AMD has officially released its 3rd generation Ryzen CPUs. From today, PC gamers can purchase the AMD Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 5 3600X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 7 3800X and Ryzen 9 3900X desktop processors. AMD also introduced a new X570 chipset for socket AM4, supporting the world’s first PCIe 4.0 readiness, which exhibited 42% faster storage performance than PCIe 3.09, enabling high-performance graphics card, networking devices, NVMe drives, and more.
Now we won’t go into full details about these desktop processors as we’ve already covered everything that can be said about them in previous articles. Instead, we’ll concentrate on the third-party gaming benchmarks that have been released.
A couple of days ago, the benchmarks from PCGamesHardware’s review got leaked, suggesting that the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X could beat the Intel Core i9 9900K under certain conditions. However, and based on a lot of third-party benchmarks and reviews, it has become pretty clear that the best/fastest CPU for gaming is still the Intel Core i9 9900K.
While AMD was able to close the gab between its processors and those from Intel, and in some multimedia/productivity scenarios it has surpassed Intel’s offerings, Intel is still the king when it comes to PC gaming performance.
Whether we’re talking about games mainly using one or two CPU cores/threads, or games that scale on multiple CPU cores/threads, Intel is still beating AMD.
Now I don’t know what will happen when the next-gen consoles will come out (and whether heavily multi-threaded games will run faster on AMD’s CPUs), however pretty much all APIs – from DirectX 11 to DX12 and Vulkan – currently perform better on Intel’s CPUs.
Below you can find the benchmark videos from Hardware Unboxed and Joker that feature a lot of games that are powered by a wide range of game engines.
John is the founder and Editor in Chief at DSOGaming. He is a PC gaming fan and highly supports the modding and indie communities. Before creating DSOGaming, John worked on numerous gaming websites. While he is a die-hard PC gamer, his gaming roots can be found on consoles. John loved – and still does – the 16-bit consoles, and considers SNES to be one of the best consoles. Still, the PC platform won him over consoles. That was mainly due to 3DFX and its iconic dedicated 3D accelerator graphics card, Voodoo 2. John has also written a higher degree thesis on the “The Evolution of PC graphics cards.”
Contact: Email
Intel money
Oh, we are definitely getting paid for saying the facts as they are (yesterday we were paid from AMD for our “leaked benchmarks” article but Intel paid more so blue team FTW I guess). We are constantly getting paid from Intel, NVIDIA and Ubisoft. Ubisoft is the best. Oh, and from Konami because… Konami.
Joking aside, we want AMD to beat Intel (competition is great for consumers) but it still can’t when it comes to games performance (and in case you guys haven’t noticed in the past eight years, we are a PC GAMING website).
PS: We still plan on building a Zen2 PC system mind you (instead of a i9 9900K system). Oh and I can already see all the comments in our upcoming PC Performance Analysis articles saying “Pair that RTX2080Ti with an i9 9900K CPU, the Ryzen 9 3900X is bottlenecking it”
The ryzen 9 3900x is not that far anyway, and im pretty sure in the long run this cpu will be better for gaming
Bro, 3950X [ heavy breathing ]
Alright mate, but don’t mention the productivity tests if you’re not gonna say the 3900x beats the 9900k in pretty much all of them and not just “some”.
Throughout the article all you’re repeating is that “Intel is still the bes for gamin” without mentioning the price to performance sacrifice you’re making with Intel to get the best.. obviously if you can afford getting a 2080 ti like the above benchmarks are testing and no issue throwing the dosh then sure, get the 9900k(or 3900x/3950x if you do productivity as well or want more cores).
I’m assuming the 3600/3600x is going to be the best buy if you’re after price to performance as it’ll probably perform similarly to the 3700x or in Intel terms – 8700k.
Just don’t forget once more and more games start utilising more cores and threads chances are Amd is going to edge out in those games(1600 is beating 7600k in newer games).
LOL 🙂
The Ryzen 3 do beat intel. Maybe look at ALL of the numbers and don’t pick and choose. Hell go steal the insight from actual tech-heads if needs be rather than your partially invented/misinterpreted/misrepresented and uninformed opinions. Not an AMD fan here btw. I have literally never owned any AMD products. That is about to change, because choosing Intel over AMD at this point is actually wasting money for no actual gain.
John, don’t pay no mind to the haters. I think you are doing a good job and I enjoy visiting this site 🙂
Not me, google news suggested this site, saw the click bait article, i still clicked it. Horrible article, bias oozing from the author.
