Call of Duty: Ghosts – Official Minimum Specs Revealed, 6GB RAM & 40GB HDD Required

Call of Duty Ghosts

Holy bloody hell. Activision has just revealed the official minimum requirements for Call of Duty: Ghosts, and even though the game supports dual-cores… PC gamers will need at least 6GB of RAM, 40GB of free HDD and a 64bit OS to run it. The PC version of Call of Duty: Ghosts is rumored to feature higher resolution textures than its next-gen version, however it’s pretty funny that the game demands 6GB of RAM as a minimum requirement. You can view the complete list below, and kudos to our reader ‘John Vanitsidis’ for spotting them.

Call of Duty: Ghosts Minimum Requirements:

-OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit
-CPU: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E8200 2.66 GHZ / AMD Phenom™ X3 8750 2.4 GHZ or better
-Memory: 6 GB RAM
-Hard Disk Space: 40 GB
-Video: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTS 450 / ATI® Radeon™ HD 5870 or better
-Sound: 100% DirectX 9.0c compatible 16-bit sound card
-Internet: Broadband Internet connection for Steam and Online Multiplayer

For comparison purposes, here are the rumored specs that were revealed via the GeForce website

-OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit
-CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 2.66 GHZ / AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4 GHZ or better
-RAM: 6 GB RAM
-HDD: 50 GB HD space
-Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti / ATI Radeon HD 5870 or better
-Sound: DirectX Compatible Sound Card
-DirectX: 11
-Internet: Broadband connection and service required for Multiplayer Connectivity. Internet connection required for activation.

  • dukenukem973

    heard 20gb alone is needed for the fish AI.

    • shadowhedgehogz

      More like a full processing core for the fish A.I..

    • Dakan45

      Atleast DSO cant whine about low res textures this time.

      Hopefully those 50gb are put in good use.

      • PcRules

        Hell yeah finaly it seems we will get those nice textures we Pc gamers should have eons ago and I think it’s much thanks to Nvidia who are doing all they can to put those crappy nexgen consoles look bad 😀

        So we can gladely let Nvidia pay the devs a shitload of money so we get a version that just crush anything consoles 😉

        So yeah lets up the ant as much as possible, we fucking deserves awesome versions of every game.

    • Warrior88

      HEHEHE!
      I was thnking 35gb for Riley and 5gb everything else! 😀

  • How can the min specs of CoD Ghosts be higher than min specs of BF4? :/

    • Warrior88

      Trying to use an old engine and fitting as much as they can in there…those quick updates can result in an unoptimized product in terms of space, performance, etc!

      • Djinferno806

        Or just a direct port from the next gen version and hasn’t been properly optimized for PC hardware yet.

        People seem to think that just because the coding is similiar and the next gen consoles are running x64 cpu’s, there doesn’t have to be optimizations still.

        Regardless, I hope this is not the case.

  • len

    I don’t see what the big surprise is, do people expect exponential leaps in asset quality to keep fitting in on dvd sizes?

    • Dudebro Zero

      No. But there’s no exponential leap in asset quality in COD Ghosts. The textures are in no way superior to BF3.

      • len

        lol

  • archnophobia

    This is some bullChit to buy new PC’s, but hope we can do it without 64-bit…

    • s_fnx

      Whoever buys a new PC because of COD doesn’t deserve to live!

      • archnophobia

        lol :p

    • KopyKat007

      Well of course! This whole “next gen” thing is their best chance/excuse to scare people into buying over the top expensive PC’s and cards and everything for a nice big surge in hardware sales.

      Im surprised they don’t recommend a top of the line processor as well!

      Im just going to relax and wait and see what happens.

  • BaezukaLANGLEY

    The graphics (and maybe the game complete) apparently doesn’t deserve that specs.

  • Dakan45

    You know i was looking at those articles that try to confirm wherever ghosts will be 1080P on ps4/xbox one or not…I was like “if they cant run cod at 1080p, then they trash”

    Now i am rethinking that statement.

