyline that unfolds as you explore overgrown forests and abandoned cities with your team of Mutants. Mixing that with real-time stealth gameplay gives you a unique way to approach or avoid combat situations you encounter while exploring.”
Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden is powered by Unreal Engine and is based on the classic ‘Mutant’ IP that has spawned several popular pen and paper role-playing games since the 1980s, including the current ‘Mutant: Year Zero’ from Free League and Modiphius Entertainment.
Enjoy!
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Why i dont play turn base garbage https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/92f1bd5f2b701630917f5c3db6f7ffea274c832fea419779b10089c0cc0c5d13.jpg
Or 90% missed 4 shoot
LOL! I was about to post something like this. It’s from the devs who made Xcom where 95% hit means you means you miss 95% instead and have to load the game over and over so the 95% hit would actually hit —__—
Load a savegame because of a missed shot? LOL.
Well, the shot is a matter of life and death for my high level
character and the 95% has missed so many times. So yeah, I will load the sh*t out of that save because a 95%
hit should mean it will hit 95% of the time
”a 95% hit should mean it will hit 95% of the time”
Uh no, not at all… a 50% probability shot doesn’t mean that it will land 50 shots out of 100, or 25 out of 50… do you people even went to elementary school?
AHAHAHAHAHA! WHAT!? Looks like the fanboyism got the better of you. What kind of math are you talking about? I think you should ask yourself that question. That “95%” means that the shot should hit with a 95% probability and a 5% probability that it will miss
Chill out, yes, this is correct: “95% means that the shot should hit with a 95% probability and a 5% probability that it will miss”
But this is not: “95% hit should mean it will hit 95% of the time”, do you not understand the difference?
“Math” question : A man shot a target 100 times. The man’s accuracy rate is 95%. How many times did the man hit the target?
Pass a test questionnaire with an answer other than “95” to math teachers and they will definitely mark it as wrong. What kind of math are you even talking about? some kind of “philiosophical” math or something?
You’re confused. A man’s accuracy rating is not the same as a chance to hit something. Two different concepts.
If I have a 95% chance to hit a target, you understand that it’s possible to miss, for example, 2 shots out of two, right?
Edit: I get why you guys don’t like turn-based, apparently it’s too complicated, lol.
Yes, there’s a 5% chance that could happen which is very low. “BUT” this was your counter point
Uh no, not at all… a 50% probability shot doesn’t mean that it will land 50 shots out of 100, or 25 out of 50
Which is completely wrong. Now you’re just asking me if there’s a probability that the shot will miss twice in a row. Of course there is. The accuracy is only 95% and not 100%.
Also, in case of your beloved Xcom. The 95% accuracy rate in that game misses too often that anyone who knows proper math and not blinded by fanboyism would have an idea that the math invlolved in calculating the hit probability in that game is off
I have also liked turn based games since jrpg era just not games where high percentage of hit rate miss a lot
So my “beloved” XCOM 2 is buggy, so? What else can you expect from Firaxis?
And how the hell is “a 50% probability shot doesn’t mean that it will land 50 shots out of 100, or 25 out of 50” wrong? Are trolling or what?
“So my “beloved” XCOM 2 is buggy, so? What else can you expect from Firaxis?”
pffft … AHAHAHAHA!
“And how the hell is “a 50% probability shot doesn’t mean that it will
land 50 shots out of 100, or 25 out of 50″ wrong? Are you trolling or
what?”
You would never believe me because I’m just some random guy on the internet. Just find a mathematician you know and argue with him/her —__— . I’m done
You were called out on some stupid thing you said and you’re not mature enough to acknowledge it. End of story.
considerign how the game has enemies that can cover up a olympian running distance and instantly hit you and mutate your character into an enemy while they take multiple attacks to die…yeah.
Even an injury is a fatal error since the troops take so long to heal and you cant use them in combat.
There’s plenty of action-twitch garbage out there.
I Disagree! but nice image 😀
i know there are some good like CIV or chess its like 1 out of 100 is good .
maybe you just lack the IQ to understand how do turn based games work.