I will add DSOgaming to my hide all stories in my news feed. Article like this tells me enough about the intent and bias of the site.
There is no circumstance where Intel is the better option. If you think winning by few measly FPS while costing more and drawing more power and on an older node process, then just give Intel your paycheck.
Intel money means Intel has a ton more than AMD
we all know 9900K is better at gaming at 1080p but cost still matters
the tone of the article is 9900K is better and that is something that can’t be thrown without explanation and you demeaned the 5700 before the price cut and after price cut didn’t correct the article
you can check your articles and you will see a clear biased opinion against AMD
“What ultimately this means is that NVIDIA does not have any rival for its top three graphics cards; the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080Ti, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX2080 SUPER and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. As such, those seeking for higher framerates in their games will simply have to go the green way. On the other hand, and with this price cut, the mid-tier GPU market tier got a lot more interesting!”
you always direct the conversation and twist it to say that Nvidia and Intel are better anyway
this is a criticism because this is my go to pc site and i like most your content but you SOMETIMES look down on AMD just state the facts without provocative headlines and security wise who in their right mind goes for Intel anymore but i am sure if the numerous security flaws -that are still coming mind you- that Intel suffer were AMD’s,the discussion would have been different
you are becoming like pcgamer
woudnt be easier for your menthal health to just calculate the procent with which intel beats amd and the rest of tabs and after that to talk if is sponsored article or not?
A man looking female gender bender CEO lol..Talk about blurred reality.
You gotta thank “it” for competitive processors
You shouldn’t say such mean things about Huang, this article isn’t even about graphics cards.
This “news article” reads like a opinion piece of Intel fan. Ugh.
Facts aren’t opinion, dingaling.
Off ya go.
Some people also think that Earth being flat is also a fact. So go be stupid somewhere else.
Nice that you posted this video, 9900K wins in 99% of games, dumb F fantard, and when it wins it wins by huge margin.
Only at 1080p and only with $1200 2080ti and only past 140+fps…If that is a huge win to you…you got no right to call anyone a moron ffs!
One week with my i9-990K and I’m still very impressed by it.
If they’re close in terms of performance, price will make the difference.
I believe AMD is king of better $/perf ratio from what i read.
On top of that just the fact alone that X570 has PCIe 4.0 makes it a better platform and future proof(the socket it going to have Zen 3 etc). In my opinion there is no reason to invest in any other platform at this point that does not have PCIe 4.0.
Come next year everything will be switched over to PCIe 4.0, with these benches being a few FPS off I rather get new future proof mobo tech and more logical cores in my config.
At the end of the day your GPU is the most important component and pairing that up with PCIe 4.0 is really going to be the best setup in the long run that you can get. If I where to get a Intel rig now I would just wait till it has a PCIe 4.0 mobo or it be a waste of money at this point and just old tech.
Yea agreed on everything! Clearly AMD is the go to right now. For me intel would have to drop another 10-15% ON TOP OF the already announced 15% to be relevant right now. Even then, i’d still be inclined to go with AMD for the mentioned facts.
They’re making good strides!
Only enthusiasts, content creators and consumers with deep wallets will switch, PCIE 4 is DOA for average consumer market (presumably 90% that is), period. For GPUs – quite the future to look forward, but nowadays gamers barely exploit PCIE 3 and SATA III is still the core of mainstream SSDs.
That’s exactly what was being said about PCIe3 when it was launched, but GPUs still switched to the new standard by the next generation of cards.
When since did the i9 9900k become a “gaming GPU”. Boy o’ Boy, you people can most certainly move the goal post.
price is the important thing not who is the king.
That’s the truth, and with that said we haven’t seen this great of price:performance in a long as* time. I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen such great performance for a CPU priced at the 3900x pricing.
“you sound like brexiteers”
As opposed to the remoainers that argue that brexit lost because despite breixt party being first in votes all the other parties put together are a higher percentage of the vote so remain won.
Also leave the EU or you will end up like Greece, Italy, Portugal, France,Spain and Germany is soon gonna go to a recession.
“c*nts like Nigel Farage”
“F*k Brexit, f*k anyone who voted to leave”
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d36686797357c035c44544e459be9d885ad1afba495615d1f30acc188485bf2a.jpg
he is such a clueless moron check my replies to him.
He’s by far the biggest moron I’ve ever witnessed here!
a true npc.
Why are all Brits so retarded?
and cucks?