    Wtf happened? Back when cod4 and bioshock launched games were not so damn demanding.

  • Dudebro Zero

    >AMD 5870 or better

    This is hilarious. Yeah right, make a BARELY next-gen version of your rehash series aimed specifically at the casual audience and require them to buy a beast computer to run it. I’m a H4RDC0R3 G4M3R and I’m still running on a 5850 because it’s fine for literally every other game coming out these days. I wasn’t planning on buying COD ever so no loss for them or me, but I’m pretty sure most kids who gobble this stuff up don’t own a better graphics card. Activision, enjoy complaints about performance from people who didn’t bother to check the requirements before purchasing.

    The fact that the 5870 is also the RECOMMENDED card suggests that it’s a typo in the minimum requirements, same for the 6 gigs of RAM. Maybe the real requirement is a 4870 which would still be too friggin high for a COD game. Who knows about the RAM. 4 would be reasonable.

    • Second bit is not recommended, that is just the geforce min specs released a few weeks ago for comparison. They have not listed recommended. However, 5870 surely must be a typo, given that it is 2x better than the GTS 450.

  • FamiliarrStrangerr

    Recommended System Requirements are yet to come….

    .

    .

    .
    …to the market

    • Warrior88

      Core i7 or AMD FX-8350, AMD Radeon 290X or NVidia Titan, 16GB RAM, 60GB HDD…recommended to make Riley run and kill bad guys with big guns with his teeth more efficiently, and lots of fishes to move outta your way very quiackly! 😀

  • Adamos Makis

    So according to their minimum specs my 6850 which mops the floor of 550Ti should not be able to run the game ? Yeah right

    • Djinferno806

      5870 seems like a typo. They probably meant to say like 5670 or something i dont know. Its probably just so people know that you need a DX11 card minimum.

  • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

    WOW! feel bad for PC gamers who haven’t upgraded in the last few years. They’re gonna have a hard time keeping up if more games have this huge jump from this point forward in specs.

    • Kyle Jackson

      I know I wouldn’t want to spread around that my PC couldn’t even handle a COD game.

      • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

        Precisely. It’s all thanks to Crysis that started that issue-with only elite PC gamers being able to take on Ultra settings or even Low for that matter. Let’s hope this is a sign that a lot of AMD and nVidia’s stuff get huge price drops so that more gamers play the PC version.

        • randir14

          Crysis 2 and 3 made great strides in giving low settings good visuals and performance. Google “Crysis 3 vs. Crysis 1: Low and High Settings” and you’ll find an image that will show you the difference.

        • FamiliarrStrangerr

          during Crysis 2 crytek said everybody will be able to run crysis 2, its a game for all, from inbuilt graphics chip users to new gt series
          during crysis 3 crytek said no! :-/ only few thousand dx11 cards owner can run, others get to the youtube

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            youtube’s pointless if you don’t have the monitor or horsepower to show the true essence of the visuals.

    • Why feel bad when a lot of us can play so called next-gen games on our 4 year old PCs without buying a totally new system. Console users have to, lose the backwards compatibility and pay more for their games.

      • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

        well, it costs a lot more for you guys just to upgrade the significant parts like RAM, GPU and CPU and sound video cards than it does console gamers to go and get a new console altogether and pay for extra with Xbox Live or PS+. Games only cost more on consoles because of publishers, but that doesn’t necessarily mean PC games are cheaper to make in comparison. Even if you play next gen already, in the long run you’ll spend more than we ever spend on stuff in the video game industry. So we get more value at a lower cost. I mean surely the majority of PC gamers have tight wallets, only upgrading every 2-3 years with an elite few being able to get the latest as soon as it comes out, given how prices of computers themselves have gone up in the past decade. Besides, how long do you think it will be until PC gaming gets so advanced that your games from the 90s and early 200s won’t be supported anymore but whatever comes next-all good things come to an end unfortunately and eventually my friend?