He must not watch Rick and Morty.
Yeah . I cant even play chess .
wasteland 2 is pretty good, but xcom is insanely bottlenecked aginast the player.
Uh-oh.
What’s wrong with that?
High chances of shoehorned tumblr politics.
its gonna mention how great multiculturalism is every chance it gets. im gonna call it now, the “mutants” are a allegory for muslim/african refugees
sweden is cucked
in pewdiepie;s latest video he tells amy schumer to go to saudi arabia and points the flag of sweden. I love redpill pewds.
ahahaha! thats great.
I was interested up until turn based was mentioned.
This would have been great if it was more akin to an ARPG.
ITS XCOM WITH DUCKFACE-KIN
“That was the whole point of me replying to Tomas’ comment.”
Then you totally missed the point lol, since Tomas was talking about turn-based games in general, and not specifically of XCOM 2.
And you never told me the ‘right answer’ because you have no idea what you’re talking about, evidenced by pure nonsense such as “95% hit should mean it will hit 95% of the time” and the fact that you need a ‘mathematician’ to comprehend basic math.
But that’s ok, the way you write you probably are still in high school.
WHAT!? 0_0
So I can’t reply with my own point in mind? AHAHAHA! Yup… don’t stop digging yourself deeper into a hole. Also, you’re the one who needs a mathematician to understand very simple math. Remember this question?
“”Math” question : A man shot a target 100 times. The man’s accuracy rate is 95%. How many times did the man hit the target?”
Why don’t you answer it with your pseudo-philosophical math bullsh*t? Because you know I’m right. It just shows how stupid you are or how desperate you are on defending your point or just both.
Which school did you even go to or did you not go on one? File yourself a refund because you obviously didn’t learn anything. Spend that money and go back to a real school, dude. You honestly need education.
Kid seriously, you need to chill out, get laid or something.
Don’t you remember what I told you about “A man shot a target 100 times. The man’s accuracy rate is 95%. How many times did the man hit the target?” It’s right up there, a few messages up. Told you you were right about it, but that is (and was at the time you brought it up) completely irrelevant to the point that we were discussing.
So, for the 100th time, your statement “95% hit chance should mean it will hit 95% of the time” is simply wrong, there’s nothing ‘philosophical’ or complicated about it. A 95% hit CHANCE does NOT guarantee that you will hit 95 shots out of 100, how is this super simple concept so complicated for you to understand?
At this point I don’t think it’s a schooling issue, you must be suffering from severe retardation.
“Kid seriously, you need to chill out, get laid or something”
“you must be suffering from severe retardation”
ROFL!
typical internet user that’s too stupid that he resorts to name calling
and personal attacks. *SMH* And you have the guts to call someone
immature/kid? YEEESH. Grow up, dude. Do you even see the irony in there?
“A 95% hit CHANCE does NOT guarantee that you will hit 95 shots out of 100”
What’s the fu**ing difference!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!111111111
You
admit that my answer to my math question is right yet you say this is
wrong? My math question is only worded but if you analyze it and
simplify it. It will be :
What is 95% of 100? in which the answer is 95
Which
is the same fu**ing thing as 95 out of 100 or 95/100 which you are
saying is wrong and at the same time admitting is right. FFS! ASK A
GODDAMN MATHEMATICIAN YOU CAN TRUST! PLEASE, PLEAAAAASE! I’M BEGGING
YOU! I’m not asking you this so I can prove I’m right. I’m asking you
this so you can at least learn something.
Oh boy, you accuse me of resorting to name calling and personal attacks when in reality it’s you who’ve been outright insulting me in the comments.
And for the hundredth time, you can fire 2 shots in which you have a 95% hit CHANCE to hit, but you can be unlucky and still miss both of them, and even more. That 5% is real, get it? That 95% signifies only PROBABILITY, it’s never, ever a sure thing. How is it possible that you can’t understand that?
I’m now convinced you have some form of mental problem or disability.
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Insulting you in the comments? where? can you kindly point it to me?