His response is totally retarded, he doesnt even know basic things like how wages have gone up. A total npc.
dafuq you talking about? Wages are going up because immigrants are leaving. The rest are unrelated to the brexit that HAS NOT EVEN HAPPENED. Any company will tell you that the market wants a answer in or out, they have taken the necessary precautions for either scenario, its not like your economy is based on euro or something or you dont happen to be the commerce hub of the world. Its like you got trash in your brain, Germany is going into recession despite practically running the eu and doing austerity for years. Taxes re not rising because of brexit, welfare and healthcare and police are not doing worse because of brexit but mass migration and socialist schemes that always fail as they did in south europe. Nigel farage is not in charge in order to spend money on the NHS instead, so why blame him?
“Do you know what EU Offered? Security, stopping our government from archaic laws and taxes”
Eu taxes everything on sight because its a failing project with too many poor countries, too many net benefactors and few net contributors. You talk about “archaic laws” but just the other day a kid was suspended from a Scottish school because he said there are 2 genders, not to mention the count dankula case. Do you see the eu standing up for their freedom? No. The whole eu project is soviet union 2.0 and they are building an army. There is no security in the eu, the only way you are “safe” is from having your own currency and if you are dumb enough to give it up, then yeah living will destroy your economy.
“Massively increased cost on tech to the point that I was paying nearly the same that AMERICANS were AFTER TAX for my new hardware. Pisstake.”
Oh you mean like in the rest of Europe? Hardware prices have rised everywhere and eu is putting more taxes in it, every country is doing it for stupid reasons just like the tax on plastic and straws, it never freaking ends, they even legislate the length of candlewicks and you act like its some kinda libertarian paradise and not a protection racket. The eu is fining companies in silicon valley for not following their stupid laws, making it impossible to create any tech startup companies in EU. How on earth can you possibly argue that the EU is less taxes and less stupid authoritarian laws is beyond me. UK is one giant meme at this point but Brexit isnt the problem, rejecting the torries and labor and then brexit is the solution. But of course having so many immigrants who dont work means you gotta tax people to keep paying them their free stuff.
Dude do you live in la la land?
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/jan/22/uk-pay-growth-employment-weekly-earnings
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/01/pay-rise-nearly-two-million-national-living-wage-legal
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/16/uk-wage-growth-at-new-decade-high.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-03-04/east-european-migrants-are-leaving-u-k-and-hurting-the-economy
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/photography/immigrants-leaving-britain-escape-brexit-hostility-photos-a8841026.html
https://www.ft.com/content/960b4672-3b3e-11e9-b72b-2c7f526ca5d0
The anti p*rn law has not gone in effect and cameras with face recognition are anything but “archaic surveillance laws”
I fail to see what any of the laws that May’s party made have to do with brexit or Farage. I need to repeat myself, Farage is not in charge the Torries are, which is why no Brexit yet. Why you blame Farage for something that he is not responsible for but the government is responsible for? Finally quick question do you think when corbyn wins, do you think he will lower taxes or raise them?
” That it doesn’t matter if he’s not in charge, the NHS doesn’t work like that. It’s social healthcare. Who’s in charge is irrelevant. He made a promise to the public, a promise that would never and could never be fulfilled.”
Dude are you insane he never said he will promise money will got to the NHS, its not like he is the government, he promised not to stop fighting till brexit happens, which is why he is back in politics with a new party. Thats his promise if you want the money to go to the NHS then vote brexit party when it runs for local elections, thats how democracy works.
“The whole EU project is Soviet Union 2.0? You mean, without the blatant disregard for human life, with encouragement to support better standards for human rights. Etc.”
It is though, https://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865
Also who do you think created the concept of “political correctness” and “hate speech”, they did and pushed to the west through UN. As for human rights go own, tell the Greeks how much of rights they have and how many more rights the illegals who call themselves “refugees” compared to them. You would have a point if the things that happen in the UK were shut down by the european courts but they dont, in fact the eu court ruled that saying Mohamed was a pedophile, a objective fact is not free speech and agreed with Austria who sent a woman to prison for doing this.
https://eclj.org/free-speech/echr/blasphemy-crime-the-echr-is-not-charlie
“oh its not free speech its hate speech”, “oh its not blasphemy law”
Changing words and definitions, making up exceptions for rules and bending them. Sending people in prison not for what they did, but for some unrelated made up reason. Face it, it is soviet union 2.0, why its building an army? Who is that army gonna fight? Russia?
“Also, you realize Brexit doesn’t get rid of immigrants. Right? ”
Right, which is why i said that immigration has dropped, work immigrants are leaving as pointed in the articles above.