        • Djinferno806

          Do i really have to go into the whole, and point? Oh and I forgot all this while netting better performance/visuals as you upgrade along the way.

          No fanboyism meant, but if you are going to point out what you did, I think its fair to consider everything.

          I think at the end of the day, we all end up paying similar prices(not counting uber mega PC builds at $1500+)

          P.S. Only console that matters to me is the WiiU! Bought it just for the new zelda game… isnt that sad? lol… ok maybe for virtual console too.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            no you don’t I know how it works but haven’t done it myself so sorry if I’m not evening the playing field with making this comparison. Sure we may end with similar spending, but from your experience, which one saves more? Lastly, I’m not saying PC is worse than console or vice versa just because of how much it costs. I’m just saying that I think it would be smarter to make PC gaming more available to people instead of sticking with the elitism it’s always held in the market place-because if it’s that good everybody should have the right to experience it. And I actually have Wii U-grew up with Nintendo btw- and want PS4 and Xbox One so ur statement is nothing new to me as Nintendo was my childhood and I do plan myself to get Wind Wkaer HD and the eventual Zelda Wii U so I don’t find ur decision a letdown, rather I applaud it and am proud that u decide to stick out among those who still doubt Nintendo to this day. I myself haven’t purchased anything from the Virtual Console but plan on getting Earthbound as I never played it but I am sure you have, and for 3DS plan on getting The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages on the Virtual Console. This was not a love/hate argument on PCs and consoles I was just trying to point out that PC should be more welcome to open arms like consoles are while still providing the freedom they already have. For the record, I am more of a console guy and will always put Nintendo first above all else-loyal to the very end. Peace.

          • Djinferno806

            Hey man I respect whatever opinion you hold about your ordered gaming style. I just wanted to point that one thing out because its actually not too hard or expensive to PC game.

            Probably will get a ps4 or Xbox as well for certain exclusives lol.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            ok, I understand. thing is though is that I’ve never exactly lived poor but my parents just never sought to upgrade much with the hardware and software as companies like Microsoft always had backwards compatibility with programs so they never saw the need to catch up, especially with HD TVs, as I didn’t own one until just last year: that’s how far behind they’ve kept me. so I’ve always had Nintendo consoles up until now where now I also have Sony and Microsoft stuff. I think they have the money so that I can start if I wanted to, but given that I’m always spending money towards consoles I won’t be doing PC gaming anytime soon. I will probably start off in the Medium range and then work my way up to where I can support Ultra settings but never forget where I started-consoles. the only ps4 and xbox one exclusives I am excited about are infamous: second son, killzone, shadow fall, knack, the order: 1886, halo xbox one, and quantum break; that’s just retails titles as indie titles I’m also craving to get. I suppose then you’ll get some Wii U exclusives also such as Super Mario 3D World and Wii U Party U coming later before 2014-as I’m excited for those and also some in 2014 such as X, Bayonetta 2, Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze, Mario Kart 8, and SMASH BROS!?

          • Djinferno806

            Ya that’s fair, my parents were the same… Once I had a job I started buying my own parts to support my PC addiction lol. But still had n64 and ps1,ps2.

            Other than Zelda games and Nintendo classics on the virtual console I don’t know what else I’d really get. Mario games on sale or Lego games to play with the gf haha.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            Yeah, I’ll probably do the same-once I finish college that is. I have n64 also-heck I’ve been playing DK64 on it; machine’s still going strong as I play through for my very first time on that game, as I actually started gaming in the Gamecube era so I missed on on lotta games. meanwhile my cousin got ps1 and ps2 so I’ve been able to catch up on stuff like Crash Bandicoot and Spyro the Dragon while I just downloaded MGS on my PS3 Super Slim. When it comes to Nintendo consoles, all I also ever really get is their first party games as they’re always worth while I just get third party on Sony and Microsoft’s consoles, mainly the latter even though I only really get first party for them also. Mario games were my main foray growing up and I still love them. Love the Lego games-looking forward to especially playing Lego Marvel Superheroes with my family; supposed to be the best one yet. It’s sad that as time has passed the quality of games over the long term has seemed to drop as the games are only made for the moment and time we’re in now with only a few now having long term value where you can go play back and feel the nostalgia. I think that’s the main reason why so many gamers today have fond memories of their experiences in the 80s and 90s- it was a time where it seemed the fun could never end but now it seems everyone’s treading water. I don’t know; maybe it’s just how the industry’s been fluctuating lately but now it looks to be rising back up, as a Renaissance, so perhaps those glory days will return to their prime in this day and age. Can’t deny how much fun people recall having onNES, SNES, N64, Sega Saturn, and PS1. Now people just move; be hard pressed to find many people who still even have their old systems at all.

          • Djinferno806

            I keep saying it, the industry needs a crash … To stop dropping so much budget on visuals and go back to focusing on gameplay. So many smaller companies do it with little budget.

            The big devs and publishers need a big economy smack. They spend 200 million on a game and complain they only made 100 million in sales… Give me a break… Theres no reason every game needs this budget. Small European Devs know where its at.

          • Dakan45

            yup.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            question though: how long will it take for the industry to recover from another crash, as if I recall the one that occurred three decades ago lasted for a few years. with the economy we have now, do you think it will be longer or shorter time before people learn the difference? the only budgets are high is publishers..if everyone were an indie company everyone would save money. AAA doesn’t have to mean you have a publisher but depend on the scope and scale of the game itself. I agree devs don’t need the budget but until devs start developing savvy ways to cut down development time beyond Unreal Engine 4, G-FLEX, Luminous Studio Engine, Compute Shaders, etc. the budgets will increase as technology matures. and yes, small euro devs have the right idea let’s hope everyone else takes some pointers from them.

          • Dakan45

            batman 1 and 2 were great, lets see how marvel lego is.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            yup. looking forward to that.

          • TheScienceEnthusiast1130

            🙂

        • Unless PCs change their achitecture then the compatibility will alway be there. Emulators and compatiliblity modes will allow PC users to enjoy old games, just like I can play old games from the 80s on my PC now.

          If you want to game on a PC with a tight wallet then fine, that’s the beauty of PC’s, price points for everyone, you just play games at lower or higher setting according to your hardware.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            Okay, well hardware can only support software for so long. Unless there’s a way to port games from one emulator to another, the games will still need to be repurchased or preserved somehow as although people will upgrade their emulators the people who make them only support them for so long. And second, I want a high end rig- I don’t want all that low spec crap. I don’t plan on getting one right away as next gen consoles are coming but once I do start I plan on PC gaming as much as I do console gaming.

        • Dakan45

          To be fair the last gen launch titles were nowhere near as demanding, but now the developers actually make the pc version superior than the next gen version, thats why i believe there is a sudden jump on specs.

          My pc is 5 years old, i was playing games with a gtx 275 from 2008, while consoles running those games low-medium settings with inferior resolution and fps.

          Small upgrade and i am good for a while, big upgrade and i am good for many years.

          Pc graphics advance, so do requirments, console graphics….meh.

          I can play every game from the early 90s including Nes and commodore 64 games from the 80s.

          Steam delivers a better price and looking at the crap the AAA industry has becoming i see me heading to indie, which means less need to ugprade.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            that’s true-explains why COD: Ghosts minimum HDD requirement is 40 GB which is quite a lot and why Ultra settings on Battlefield 4 require at least 12 GB RAM. My PC is like a dinosaur-the best it can do is play games from 80s and 90s. wouldn’t be able to handle games made now, even on lowest settings-needs some upgrading which I think is pointless as of now as I’m sure new tech and other things are bound to pop in the next couple years so I will wait. I think I will just get my own computer that’s up to date and is good for at least a few years instead of upgrading what I have now. And also think I too will begin playing 80s and 90s games on my computer because if I were to try getting the games now in their original form I will probably spend a lot more than I would just doing it on the computer though some stuff is still remarkably cheap. I’ve never actually used Steam but have seen how it works and looks pretty neat. Might get an account once I get a computer designed for gaming, and then start playing much more indies as I was impressed with indie titles such as Limbo and Flower. and save more money also like you said. Steam is subscription right, but the content is worth it though as I always read how it always gets huge discounts for its games?

          • Dakan45

            Steam is free, you buy something and you can redownload it from any pc in the world with your acount.

            Steam does lots of discounts, on summers they put most games 75% off, tons of money go to steam. You can vote for which game to get a high discount deal. Also steam greenlight gets indie games on steam through the users voting which games they want to be approved for steam.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            awesome! sounds like a great deal-why didn’t I start showing interest before? gotta get it ASAP when it get a rig.

          • Dakan45

            Because consoles like to hype their own stuff and sonytards make it as if sony makes the right choices when in reallity thats not true, just like people bought ps2s instead of superior xboxs back then, the same will happen now, they will go after sony and ignore steambox when in all seriousness its a far better deal.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            well I’m console agnostic so I have all three companies’ systems. Since I’m more of a console guy, I plan to get all next gen consoles first and then look into the PC side of things ASAP as consoles have always been my home. I suppose based on what you said, SteamBox will be on of your first investments before heading straight to whichever next gen console you want first?

          • Dakan45

            You can ask us on what parts to put into your pc in order to make it cheap and optimized. Dont buy prebuild.

            “next gen” so far seems to be about having the power of a decent pc and not many good games.

            I see myself sticking to indie games in the future. Guess what i play now? Lego marvel super heroes.

            Bf4 and killzone shadowfall? Nope generic linears shooters. The only game i am remotely interested is watchdogs. I just dont see any reason to buy a console or upgrade my pc. I am gonna stick at playing games with good gameplay and not graphics.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            Yeah, I’ve never upgraded my own PC or built my own before so I won’t buy prebuild but I currently have a notebook so I plan on either getting a desktop computer or a laptop with a big monitor. next gen I think since people tend to pay attention more to how much more horrsepower the next thing will have over the last thing, console makers are emphasizing that first so later on next year or the year after I think we will see more beyond graphics. I personally don’t see myself getting most of the games coming to next gen, not until I check it out myself maybe. And I agree that indies have really been hitting it out of the ballpark lately and actually plan on getting nearly all of them whenever I can as they give me this nostalgic feeling and are so much fun in a way most console games haven’t replicated lately. My first indie games I plan to get are Outlast, Contrast, and the PS4 version of Flower. I love the Lego games and love Marvel so Lego Marvel Super Heroes is definitely on my list but am not sure which system to get it for-Wii U or PS4. And honestly, although I want BF4 and KZ:SF, I too agree that they seem to be treading familiar ground of some sort. Watch Dogs is definitely on my radar. I knew when I saw the trailer for it for E3 2012, I knew I wanted this game. It’s too bad it got delayed but at least it’ll be of better quality. And yes, I rather play something with great game play than has great graphics doesn’t make you feel involved in the game.

          • Dakan45

            You can get shops to build it for you, just order what you want in it.

            Nor you need a super pc, maybe we tell you what to put and get a 500$ pc that runs games just as well as next gen consoles and you will be having more fun playing indie games from steam.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            gotcha. first game I wanna get when I do eventually have it in my hands and get Steam is Half Life. Have been dying to play it.

          • Dakan45

            Your pc cant play a game from 1998? If thats so, youtube shouldnt even load properly and you should be using at BEST windows xp.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            I actually don’t know the specs for Half Life. What are minumum and recommended specs for HD version of Half Life? And I have Windows XP I just don’t know what version. Alos the hardware for my computer is slow. Would have to check to see what are the exact specs and how they measure up to today’s specs.