You’re the one who blurted “Kid seriously, you need to chill out, get laid or something” and “you must be suffering from severe retardation.” You’re so desperate at making me the wrong/evil one that you’re just making yourself look like the victim. Ughhh…..
“And for the hundredth time, you can fire 2 shots in which you have a 95%
hit CHANCE to hit, but you can be unlucky and still miss both of them,
and even more. That 5% is real, get it? That 95% signifies only
PROBABILITY, it’s never, ever a sure thing. How is it possible that you
can’t understand that?
I’m now convinced you have some form of mental problem or disability.”
It looks like you won’t get me unless I stoop down to your level, huh?
MATH IS AN EXACT SCIENCE. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “UNLUCKY” YOU STUPID FUC*ING C*NT! Go back to studying grade school math so you can develop that tiny bird brain of yours so you can at least level to that of an intelligence of a 10 year old. I guess sucking the di*ks of the Xcom devs made you only think about their dic*s all the time and gave you no time to study, huh? That’s sad, dude.
Okay, I’ll just say you’re right so you can go back to sucking the di*ks of your boyfriends, okay? Arguing with an intelligent person on the internet must have took you a lot of time and shaved the time you get to suck their dic*s, huh? Oh yeah … remember to study “proper math” from time to time, okay? that way you won’t look like a complete tool the next time someone throw you a simple math question. Satisfied?
WOW 0_0 … WWWOW. I’ve seen the likes of Kim Kardashian here but you … you are something. So much desperation and so much stupidity swirling into one clusterfu*k of a living being. *SMH* Tsk tsk tsk … you … are … something
Aahhh, salty tears from screaming foaming apes are the most delicious!
So now probability isn’t math? LOL, next thing you’ll tell me the Earth is flat.
Kiddo, your posts are pure gold, please keep them coming!
First you insult me, then you ask me where (dude just read what you wrote earlier, there are at least a couple of ‘stupid’ up there), and then, to completely invalidate yourself you go apesh*t yelling about sucking dicks, hahahaha!!
And then finding a ‘mathematician’ to prove you that mathematic probability exists ROFL.
My point still stands and I’ll give you another super easy example because this is just so much fun: you go to the casino (not that you’re old enough for that, but hey) and you bet 10 times on red. According to you it’s absolutely impossible to get a result other than 5 hits on red and 5 hits on black, because of the ‘50% chance to hit’ Do you not realize how utterly moronic and nonsensical that is?
Oh sh*t 0_0 … yeah … you’re hopeless. You call that game of chance math?
Calling you stupid wasn’t an insult. IT’S FACT. I mean just look at this example you’ve given.
Okay, let me explain to you the difference you stupid buffoon. The casino game (which I assume is roulette based on what you said) isn’t an exact science because there are too many variables that cannot be controlled. For example, the force the dealer throw the ball isn’t always the same, the speed and force of how the roulette is spinning also isn’t always the same and many others while a turn-based game’s hit chance is based on math. There are also different variables in the hit chance of a game but it’s controlled because it’s been encoded. It’s fixed. It cannot be changed unless patched. After calculating all the variables, the calculated answer, which is the hit chance in this case, is also fixed. Do you understand? HOLY FU*ING SH*T, man. Study a little *SMFH*
What you’re saying here is exactly the same as what I am saying. You just explained it in more details. The only wrong thing is the variables in a video game are not random. They are also fixed but it can also change in the sense that one armor has a fixed defense but it changes when it’s upgraded or something like that.
The same fu*king principle and yet you’re saying “80% to hit probability does not mean you will hit 8 shots out 10.” It seems like you’re getting it and you somehow really REAAAALLY want to deny that I’m right so you’re contradicting yourself or you’re so stupid to know that what you and I are saying are the same and somehow you reach to a different answer. Also, why do you insist on using 50% probability?
You’re really hopeless. You’re fixated on not agreeing with me even though you’re basically agreeing with me on your answers. Let’s just say you’re right coz I’m fu*king tired on explaining simple math to you. You can reply whatever you want coz I’ll be ignoring whatever you’ll be saying. Study harder the next time, dude.