“The laws that silicone valley aren’t following are ones to do with consumer rights. Protecting people from spending money on unsupported products.”
Psst, article 13, eu is basically gonna destroy the internet to maximize profits for corporations, silicon valley with have to pay for those laws as well as well as hate speech laws. Basically what i am telling you here is that the eu decides the length of candle wicks, the shape of bananas and thus what is a “supported product” the eu will turn silicon valley into “unsupported products”. No one asked for this but the wise unelected eu lobbyists did it anyway not for the consumers but for the corporations.
“Theresa May alongside cutting money for police and NHS also took away millions in benefits away from the terminally ill and disabled…By the by, some resorted to suicide because of it. Just to stop the financial strain on their families. That. Is what Brexit’s legacy will be. Something that divided the country and ruined lives. It hurt and is still hurting our economy. Especially on imported goods.”
1.wtf this has to do with brexit?
2.people still voted for the brexit party, so people are still pro brexit.
“And you, have no clue what you’re talking about. You definitely do not live in the UK because if you did, then you deserve no respect. You ruined our country because you wanted it to be YOUR country. You selfish dodo.
Watch what happens. In 5-10 years. We’ll hold another referendum once all the ignorants forget how to vote and the old, rich, racists die and suddenly magic happens, the remainers will be the majority and the country’s will get better.”
I have concluded that you are a gigantic moron. You are the one who has no idea wtf you are talking about not me, i showed you articles proving that you are completely and utterly clueless on wtf is going in the country.
The country isnt “ruined” because of breixt, econony is doing fantastic, the only thing that has “ruined” the UK is the authoritarian laws that also labor pushed, the “gross offense” that count dankula was fined for was made by labor and lets not talk how sadiq khan has destroyed london with 600% increase in crime especially stabbings. You talk about ignorant people but you are clueless as proven by articles, you talk about racists as if the people who voted to leave didnt do it out of principle but they have to be racists and old and rich according to you, because you know, the entire Westminster bubble did not vote overwhelmingly to stay in the eu, because the elites do not overwhelmingly support saying in the eu because they can make more money that way. You are completly detached from reality. Also i dont know about 5-10 years, only moronic npcs believe this idiocy that “most of the people who voted for brexit have died so have another vote” bs, the fact there was a major victory of brexiteers with the brexit party proves that. So no 5-10 years, no but in 20 years the demographics of UK will be quite different, the number one newborn name is Mohamed, so in the future UK will be less British and more islamic, while they do like their free wellfare, its not like these people are particularly intelligent, inbreeds rarely are
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/children/11723308/First-cousin-marriages-in-Pakistani-communities-leading-to-appalling-disabilities-among-children.html
also their views are not particularly “progressive”, London has already become less “tolerant”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/17/londoners-least-liberal-homosexuality-pre-marital-sex/
Now combine that with the fact all those people who are opposed to brexit and are totally the good guys and will be the majority in the future when the “racist old rich farts die” , vote labour which is taking a socialist approach to things with corbyn having his fans with hammer and sickles flags in his rallies…and the country isnt gonna get better, its gonna get worse because socialism always fail, uk is gonna become like south europe corrupt, bankrupt and everyone living on food stamps.
My god you are a giant clueless moron.
Ugggh a leftist who thinks he is smart , gross.
Intel wins on low resolution tests but on 3440x1440p and 4k there are the same results.
So basically the next step in gaming they’re essentially the same thing, but AMD also has the extra benefit of being a far better processor for any work machine usage that currently is available on the market, which most gamers are currently doing?
As the resolution increases the games become more GPU dependent. I’ve been looking to upgrade my 3770k. Since I game at typically 1620p or higher my gtx 1080 is still a solid work horse. I’ll hold out for the 4950X next year and see if this video card craziness has calmed down.
If my mobo didn’t blow out on my last December, I’d still be using my 3770k. Solid CPU, has many more years left in it.
That is exactly why I just keep waiting to upgrade. I might even hold out for the Ryzen 5000 series and to see what Intel does.
Piece of advice John. When you don’t know what the f*k you’re talking about. Don’t say anything, just report what the experts say. Your opinion is literally worthless.
A bit of advice: Stay to the experts then because we, the worst and worthless pieces of crap that the Internet has ever created in all eternity, are making money from you when you comment on our articles ;). Just saying 😛
You’re a joke mate. That’s cool. We all know why your site has sh*t metrics.