          • Dakan45

            You can run it. Period.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            Alright. I’ll wait anyway as I want to build up my game library and my computer can’t even do full HD so I will take my time until I get a computer that can run a variety of games.

          • Dakan45

            No point running old games in full hd, it can cause bugs as well, infact dont bother running games from the 90s higher than 1280×1024.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            really? I had no idea that could happen. how is that even possible? I’ll just modify resolution for when I get HD computer so I play old games at their normal resolution and play HD games in full HD.

          • Dakan45

            Old games are not designed to run in very high resollutions, you may run in gamestopping bugs or glitches, its rare but still Hell Requiem avenging angel works only on win98, on xp it has crashes and certain game stopping glitches, no one bother to fixed it.

            Sow why dont you try duke nukem megaton edition, you cant go wrong with all that content for that low price.

          • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

            I see. Well, I actually plan on upgrading to Windows 8 soon but dunno when exactly, as XP is to be phased out in a few months time or so. Perhaps I can do PC gaming on my computer after all-except I have no clue how much HDD space I have and I won’t be able to play in Full HD on more modern games so I guess I can just start of slow and begin with older games first before I can do any recent games.

      • Dakan45

        correct.

        My 186$ gtx 660 oc will play next gen games just fine for 2 years.

        No need to unplug my new console and plug the old one to play old games.

    • Warrior88

      Go play with your 3DS buddy…the elders are talking!

      • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

        no I am just a lower elder as I’m not as experienced as you higher elders. Home console gaming came first for me before I ever started handheld gaming. I understand lotta stuff about PC gaming but not everything as I don’t do any PC gaming myself. but once I do start, I’ll be unstoppable. home consoles will always be my home though, especially Nintendo. btw, Ken Levine of Irrational Games will be receiving the Lifetime Awards at the Golden Joy Stick Awards on Friday. Which do you think was his greatest contribution to the industry: Bioshock Infinite, BioShock, or System Shock 2, as ur profile pic is of Shodan? (never played the latter, just the first two as I wasn’t old enough to play then; heard it was a great game).

      • TheScienceEnthusiast1130

        QUIT stereotyping.

  • John Evans

    lol at you you cry babies complaining that the specs are too high. you arent real pc gamers. go play the 360 version you console plebs, while i will be getting this and playing with textures and graphics better than the next gen versions. i am the true pc master race.

    • Evans John

      Apparently, you’re one true retard too.

    • Djinferno806

      Not sure if serious…..

      I don’t know whether to brand you a PC elitist fanboy because your hating on other PC players but at the same time your hating on consoles too…

      Could you be a hybrid we have all heard of?

      Half PC elitist retard, half sour breast milk fed deutchbag.

      I’m not worthy…. I have to go now… Forgive me.

    • Dakan45

      Yeah.

      OMG COD LOOKS LIKE CRAP, ITS 2005 GRAPHICS, OMG NO UPGRADES.

      OMG THE TEXTURES ARE BLURRY.

      There you got pal, super high requirments 4k textures 50gb game.

      HAPPY?

  • Djinferno806

    Looks like DirectX11 will be the only version supported. Too bad for guys with older cards that are more powerful than 450 or 5870. But at the same time its good for us because with only one API version, there should be better optimizations, at least in theory lol.

  • Amir

    the game officialy supports 4K res (means super high res textures), and with that comes 40GB data on your HDD, i’m happy with it if it’s real but lack of recommended specs make that last rec spec (780gtx) looks real

    • Djinferno806

      ya if you want to play at 4K maybe…. Other than that, there is no reason in the world you will need anything close to a 780 to max this game out at 1080p.

      • Amir

        i know that, but maybe 780gtx was for 4k resolution with max setting. this game has nothing to impress

  • John Smith

    no 32bits system ? is this 64Bits only ?
    6GB seems like a lot but when you have a software that can truly take advantage of it why not.