Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League new screenshot

Rocksteady in damage control, can anything save its GaaS game?

Warner Bros will release Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League next month. And, from the looks of it, Rocksteady is currently in “damage control” mode, with its product director Darius Sadeghian trying his best to convince people that this isn’t a GaaS game, and that it has the DNA of the Batman: Arkham series.

In an interview with GamesRadar, Sadeghian avoided calling Suicide Squad a Game as a Service title, claiming that the game does not fit with any particular label. And you know what? I’ll bite. If it doesn’t fit with any genre, then what exactly is it? Why should players be excited about it? What’s its target audience?

The truth is that this new Suicide Squad is a GaaS game. We know that. Warner Bros knows that. Rocksteady knows that. Everyone knows that. The fact that Sadeghian attempts to hide its genre speaks volumes about Rocksteady’s confidence.

Not only that but some new previews went live a couple of hours ago. And, surprisingly enough, some of them were negative. But you know what all of them had in common? The game’s genre. All of the previews call this a GaaS game. The fact that Rocksteady is still trying to hide it is laughable.

Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League suffers from all the issues we’ve criticized. No matter what the execs say, this isn’t a “Batman Arkham” game. This statement kind of reminded me of Redfall. Remember when Arkane and Bethesda were claiming that Redfall had the DNA of Arkane’s games?

And I’ll be realistic here. The Rocksteady that made Batman: Arkham City and Arkham Knight is long gone. That’s the harsh truth. The team that is working on Suicide Squad is not the same as the one that gave us Arkham Knight. I mean, even the studio’s co-founders Sefton Hill and Jamie Walker left it at the end of 2022.

To sum up, if you’ve played Anthem and Marvel’s Avengers, you more or less know what you can expect from it. Suicide Squad will be a GaaS title, and it might have an interesting story. And, if you want to experience its story, you’ll be able to watch a story video on YouTube. That is if you are not into GaaS games. If, on the other hand, you love them, you might want to give it a go!

47 thoughts on “Rocksteady in damage control, can anything save its GaaS game?”

  1. PC gamers have time and time again shown they want games as a service.

    Valve made microtransactions and DRM mainstream on PC. And PC gamers embraced that, they made Valve, Activision, Blizzard, EA, Epic and Rockstar into billion $ companies.

    Of the people who reject GAAS, there is about 1% on PC (mostly single player and GoG users), the other 99% is on Nintendo Switch demanding physical copies of games.

    The reason PC has so many microtransactions, forced online services, and DRM, …. is PC gamers. Developers are just making what PC gamers are choosing to play.

  2. “And I’ll be realistic here. The Rocksteady that made Batman: Arkham City and Arkham Knight is long gone. That’s the harsh truth. The team that is working on Suicide Squad is not the same as the one that gave us Arkham Knight.”

    You’re right John, these aren’t the same people that made the Arkham games. These are the ones who hijacked the company and claiming as if they’re the ones who made the Arkham games:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cf87fcf600d2038a55b74224f1d3f8886556b0465c1938ce497e8a94ccee6a57.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/31881d376b17b2278a6c171e84d4fb87252f870b92b638d867749e1705c41bc5.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3151ec7065300c7f316e35dfc63d7f2eff3ebc5555db6e89d68a613eede29d33.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/771932eac7965e9badd68c33f34dee7c4a96e46fe8d3ab695f1a0cbd68672f15.jpg

    “Why should players be excited about it? What’s its target audience?”

    This:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b1ffc0a7e5549c8eb7042bc24b52c555b9564fc99c95c50e0e848747f2e00f93.jpg

    1. But these days woke leftoids hate Jews even more than stormfront does, they’d probably updoot that last pic if you posted it in some leftoid subreddit in the context of the Israel/Palestine war.

      1. the woke are jews. It was meant to be only for white people, not to backfire against them, so now they are mad their lapdogs attack their mosnters.

    2. All of those pictures you posted are true but game developers are all pro-Palestine now and anti-Israel.

      1. That’s why tens of celebrities are getting cancelled over something as simple as supporting Palestine, right?

        1. Getting canceled by companies directly. With the woke stuff they usually do the canceling based on how many leftists are complaining about it on Twitter and other platforms, but can’t wait for that when it comes to anything against the Jews.

      2. Many say is because it “backfired” i say it was part of the plan all along. Have to keep the victimhood con going somehow for future generations and the “new americans”. Noticed how is being “allowed” to critized when a couple of years ego you would get banned asap.
        If something did backfire, as always is their own chutzpah.