“you guys sound like Brexiteers”
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d3f8bae29fb0128c3b4a6a15fc0be673f06bf7396557fd57b414cf7e9cc2c9d7.jpg
what a biased article… most reviews are showing 3900X on par or better then the 9900K. When Ryzen is behind, it’s usually by no more than 5%, which is irrelevant. Seriously, this statement says it all about the tone of this article: “and in some multimedia/productivity scenarios it has surpassed Intel’s offerings”.
WHAT?
3900X OBLITERATES 9900k in most multimedia and productivity,, I mean, there are scenerios in which it wins with almost 100% better performance, it’s insane.
Please, don’t be so biased, I like this site, but this is pure BS.
That 5% clearly means they’re king! Such a massive difference! Ph who the f*k am I kidding, its negligible performance difference at best and Intel got their sh*t kicked in hardcore from a price:performance ratio. They have nothing to offer that is nearly the same, and as far most gamers are concerned who the hell just uses their PC for strictly playing PC games?
I don’t know a single person who does this anymore, nor did I really ever really know anybody who did do it.
The cinemark benchmark proves that “surpasses” is the biggest understatement ever typed up about a CPU, and obliterate is simply to damn small. It demolishes Intel completely and totally.
The point I’m making is that in the day of gamers making videos, streaming, producing music, producing games, producing graphics, etc; AMD beat the very living hell out of Intels best offering.
The last laugh will be had by AMD when most production studios, and gamers start moving towards their CPUs who produce all kinds and types of various media. Who the hell would go for Intel now? Biased people who are fooling themselves?
It’s ridiculous to sit here and say, that while Intel beats out AMD in a few FPS, that they’re somehow making the best CPUs for gamers or even for games if the difference is currently negligible at best.
Gamers encompass far more than just people who sit around benchmarking their games all day long.
On paper ornaments benchmark is one thing, but in the wild is another.
I’ll give up the few FPS difference to have an overall better machine for everything else I do besides sitting around drooling over a minor at best FPS difference.
I don’t need 150fps, if I can maintain a steady 144fps and produce music at a far better and faster pace due to having a better CPU.
Know what I mean?
And that’s not to mention the games in which 3900X actually wins, which are like 40% of the overall tested games. What this means is that it’s not even a clear win for Intel, since the 3900x is equal or lower by a few fps in the remaining 60%, not in all of the games. Oh, and even that is expected to change as the next-gen console arrives and games are optimized for more cores.
Now, start streaming your game and Intel loses in 100% of the cases. I usually play FPS games with spotify running on the background, or chrome with tabs open on youtube or whatever I was reading, also discord, steam, battle.net, and I usually stream to twitch so that my friends can go to my channel and watch it anytime I’m playing… hell, we’re not in the 90’s anymore, we don’t stop and close everything we’re doing just to play a game, we just launch it alongside whatever is already open and play and, for these scenarios, which I’d say are typical for most people, Ryzen clearly offers better performance. So, saying that Intel is still the best option for gaming is either naive or just pure BS.
Let’s also not forget that I can upgrade to the new Ryzen using my first gen motherboard, that it consumes less energy, reach lower temperatures, comes with a cooler that is actually decent, costs less while having double or even triple the core count. Buying the 3900x instead of the 9900k should be a no brainer.
3900x wins in 1 or two games, stop spreading lies you dirtbag
Ratbag
ROFL, go to Linus channel, see their review.
AMD Fantard Lies:
SotTR – 147 vs 136
FarCry 5 – 152 vs 127
DE:MD – 147 vs 123
BV – 162 vs 149
W3 – 204 vs 203
Strange Brigade – 227 vs 218
Formula 1 – 184 vs 179
Source, Guru3D, 1080p
Something not mentioned in this review at least, is that unless you have a 1200 dollar video card, the Ryzen will beat the Intel in most games.
Try even harder fanboy amd is still playing the catch up game
Dose intel releasing a 16 core gaming cpu in september?
What?
Still an Intel Nvidia combo for me.
Intel 9900k is clearly the best gaming CPU still, especially if you consider the overclocking potential, these new AMD chips can be barely overclocked at all.
Because they are being overclocked automatically by the system depending on how good your cooking is.
I can cook pretty well, so that would give my system a good OC?
It was obvious from the start amd ryzen 2 is beast in productivity but still way behind intel in some game. for me i will stick with Intel until amd find a way to beat intel in games
“Intel Core i9 9900K still the best gaming CPU” only if you exclude streaming from gaming scenario ofc ))
I will add DSOgaming to my hide all stories in my news feed. Article like this tells me enough about the intent and bias of the site.
There is no circumstance where Intel is the better option. If you think winning by few measly FPS while costing more and drawing more power and on an older node process, then just give Intel your paycheck.
Intel’s still generally ahead overall, but AMD still pulls out more than a fair share of major wins (stuff like CS:GO being pretty jaw-dropping), and more modern games/engines are more and more favorable to Ryzen. Also, as Linus from LTT has shown, there’s a lot of gaming perf on the 3900X being left on the table from poor thread scheduling still. This article’s pretty freaking horrible tbh. You know, maybe actually include some insightful analysis, whereas this just sounds like misleading regurgitation *shrug*.
Anyone who thinks the i9-9900K will age better for gaming vs the +4c/8t R9 3900X using the same Zen 2 arch in the next-gen consoles needs their head checked (just look at R5 1600 vs i5-7600K results in 2017 vs now, and amplify that even more). And that includes yourself.
The i9-9900K is now a really stupid buy, even for gamers, outside a few incredibly niche scenarios.
I’d still buy AMD. Sorry, Intel.
You get what you pay for, it’s plain and simple, tech has always been this way and AMD has always been behind Intel it’s nothing new. So much hype for the 3000 series and as usual AMD doesn’t deliver, at least not for games. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good CPU for the price but I wouldn’t never buy AMD for gaming, never did never will.
I guess you still must be gaming like it’s 2001 then, maybe come and join us over here, we’re playing at 4k now and at 4k there’s no difference between these cpus. However the second you do anything outside of gaming the 9900K just can’t keep up 🙁
All depends what you want, currently AMD has the better performance for workstation but Intel remains for gaming and as soon as Intel releases their next cpu’s, AMD will be behind again for workstations. Oh and 4K is overrated, current tech is not powerful enough to have decent frames!
Seems like inlet is really struggling right now, still cannot even get 10nm working when AMD is already on 7nm and moving forward. Also 4k isn’t overrated, I play all my games in 4k and get 60fps with a 1080ti which is perfect for me. Going from 1080p to 4k it’s like wearing glasses for the first time, it’s easily the biggest game changer when it comes to gaming, it also makes the older games look really nice.
This is completely meaningless. If you need 250 FPS instead of 245, then yes, a 9900K is the “best” gaming processor. But most people don’t need that many frames because they don’t use an RTX 2080 on 720p. On higher resolutions, the Ryzens are at best a percent or two slower.
I wonder how much Intel paid to get this on the front page of Googles tech news feed?
Correction for the above misleading article:
AMD is a multitaskers dream. Its performance is within single digit percentage points to Intels most expensive product at a bargain price. Its multithread performance in unmatched in the consumer market. It out performs everything in its price range hands down.
Correction:
I7 9700k is the best gaming cpu:exactly same performance as the 9900k in gaming at a better price and actually have an advantage in games that dont like hyperthreading
Yeah, 9900k is still slightly better but price difference is huge, ryzen has better value.
I don’t know about you peasants still gaming at 1080p like it’s 2001 but I game at 4k and at 4k it doesn’t really matter which CPU you have. So having the extra cores for everything else you do outside of gaming easily makes the 3900x better than the 9900K. Also we’re slowly moving to 2k being the new 1080p and the differences in cpus starts to become irrelevant, the only thing that really benefits you moving forward are the extra cores.
You sound like typical AMD fantard, with their Pauper fantasies about price/performance which is only relevant for low end market.
Intels 10th gen will be faster and cheaper then most Ryzen 3000 CPUs
i9-10900KF 10/20 3.4Ghz/5.2Ghz = 499$
i9-10900F 10/20 3.2Ghz/5.1Ghz = 449$
i9-10800F 10/20 2.7Ghz/5.0Ghz = 409$
i9-10700K 8/16 3.6GHz/5.1Ghz = 389$
i9-10700 8/16 3.1Ghz/4.9Ghz = 339$
i5-10600K 6/12 3.7Ghz/4.9Ghz = 269$
i5-10600 6/12 3.2GHz/4.8Ghz = 229$
i5-10500 6/12 3.1GHz/4.6GHz = 199$
i5-10400 6/12 3.0GHz/4.4GHz = 179$
i3-10350K 4/8 4.1GHz/4.8GHz = 179$
i3-10320 4/8 4.0GHz/4.7GHz = 159$
i3-10300 4/8 3.8GHz/4.5GHz = 149$
i3-10100 4/8 3.7GHz/4.4GHz = 129$
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0922a54f89153b947edc9e34f01f7b13d63bf3c98a188f0d8fd232622c2ee8cd.jpg