    3. You and Jews are the same ethnicity, you all look like the guy at the bottom.
      At least Jews have some European DNA. 90 percent of Arabs look utterly disgusting.

        1. She looks decent.
          You have some nerve making fun of this person. I don’t even have to search for an ugly-looking Arab. It’s like beating someone who’s already beaten to a pulp.
          Just look up the word Arab on Google and you will not find a single average-looking person. Do I have to remind you that the criteria of what is considered attractive in Arab countries is literally a person who looks like me? lmao

        1. I said most Arabs are ugly, and you’re here asking me if being ugly means you’re Arab or not.
          Were you born without braincells?

  3. I just watched a preview video from the German PC Games and I think at the core it could be a fun game like Sunset Overdrive but cringe dialogue, item rarity, skill tree, etc… No thanks. There are better alternatives if I want loot driven games.

  4. This game never looked good and the minute it was revealed that Sweet Baby Inc. consulted or worked on it was the final nail in the coffin.

  5. “if you want to experience its story, you’ll be able to watch a story video on YouTube.”
    -Bingo.
    This game is DOA. I’m more exited for the sh@tshow this game brings on release than the game it self.

  6. A lot of the fervor around the game would go away if people were just honest. If it’s a Games as a Service game, call it that. If this isn’t the same Rocksteady that made the Arkham games, and instead is more concerned by the color of hair the “developers” have, say so. If it’s not the game Rocksteady really wanted to make, but the WB coproration wanted instead, just BE HONEST!.

    All this lying is really the underlying issue. If Rocksteady from the start said “We wanted to do a Superman game, we even eluded to it in Arkham Knight, but Warner Brothers wanted us to do Suicide Squad. Then when we make it very similar to the Arkham games, but Warner Brothers stepped in and wanted us to make a Games as a Service game instead.” No one would care. Everyone who did care, would understand the game isn’t what we wanted, and would end up not paying attention to it. Not giving it any coverage, and just forgetting it even exists. We could all have moved on with our lives years ago.

    But instead, we continually get lies, and are given false hope that “Maybe it isn’t as bad as we think it’s going to be”. Even though all the leaks and now actual hands on reports are saying “Yup. It’s exactly as bad as you think it is.” Just stop the lies and we can all move on from this gaming travesty.

  7. PC gamers have time and time again shown they want games as a service.

    Valve made microtransactions and DRM mainstream on PC. And PC gamers embraced that, especially US PC gamers, they turned Valve, Activision, Blizzard, Epic, Capcom and Rockstar into billion $ companies by spending money on online services instead of standalone games.

    The reason PC has so many microtransactions, forced online services, DLC, and DRM, is PC gamers. Developers are just making what PC gamers are choosing to buy.

    Of the people who reject GAAS and want standalone offline games, there is about 1% on PC (mostly single player and GoG users), the other 99% is on Nintendo Switch buying physical copies of single player games.

    1. How is the shilling astroturfing rate going nowdays? Per comment, response? Or are you one of the “slow” ones?

      Microsoft started it all with the OG Xbox, paid online and DLC, Asia as a whole made the “micro transactions” popular not Murica.

  8. Well Rocksteady (with WB being complicit) seem intent on self destructing, as this will be the second DCU based game thats marketed as a SP game but it in fact needs an always on connection. RS pulled the same sh*t with ‘Gotham Nights’ and I was forced to set sail on the high seas for alternative way to play the game I f**king paid for.

    The fact RS are trying to be dishonest right from the get go demonstrates they are not trustworthy and dont deserve your money. Fool me once, shame on RS/WB. They wont get a second chance.

    To quote Mr Freeman “This game is DOA. The sh@tshow will be more than the games release”.

  9. “Darius Sadeghian trying his best to convince people that this isn’t a GaaS game, and that it has the DNA of the Batman: Arkham series.”

    It has the DNA of a DOA game, and no, I don’t mean Dead or Alive.

  10. Then it is another big DOA for sure. Kind like these circumstances. Let them rot in their own dungeon. Bloody fools.

  11. The thing I don’t understand is why tf do they keep ruining dev teams whose area of expertise is single-player story-driven games?

    I mean, if you want to do GaaS, fine, just give it to a new/separate dev team to develop? Let the excellent single-player dev team keep doing what they do best. The Arkham games made a lot of money for WB also…so let that continue at least?

  12. What i do not realize is in fact how you are no longer actually much more wellfavored than you might be right now Youre very intelligent You recognize thus considerably in relation to this topic made me in my view believe it from numerous numerous angles Its like men and women are not fascinated until it is one thing to do with Lady gaga Your own stuffs excellent All the time handle it up

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *